`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`CAMDEN VICINAGE
`
` SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Nos. 14-667-JBS-KMW
` 14-4149-JBS-KMW
` 14-5144-JBS-KMW
`
`LTD., et al.,
` Plaintiffs,
`v.
`
`LUPIN, LTD., et al.,
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to
`
`counsel during the telephone status conference held on
`February 25, 2015; and the Court noting the following appearances:
`Bryan C. Diner, Esquire, Melissa Chuderewicz, Esquire, Justin J.
`Hasford, Esquire, and Jessica M. Lebeis, Esquire, all appearing on
`behalf of the plaintiffs; and Michael E. Patunas, Esquire, Emily
`Rapalino, Esquire, and Daniel P. Margolis, Esquire, all appearing
`on behalf of the defendants; and for good cause shown:
`IT IS this 27th day of February, 2015, hereby ORDERED:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NO.
`1
`
`DATE
`
`
`April 23, 2015
`
`
`April 30, 2015
`
`June 15, 2015
`
`EVENT
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims for Lupin ’813 and
`’606 cases and Metrics, Innopharma, Apotex and
`Paddock cases
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions and Non-
`Infringement Contentions and document production
`for Lupin ’813 and ’606 cases and Metrics,
`Innopharma, Apotex and Paddock cases, limited to
`100 pages per patent3
`
`Plaintiffs’ Infringement Contentions and Response to
`Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions and document
`production for Lupin ’813 and ’606 cases and
`Metrics, Innopharma, Apotex and Paddock cases
`
`2
`
`3
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2012
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01100
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00667-JBS-KMW Document 63 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 285
`
`EVENT
`Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction for
`Lupin ’813 and ’606 cases and Metrics, Innopharma,
`Apotex and Paddock cases
`
`Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and
`Extrinsic Evidence for Lupin ’813 and ’606 cases and
`Metrics, Innopharma, Apotex and Paddock cases
`
`Exchange of Identification of Evidence to Oppose
`Other Parties’ Proposed Claim Construction for
`Lupin ’813 and ’606 cases and Metrics,
`Innopharma, Apotex and Paddock cases
`
`Submit Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
`Statement for all cases
`Completion of Claim Construction Discovery for all
`cases
`Opening Markman submissions for all cases
`
`Completion of discovery from an expert who
`submitted a certification with opening Markman
`submission for all cases
`
`DATE
`
`
`May 22, 2015
`
`
`May 29, 2015
`
`
`June 12, 2015
`
`
`June 26, 2015
`
`July 27, 2015
`August 10, 2015
`
`September 9, 2015
`
`
`Responding Markman submissions for all cases
`
`October 9, 2015
`
`
`November 2, 2015
`Thirty (30) days after
`entry of Court’s
`claim construction
`order per L. Pat.
`R. 3.8
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`Claim Construction Hearing for all cases
`
`
`
`Disclosure of reliance on advice of counsel for all
`cases
`
`Completion of fact discovery for all cases
`
`
`Opening expert reports due for all cases
`
`
`Rebuttal expert reports due for all cases
`
`
`
`NO.
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00667-JBS-KMW Document 63 Filed 02/27/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 286
`
`
`
`NO.
`17
`
`EVENT
`
`Reply expert reports for all cases
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Completion of expert discovery for all cases
`
`
`Dispositive motions due for all cases
`
`
`Motions in limine due for all cases
`
`Pretrial conference for all cases
`
`Trial for all cases
`
`DATE
`
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`To be determined by
`the Court
`
`March 7, 20161
`
`23. Any application for an extension of time beyond the
`
`deadlines set herein shall be made in writing to the undersigned
`and served upon all counsel prior to expiration of the period
`sought to be extended, and shall disclose in the application all
`such extensions previously obtained, the precise reasons
`necessitating the application showing good cause under FED. R. CIV.
`P. 16(b), and whether adversary counsel agree with the application.
`The schedule set herein will not be extended unless good cause is
`shown.
`
`
`
`
`
`THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER
`MAY RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
`16(f).
`
`s/ Karen M. Williams
`KAREN M. WILLIAMS
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc: Hon. Jerome B. Simandle
`
`
`
`1 All parties should note that the March 7, 2016 trial date has been confirmed by the Honorable
` Jerome B. Simandle.
`
`Page 3 of 3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
