throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00336-JBS-KMW Document 26 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 144
`
`Melissa A. Chuderewicz
`PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
`(A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership)
`Suite 400
`301 Carnegie Center
`Princeton, NJ 08543-5276
`(609)951-4118
`chuderem@pepperlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintifs
`BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORA TED,
`BA USCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDiNGS CORP.,
`and SENJUPHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED,
`BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS
`CORP. and SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO..
`LTD.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:1 5-cv-00336-JBS-KMW
`
`STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND INJuNCTION
`
`Whereas the parties in the above-captioned action have agreed to terms and conditions
`
`representing a negotiated settlement of this action and have set forth those terms and conditions
`
`in a Confidential Settlement and License Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”),
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, through
`
`their undersigned counsel of record, that:
`
`33824365 vi
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2027
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01100
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00336-JBS-KMW Document 26 Filed 05/18/15 Page 2 of 4 PageID: 145
`
`1.
`
`In the event that the claims of Plaintiffs’ U.S. Patent No. 8,129,431 (“the ‘431
`
`patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,669,290 (“the ‘290 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,754,131 (“the ‘131
`
`patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,871,813 (“the ‘813 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,927,606 (“the
`
`‘606 patent”) asserted against Defendants are not held invalid or unenforceable and in the
`
`absence of a license or other authorization from Plaintiffs, the ‘431, ‘290, ‘131, ‘813, and the
`
`‘606 patents are valid, enforceable, and would be infringed by any unlicensed manufacture, sale,
`
`offer for sale, use, or importation in the United States of the generic product that is the subject of
`
`Defendants’ Abbreviated New Drug Application Number 20-7334 (the “Apotex Product”, as
`
`defined in the Settlement Agreement).
`
`2.
`
`Defendants and anyone acting on the behalf of any of Defendants, except as
`
`expressly licensed by Plaintiffs in the Settlement Agreement, will be enjoined until expiration of
`
`the ‘431,
`
`‘290,
`
`‘131,
`
`‘813, and ‘606 patents (or as otherwise provided in the Settlement
`
`Agreement) from (i) making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing into the United States
`
`of America the Apotex Product, and (ii) participating in the profits from making, using, offering
`
`to sell, selling, or importing the Apotex Product in the United States, and (iii) indemnifiing
`
`others with respect to any making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing the Apotex
`
`Product in the United States.
`
`3.
`
`Notwithstanding any provision of the foregoing, Defendants shall be entitled to
`
`contest the infringement, validity and/or enforceability of the ‘431, ‘290, ‘131, ‘813 and ‘606
`
`patents in any future litigation, patent office proceeding, or otherwise over the ‘431, ‘290, ‘131,
`
`‘813 or ‘606 patents pertaining to any product that is not the Apotex Product and is not the
`
`subject of the Apotex ANDA (as defined in the Settlement Agreement).
`
`4.
`
`Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
`
`33824365 vi
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00336-JBS-KMW Document 26 Filed 05/18/15 Page 3 of 4 PageID: 146
`
`5.
`
`This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce this Stipulated Consent Judgment
`
`and Injunction and the parties’ related agreements resolving this matter.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendants are entitled to maintain their Paragraph IV
`
`certification to the ‘431,
`
`‘290,
`
`‘131,
`
`‘813, and ‘606 patents pursuant
`
`to 21 C.F.R.
`

`
`3 14.94(a)(12)(v). Each Party acknowledges and agrees that the 30-month stay with respect to
`
`the approval of the Apotex ANDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iii) is hereby terminated.
`
`7.
`
`The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this Stipulated Consent Judgment and
`
`Injunction.
`
`Dated: May 14, 2015
`
`s/Melissa A. Chuderewicz
`Melissa A. Chuderewicz
`PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
`(A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership)
`Suite 400
`301 Carnegie Center
`Princeton, NJ 08543-5276
`(609)951-4118
`chuderem@pepperlaw.com
`
`Attorneys or Plainrffs
`
`BAUSCH & LOMB fNCORPOR.4 TED, BA USCH &
`LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS CORP., and SENJU
`PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`
`Of Counsel:
`Bryan C. Diner
`Justin J. Hasford
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`(202) 408-4000
`
`#33824365 vi
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00336-JBS-KMW Document 26 Filed 05/18/15 Page 4 of 4 PageID: 147
`
`TAFT, STETTENIUS & HOLLISTER
`
`Attorneysfor Defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex
`Coip.
`
`s/ Richard Ruzich
`Richard Ruzich
`Taft, Stettenius & Hollister
`111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 836-4012
`
`So Ordered this_____
`
`of A’t.’-j
`
`,zo±
`
`Jrome B. Simandle, Chief U.S. District Judge
`
`#33824365 vi
`
`Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket