throbber
10fZ7/2015
`
`Braid vs. genetic: Wtich is best cdaact sugeiy medcine? | Optitdmdogffims
`
`Ophthahnology Times
`
`CUTTING-EDGE ADVANCEMENTS
`
`CONNECT:
`
`
`
`O3’H'l-l—’.l,’QL2E‘v ‘WES 3333:
`
`
`0P|lhl|I1dozyT@<h-—n—
`
`eNews Sign up . ‘
`
`TRENDING:
`
`Retina Treatments
`
`Resident writers‘ Progam
`
`Ophthalmic Tech’: Community
`
`PREV
`
`Collagen CXL in young keratoconic patients
`
`Retinal inflammation: Novel drug delivery
`
`NEXT
`
`ophthaimoiogyrimes Ophthalmology
`
`Brand
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract
`-
`-
`,)
`surgery medicine.
`
`"‘s°""°‘°°""‘s
`Retina Treatments
`
`"““"‘“°°"'E'"
`
`Contact Lenses an em we
`Ophthalmic Technician Community
`.
`.
`Chronic Disease
`
`Why brand name medications considered treatments of choice
`
`Pain Maiaqernent
`
`MORE
`
`I ’ ,
`
`,
`
`How many pterygium procedures do
`you perfonn in a typical month?
`0 1 to 2
`
`0 3 to 5
`O 6 to 10
`
`O 11 or mote
`
`VIEW RESILTS
`
`due to safety, efficacy
`
`May 01, 2014
`
`By Cheryl Guttman Krader
`
`Take home
`
`Substituting generic products for brand name innovators in cataract surgery
`medication regimens can bring tradeoffs in efficaq/, safety. and convenience,
`perhaps with just modest savings in cost.
`
`By Cheryl Guttman Krader; Reviewed by Eric D. Donnemeld, MD, Stephen 5. Lane,
`MD, and Francis 8. Man, MD
`
`Brand name medications may oost more than generic alternatives,
`but the extra money spent is well worthwhile oonsidering the many
`other ways innovator products differ from generic pharrnaceuticals.
`according to leading cataract surgeons.
`
`
`
`~. A
`
`Dr- Donnenfield
`
`Eric D. Donnenfeld. MD. Stephen s. Lane. MD, and Francis s. Mah,
`MD, discussed why they prefer to write prescriptions for brand name
`antimicrobial and anti—inflammatory products in their cataract surgery medication regimens.
`
`titpjlqfltdmdogjtimes modarnneddmwmmflflmdqfimwwwl/mwaduadwwmc-mmmfi-<xam :ffT IT 60
`
`PAGE 1 OF 6
`
`LUPIN V SENJU
`
`IPR20l5—01105
`
`

`
`1(Y27/2015
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract surgery medicine? | Ophtha|mologyTimes
`
`Dr. Mah acknowledged that generic products do provide a service by virtue of their lower
`
`upfront cost. However, he emphasized that decisions on medications should also take into
`
`account efficacy, safety, and dosing convenience.
`
`Low cost not always most important
`
`ketorolac. lm~::;‘*wvrestuvfm, O tr‘l\”t'lr'1"'dJ W2,‘
`
`Interior corneal stalnlrg following cataract
`surgery In a patient treated with topical generic
`
`“You really can't put a price on the benefits of better safety and efficacy," said Dr. Mah,
`
`director, cornea and external disease. and co-director, refractive surgery, Scripps Clinic. La
`Jolla, CA.
`
`The bottom line. Dr. Donnenteld said, is that the branded products of the medications used
`
`in cataract surgery offer significant advantages over their generic counterparts. and the
`differences translate into better outcomes.
`
`“Achieving premium outcomes with cataract surgery requires the use of premium
`
`pharmaceuticals,” said Dr. Donnenfeld, clinical professor of ophthalmology. New York
`
`University, New York, and founding partner, Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island and
`Connecticut, Rockville Centre, NY.
`
`Similarly, Dr. Lane— adjunct professor of ophthalmology, University of Minnesota,
`
`Minneapolis. and medical director, Associated Eye Care. Stillwater. MN— summed up his
`
`preference for prescribing brand name products as being based on a focus to provide the
`
`best possible care.
`
`"Patients must be educated so that they understand that saving money is not as important
`
`as taking care of their problem.‘ he said. “Patients should be made aware that use of a
`
`less expensive generic medication may be done at some risk."
`
`lnequivalence of generic equivalents
`
`U3
`
`According to FDA policies, ophthalmic generic products
`introduced prior to 1992 did not have to match the inactive
`
`ingredients of the innovator. Beginning in 1992, newly approved
`
`generic ophthalmic solutions had to contain the same active and
`
`inactive ingredients as the innovator and in the same
`concentrations otherwise manufacturers had to demonstrate
`
`clinical bioequivalence. Demonstration of bioequivalence is also
`
`required for all generic ophthalmic products that are not
`
`solutions. regardless of whether the ingredients are the same as
`
`D|'- line
`
`the innovator.
`
`..
`_
`,
`,
`PAGE20F6,_
`http://ophthalmoIogytrmes.modernmedrcrne.com/ophthalmologytlmeslcontentltagslbrandlbrarxivsegenerrc-whrclrbest-cataract-surgerymedic:ne?page=ful|
`
`2/6
`
`

`
`10/27/2015
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract surgery medicine? | OphthalmologyTimes
`
`The key is that there are no requirements for generic manufacturers to conduct studies
`proving that their product is clinically equivalent to the innovator in terms of efficacy and
`safety. The unfortunate consequences of this situation are well­known to ophthalmologists
`through the experience with the generic topical diclofenac product that was responsible for
`corneal melts. Subsequently, reports have also emerged describing corneal melts and
`epithelial defects associated with the use of other generic nonsteroidal anti­inflammatory
`drugs (NSAIDs), the surgeons noted.
`
`l
`

`
`“I 
`
`i  NSAID  been tested in clinical trials, the

`  h  h d  h
`ld 
`BUSINESS
`EDUCATION
`CAREERS
`PUBLICAT ONS
`g  
`id Dr. Mah. “However, in  he





`y 
`absence of clinical data, we have no idea how the efficacy and safety of generic products
`compare with the brand name medications.”
`
`CONTACT US
`
`LOG IN | REGISTER
`
`Dr. Donnenfeld noted that he has seen many patients using a generic ketorolac product
`who complain of decreased vision following cataract surgery. Slit­lamp examination reveals
`the presence of superficial punctate keratitis in the visual axis, a problem that resolves
`upon cessation of the generic NSAID, he said.
`
`Inferior substitutions
`
`Due to patent protection, the latest brand name products have no generic equivalent.
`Therefore, when generic substitutions for these products are made at the pharmacy, the
`dispensed medication will be within the same broad class as the product prescribed (ie.,
`corticosteroid, NSAID, antibiotic), but may represent an entirely different entity in a
`different, suboptimal vehicle and with different dosing directions.
`
`Discussing NSAIDs, Dr. Donnenfeld noted that the most recent generation of products
`within this class—nepafenac 0.3% suspension (Ilevro, Alcon) and bromfenac 0.07%
`(Prolensa, Bausch + Lomb)—are safer, better tolerated, and have dosing regimens that are
`easier for patients to comply with relative to older brand name and generic NSAIDs.
`
`“The newest agents offer once a day dosing,” he said. “That is a tremendous convenience
`advantage that enables compliance and therefore increases efficacy. At the same time, the
`decreased drop burden reduces the risk of epithelial toxicity.”
`
`Dr. Mah also noted that the reduced dosing frequency with the newest NSAIDs has safety
`value because it minimizes ocular exposure to preservatives. In addition, the newest brand
`name ophthalmic products are more likely than the generic agents to be formulated with an
`advanced, “gentler” preservative or at least with a lower concentration of benzalkonium
`chloride, he said.
`
`Dr. Lane mentioned that due to ingredient differences, the generic NSAIDs are associated
`with higher rates of stinging on instillation than the latest brand name products. That factor
`combined with their increased dosing frequency—up to 4 times a day—can compromise
`compliance and therefore the benefit of treatment.
`
`“The consequences of not using an NSAID as directed after cataract surgery include
`increased anterior chamber inflammation and even cystoid macular edema,” Dr. Lane said.
`
`He noted that the problem of substituting one chemical entity for another is also an issue
`with generic substitutions for corticosteroids and antibiotics as the newest and best
`products within these classes have no generic equivalent.
`
`“A branded drug like loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel (Lotemax Gel, Bausch + Lomb) may
`be substituted with a generic prednisolone acetate. While both medications are steroids,
`
`http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/content/tags/brand/brand­vs­generic­which­best­cataract­surgery­medicine?page=full
`
`3/6
`
`PAGE 3 OF 6
`
`

`
`10/27/2015
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract surgery medicine? | OphthalmologyTimes
`
`they are very different compounds with a different safety profile, and their formulations are
`markedly different,” he explained.
`
`Discussing antibiotics, Dr. Lane noted that when substituting for a branded fluoroquinolone,
`patients might be given a generic aminoglycoside or sulfonamide.
`
`“The spectrum of antimicrobial coverage of these two antibiotic classes is vastly different
`than with the latest generation fluoroquinolones,” he said.
`
`Dr. Mah also highlighted concerns about antibiotic substitutions. He noted that compared
`with both non­fluoroquinolone ant biotics and earlier generation fluoroquinolones
`(ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin), the latest generation fluoroquinolones,
`besifloxacin 0.6% (Besivance, Bausch + Lomb), moxifloxacin 0.5% (Vigamox/Moxeza,
`Alcon), and gatifloxacin 0.5% (Zymaxid, Allergan), have more potent activity against
`important endophthalmitis pathogens along with an advantage of less frequent dosing. In
`addition, the propensity for development of bacterial resistance is lower using the newer
`fluoroquinolones than the older entities, and that is an important consideration recognizing
`that antimicrobial resistance is a growing global concern.
`
`Minimal savings
`
`The only potential benefit of a generic medication is lower cost, but Dr. Lane pointed out
`that significant savings usually only come when there is a substitution for an entirely
`different medication. Furthermore, the price of generic medications may be much higher
`than patients expect. Although generic manufacturers do not need to recoup drug
`development costs, the manufacturing process itself may be complex, and its expense will
`be reflected in price paid at the pharmacy counter, Dr. Lane said.
`
`Furthermore, prices of generic medications have been on the rise recently, narrowing the
`cost difference between branded and generic medications, and that trend may continue if
`more rigorous FDA standards for generic medications are implemented, Dr. Mah said.
`
`He noted that in his geographic region, patients without prescription insurance coverage
`could expect to pay between $40 and $50 for generic prednisolone acetate 1% and $100
`for generic fluorometholone, if they can find it at all.
`
`“With the use of manufacturer­supplied coupons, brand name products may actually be
`cheaper than the generic, and with branded products, we can sometimes provide patients
`with free samples,” Dr. Mah said. “That is an opportunity that simply does not exist with
`generic products.”
`
`Patient education
`
`As a bottom line, all three surgeons said that while they are sensitive to the costs of some
`brand name medications and leave the final decision to the patient, they still recommend
`the brand name products.
`
`“My recommendation is based on what is best for the patient,” Dr. Donnenfeld said. “That
`starts with safety and efficacy but also includes cost. However, I give patients the choice of
`deciding what they think is best for them.”
`
`Dr. Lane noted that patients in his practice receive written materials with information
`detailing why the branded medications are preferred.
`
`“We encourage patients to fill their prescriptions as written, but at the end of the day, it is
`
`http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/content/tags/brand/brand­vs­generic­which­best­cataract­surgery­medicine?page=full
`
`4/6
`
`PAGE 4 OF 6
`
`

`
`10/27/2015
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract surgery medicine? | OphthalmologyTimes
`
`the patients who choose what they want to use for their treatment,” he said.
`
`Dr. Mah said he also counsels patients about the concerns accompanying the use of
`generic products.
`
`“I essentially have an informed consent discussion in which the patient is told the generic
`products may require more frequent dosing, have not been demonstrated safe and
`effective in FDA clinical trials, and do not have to defend product­specific safety information
`in their labeling since the label is taken from the branded drug without trials,” he explained.
`“Therefore, I tell patients that I cannot guarantee the results they will get using a generic
`product. I offer patients the coupons for branded medications if the cost is an issue, and
`even have the patients call for samples if the coupons do not bring down the costs to a
`reasonable level.”
`

`
`Eric D. Donnenfeld, MD
`
`E: ericdonnenfeld@gmail.com
`
`Dr. Donnenfeld is a consultant to Alcon, Allergan, and Bausch + Lomb.
`

`
`Stephen S. Lane, MD
`
`E: sslane@associatedeycare.com
`
`Dr. Lane is a consultant to Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, Kala, Nicox, Ocular Therapeutix, Omeros, and PRN.
`

`
`Francis S. Mah, MD
`
`E: mah.francis@scrippshealth.org
`
`Dr. Mah is a consultant to Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Foresight Biotherapeutics, Nicox, and Ocular
`Therapeutix.
`
`TAGS
`
`brand
`
`brand vs. generic
`
`Cataract Surgery
`
`Eric D. Donnenfeld, MD
`
`Francis S. Mah, MD
`
`generic
`
`Modern Medicine Feature Articles
`
`Stephen S. Lane, MD
`
`Ophthalmology
`
`Cheryl Guttman Krader
`
`Cheryl Guttman Krader is a contr butor to Dermatology Times, Ophthalmology
`Times, and Urology Times.
`
`MORE
`
`0 COMMENTS
`
`You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!
`
`SIGN IN / REGISTER
`
`All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use,
`and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive,
`in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community
`FAQ.
`
`http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/content/tags/brand/brand­vs­generic­which­best­cataract­surgery­medicine?page=full
`
`5/6
`
`PAGE 5 OF 6
`
`

`
`10/27/2015
`
`Brand vs. generic: Which is best cataract surgery medicine? | OphthalmologyTimes
`
`No comments available
`
`CONNECT:
`
`BUSINESS &
`TECHNOLOGY
`WOMEN'S
`HEALTH
`CHILDREN'S
`HEALTH
`MEN'S
`HEALTH
`
`SKIN
`
`HOME
`
`REFRACTIVE
`
`CATARACT
`
`RETINA
`
`GLAUCOMA
`
`CORNEA
`
`PHARMACY
`
`GENERAL
`OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`PRACTICE
`MANAGEMENT
`
`OPHTHALMOLOGY
`TIMES EUROPE
`
`EYECARE
`
`CAREERS
`
`Home | About us | Contact us | Advertise | All Content | Editorial and Advertising Policy | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertiser Terms | Linking and RSS policy
`
`© 2015 UBM Medica, LLC, a UBM company.
`
`Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.
`
`Please send any technical comments or questions to our webmaster.
`
`http://ophthalmologytimes.modernmedicine.com/ophthalmologytimes/content/tags/brand/brand­vs­generic­which­best­cataract­surgery­medicine?page=full
`
`6/6
`
`PAGE 6 OF 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket