`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No.32
`
` Entered: December 2, 2015
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VI, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CELGENE CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-01092 (Patent 6,045,501)
`Case IPR2015-01096 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01102 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01103 (Patent 6,315,720)1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, MICHAEL W. KIM, GRACE KARAFFA
`OBERMANN, and TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Andrew S. Chalson and Paul J. Skiermont
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`Having considered the parties’ Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`of Mr. Andrew S. Chalson, and Mr. Paul J. Skiermont, and their declarations
`in support thereof, it is:
`
`1 This Order addresses issues common to all identified cases. We exercise
`our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01092 (Patent 6,045,501)
`Case IPR2015-01096 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01102 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01103 (Patent 6,315,720)
`ORDERED that the parties’ unopposed motions for admission pro
`hac vice of Mr. Chalson and Mr. Skiermont are granted; Mr. Chalson and
`Mr. Skiermont are authorized to act only as back-up counsel in the instant
`proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner and Patent Owner are to
`continue to have a registered practitioner represent them as lead counsel for
`the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Chalson and Mr. Skiermont are to
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal
`Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Chalson and Mr. Skiermont are to be
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a),
`and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01092 (Patent 6,045,501)
`Case IPR2015-01096 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01102 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01103 (Patent 6,315,720)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Sarah Spires
`Skiermont Puckett LLP
`sarah.spires@skiermontpuckett.com
`1092CFAD6@skiermontpuckett.com
`
`Ki O
`Skiermont Puckett LLP
`ki.o@skiermontpuckett.com
`
`Parvathi Kota
`Skiermont Puckett LLP
`1092CFAD6@skiermontpuckett.com
`
`Paul Skiermont
`Skiermont Puckett LLP
`paul.skiermont@skiermontpuckett.com
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Francis Cerrito
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Eric C. Stops
`ericstops@quinnemanuel.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01092 (Patent 6,045,501)
`Case IPR2015-01096 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01102 (Patent 6,315,720)
`Case IPR2015-01103 (Patent 6,315,720)
`
`
`
`Frank C. Calvosa
`frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Anthony Insogna
`Jones Day
`aminsogna@jonesday.com
`
`J. Patrick Elsevier
`jpelsevier@jonesday.com
`
`Gasper J. LaRosa
`gjlarosa@jonesday.com
`
`
`4