throbber
Annals of Internal Medicine
`
`... Nevvs for internists
`
`Preparing for
`Thalidomide's
`Comeback
`
`T halidomide is on the verge of being
`
`introduced-with great care-into
`the U.S. marketplace. The news
`provokes polarized reactions: disbelief that
`such a potent teratogen could be made
`available after the lessons of almost 40
`years ago, and impatience for a drug that
`can lead to exceptional improvements in
`some rare debilitating immune diseases.
`In early September, an advisory commit(cid:173)
`tee to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) recommended that the FDA approve
`marketing of thalidomide for erythema
`nodosum leprosum, an inflammatory mani(cid:173)
`festation of leprosy that results in painful
`cutaneous lesions on the arms, legs, and face.
`The committee also strongly recommended
`limiting distribution of thalidomide, with
`stringent safety measures put in place to
`avoid birth defects and other side effects.
`The renewed interest in thalidomide
`comes from studies showing a complete
`response in 90% of patients with erythema
`nodosum leprosum who used thalidomide,
`according to Janet Woodcock, MD, chief
`of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation
`and Research. The drug is also under
`investigation to deteonine its effectiveness
`against graft-versus-host disease, the AIDS
`wasting syndrome, some solid tumors, cer(cid:173)
`tain serious primary deonatologic condi(cid:173)
`tions, tuberculosis, aphthous ulcers, and
`macular degene.ration. Woodcock said that
`evidence is most compelling for th.e drug's
`effect on aphthous ulcers in patients with
`HIV infection (N Engl J Med. 1997;335:
`1487-93) and with Beh9et disease. She
`considers the data on the AIDS wasting
`syndrome "promising" but preliminary.
`The committee's recommendation was
`preceded by a year of intensive debate and
`planning because of the drug's potentially
`
`severe side effects. Even one dose of
`thalidomide, when taken during the early
`stages of pregnancy, can cause fetal defor(cid:173)
`mities. The drug can also cause peripheral
`neuropathy, sometimes resulting in perma(cid:173)
`nent nerve damage.
`
`A Brier History
`Thalidomide was originally marketed
`as a sedative and was often used for morn(cid:173)
`ing sickness outside of the United States
`in the 1950s and early 1960s. Although
`thalidomide was the third largest-selling
`drug in Europe-<onsidered so safe it was
`sold over-the-counter in many places-it
`never passed FDA scrutiny. At least 8000
`of the babies born to women who took the
`drug during pregnancy had phocomelia,
`which is characterized by missing digits,
`arms and legs, and internal organ deformi(cid:173)
`ties. In the United States, 17 babies were
`born with the rare birth defect; their moth(cid:173)
`ers had received the drug from overseas
`sources or received premarketing samples
`distributed by drug company represer:lta(cid:173)
`tives. The thalidomide episode resulted in
`stricter review requirements for drug
`approval by the FDA, including proof of
`safety and efficacy plus infooned consent
`by all participants in clinical trials.
`Today, the FDA has in hand new data
`that indicate thalidomide's promise in
`fighting several serious diseases for which
`no effective alternate therapy exists, but the
`risks, of course, remain. Because many of
`the diseases in which thalidomide is poten(cid:173)
`tially beneficial afflict young women
`(Beh9et disease, the Sjogren syndrome,
`Crohn disease, and rheumatoid arthritis),
`issues of teratogenicity are critical.
`Because of a recent study showing thalido(cid:173)
`mide in rabbit semen and uncertainty about
`its presence in human semen, both women
`and men receiving the drug will be
`required to use contraception.
`Concerns about birth defects have been
`so great that investigational use of thalido(cid:173)
`mide for erythema nodosum leprosum has
`been limited to men and postrnenopausal
`
`or surgically sterilized women. The FDA is
`unlikely to limit general use of the drug to
`that extent, but if it is approved as pro(cid:173)
`posed, thalidomide will be the most
`restricted drug in the United States, Wood(cid:173)
`cock confirmed. Every physician, pharma(cid:173)
`cist, and patient involved with thalidomide
`will be required to adhere to a tightly con(cid:173)
`trolled protocol, according to Bruce J.
`Williams, from Celgene Corporation of
`Warren, New Jersey, the drug's marketer.
`To gain access to the drug, patients will
`be required to receive risk-benefit counsel(cid:173)
`ing, sign an informed-consent agreement,
`use two forms of birth control, and partici(cid:173)
`pate in frequent surveys; monthly prescrip(cid:173)
`tions will only be filled after pregnancy
`testing. Compliance and fetal exposures
`will be tracked. Only pharmacists registered
`to participate will be permitted to dispense
`the drug. By registering, they commit to
`dispense thalidomide in 28-day supplies in
`original packaging (special blister-packs
`with pregnancy warnings encasing each
`pill) only after seeing the signed infooned(cid:173)
`consent document. The drug cannot be dis(cid:173)
`pensed as a simple refill, and patients will
`be advised to return unused doses.
`When asked whether a patient using
`thalidomide can decline the use of birth
`control for religious or other reasons,
`Williams responded: "Women can make
`informed choices about whether or not to
`take the drug. But if they are of childbear(cid:173)
`ing age and want the drug, they must
`use contraception." Boston University
`researchers will maintain a thalidomide
`users registry modeled after the registry
`that tracks use and pregnancy outcomes for
`users of isotretinoin, which is marketed by
`Hoffman-La Roche in Nutley, New Jersey,
`under the trade name Accutane (Box).
`
`Zero Risk Impossible
`Even with these unprecedented safety
`measures, experts admit that zero risk is an
`impossible goal. Babies will be born with
`birth defects if thalidomide is made avail(cid:173)
`able. But based on the isotretinoin experi(cid:173)
`ence, 20 years of testing in erythema
`nodosum leprosum, and limited use of
`thalidomide by 72 women with the AIDS
`wasting syndrome or aphthous ulcers, the
`FDA is prepared to move ahead.
`Implications of this regulatory action
`go beyond U.S. borders. It sends a message
`to other countries, said Colin Crawford,
`MB, ChB, DPH&H, from London's Imperial
`
`(Continued on next page)
`
`15 November 1997 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 127 • Number 10
`tS November 1997 • Annals of lflltmal Mtdicint • Volume 12? • Number 10
`
`951
`951
`
`CFAD VI 1019-0001
`
`

`

`f;iiiFJFiJifl
`
`N•vvs for Internists
`
`teenager ask for Accutane inappropriately.
`We have to accept the fact that this will
`happen with thalidomide and be prepared."
`Advocates for survivors of thalidomide
`defects are calling for efforts to develop
`
`College of Science, Technology, and Medi(cid:173)
`cine. If the U.S. government makes thalido(cid:173)
`mide available, developing countries may do
`the same, he predicted, most likely without
`the comprehensive safety and tracking pro(cid:173)
`gram being planned for the United States.
`Thalidomide is already available in 8 of
`I 0 South American countries. Thirty-four
`cases of thalidomide embryopathy have been
`reported since 1965. Most have occurred in
`Brazil, wile.re the prevalence of leprosy is
`high and where, until recently, thalidomide
`was available without a prescription.
`In the United States, the communica(cid:173)
`tions challenges are twofold. A population
`of patients vividly remembers the first
`thalidomide tragedy. But an informal FDA
`poll found that most people under age 35
`have never heard of thalidomide and are
`unaware of its potential harmful effects.
`"When communicating about risks of any
`disease lo a patient, we have to be aware of
`the cohort experience that patient brings,"
`said Gail J. Povar, MD, clinical professor
`of medicine and health care sciences at
`George Washington University School of
`Medicine in Washington, D.C. Recalling
`her own reaction to the thalidomide news
`in the 1960s, Povar stated that nothing
`could have convinced her to take the drug
`if she had any chance of becoming preg(cid:173)
`nant. But she predicts that 25-year-olds
`will be furious if their physicians refuse to
`prescribe it for them. She has seen this hap(cid:173)
`pen with isotretinoin. "Every week I have a
`
`I analogues of thalidomide without the
`
`harmful side effects. But analogue devel(cid:173)
`opment may take some time because
`researchers are not sure exactly how
`thalidomide works. Its immunomodulatory
`effects may occur through selective inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of tumor necrosis factor, the inflam(cid:173)
`matory cytokine involved in many dis(cid:173)
`eases. lt may also block angiogenesis, the
`most likely reason for its report.ed effec(cid:173)
`tiveness against some solid tumors and per(cid:173)
`haps the method by which it blocks fetal
`limb and organ development.
`"Thalidomide will likely spark dis(cid:173)
`agreements both within the medical com(cid:173)
`munity and between medicine and the pub(cid:173)
`lic about what limits, if any, to impose on
`use in fertile women. In addition, because
`of its exciting potential in the amelioration
`of serious illnesses, thalidomide may tempt
`clinicians to go beyond well-documented
`indications to more experimental applica(cid:173)
`tions," said Povar. " Informed consent
`becomes much more important here. Our
`obligation goes way up. We need to be
`very clear that use is experimental.
`"For the most part, thalidomide poses
`no more-and no less--a challenge to the
`practitioner than any other drug with sub(cid:173)
`stantial promise and potential
`toxic
`effects," she continued. "lt would be unfor(cid:173)
`tunate if thalidomide was considered too
`risky because of its past. Physicians just
`need to work closely with patients."
`('
`
`-Cori Vanchieri
`
`Will Pregnancy Prevention Work?
`A program to reduce pregnancies in women who use isotretinoin, a known
`teratogen, for severe, cystic acne is being considered as a model for thalidomide.
`In 1988, Han unprecedented and novel" pregnancy prevention program was
`developed for isotretinoin users, according to Allen A Mitchell, MD, professor of
`epidemiology and pediatrics at the Boston University School of Public Health.
`Rates of oral contraceptive use and abstinence were higher in the isotretinoin
`users than in the general public. The pregnancy rate was 7% that of the U.S.
`population. Of the 210 009 women with complete follow-up, 623 became preg(cid:173)
`nant. Two thirds of the pregnancies resulted from contraceptive failure; 68%
`were electively aborted, 16% were spontaneously aborted, 3% were ectopic,
`and 11 % resulted in live births. As expected, 25% to 30% of the babies had
`birth defects. Mitchell, who implemented the isotretinoin registry, has suggest(cid:173)
`ed that a more stringent program may be required for thalidomide users.
`-Cori Vanchieri
`
`Heart Disease:
`Women's Unique Risks
`Demand Attention
`
`esponding to what it calls a "silent
`pidemic," the American Heart
`ssociation (AHA) has released
`new guidelines to help physicians prevent,
`diagnose, and treat heart disease in women
`(Circulation. I 997;96:2468-99). The AHA
`also unveiled a national survey of IOOO
`women ages 25 and older in which fewer
`than one third said they had discussed
`heart disease with a physician. Only 8%
`considered heart disease their biggest
`health threat. In reality, heart disease kills
`half a million women each year-more
`than all types of cancer combined (Box).
`"Much of heart disease [in women]
`gets missed or misdiagnosed," said Martha
`Hill, RN, PhD, president of the Dallas(cid:173)
`based AHA. "Now, we're learning a lot
`about the prevalence of heart disease and
`the benefits of treatment. This statement
`shares what we've learned."
`
`Age and Coexisting Conditions
`Differences in coronary heart disease
`(CHO) between men and women con(cid:173)
`tribute to a disparity in the mortality rate.
`Women tend to develop CHO 7 to I 0 years
`later than men-after menopause, when
`the cardiovascular benefit of estrogen is
`apparently lost. Because they present with
`heart disease at later ages, women are also
`more likely to have coexisting conditions
`that can reduce survival.
`Women oft.en present cardiac symp(cid:173)
`toms late, when the disease has progressed.
`And although women frequently experi(cid:173)
`ence the same kind of chest pain as men
`during a myocardial infarction (MI), they
`are also more likely to have confusing
`symptoms of upper abdominal pain, nau(cid:173)
`sea, or fatigue. Finally, basic physiologic
`differences, such as smaller body size-(cid:173)
`hence smaller coronary arteries--make
`bypass surgery more difficult and lead to a
`higher ope.rative mortality rate.
`"All this means that physicians need lO
`recognize that there are unique aspects of
`heart disease in women," said Lori Mosca,
`MD, PhD, a preventive cardiologist at the
`University of Michigan en Ann Arbor and
`lead author of the AHA statement "You
`need to screen for the disease and then
`
`(Continued on next page)
`
`952
`952
`
`15 November 1997 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 127 • Number 10
`15 November 1997 • A1111ols of lnttnwf Medicint • Volume 127 • Number 10
`
`CFAD VI 1019-0002
`
`

`

`aggressively treat women who are at risk."
`Prevention, of course, is the best
`approach. Educating all patients-even
`young ones-about the major risk factors,
`including smoking, diet, and lack of exer(cid:173)
`cise, remains the essential first step. These
`factors affect both men and women at
`roughly the same rate.
`Other risk factors disproportionately
`affect women. Diabetes, for example, rais(cid:173)
`es a woman's risk for CHO three to seven
`times above normal while causing only a
`two- to threefold increased risk for men.
`The reasons for this difference are not
`known. As with diabetes, a decreased level
`of high-density lipoprotein is a stronger
`predictor of CHO in women than in men,
`and an elevated level of triglycerides may
`have a more serious consequence for
`women as well.
`
`Routine ScreeninJ!
`The AHA guidelines recommend rou(cid:173)
`tine blood pressure screening every year or
`two and measurement of both total choles(cid:173)
`terol and high-density lipoproteims begin(cid:173)
`ning in a patient's twenties. Risk factor
`awa.reness and an ability to recognize
`warning signs are the keys to prevention
`and early diagnosis for women, according
`to the AHA.
`Diagnosing heart disease may require
`different tests for men and women. For
`example, ordinary treadmill testing may be
`more likely to yield false-positive results in
`
`Numbers Tell the Story
`• Coronary heart disease (CHO)
`kills half a million U.S. women
`every year
`• CHO accounts for 45% of all
`deaths in women, more than all
`forms of cancer combined
`• The mortality rate from CHO is
`69% higher in African-American
`women than in white women
`• 1 in 2 women die of heart disease
`or stroke; 1 in 25 die of breast
`cancer
`• In the Framingham Heart Study,
`63% of women who died suddenly
`of CHO had no previous symptoms
`Source: American Heart Assooaoon
`
`women than in men (Am J Cardiol.
`1995;75:520-600 ). Instead, the AHA rec(cid:173)
`ommends considering the use of stress
`echocardiography to evaluate possible symp(cid:173)
`toms of CHD. New imaging techniques, like
`magnetic resonance imaging or positron
`emission tomography, are still experimental
`but may be useful in the future.
`
`Aggressive Treatment
`Withfo 2 years of an Ml, 36% of
`women die, compared with 21 % of men.
`The mortality rate is particularly high in
`African-American women. Severity of ill(cid:173)
`ness, increased age, and more comorbid
`conditions may all contribute to the higher
`mortality rate in women. But considerable
`evidence, including a recent Canadian
`study, suggests that women receive far
`fewer tests and less medication after an MI
`than men do, even when they see a physi(cid:173)
`cian just as often (Arch Intern Med.
`1997; 157: 1545-51 ).
`The AHA recommends that physicians
`manage heart disease as aggressively in
`women as in men ... There's no such thing as
`a touch of high blood pressure," emphasized
`Kelly Spratt. MD, a cardiologist at the Uni(cid:173)
`versity of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. "If
`you find it. you've got to treat it" For men
`and women alike, the medications most
`commonly used to treat CHD are aspirin,
`angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,
`6-blockers, and lipid-lowering drugs.
`Preliminary studies suggest that hor(cid:173)
`mone replacement
`therapy
`in post(cid:173)
`menopausal women lowers the risk for
`both CHO and stroke. Accordingly, many
`physicians prescribe estrogen supplements
`for their female patients, depending on the
`patient's comfort level with hormone
`replacement and relative risk for endome(cid:173)
`trial and breast cancers. The AHA state(cid:173)
`ment. like those from a number of other
`organizations, supports an approach that
`weighs the pros and cons of hormone
`replacement therapy for each woman, con(cid:173)
`sidering her health, disease risks, and fam(cid:173)
`ily history.
`The AHA contends that, by applying
`the most up-to-date knowledge about pre(cid:173)
`vention, diagnosis, and treatment of heart
`disease, physicians can revolutionize health
`care for women. 'There is more informa(cid:173)
`tion available than ever before, and physi(cid:173)
`cians are more aware of heart disease's
`challenges," Hill said. "That's a step in the
`f'
`right direction."
`
`-Kathryn S. Brown
`
`Resolution Due in
`Medical Software
`Regulation
`
`TI U.S. Food and Drug Administta(cid:173)
`
`on (FDA) has been trying for more
`than a decade to determine the best
`regulatory approach to the burgeoning
`"stand-alone" medical software industry.
`With the FDA's decision due soon, manu(cid:173)
`facturers of stand-alone software and mem(cid:173)
`bers of the medical informatics community
`alike are optimistic that the agency will fol(cid:173)
`low the path of least regulation.
`Since it began regulating medical
`devices under a 1976 statute, the FDA has
`required stringent review of software that is
`"embedded" inside such devices as pace(cid:173)
`makers and ventilators. Li.kewise, it has
`regulated "accessory" software that can be
`run on general-purpose computers to oper(cid:173)
`ate systems, such as radiation-planning
`systems or brain-mapping software.
`But stand-alone software, which runs on
`conventional computers to process words
`and data, has been in a gray zone. Its appli(cid:173)
`cations range from computerized patient
`record systems and off-line archives to data
`analysis programs that aid in determining
`therapy, and such expert systems as deci(cid:173)
`sion and diagnostic support programs.
`With renewed momentum, the FDA is
`moving to adopt its first formal regulation of
`the $6 billion stand-alone software industry.
`Harvey Rudolph. PhD, acting director of the
`FDA's Office of Science and Technology in
`the Center for Devices and Radiological
`Health, said the agency's position is likely to
`be "deregulatory" or mainly "hands-off."
`Rudolph said the policy options will be dis(cid:173)
`cussed soon with the staff of the secretary
`of Health and Human Services, Donna
`Shalala. Rudolph expects final regulations
`to be in place in another year.
`
`Exempting Low Risk
`Rudolph said the FDA will propose a
`"risk-based approach" that focuses its regu(cid:173)
`latory efforts on software with the greatest
`potential to harm patients, while exempting
`most software that poses minimal risk. For
`some moderate-risk products, manufacturers
`would be required to submit a standard pre(cid:173)
`market notification or make self-declarations
`that their products meet certain standards.
`The FDA is still defining risk categories.
`
`(Continued on next page)
`
`15 November 1997 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 127 • Number 10
`15 November 1997 • Amwls of Jnremal Medicine • Volume 127 • Number 10
`
`953
`953
`
`CFAD VI 1019-0003
`
`

`

`<!PiFili!fl
`
`.. . N t! vvs -fo r I n t e r n ists
`
`premarket approval. But things have gotten
`more complicated since 1989." Computer
`networking bas resulted in interconnections
`among several software devices. When
`data flow through a combination of pro(cid:173)
`grams, the chance of malfunction can
`increase.
`Still, developers of stand-alone medical
`software hope that the FDA will continue
`its present practice of minimal regulation,
`according to Edward Larsen, president of
`Health Patterns, of LaGrange, Illinois.
`Larsen prepared a proposal on FDA regu(cid:173)
`lation for the Center for Healthcare Infor(cid:173)
`mation Management (CHIM) in Ann
`Arbor, Michigan, which represents about
`100 vendors of stand-alone software and
`computer networking equipment. The
`American Medical Informatics Association
`has also joined with related groups to pro(cid:173)
`pose an approach that keeps federal regula(cid:173)
`tions to a minimum (Ano Intern Med.
`1997; 127:842-5. J Am Med Informatics
`Assoc. 1997;4:442-57).
`"There is no evidence of hazard in
`tenns of death or serious injury attributable
`to 'stand-alone' medical software that
`CHIM has been able to find," according to
`
`the CHIM report. "Mandating new regula(cid:173)
`tions is unwarranted in the face of the
`absence of data showing harm and the
`availability of data showing that stand(cid:173)
`alone software reduces paperwork. errors."
`CHIM has submitted to the FDA an
`algorithm to determine whether a stand(cid:173)
`alone product should be regutated or
`excluded. It would exempt software used
`for education and in financial and adminis(cid:173)
`trative systems. It calls for increased scruti(cid:173)
`ny of software used in immediate decisions
`that could harm or kill patients in the
`absence of compe.tent human review.
`The FDA has met several times with
`CHIM to draft regulations that would serve
`the public health and be acceptable to
`industry. Rudolph said he expects that the
`FDA's deregulatory proposals are "in con(cid:173)
`cert" with CHIM's recommendations.
`But Larsen said he is taking a wait-and(cid:173)
`see approach: "Self-declaration about
`meeting standards in theory is a good
`thing. But who is going to write the stan(cid:173)
`dards? And what are they going to say?
`0
`The devil is in the details."
`
`-Howard Wolinsky
`
`Some medical catastrophes have
`assured that software-controlled devices
`will receive high-level scrutiny. ln 1986,
`several patients received massive over(cid:173)
`exposure to electron beam radiation from a
`linear accelerator because of a software
`problem. Two patients d.ied and another
`was severely burned, recalled Rudolph.
`He said that about 500 device recalls
`occur annually, I 00 of which involve prod(cid:173)
`ucis with software. Of those 100 products,
`the malfunctions in 40 are related to th.e
`software itself.
`Problems have included software mal(cid:173)
`functions that resulted in improperly
`labeled radiographs and infusion pumps
`with incorrect timing that resulted in over(cid:173)
`doses of medication.
`But the FDA has trod lightly on the
`stand-alone medical software industry. And
`developers of such software, unlike the
`makers of traditional medical devices with
`embedded software, such as pacemakers
`and ventilators, are unaccustomed to regu(cid:173)
`lation. They are worried about the implica(cid:173)
`tions of the new rules. Some software
`developers have feared, for example, that
`even stand-alone programs that run with
`widely used spreadsheet programs, such as
`software for billing systems or patient
`appointment reminders, would have to
`undergo the same scrutiny as a new pace(cid:173)
`maker or infusion pump.
`
`Human Intervention Loophole
`1be argument for exemption is based on
`a draft policy supported in 1989 by then
`FDA Commissioner Frank Young, MD,
`who stated that software, such as expert sys(cid:173)
`tems and products using artificial intelli(cid:173)
`gence, should be exempted if it is "intended
`to involve competent human intervention
`before any impact on human health occurs."
`Rudolph warned that some manufactur(cid:173)
`ers have "purposely or inadvertently" tried
`to apply the "competent human interven(cid:173)
`tion" standard to avoid regulation. Harold
`Schoolman, MD, deputy director for
`research at the National Library of Medi(cid:173)
`cine in Bethesda, Maryland, added, "V./e
`all thought we had a simple solution: As
`Jong as a competent health professional can
`interpret and intervene and make the ulti(cid:173)
`mate decision, then there was no need for
`
`News Notes
`The Shifting Landscape of AIDS
`The mortality rate from HIV and AIDS declined by 26% in 1996. This sub(cid:173)
`stantial drop-from 15.6 deaths per 100 000 persons in 1995 to 11 .6 per 100 000
`in 1996-moved AIDS from the number one to the number two cause of death
`among 25- to 44-year-olds, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
`Prevention in Atlanta. The improvement is being attributed primarily to the
`recent availability of combination therapies for patients with HIV and AIDS.
`This good news is tempered by reports that the number of U.S. women ages
`13 and older diagnosed with AIDS has increased almost sixfold-from 0.9 cases
`per 100 000 in 1991 to 5.2 per 100 000 in 1995. The greatest increases were
`among women who acquired HIV through heterosexual contact rather than
`through use of injection drugs (JAMA. 1997;278:911-16). Women now comprise
`almost 20% of adult patients with AIDS.
`
`Women Confuse Arthritis and Osteoporosis
`U.S. women may mistakenly wait for symptoms of arthritis before taking
`action against osteoporosis, according to a recent telephone survey. Six in ten
`women surveyed think that osteoporosis has warning signs or symptoms. More
`than 70% of respondents cited pain, 50% mentioned stiffness, and 33%
`referred to swollen joints as symptoms of osteoporosis.
`More than 40% of respondents stated that osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
`are related diseases. Half said that they believe the treatments for arthritis and
`osteoporosis are similar. The random-digit dialed telephone survey of 505 women
`was funded by the National Osteoporosis Foundation in Washington, D.C.
`Robert Lindsay, MD, PhD, president of the foundation and chief of internal
`medicine at Helen Hayes Hospital in New York, expressed concern thait confu(cid:173)
`sion surrounding these diseases leads many women to ignore their risk for
`osteoporosis and fail to take steps to protect themselves from the disease.
`
`954
`954
`
`15 November 1997 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 127 • Number 10
`15 November Im • Amials of Jnlemal Medidne • Volume 127 • Number 10
`
`CFAD VI 1019-0004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket