throbber
e Care Compan I eing Sold to Valeant
`
` Michael J. de la Merced
`
`Ma 27, 2013 9:29 am
`7:54 p.m. | Updated
`
`Bausch & Lomb, the eye care company, agreed on Monday to sell itself to
`Valeant Pharmaceuticals International of Canada for about $8.7 billion,
`sidestepping the lengthier process of an initial public offering.
`
`Under the terms of the deal, Valeant will pay $4.5 billion to the investor
`group that owns Bausch & Lomb, led by the private equity firm Warburg
`Pincus. It will also spend about $4.2 billion to repay Bausch & Lomb’s debt.
`
`The agreement continues the flurry of deal­making in the health care
`industry, as companies seek to buy the growth they are hard­pressed to
`generate on their own. Announced merger volume in the sector this year is up
`14 percent from the period a year earlier, even as takeovers have fallen 8
`percent.
`
`Related Link
`Document: Joint news release
`
`Valeant, based in Laval, Quebec, has made acquisitions a core part of its
`growth strategy as it has become a big specialty drug maker. The Bausch &
`Lomb deal is the company’s biggest, over three times the value of its $2.6
`billion purchase of the skin care company Medicis Pharmaceutical last year.
`
`Adding Bausch & Lomb, a giant maker of contact lens solution and
`surgical devices, will significantly bolster Valeant’s offerings in the sector.
`
`4/7/2015
`
`Eye Care Company Is Being Sold to Valeant ­ NYTimes.com
`
`http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/bausch­lomb­to­sell­itself­to­valeant­for­8­7­billion/
`
`1/3
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2205
`LUPIN v SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`PAGE 1 OF 3
`
`

`
`Bausch & Lomb will absorb its new parent’s existing ophthalmology
`operations, creating a business that is expected to generate more than $3.5
`billion in net revenue this year.
`
`“We believe it’s a great move for the company,” J. Michael Pearson,
`Valeant’s chief executive, said in an interview by phone.
`
`While Bausch & Lomb’s products don’t necessarily include home runs,
`Mr. Pearson said, “there’s an opportunity for a lot of singles and doubles here.”
`
`Brent Saunders, the chief executive of Bausch & Lomb, said in a
`statement: “Our companies have a shared commitment to providing
`innovative and high­quality products and exceptional service to customers.”
`
`The takeover also means a tidy payday for Warburg Pincus, which led a
`$4.5 billion leveraged buyout of Bausch & Lomb in 2007. The firm already
`benefited from a $772 million special dividend that Bausch & Lomb paid out in
`March, the bulk of which went to its controlling investor group.
`
`Through the deal, Warburg Pincus is expected to reap a return of as much
`as three times its original investment, according to a person briefed on the
`matter.
`
`Warburg Pincus began exploring a sale or initial public offering for
`Bausch & Lomb late last year and held preliminary talks with a number of
`potential bidders. Among them was Valeant, though Mr. Pearson said that at
`the time he and his board could not justify paying the more than the $10
`billion that Warburg Pincus was seeking.
`
`Instead, Bausch & Lomb filed in March for an initial public offering.
`
`Until last month, Valeant was pursuing a takeover of a different company,
`the generic drug maker Actavis, in what would have been a deal worth over
`$13 billion. When those talks collapsed, Valeant then turned to Bausch &
`Lomb. Mr. Pearson said the bulk of the work on Monday’s transaction took
`
`4/7/2015
`
`Eye Care Company Is Being Sold to Valeant ­ NYTimes.com
`
`http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/bausch­lomb­to­sell­itself­to­valeant­for­8­7­billion/
`
`2/3
`
`PAGE 2 OF 3
`
`

`
`place over the last week, with much of the initial due diligence already
`completed.
`
`Though Valeant’s offer was lower than the valuation that Bausch & Lomb
`would have fetched in an initial offering, it allowed Warburg Pincus to exit its
`investment quickly. Taking the company public would have meant a more
`gradual sale over two to three years.
`
`The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter, pending
`regulatory approval.
`
`Mr. Pearson said that while integrating Bausch & Lomb would take some
`time, Valeant would continue to pursue what he described as smaller “tuck­in”
`acquisitions. But deal­making will remain a core part of the company’s growth
`plans.
`
`“Our strategy is our strategy,” he said. “Our aspiration is to become the
`most valuable pharmaceutical company in the world.”
`
`Valeant was counseled by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, and
`Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt. Bausch & Lomb was advised by Goldman Sachs,
`JPMorgan Chase and the law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton.
`
`A version of this article appears in print on 05/28/2013, on page B2 of the NewYork
`edition with the headline: Eye Care Company Is Being Sold To Valeant.
`
`© 2015 The New York Times Company
`
`4/7/2015
`
`Eye Care Company Is Being Sold to Valeant ­ NYTimes.com
`
`http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/bausch­lomb­to­sell­itself­to­valeant­for­8­7­billion/
`
`3/3
`
`PAGE 3 OF 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket