`
`UNITED STATE-‘S DEPARTMENT OF (‘.OMMF.R('E
`United Slates Patent and Trademark Ollice
`:\Il»(lIL‘Sfi: C0.\/[MISS IONFR FOR PATENTS
`PO Box I-15!‘:
`Alcumlna, Vugulizl II\| \- I-ti)
`www nsplo gm
`
`/\PPi,l("r\TION NO.
`
`F1'l JNG TMTF.
`
`FIRST N.-’\Ml7.l') i\'VF.NTOR
`
`/\'i'l'ORNF.Y DOCKET NO.
`
`('0NFiRVl.I\Tl0\‘ NO.
`
`l-1/105.976
`
`Ol/28/ZOI4
`
`Shirou S.‘\W;‘\
`
`2014-0075
`
`4523
`
`5 1
`vsvx
`n 3/2n-1
`\[Nl:‘NDl:‘RO’l‘H LlND&P()N/’\/(l.‘K)L.L.P.
`I030 15th Street, N.W.,
`
`Suite 400 Past
`Washington, DC 20005-1503
`
`SOROUSII. I-A\’I—»\
`
`P R
`
`T
`
`_
`
`‘
`1627
`
`N( )'I'lH( ‘A'|'I( ).\‘ 1).-\'l‘l:
`
`I)liI.lVliRY MODE
`
` 03/13/.2014
`
`liL1:‘Cl‘RONlC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any. is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`ddalecki @ wenderolh .com
`eoa@ wenderoIh.com
`
`l’l'OL—90A ( Rev. 04/07)
`
`PAGE 1 OF 8
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2255
`
`LUPIN V SENJU
`
`IPR2015—01105
`
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`
`Application No.
`
`14/165,976
`
`
`
`
`App|icant(s)
`
`SAWA ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Art unit
`Examiner
`AIA (First lnventorto File)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1627
`LAYLA SOROUSH
`§‘3*”3
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Period for Reply
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE §MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`
`
`In no event, however may a reply be timely filed
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will. by statute. cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Any reply received bythe Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`—
`
`
`
`Status
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1)|XI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 1/28/14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I] A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`2b) This action is non-final.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5)XI Claim(s) O3 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ is/are allowed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s) 1.<9;z1¢‘3is/are rejected.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) _ is/are objected to.
`) j are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`://www.usoto.ciov/ atents/init events/. E‘:/'inde><.'s , or send an inquiry to PPl--lfee<ibacK@usjgtooov.
`htt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application Papers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11)|:| The drawing(s) filed on j is/are: a)I:l accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85( ).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12)lZ| Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C.§119(a)—(d) or ( ).
`
`
`Certified copies:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a)lXl All
`b)I:| Some” c)I:I None of the:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.|:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.XI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. 10/525,006.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.l:l Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2( )).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`1) D Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2) IX Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 1/28/14.
`
`
`
`
`U 8 Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-18)
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`
`
`3) El jmervjew summary (PTQ.413)
`
`
`
`
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date.
`
`
`
`
`
`D O h
`_
`
`
`‘ 9“:-
`
`
`4)
`
`
`
`
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20140307
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 2 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The following is in response to the Preliminary amendments filed on 1/28/2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent
`
`
`
`provisions.
`
`
`
`
`Double Patenting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unjustified or improper time wise extension of the “right to exclude" granted by a patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (c) or 1.321 (cl)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of
`
`PAGE 3 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`out completely online using web—screens. An eTermina| Disclaimer that meets all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`requirements is auto—processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info—l.jsp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 8129431. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the patent are drawn to an aqueous liquid preparation consisting essentially of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the following two components, wherein the first component is 2—amino—3—(4—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bromobenzoyl)phenylaceticacid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate and the second component is tyloxapol wherein said liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration, and wherein when a quaternary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ammonium compound is included in said liquid preparation, the quaternary ammonium
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compound is benzalkonium chloride whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aqueous liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second
`
`
`
`PAGE 4 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component; wherein the first component is 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is present in the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v % to about 0.2 w/v
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°/o; the second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amount sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 8497304. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the copending application are drawn to an aqueous liquid preparation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprising 2-amino-3—(4— bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid sodium salt thereof or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate thereof, and polyoxyl 40 stearate, wherein the concentration of the polyoxyl 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stearate is selected from a range of a minimum concentration of 0.02 w/v % to a
`
`
`
`maximum concentration of O.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 w/v% whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aqueous liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component; wherein the first component is 2-amino-3-(4—bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is present in the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v °/o to about 0.2 w/v
`
`
`
`PAGE 5 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°/o; the second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amount sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 8669290. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the copending application are drawn to a stable aqueous liquid preparation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component; wherein the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is 2—amino-3-(4- bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a pharmacologically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at least one selected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is the sole
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation; the second component is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount sufficient to stabilize
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is formulated for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ophthalmic administration whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable aqueous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the first component is 2—amino—3—(4—bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the hydrate is at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and is present in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v °/o to about 0.2 w/v °/o; the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount
`
`
`
`PAGE 6 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is
`
`
`
`
`formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`No claims allowed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`examiner should be directed to Layla Soroush whose telephone number is (571 )272—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5008. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 8:30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supervisor, Sreenivasan Padmanabhan, can be reached on (571) 272-0629. The fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is
`
`571-273-8300.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`
`
`
`/Layla Soroushl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 1627
`
`
`
`PAGE 7 OF 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 8 OF 8