throbber
Political/Regulatory Timeline
`
` 1931:
`
`NYSE required marking short sales, no short sales on downticks
`
`
`
`
`
`16 other U.S. exchanges followed by 1935.
`
` 1938:
`
`SEC adopts 10a-1 – strict uptick rule (binding at 1/8th tick size).
`
` 1939:
`
`SEC again allows shorting on zero-down ticks.
`
` 1963:
`
`Special SEC study of short selling.
`
` 1976:
`
`SEC rule proposal to suspend tick test, withdrawn 1980.
`
` 1991:
`
`House Report recommends tick test for Nasdaq.
`
` 1994:
`
`NASD Rule 3350 requires bid test for shorts.
`
` 1999:
`
`SEC concept release about potential repeal of 10a-1.
`
` 2003:
`
`Reg SHO proposed, adapted 2004, leads to 2-year experiment
`
`
`
`
`
`that removes tick test for some stocks.
`
` July 2007: Tick test repealed, new locate requirements.
`
` Sep 2008: Ban on naked shorting, shorting ban for “financials.”
`
` Feb 2010: Alternative uptick rule on stocks with 10% drop in price in a day
`
`CFAD VI 1060 - 0001
`CFAD VI v. CELGENE
`IPR2015-01103

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket