throbber
SENJU EXHIBIT 2074
`LUPIN v SENJU
`IPR2015-01105
`
`PAGE 1 OF 3
`
`

`
`TABLE 1. Alkaline Hydrolysis of Benzylpenicillin Anilides
`
`CaH5Cl~lzCONH— cH—— i‘+’\'c(C.”’
`(J:
`CH,
`/“w—H%flMi
`,
`O
`
`R
`
`Melting
`_ l Calculated
`”.
`R
`point
`Empirical
`____fl____ E
`'0 1
`
`(in de ).
`formula
`C
`N
`C
`N
`T‘
`.5
`<: *3. M E
`g
`
`H
`p—CH3
`p-OH
`p~Br
`P-N02
`m-N02
`m-OH
`——NHC5H4 X=OH
`
`9,82 64,50 10,20 4,58
`64,50
`C22H23N3O3S
`129-1303»
`9,43 65,30
`9,91
`5,12
`65,41
`c,,H,,N,o,s
`190-1911:
`9,85 61,90
`9,89 5,50
`60,90
`C3zH33N3O4S
`l28—131C
`8,76 53,80
`8,52 3,91
`169-17013 C2gH23N5O3BIS 53,16
`205—207b
`C22H22N405S
`59,00 12,90 58,20 12,30
`1,02
`159———16lC
`C32H22N4O5S
`58,10 11,87 58,20 12,30 2,50
`1I2—1l5C
`C22H33N3O4S
`00,90
`9,49 61,90
`9,89 4,17
`CuH13N2O4S
`-—
`—~
`——
`——
`——
`
`2,28
`2,39
`2,53
`2,10
`1,83
`1,87
`2,21
`16,50
`
`*Crystallization solvents: a) carbon tetrachloride; b) acetone;
`ethylacetate + petroleum ether.
`
`c)
`
`as a pseudounimolecular reaction. The reaction velocity
`constant was computed, and was also determined graph-
`ically, as for a first order equation. Velocity constants
`obtained for hydrolysis of the anilides were found to
`be about one order of magnitude lower than that of
`benzylpenicillin (16.5 - l0‘3), but they differed little
`from each other (see Table 1 and Fig. 1).
`
`The substantial difference between the velocities
`of hydrolysis of benzylpenicillin and of the anilides is
`due to a sharp decrease in the electron density on the
`
`nitrogen atom of the penicillin ,8-lactam ring,when P‘CH3
`
`The reaction constant p has the value——0.l2. The negative sign of p bespeaks a favorable effect of
`electron donor substituents upon the reaction velocity constants, while its low absoluteivalue indicates
`slight sensitivity of the reaction to structural variation in the anilide molecule.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`
`Anilide Synthesis. 0.00268 mole of potassium benzylpenicillinate was dissolved in 10 ml water and
`the solution was acidified with 0.5 N HCl to a pH, of ca 2.0. The aqueous phase was saturated with KCl, and
`the liberated benzylpenicillinic acid was extracted several times with 3 ml portions of chloroform. The
`extracts, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and cooled to —5°, were mixed with 0.00268 mole of triethylamine
`in chloroform and allowed to stand for 30 min. After addition of 0.00268 mole of ethoxyforrnic acid chloro-
`anhydride in chloroform to the formed triethylamine benzylpenicillinate, the solution was stirred for 30 min
`at—5°, and then treated with 0.00268 mole of the respective amine in chloroform (in the case of nitroanilines
`
`PAGE 2 OF 3
`
`73
`
`-1og K
`
`2-75
`
`2.72‘
`
`2'68
`
`2_5o
`
`P‘OH
`j—1—-——
`-—-J
`-——-—l
`Ia I
`0,6
`0,4
`0,2
`~o.2
`0
`-0.4
`Fig. 3. Velocity constants of hydrolysis of
`benzylpenicillin anilides as a function of Ham—
`met's o constants for the respective substituents
`in aniline; p = -0.12.
`
`
`
`COOH is replaced by the arylamide group CONHC6H4R.
`The introduction of electron donor or electron acceptor
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`substituents into the benzylpenicillin anilide molecule
`leads to no significant change in the velocity constant
`of hydrolysis. This is caused by a considerable damp-
`ing of the inductive effect in the intermediate thia-
`zolidine ring. Even though the position of the sub-
`stituent was far removed from the reaction site, it
`was, nonetheless, possible to study its effect upon electron density on the nitrogen atom in the 5—lactam
`ring.
`It was found that electron donor substituents increased, and electron acceptor substituents decreased
`the velocity constant of hydrolysis. A linear relationship was established between the logs of the reaction
`velocity constants, the pK of the amine (Fig. 2), and Hammet's constant (Fig. 3), thereby confirming ap-
`plicability of the Hammet equation to the given reactions.
`
`PAGE 2 OF 3
`
`

`
`and aminophenols acetone was used as the solvent). The reaction went to completion in 3 h at a temperature
`of 0-5“. The reaction product was first washed with distilled water, then with 20 ml of 0.2 M citric acid,
`25 ml 0.2 M Nazi-IP04, again with distilled water, and finally dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. The chloroform
`was removed under vacuum without the addition of heat, and the residue was crystallized from a suitable
`to solvent to yield the anilide.
`
`Kinetic Studies, A weighed sample of the benzy1penicil1in—anilide (0.05—0.07 g) was dissolved in a
`50 ml volumetric flask, in 15 ml of dimethylformamide (purified by vacuum distillation), and diluted to the
`50 ml mark with a pH 2.0 glycocoll buffer. The resultant solution was kept at 30 :|: 0.2° in a thermostat,
`and samples were taken from the reaction vessels at given time intervals and analyzed iodometrioally [7]
`for residual, non-hydrolyzed, benzylpenicillin.
`
`P. Doyle, J. H. C. Nayler, and H. R. J. Waddington, J, Chem. Soc., 497 (1963).
`P. Doyle, J. H. C. Nayler, H. Smith, et al., Nature _1_9__1_, 1091 (1961).
`S.
`Khokhlov, E. M, Kleiner, and E. N. Druzhinina, Antibiotics, No. 6, 42 (1958).
`F.
`Paparin and M; V. Solovskii, ibid., No. 11, 1000 (1965).
`D. A. Johson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., lg, 3636 (1953).
`'
`A, Albert and E. P. Serjeant, Ionization Constants of Acids and Bases, London (1962).
`The Analyst, 11. 550 (1949),
`
`
`
`n
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`
`E E A E
`
`o
`
`_<l‘d§U1§:PC.OL\'Jl-*
`
`74 PAGE 3 OF 3
`
`PAGE 3 OF 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket