throbber
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Drug Safely 2006: 29 (4): 321-329
`0114-6916/06/0004-0321/$39.96/0
`

`
`Thalidomide Use in the US
`Experience with Pregnancy Testing in the
`S.T.E.P.S.® Progranrrnrre
`
`Kathleen UhV Edward Cox} Rose Rogan? Jerome B. Zeldis? Dena Hixon} Lesley(cid:173)
`Anne Furlong, 1 Sarah Singer, 1'3 Tracy Holliman? Joanne Beyer2 and
`William Woolever2
`l US Food & Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville,
`Maryland, USA
`2 Cclgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA
`3 National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`Introduction: In 1998, thalidomide (TI1alomid®), a known humm1 teratogen, was
`approved by the US FDA for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum. To
`prevent fetal exposure to thalidomide, a restricted distribution risk mm1agement
`programme, the System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety
`(S.T.E.P.S.®), was implemented. All clinicians, pharmacists and patients who
`prescribe, dispense and receive thalidomide, respectively, are required to enrol in
`S.T.E.P.S.®. Sexually active Cemales or childbearing potential must use two
`methods of birth control before, during and after treatment. These patients must
`also have a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours before beginning therapy and
`periodically while on therapy. The objective of this report is to summarise the
`patterns of thalidomide use and to describe the occurrence of positive pregnancy
`tests in females of childbearing potential while they were using thalidomide in the
`S.T.E.P.S.® programme in the US.
`Study design/methods: A retrospective review of patients receiving thalidomide
`within the S.T.E.P.S. ® programme from September 1998 to 31 December 2004 to
`determine the occurrence of positive pregnancy tests whilst on treatment.
`Results: Approximately 124 000 (43% female) patients were registered within
`the S.T.E.P.S.® programme between September 1998 and 31 December 2004.
`Approximately 6000 patients were females of childbearing potential, representing
`5% of all patients and 11% of all female patients. Between 30 July 2001 m1d 31
`December 2004, >88% of thalidomide use was for oncological conditions. Tiwre
`were 72 females of childbearing potential who had positive pregnancy tests.
`Sixty-nine of these patients had false positive pregnm1cy tests. Of the remaining
`three, one womm1 was pregnm1t while on thalidomide. TI1is patient had m1 initial
`negative test m1d received thalidomide. Therapy was stopped when she had a
`positive pregnancy test. This pregnancy resulted in a miscarriage. Two additional
`patients were determined to be pregnant before receiving thalidomide.
`Conclusions: The S.T.E.P.S.® programme is critical to managing the risks of
`thalidomide-associated teratogenicity. Sustained vigilance among healthcare
`providers and patients receiving thalidomide is essential to its continued success.
`
`
`
`CELGENE EXHIBIT 2006
`Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI LLC (Petitioner) v. Celgene Corporation (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2015-01103
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`

`
`322
`
`Uhl et al.
`
`Healthcare providers should be aware of the occurrence of false-positive pregnan(cid:173)
`cy tests in females of childbearing potential receiving thalidomide.
`
`Introduction
`
`Thalidomide first became available in 1956 in
`West Germany as a sedative-hypnotic agent. By
`1960 it had been introduced in 46 countries (exclud(cid:173)
`ing the US) and was widely used to treat nausea and
`vomiting in early pregnancy. An epidemic of
`phocomelia, an extremely rare congenital abnormal(cid:173)
`ity of the limbs, and other associated malformations
`in an estimated 15 000 babies soon followed.f 1
`1 Ger(cid:173)
`many withdrew thalidomide from its market in No(cid:173)
`vember 1961 and other countries followed over the
`next lO months.
`In 1998 the Thalomid® 1 brand of thalidomide
`(Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA), was ap(cid:173)
`proved by the US FDA to treat erythema nodosum
`leprosum. Thalidomide is marketed in three coun(cid:173)
`tries outside of the US by the Pharmion Corporation
`through an international licensing agreement with
`Celgene. These three countries include Australia,
`New Zealand and Turkey. There are other compa(cid:173)
`nies worldwide that market and distribute other dose
`presentations of thalidomide; not all of these have
`risk management programmes.
`To prevent fetal exposure to thalidomide, a risk
`management
`programme,
`the
`System
`for
`Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety
`(S.T.E.P.S.®), was implemented in the US, and a
`similar programme was implemented internationally
`by Pharmion. All clinicians, pharmacists and pa(cid:173)
`tients who prescribe, dispense and
`receive
`Thalomid®, respectively, are required to enrol in
`this restricted distribution programme, regardless of
`the disease that is being treatedJ2l The S.T.E.P.S.®
`programme is an intensive, multi-component, inte(cid:173)
`grated risk management programme that restricts
`drug use to registered clinicians, pharmacists and
`patients (figure 1).
`
`The purpose of the present study is to summarise
`the patterns of thalidomide use in the US and to
`describe the cases of positive pregnancy tests that
`have occurred in females of childbearing potential.
`This report is a summary of the programme review
`of registered patients receiving Thalomicf® in the
`mandatory S.T.E.P.S.® programme in the US.
`
`Study Design and Methods
`
`A retrospective review was conducted of patients
`in the Celgene database who received Thalomid® in
`S.T.E.P.S.® from September 1998 to 31 December
`2004, including a more in-depth review of all pa(cid:173)
`tients who had positive pregnancy tests. Patient
`identifiers were removed for this S.T.E.P.S.® pro(cid:173)
`gramme evaluation. This research was reviewed and
`approved by the FDA Research Involving Human
`Subjects Committee. Descriptive characteristics of
`all patients with positive pregnancy tests were eval(cid:173)
`uated including patient demographics, the reason for
`thalidomide treatment, concomitant medications
`used and concomitant diseases present.
`Females of childbearing potential were defined
`as postmenarchal women who had not undergone a
`hysterectomy or who had not been naturally postme(cid:173)
`nopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e.
`who have had menses at some time in the preceding
`24 consecutive months), in accordance with the
`Thalomid® product labellingJ3l
`All positive pregnancy tests were further evalu(cid:173)
`ated by the patient's healthcare provider using any
`of the following: serial ~-human chorionic gonado(cid:173)
`tropin (~-hCG) testing, serum hormone testing (e.g.
`luteinising hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone,
`estradiol), medical history, physical evaluation, pel(cid:173)
`vic ultrasound and/or gynaecological consultation
`according to standard operating procedures adjusted
`as clinically appropriate. A true-positive pregnancy
`
`1 Thalomid® and S .T .E.P .S. ® are registered trademarks of Celgene Corporation. The use of trade names is for product
`identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV, All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`
`Thalidomide Use in the US
`
`323
`
`test was defined as a postttve pregnancy test in a
`female who was confirmed to he pregnant hased
`upon further evaluation with the aforementioned
`tests or procedures. A false-positive pregnancy test
`was defined as a positive pregnancy test in a female
`
`who was found not to he pregnant hased upon fol(cid:173)
`low-up evaluation. The overall category of false
`positive pregnancy tests included indeterminate a(cid:173)
`hCG test results.
`
`Prescriber: A licensed practitioner and registered in S. T.E.P.S.®. The prescriber calls the interactive voice response (IVR) system and
`responds to a brief series of questions, including the amount of thalidomide (Thalomid®) to be dispensed.
`
`Patient: A person registered within S. T.E.P.S.® and able to receive thalidomide. The patient calls the IVR system and responds to a
`brief series of questions designed to query the patient on procedures to assure safe use of thalidomide.
`
`Pharmacist: A pharmacy registered with S. T.E.P.S.® who will dispense thalidomide. The pharmacist calls the IVR system to check if the
`thalidomide prescription has been authorised (i.e. the physician's and the patient's responses to the IVR queries are in accordance with
`the parameters for safe use of thalidomide) and enter quantity to be dispensed.
`
`IVR: A telephone-based system used by patients and prescribers to complete required surveys and for pharmacists to receive
`verification to dispense thalidomide. The IVR verifies that females of childbearing potential are using two methods of birth control, at
`least one of which is designated as a highly effective method, unless the woman completely abstains from heterosexual sexual contact.
`The methods of birth control must be initiated 4 weeks prior to beginning thalidomide and the woman must have a negative pregnancy
`test within 24 hours before the first dose of thalidomide. All females of childbearing potential must have pregnancy tests weekly for the
`first month of treatment and then monthly until 1 month after stopping therapy. Females with irregular menses must have pregnancy
`tests every 2 weeks while receiving thalidomide therapy. Any positive qualitative pregnancy test must be followed by a quantitative
`pregnancy test.
`
`Risk groups: S. T.E.P.S.® classifies patients into the following risk categories:
`• female child not of childbearing potential
`• female child of childbearing potential
`• adult female not of childbearing potential
`• adult female of childbearing potential
`• adult male
`• male child.
`
`Authorise dispensing: Upon completion of a patient and/or prescriber survey resulting in no survey intervention, drug can be
`dispensed by a registered pharmacy.
`
`Dispense: Pharmacy calls the IVR or customer service to dispense thalidomide to a patient.
`
`Intervention: At-risk responses or inappropriate entries in the IVR system result in transfer of the caller to a Celgene S. T.E.P.S.®
`Intervention Specialist for intervention to evaluate and remedy at-risk behaviours when appropriate.
`
`Fig. 1. Schematic of the procedures for prescription authorisation in the System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety
`(S.T.E.P.S.®) programme.
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV, All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`
`324
`
`Uhl et al.
`
`The rate of false positive pregnancy tests among
`females of childbearing potential was calculated for
`selected reporting period intervals. The numerator
`comprised the number of false positive pregnancy
`tests. The denominator comprised the number of
`pregnancy tests performed during the reporting peri(cid:173)
`od intervals. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals
`were calculated using the normal approximation.
`The Cochran-Armitage Chi-squared test was used to
`test for a linear association between time interval
`(2001, 2002, 2003, 2004) and the rate of false posi(cid:173)
`tive pregnancy tests.
`
`Results
`
`Since its approval in 1998 through to 31 Decem(cid:173)
`ber 2004, approximately 726 000 prescriptions for
`thalidomide were written. Approximately 124 000
`patients (57% male and 43% female [table I]) were
`registered in the S.T.E.P.S.® programme. Approxi(cid:173)
`mately 6000 patients were females of childbearing
`potential, representing 5% of all patients and 11% of
`all female patients. The prescription of thalidomide
`in the US by reporting period interval is summarised
`in table I. The majority of the use of thalidomide
`(during the period 30 July 2001 to 31 December
`2004)
`is
`for conditions other
`than erythema
`nodosum leprosum, the approved indication, with
`>88% used for the treatment of oncological condi(cid:173)
`tions (table II).
`The number of females of childbearing potential
`receiving thalidomide has increased since the ap(cid:173)
`proval of thalidomide (table I), with a corresponding
`increase in the number of pregnancy tests (table III).
`Since females of childbearing potential are required
`to have pregnancy tests before, during and after
`therapy, the number of tests is higher than the num(cid:173)
`ber of such patients enrolled in S.T.E.P.S.®. Quanti(cid:173)
`tative B-hCG test results were provided for 64 cases,
`and 80% of these provided the laboratory reference
`value or ranges for the quantitative test (these data
`are available as supplementary material from http://
`www.adisonline.com/drs).
`By 31 December 2004, 72 positive pregnancy
`tests have been reported in the S.T.E.P.S.® pro(cid:173)
`gramme ( 69 were ultimately determined to be false
`
`positives): four cases in the first 3 years of market(cid:173)
`ing (September 1998-18 June 200 I) and 68 cases
`from July 200 I to 31 December 2004 (table TIT).
`Thalidomide treatment was stopped immediately af(cid:173)
`ter a positive pregnancy test, and while test results
`were being evaluated. Three of the 72 cases repre(cid:173)
`sented true pregnancies (case 1, case 2 and case 3).
`In cases 2 and 3 the mechanism of S.T.E.P.S.®
`detected pregnancy prior to the patient receiving
`thalidomide.
`Case l was a 44-ye<tr-old female with "high risk
`malignant melanoma" that had not responded to
`multiple prior therapies. She was unable to tolerate
`oml contraceptives and reported using two b<trrier
`methods of contraception. She had a negative preg(cid:173)
`nancy test on day 8 of her menstnml cycle before
`starting thalidomide, and had two subsequent nega(cid:173)
`tive pregnancy tests during the first month of treat(cid:173)
`ment. On days 35 and 36 of th<Llidomide therapy she
`had positive qtmlitative serum B-hCG
`tests.
`Thalidomide therapy was stopped on day 35. On day
`42 her quantitative B-hCG level was 1883 m[U/mL
`(reference value <5 m[U/mL for non-pregnant wo(cid:173)
`men). No further quantitative B-hCG results were
`reported. She had vaginal bleeding on day 63 and
`ultrasound examination "reve<Lled only blood clots,
`so it was assumed that the patient passed the foetus"
`(wording verbatim from MedWatch form). No fur(cid:173)
`ther follow-up was available.
`Case 2 was a 26-year-old female wilh dennalo(cid:173)
`myosilis who had a posiLive pregnancy Lesl prior Lo
`receiving tluLlidomide. The patient did not receive
`thalidomide, but subsequently miscarried.
`Case 3 was a 28-year-old female witl1 malignant
`neoplasm of tlw vulva who had a positive pregnancy
`test prior to receiving thalidomide. The patient con(cid:173)
`sulted witl1 her physician and elected to undergo a
`termination and a tubal ligation. Subsequently, she
`began thalidomide therapy after it was confirmed
`that she was not pregnant.
`The age range for patients witl1 false-positive
`pregnancy tests was 12-56 years. These patients
`received thalidomide for treatment of multiple my(cid:173)
`eloma (54%), various neoplasms (39%) or other
`disorders (7% ). The total duration of therapy for
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV, All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`
`C)
`
`@
`25
`"' f;
`
`~-
`0
`a
`0
`
`i
`
`~
`
`Risk classification group
`
`Reporting period
`1998'
`1999'
`
`Males [n (%)[
`
`Females not of childbearing
`potential [n (%)[
`
`Females of childbearing
`potential [n (%)[
`
`451
`(57.7)
`
`248
`(31.7)
`
`83
`(10.6)
`
`3633
`(53.7)
`
`2617
`(38.7)
`
`514
`(7.6)
`
`~
`
`Total'1[n (%)[
`
`Table I. Characteristics of patients receiving thalidomide (Thalomid®) in the S.T.E.P.S.® programme according to reporting period 8
`
`2000'
`
`6142
`(54.9)
`
`4413
`(39.4)
`
`633
`(5.7)
`
`11 188
`(100)
`
`January-29
`July 2001"
`
`3889
`(57.0)
`
`2614
`(38.3)
`
`323
`(4.7)
`
`6826
`(100)
`
`30 July-
`December
`2001d
`10555
`(56.9)
`
`7267
`(39.2)
`
`739
`(4.0)
`
`18 561
`(100)
`
`2002'1
`
`2003'1
`
`2004'1
`
`14590
`(57.4)
`
`9603
`(37.8)
`
`1217
`(4.8)
`
`25410
`(100)
`
`15483
`(57.9)
`
`10009
`(37.5)
`
`1237
`(4.6)
`
`26729
`(100)
`
`15889
`(58.2)
`
`10155
`(37.2)
`
`1276
`(4.7)
`
`27 320
`(100)
`
`Totalb
`
`70632
`(57.2)
`
`46926
`(37.9)
`
`6022
`(4.9)
`
`123 580
`(100)
`
`.,
`;1
`[
`0
`~-
`it
`~ (!)
`s·
`9'
`e (fl
`
`(!)
`
`a
`"' 0
`~
`;g
`{6·
`§f
`m
`<
`"
`
`~)
`(Q
`'" Q
`iD'
`-<
`25
`C) "' "
`"'
`:~
`
`782
`(100)
`
`6764
`(100)
`
`Thalidomide therapy
`
`Dose range (mg)
`
`50-1050
`
`50-1400
`
`50-2400
`
`50-2400
`
`50-1400
`
`50-1200
`
`50-1200
`
`50-1200
`
`Mean duration [d (SD)[
`
`35.5
`(19.8)
`
`71.1
`(66.2)
`
`92.9
`(82.5)
`
`101.9
`(86.5)
`
`77.65
`(444.6)
`
`120.95
`(100.4)
`
`126.23
`(1 01 .4)
`
`128.90
`(102.9)
`
`Mean patient age
`
`All patients [y (SD)[
`
`Females of childbearing
`potential [y (SD)[
`
`53.3
`(NA)
`
`NA
`
`57.4
`(NA)
`
`NA
`
`60.9
`(NA)
`
`NA
`
`62.4
`(NA)
`
`NA
`
`66
`(14.1)
`
`42
`(9.3)
`
`65
`(14.4)
`
`42
`(9.0)
`
`67
`(14)
`
`43
`(9)
`
`66
`(14)
`
`42
`(9)
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`a Represents data from a total of 726 032 prescriptions dispensed.
`
`b Total of percentages may not equal 100% because of rounding.
`
`Data from Slone Epidemiology Genter reports. Some patient demographic information was not available.
`
`Data from Gelgene's S.T.E.P.S.® programme, modified on 30 July 2001. Because the S.T.E.P.S.® programme was modified 30 July 2001, data for the year 2001 is
`presented in this table for the period January-30 July 2001 and then separately for period 30 July 2001-December 2001.
`
`NA = not available; SO = standard deviation; S.T.E.P.S.® = System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety.
`
`""
`
`N
`IJl
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`
`326
`
`Uhl et al.
`
`Table II. Diagnoses of thalidomide (Thalomid®) recipients by risk classification group (30 July 2001-31 December 2004)a
`
`Diagnosis
`(no. [%] patients)b
`
`Males
`(n = 56 517 [57.66%])
`
`Females not of childbearing
`potential
`(n = 37 034 [37.78%])
`
`Females of
`childbearing potential
`(n = 4469 [4.56%])
`
`Total
`(n = 98020 [100%])
`
`Oncological
`25 988 (26.51)
`Multiple myeloma
`4200 (4.28)
`Renal cancer
`Myelodysplastic syndrome 5051 (5.15)
`Brain cancer
`1759 (1.79)
`Melanoma
`2878 (2.94)
`Prostate malignant
`3408 (3.48)
`neoplasm
`Other neoplasms"
`
`7071 (7.2)
`
`20 618 (21.03)
`1567 (1.6)
`3145 (3.21)
`678 (0.69)
`1141 ( 1.16)
`0
`
`1186 (1.21)
`194 (0.2)
`85 (0.09)
`433 (0.44)
`466 (0.48)
`0
`
`47 792 (48.76)
`5961 (6.08)
`8281 (8.45)
`2870 (2.93)
`4485 (4.58)
`3408 (3.48)
`
`5651 (5.77)
`
`870 (0.89)
`
`13 592 (13.87)
`
`Dermatological
`Dermatological diseases
`Erythema nodosum
`leprosum
`
`Haematological
`Haematological diseases
`
`Infectious diseases
`Infectious diseases
`
`Gastrointestinal
`Digestive system/
`genitourinary
`
`324 (0.33)
`92 (0.09)
`
`503 (0.51)
`8 (0.01)
`
`247 (0.25)
`10 (0.01)
`
`1074 (1.1)
`110 (0.11)
`
`1686 (1.72)
`
`1154 (1.18)
`
`68 (0.07)
`
`2908 (2.97)
`
`372 (0.38)
`
`247 (0.25)
`
`162 (0.17)
`
`781 (0.8)
`
`326 (0.33)
`
`148 (0.15)
`
`105 (0.11)
`
`579 (0.59)
`
`212 (0.22)
`
`347 (0.35)
`
`Immunological
`Musculoskeletal/
`rheumatological
`1827 (1.86)
`3050 (3.21)
`Other
`a Data on diagnosis from October 1998 to July 2001 are not available.
`b Total of percentages may not equal 100% because of rounding.
`c Other neoplasms include colorectal, bladder/urethra, liver and other not specified neoplasms.
`
`230 (0.23)
`
`413 (0.42)
`
`789 (0.8)
`
`5390 (5.5)
`
`females of childbearing potential with false positive
`or indeterminate pregnancy test results ranged from
`<1 month to 34 months. The duration of treatment at
`the time of the first false positive pregnancy test in
`patients receiving thalidomide ranged from 4 days to
`L 7 months. Fifteen of 69 patients had positive preg(cid:173)
`nancy tests that were determined to be false positive
`pregnancy tests before thalidomide therapy was ini(cid:173)
`tiated. For 68 of 69 patients, B-hCG levels were
`<350 m[U/mL. One patient with choriocarcinoma, a
`disease that is expected to produce high concentra(cid:173)
`tions of B-hCG,f4
`1 had levels >350 m[U/mL.
`
`Discussion
`
`The S.T.E.P.S.® programme is a risk manage(cid:173)
`ment programme designed to prevent fetal expo-
`
`sures to thalidomide. S.T.E.P.S.® is an intensive,
`multi-component, integrated risk management pro(cid:173)
`gramme that restricts drug use to registered clini(cid:173)
`cians, pharmacists and patients. Any suspected fetal
`exposure to thalidomide (either in female patients or
`female partners of male patients) in S.T.E.P.S.@
`participants must be reported immediately to the US
`FDA and Celgene.f5 1
`In accordance with the S.T.E.P.S.® programme,
`sexually active females of childbearing potential
`must use two appropriate methods of contraception
`simultaneously to prevent pregnancy for 4 weeks
`before, during and for 4 weeks following treatment
`with thalidomide. Appropriate methods of contra(cid:173)
`ception include at least one highly effective method
`(e.g. intrauterine device, hormonal contraception,
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`
`Thalidomide Use in the US
`
`327
`
`tubal ligation or partner's vasectomy) and one addi(cid:173)
`tiomLl effective method (e.g. latex condom, dia(cid:173)
`phragm or cervical cap). The aforementioned meth(cid:173)
`ods of pregnancy prevention must he used unless
`continuous complete abstinence from heterosextml
`sexual contact is the chosen method of pregnancy
`prevention. Females that may become pregnant and
`postmemLrchal women who have not undergone a
`surgical menopause or who have not been postme(cid:173)
`nopausal naturally for at least 24 consecutive
`months (i.e. who have had menses at some time in
`the preceding 24 consecutive months) are consid(cid:173)
`ered to be females of childbearing potential in the
`S.T.E.P.S.® programme.
`All patients agreed to comply with the methods
`of pregnancy prevention in S.T.E.P.S.®. Despite
`this, there have been infrequent reports regarding
`patient difficulties with complying with two forms
`of contraception. For female patients, one woman
`reported using two barrier methods, one woman
`reported that she had a tubal ligation and was not
`using another method and two women reported
`missing a dose of birth control pills. Ten male
`patients reported not using a condom.
`According to S.T.E.P.S.@, females of childbear(cid:173)
`ing potential must also have periodic pregnancy
`testing. Such patient must have a pregnancy test
`(sensitivity of at least 50 miU/mL) performed within
`the 24 hours prior to beginning thalidomide therapy.
`Pregnancy testing should occur weekly during the
`first 4 weeks of use, then at 4-week intervals in
`women with regular menstrual cycles or every 2
`weeks in women with irregular menstrual cycles.
`Pregnancy testing should also be done if any female
`of childbearing potential misses her period or has
`any abnonnality in menstrual bleeding. Any positive
`qualitative urine pregnancy test is followed by a
`more sensitive qualitative sennn and/or a quantita(cid:173)
`tive sennn pregnancy test.
`Thalidomide is present in the semen of male
`patients receiving the drug. Male patients receiving
`thalidomide who are sexually active with women
`who are or could become pregnant must always use
`a latex condom during any sexual contact, even if
`the male patient has undergone a successful vasecto-
`
`E
`<D
`iil
`;})
`II
`@
`
`(1:) c.:
`u.i
`...: 1/)
`.i!i'
`_o
`.ll!
`·~
`0 c
`< z
`
`II
`
`<>:: z
`
`<>:: z
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV, All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`
`328
`
`Uhl et al.
`
`my. However, the risk to the fetus from exposure to
`thalidomide in the semen is unknown. To date there
`have been 18 reports to the S.T.E.P.S.® programme
`of pregnancies in female partners of male patients
`thalidomide: 14 normal newborns, one
`taking
`ectopic pregnancy termination and three pregnan(cid:173)
`cies with limited or no available follow-up informa(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`The initial design of the S.T.E.P.S.® programme
`retrospectively identified patient behaviours provid(cid:173)
`ing a risk of fetal exposure to thalidomide; therefore,
`procedural changes to the S.T.E.P.S.® programme
`were instituted in July 2001. These changes were
`designed to ensure that results from the required
`pregnancy tests were documented and linked to pre(cid:173)
`scription activation and dispensing through an inter(cid:173)
`active voice response (IVR) system or via customer
`service prior to dispensing thalidomide. When an 'at
`risk' behaviour (e.g. a pending, outdated or positive
`pregnancy test result) is identified using the IVR
`system, the caller is transferred to a Celgene
`S. T.E.P.S. ® Intervention SpecialistPl On average,
`5% of surveys require an intervention, verification
`or clarification of a patient or prescriber response
`prior to dispensing thalidomidePl The m<~jority of
`all issues are addressed within 24 hours of identifi(cid:173)
`cation by the IVR system. Thalidomide is not given
`if there is a known non-compliance issue.
`
`Since the approval of Thalomid® in the US, only
`three women in the S.T.E.P.S.® programme have
`been identified as becoming pregmmt: one after
`thalidomide was initiated and two at the time of
`enrolment but before the initiation of treatment with
`thalidomide. There were 69 other females of
`childbearing potential who had false-positive preg(cid:173)
`nancy tests after enrolling in S. T.E.P.S. ® (please see
`http://www.adisonline.com/drs for individual pa(cid:173)
`tient information). Women who have false-positive
`B-hCG pregnancy tests usually have levels that re(cid:173)
`low/6•71 as was
`seen
`in
`main consistently
`thalidomide users in this case series. Early pregnan(cid:173)
`cy loss is associated with rapidly falling B-hCG
`levels;fR,9l therefore, the persistence of low B-hCG
`levels in the 69 cases is not suggestive of a true
`
`pregnancy that underwent early loss after exposure
`of the developing conceptus to thalidomide.
`The frequency of false-positive pregnancy tests
`as a percentage of pregnancy tests performed
`(0.27-0.99%) has remained stable since the begin(cid:173)
`ning of the modified S.T.E.P.S.® programme that
`was initiated in July 2001 (table [[[), and the ob(cid:173)
`served rate of false-positive pregnancy tests is com(cid:173)
`parable to estimated rates of false-positive pregnan(cid:173)
`cy tests in the general population of females of
`childbearing potentialJ7
`1 Pregnancy rates among
`comparable females not taking thalidomide were not
`available for comparison. The occurrence and gen(cid:173)
`eral management of false-positive pregnancy tests
`are reviewed elsewhere.f 10
`1 Serial pregnancy tests,
`specialised laboratory tests, pelvic ultrasound or
`medic<Ll consultation can help distinguish between
`true- and false-positive pregnancy tests. [n this se(cid:173)
`ries, nine cases had further clinic<Ll evaluation for
`positive pregnancy tests beyond repeat B-hCG test(cid:173)
`ing: six had ultrasound studies, three had CT scans
`and one had further laboratory evaluation.
`The institution of the IVR system in July 2001
`was designed
`to
`identify patients exhibiting
`behaviours providing risk for fetal exposure and to
`remedy
`those behaviours prior
`to dispensing
`thalidomide. The continued ongoing evaluation of
`S.T.E.P.S.® will be essential
`to evaluate
`the
`programme's perfonmmce and to guide thture re(cid:173)
`finements to the prognunme, in order for it to
`achieve its objectives.
`Even with the use of thalidomide for a variety of
`medical conditions, the m~jority of which were for
`haematological malignancies (e.g. multiple myelo(cid:173)
`ma) and solid organ tumours,
`the amount of
`thalidomide used in the US is relatively small. Simi(cid:173)
`lar risk management programmes for other drugs
`that have demonstrated adverse risks associated
`with fetal exposure, such as isotretinoin/ 1 11 have
`been developed and implemented by drug manufac(cid:173)
`turers. The Celgene S.T.E.P.S.® programme has
`been licensed to several other drug manufacturers
`with the regulatory involvement of the FDA, for the
`increased surveillance and monitoring of physi(cid:173)
`cians, phannacists and patients, to prevent fetal ex-
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV, All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`
`Thalidomide Use in the US
`
`329
`
`posure to drugs. The vigilance of physicians, phar(cid:173)
`macists, patients, Celgene and the FDA has contrib(cid:173)
`uted to the success of S.T.E.P.S.® in preventing
`pregnancy in females receiving thalidomide.
`
`The research that is the basis for this study was funded by
`the FDA and Celgene as a part of the routine postmarketing
`surveillance of thalidomide.
`
`Conclusions
`
`The S.T.E.P.S.® programme has been successful
`in preventing fetal exposure to thalidomide. Of the
`6022 females of childbearing potential registered in
`the S.T.E.P.S.® programme, one patient became
`pregnant while receiving the drug and two addition(cid:173)
`al patients were identified as pregnant and were not
`permitted to start thalidomide treatment. This 'real
`time' risk management programme may be a useful
`model to prevent exposure of pregnant women to
`other drugs that are known human teratogens or that
`arc suspected to be teratogenic (based upon drug
`class or findings in experimental animal studies).
`Because important clinical decisions may be made
`on the basis of the results of pregnancy testing,
`clinicians using th<Llidomidc must remain vigilant in
`evaluating every fem<Lle with a positive pregnancy
`test until pregnancy is either confirmed or ruled out.
`Both the FDA and Celgene remain committed to
`preventing fet<Ll exposure to thalidomide.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`FDA authors have no conflicts of interest. It should be
`noted that Celgene is the US manufacturer and distributor of
`thalidomide.
`The following associates are to be acknowledged for their
`assistance in preparation of this study:
`Celgene Corporation: Francis Brown, Ganesh Vanekat,
`Kevin Milazzo, Mark Deibert, Pam Yurcisin, RN, Max
`Kosoy, John Patin.
`FDA: Dianne Kennedy.
`
`References
`1. Lenz W, Knapp K. Thalidomide embryopathy. Arch Environ
`Health 1962; 5: I 00-5
`
`2. Zeldis JB, Williams BA, Thomas SD, et <~. S.T.E.P.S.®: a
`comprehensive program for controlling and monitoring access
`to thalidomide. Clin Thcr 1999; 21 (2): 319-30
`
`3. THALOM[[)® (thalidomide) 50, 100tng, 200tng capsules, l"ull
`prescribing information, last revised February, 2005
`
`4. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Gestational trophoblastic disease.
`Cancer 1995; 76 (10 Suppl.): 2079-85
`
`5. Clark TE, Edom N, Larson J, et al. Thalomid® (thalidomide)
`capsules: a review of the first 18 months of spontaneous
`postmarketing adverse event sLU"veillance, including oft~label
`prescribing. Drug Saf 2001; 24 (2): 87-117
`
`6. Rot mensch S, Cole LA. False diagnosis and needless therapy of
`presmned 1naHgnant disease in wmnen with false-positive
`human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations. Lancet 2000;
`355 (9205): 712-5
`
`7. Braunstein GD. False-positive serum human chorionic gonado(cid:173)
`tropin results: causes, characteristics, and recognition. Am J
`Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (!): 217-24
`
`8. Kad::u N~ Rmnero R. Fm·ther observations on serial luunan
`chorionic gonadotropin patterns in ectopic pregnancies and
`spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril 1988; 50 (2): 367-72
`
`9. Canfield RE, O'Connor JF, Wilcon AJ. MeasLU"ing human cho(cid:173)
`rionic gonadotropin for detection of early pregnancy loss.
`Reprod Toxicol 1988; 2: 199-203
`
`10. Avoiding inappropriate clinical decisions based on false posi(cid:173)
`tive human chorionic gonadotropin test results. ACOG Com(cid:173)
`mittee Opinion No. 278. American College of Obstetricians
`and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002; I 00: I 057-9
`
`11. Isotretinoin (marketed as Accutane) capsule information [on(cid:173)
`line]. Available fi·om URL: http://www.fda.gov/cderldrug/in(cid:173)
`fopage/accutane/default.htm [Accessed 2005 Aug 26]
`
`Correspondence and offprints: Dr Kathleen Uhl, Center for
`Drug Evaluation and Research, Pregnancy Labeling Task
`Force, Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hamp(cid:173)
`shire Avenue, Building 22, Room 6460, Silver Spring, MD
`20993, USA.
`E-mail: kathleen.uhl@oc.fda.gov
`
`© 2006 Adls Data Information BV. All rights reserved
`
`Drug Safety 2006; 29 (4)
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 10
`
`

`
`Copyright of Drug Safety is the property of A DI 5 International Limited and its content may not
`be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder•s
`express written permission. However, users may print, down I oad, or emai I articles for individual
`use.
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 10

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket