throbber
Sadaf R. Abdullah
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Wednesday, May 25, 2016 2:33 PM
`Frank Calvosa; Sadaf R. Abdullah; Trials
`1092CFAD6; Nick Cerrito; Evangeline Shih; Andrew Chalson; Gasper J LaRosa;
`1096CFAD6; 1102CFAD6; 1103CFAD6
`RE: CFAD VI LLC v. Celgene Corp., IPRs 2015-1092, -1096, -1102, -1103
`
`Counsel,
`
`No conference call is necessary as the parties have submitted sufficient information for the Board to decide the issue
`presented. Based on the information presented, the Board authorizes Petitioner to submit, in each proceeding, 30
`minutes of video excerpts from the deposition of Dr. Frau.
`
`The parties are reminded that emails to the Board requesting conference calls should copy the other party to the
`proceeding, indicate generally the relief being requested or the subject matter of the conference call, state whether the
`opposing party opposes the request, and include times when all parties are available. Unless otherwise authorized, do not
`include attachments in an email and do not include substantive arguments.
`
`
`
`Thanks,
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`From: Frank Calvosa [mailto:frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com]  
`Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 9:02 PM 
`To: 'Sadaf R. Abdullah' <sabdullah@skiermontderby.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: 1092CFAD6 <1092cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; Nick Cerrito <nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com>; Evangeline Shih 
`<evangelineshih@quinnemanuel.com>; Andrew Chalson <andrewchalson@quinnemanuel.com>; Gasper J LaRosa 
`<gjlarosa@JonesDay.com>; 1096CFAD6 <1096cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; 1102CFAD6 
`<1102cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; 1103CFAD6 <1103cfad6@skiermontderby.com> 
`Subject: RE: CFAD VI LLC v. Celgene Corp., IPRs 2015‐1092, ‐1096, ‐1102, ‐1103 

`Dear PTAB: 

`Counsel for Patent Owner requested that Petitioner attach a copy of the parties' correspondence to its email below so 
`that the Board could fully understand the parties' dispute.  Counsel for Petitioner refused that request.  Accordingly, 
`attached is the correspondence to provide context for tomorrow's call.  

`Best regards, 

`Frank Calvosa
`Associate
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`212-849-7569 Direct
`
`1
`
`CFAD VI 1092 - 0001
`CFAD VI v. CELGENE
`IPR2015-01102
`
`

`
`212-849-7000 Main Office Number
`212-849-7100 FAX
`frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
`www.quinnemanuel.com
`
`NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
`may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
`recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
`review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
`by e-mail, and delete the original message.  
`
`  
`
`From: Sadaf R. Abdullah [mailto:sabdullah@skiermontderby.com]  
`Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 6:40 PM 
`To: Trials@USPTO.GOV 
`Cc: 1092CFAD6 <1092cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; Nick Cerrito <nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com>; Evangeline Shih 
`<evangelineshih@quinnemanuel.com>; Andrew Chalson <andrewchalson@quinnemanuel.com>; Gasper J LaRosa 
`<gjlarosa@JonesDay.com>; Frank Calvosa <frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com>; 1096CFAD6 
`<1096cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; 1102CFAD6 <1102cfad6@skiermontderby.com>; 1103CFAD6 
`<1103cfad6@skiermontderby.com> 
`Subject: CFAD VI LLC v. Celgene Corp., IPRs 2015‐1092, ‐1096, ‐1102, ‐1103 

`Dear Board,
`

`Petitioner hereby respectfully requests a call to discuss authorization under 37 CFR § 42.53(a) to submit video‐recorded 
`testimony in connection with Petitioner’s Replies in the above‐referenced proceedings, currently due on May 27, 2016. 
`Specifically, Petitioner respectfully seeks authorization to submit no more than 30 minutes of the videorecorded 
`testimony of one of Patent Owner’s experts in each proceeding.  

`Petitioner and Patent Owner have conferred regarding Petitioner’s request over email, but have been unable to reach 
`an agreement as to the terms of the submissions.  

`The parties are available for a conference call any time after 2 p.m. ET on Wednesday, May 24, 2016. Counsel for Patent 
`Owner is copied on this email.  
`
`Best regards, 

`Sadaf  Abdullah 
`
`________________
`Sadaf Abdullah | SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`2200 Ross Ave., Suite 4800W, Dallas, Texas 75201
`P: 214.978.6615 F: 214.978.6601
`skiermontderby.com 

`This message is the property of SKIERMONT DERBY LLP and may contain privileged information or
`attorney work product. If this message has been delivered to you by mistake, please do not copy or
`deliver this message to anyone. Instead, destroy it and notify me by reply e-mail.  

`
`  
`
`2
`
`CFAD VI 1092 - 0002
`CFAD VI v. CELGENE
`IPR2015-01102

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket