throbber
Innovate or Else: Kyle Bass Strikes Again and Challenges Shire Patents - Pharmalot - WSJ
`
`PHARMALOT
`
`News, Quotes, Companies, Videos
`
`SEARCH
`
`Sign In
`
`RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
`
`FDA
`
`LITIGATION
`
`PRICING & PATIENT ACCESS
`
`CLINICAL TRIALS
`
`MARKETING
`
`5:15 pm ET
`Apr 2, 2015
`
`GENERIC DRUG MAKERS
`
`Innovate or Else: Kyle Bass Strikes
`Again and Challenges Shire Patents
`
`PREVIOUS
`Vivus Goes on a Diet:
`Sales Reps are Cut, but
`Will FDA Help Save
`Money?
`
`NEXT
`Pharmalot..
`Pharmalittle.. As the
`Weekend Nears: We’re
`Catching up on
`Superbugs, China and
`More!!
`
`ARTICLE
`
`COMMENTS (3)
`
`ACORDA THERAPEUTICS
`
`BIO GATTEX HAYMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
`
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`
`LYLE BASS
`
`PATENTS
`
`PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES
`
`SHIRE
`
`SEARCH PHARMALOT
`
`GO
`
`
`
`1 3
`
`
`
`5 3
`
`
`
`
`
`By ED SI LVER MAN
`
`Three months ago, Kyle Bass warned the
`pharmaceutical industry that he would
`challenge and, ultimately, invalidate
`some of their patents. And once again,
`he is making good on his word.
`
`Yesterday, he filed challenges against
`patents for two Shire drugs – the Lialda
`medicine for ulcerative colitis and the
`Gattex treatment for short bowel
`syndrome. The move comes just a few
`weeks after he challenged a patent that
`Acorda Therapeutics ACOR -0.23% holds on its Ampyra multiple sclerosis drug.
`
`Kyle Bass — Bloomberg News
`
`In his view, some drug makers and biotechs hold specific patents that do not represent
`an innovation and, instead, are designed to fend off competition. By challenging the
`patents, he argues that drug prices can be lowered.
`
`“A small minority of drug companies are abusing the patent system to sustain invalid
`patents that contain no meaningful innovations but serve to maintain their anti-
`competitive, high-price monopoly to the detriment of Americans suffering from illness,”
`according to a statement sent to us by Hayman Capital Management, the fund that Bass
`founded.
`
`A Shire spokeswoman writes us that the drug maker is “aware of the two petitions that
`were filed, and will vigorously defend any proceedings that may be instituted at the U.S.
`Patent and Trademark Office. Shire is confident that the validity of our patents will be
`upheld.”
`
`His filings are part of a new wave of patent challenges that emerged in the wake of a
`provision of the America Invents Act that went into effect in September 2012. Known as
`Inter Partes Review, the procedure has made it easier and faster to file a patent
`challenge.
`
`About Pharmalot
`
`On average, an IPR can cost about $300,000 and take up to 18 months, while
`conventional litigation needed to invalidate a patent may cost $3 million or more and
`take years, according to Matthew Cutler, an attorney at Harness Dickey, who specializes
`in intellectual property and runs a website that tracks IPR filings with the U.S. Patent &
`Trademark Office.
`
`“An IPR filing is a much more cost effective and efficient way to challenge a patent,” he
`says. Of the 2,536 challenges filed since the law passed in 2012, 383 were filed against
`chemical and biotechnology patent holders. And Cutler notes that 87% of IPR filings
`
`Pharmalot explores the fast-moving, complicated world that
`develops and markets medicines – and the drug makers that
`are attempting to replenish their pipelines while grappling with
`pricing and regulatory dictates, among many other challenges.
`Writer Ed Silverman has covered the pharmaceutical industry
`
`
`
`http://blogs.wsj.c.ws om/pharmalot/2015/04/02/innovate-or-else-kyle-bass-strikes-again-and-challenges-shire-patents/
`
`1/3
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`CELGENE EXHIBIT 2031
`Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI LLC (Petitioner) v. Celgene Corporation (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2015-01102
`
`

`
`Innovate or Else: Kyle Bass Strikes Again and Challenges Shire Patents - Pharmalot - WSJ
`
`challenging pharmaceutical patent claims have, so far, been successful.
`
`For its part, the BIO trade group has denounced the tactic. In a statement issued when
`Bass filed his first patent challenge two months ago, BIO ceo Jim Greenwood argued
`that “Congress never intended for the patent challenge system to be utilized by those
`attempting to profit from the confusion the current system creates. Such efforts not only
`damage the value of companies working on cures – but hurts those sick and suffering
`patients and their families who are eager for cures.”
`
`Often, Cutler says an IPR challenge is filed by a drug maker in order to invalidate
`another company’s patents and would otherwise block its entrance to a particular
`market. Companies, he explains, are saying “let’s go on the offensive even before we
`enter a market and [try] to invalidate a patent [in order] to gain access to a market.” This
`allows a drug maker to avoid the cost of patent litigation in court.
`
`However, experts say IPR challenges may also be filed by someone shorting a stock,
`because the news about a challenge on a big-selling drug can rattle investors. On the
`day Bass filed his first challenge against an Acorda patent, the biotech’s shares dropped
`9.6%. The stock dropped 4.8% when he filed his second challenge to an Acorda patent.
`A Hayman spokesperson did not respond to questions about what, if any, kind of
`investment the firm holds in either Acorda or Shire.
`
`for nearly two decades and has closely followed the many
`hurdles facing drug companies as they move ideas from the
`laboratory to the medicine chest. He started Pharmalot while
`at The Star-Ledger of New Jersey and previously worked at
`New York Newsday and Investor’s Business Daily. Email Ed
`Silverman at ed.silverman@wsj.com, and follow him on
`Twitter @Pharmalot.
`
`What's This?
`
`Popular Now
`
`1
`
`Liberals Make Big
`Comeback in 2015,
`Poll Analysis Finds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Apple Plans
`Streaming Music
`Push at Developer
`Conference
`
`ACORDA THERAPEUTICS
`
`BIO GATTEX HAYMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
`
`LYLE BASS
`
`PATENTS
`
`PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES
`
`SHIRE
`
`PREVIOUS
`Vivus Goes on a Diet: Sales Reps are Cut,
`but Will FDA Help Save Money?
`
`NEXT
`Pharmalot.. Pharmalittle.. As the
`Weekend Nears: We’re Catching up on
`Superbugs, China and More!!
`
`PHARMALOT HOME PAGE
`
`
`
`1 3
`
`
`
`5 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Add a Comment
`
`NAME
`
`COMMENT
`
`We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please
`comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the
`use of your real name.
`
`3
`
`The May Jobs Report
`in 12 Charts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`How the Internet of
`Things Will Upend
`Retirement
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`The Ten
`Commandments for
`Wall Street Interns
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Show 5 More
`
`Comments (3 of 3)
`
`10:57 am April 9, 2015
`
`hp wrote:
`
`CLEAR POST
`
`Pharmalot Blogroll
`
`View all Comments »
`
`Generic Pharmaceutical
`Association
`National Institute for Health
`and Care Excellence
`National Institutes of Health
`
`PhRMA
`U.S. Food and Drug
`Administration
`
`People should keep in mind that the AIA was put in place at the insistence of Google, Cisco,
`HP and other large Silicon Valley tech companies. Their motivation -- depending upon whom
`you ask -- was either to cut down on patent trolls, or to facilitate big tech's misappropriation of
`technology from small innovative start ups. Either way, patents are now pretty much a joke in
`terms of conferring any real legal rights on the patent owner. If pharma wants to blame anyone,
`they should put the blame on Google.
`
`2:24 pm April 3, 2015
`
`Cluetanian wrote:
`
`Here's repeat free clue for the anti-pharma crowd: There's no such thing as a free lunch!
`
`You can't take away drug company patent protections AND take away market defense tactics
`without harming future drug development!
`
`If you beat up on pharma companies, you'll get no more new drugs!
`
`5:33 pm April 2, 2015
`
`ak wrote:
`
`Go Kyle Go! If this is true Bass has found a way to both make money while making drugs
`cheaper to the consumers/ sick/ ill people.
`
`Video
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matthew Modine
`Discusses 'Proof'
`4:02
`
`'Pitch Perfect 2'
`Screenwriter Offers
`Inside Look
`3:46
`
`Film Clip: 'I'll See You in
`My Dreams'
`0:38
`
`
`
`http://blogs.wsj.c.ws om/pharmalot/2015/04/02/innovate-or-else-kyle-bass-strikes-again-and-challenges-shire-patents/
`
`2/3
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`Innovate or Else: Kyle Bass Strikes Again and Challenges Shire Patents - Pharmalot - WSJ
`
`
`
`Wall Street JournalFacebookTwitter LinkedInGoogle+YouTubePodcasts
`
`GooglePlay
`
`AppStore
`
`Subscribe / Sign In
`
`Back to Top
`
`Subscribe
`
`Customer Service
`
`Tools & Features
`
`Ads
`
`Why Subscribe?
`
`Customer Center
`
`Emails & Alerts
`
`Advertise
`
`More
`
`Conferences
`
`WSJ+
`
`Live Help
`
`Corporate Subscriptions
`
`Redesign Guided Tour
`
`Apps
`
`Professor Journal
`
`Student Journal
`
`Guides
`
`My News
`
`Portfolio
`
`RSS Feeds
`
`Topics
`
`Video Center
`
`Watchlist
`
`Advertise Locally
`
`Content Partnerships
`
`Commercial Real Estate Ads
`
`Corrections
`
`Place a Classified Ad
`
`Jobs at WSJ
`
`Sell Your Business
`
`Make Time
`
`Sell Your Home
`
`News Archive
`
`Recruitment & Career Ads
`
`Register for Free
`
`Reprints
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`Updated 5/5/15
`
`Cookie Policy
`
`Updated 5/5/15
`
`Copyright Policy
`
`Data Policy
`
`Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use
`
`Your Ad Choices
`
`Copyright ©2015 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
`
`
`
`http://blogs.wsj.c.ws om/pharmalot/2015/04/02/innovate-or-else-kyle-bass-strikes-again-and-challenges-shire-patents/
`
`3/3
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket