throbber
Europaiisches Patentamt
`Q European Patent office
`
`Office européen des brevets
`
`illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllll
`® Publication number:
`0
`

`
`EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
`
`Date of pubtication of patent specification: 15.04.92 @ Int. C|.5: A51 K 9/03', A61 K 47/00
`
`@ Application number: 8B‘l‘l48€I4.3
`
`(29 Date of filing: 09.09.88
`
`@ Preservative system for ophtalmic formuiations.
`
`
` @) Priority: 11.09.87 us 95173
`
`@ Date of publication of application:
`15.93.89 Bulletin 89l11
`
`® Proprietor: svnrsx (U.S.A.) me.
`3401 Hillview Avenue
`
`
`
`Palo Alto California 94303(US)
`
`
`
`@ Publication of the grant of the patent:
`15.04.92 Bulletin 92/16
`
`Designated Contracting States:
`AT BE CH DE FR GB IT L3 LU NL SE
`
`@ inventor: Roger Fu, Cherng-Chyi
`14050 Shadow Oaks Way
`Saratoga, CA 95D70(US)
`inventor: Lidgate, Deborah M.
`325 Arbolecta Drive
`
`Los Altos, CA 94022(US)
`
`References cited:
`W0-A-85/04105
`DE-A- 3 025 402
`U3-A- 4 087 533
`
`CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Vol.88, £10.25, 19
`June 1978, Columbus, OH (US); M.T.NADlFl et
`al., p.166, no.183735c
`
`Representative: Barz, Peter, Dr. et al
`Patentanwéilte Dr. V. Schrnied-Kowarzik
`
`Dipi.-lng. G. Dannenberg Dr. P. Weinhold Dr.
`D. Gudel Dipi.-lng. S. Schubert Dr. P. Barz
`Siegfriedstrasse 8
`W-8000 Miinchen 40(DE}
`
`EP0306984B1
`
`Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person
`may give notice to the European Patent Office oi opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition
`shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. it shalt not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee
`has been paid (Art. 99(1) European patent convention).
`
`Flank xerox {UK} Business Services
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2330
`Lupin v Scnju,
`lPR2015-D1097, lPR20l5-01099,
`IPR2015-01100 & IPRZOIS-01105
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`Description
`
`The present invention relates to improved ophthaimic formulations, particularly to ophthalmic formula-
`tions for anti-inflammatory drugs, and specifically to an improved preservative system for ophthalmic
`formufations of carboxyl
`("-COOH") group-containing drugs, especially non-steroidal anti—infiammatory
`drugs ("t\|SAlDs").
`The invention also reiates to methods of using these formulations for treating diseases that are either
`caused by, associated with or accompanied by inflammatory processes, including, among others, glau-
`coma, cystoid macular edema, uveitis, diabetic retinopathy, and conjunctivitis, or any trauma caused by eye
`surgery or eye iniury.
`in the treatment of ophthalmic diseases was
`The topical use of NSAIDs, particularly pyrrolo pyrroles,
`first taught in U.S. Patent No. 4,454,151, where NSAID compounds (such as those described in U.S. Patents
`4,089,969; 4,232,038; 4,087,539 and 4,097,579) were exemplified in formulation with NaH2P0r‘H2O,
`Na;!~lPO4 ' H20, NaC|, benzalkonium chloride ("BAC") and sterilized water. White the formulations described
`in the '151 patent were efficacious, an insoluble complex was found to form between the NSAID and the
`BAC. The formulations became cloudy or turbid and did not, therefore, have the stability desired for shelf
`life in commerciai appiicatlons. A reasonabie minimum shelf life (that is, the time during which a solution
`remains clear and retains its pharmaceutical activity) is at least about one year, representing sufficient time
`to package, ship, and store a formulation without having to repiace expired stock too frequently. The
`solutions of the present invention have shown a shelf life of at least one year. Thus, the present invention
`entails an improvement over the formulations described in the 't51 patent.
`In general, an opthalmic formulation contains an active compound and various ophthalrnologically
`acceptable excipients,
`in the form of a solution, an ointment, a suspension, etc. An excipient is ophthal-
`mologically acceptable if
`it
`is non-irritating to the eye and if
`its active ingredient penetrates the blood-
`aqueous barrier andlor diffuses through the various ocular substructures to the site where it is pharmaco-
`logicaiiy active. The excipients can include a tonicifier, a preservative, a surfactant, a buffering system, a
`chelating agent, a viscosity agent as well as other stabilizing agents. Ophthalmic formulations must be
`sterile, and it intended for multiple closing regimens, must be preserved with an effective anti—microbial
`agent.
`
`thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate and phenylmercuric nitrate) have been
`Organo—mercuriais (e.g.,
`used extensively as the preservative in ophthalmic solutions. These compounds, however, pose difficulties
`due to potential mercury toxicity as well as poor chemical stabitlty. Benzalkonium chloride, a quaternary
`ammonium compound, has been widely used in ophthaimic solutions, and is considered to be the
`preservative of choice. However, BAC has typically been considered to be incompatible with anionic drugs
`(e.g., sallcylates or nitrates, etc.), forming insoluble complexes which cause the solution to become cloudy
`or turbid. Such a complex between the anionic drug and be-nzalkonium chloride can cause a decrease in
`the pharmaceutical activity of the anionic drug.
`Many NSA|Ds (such as ketorolac,
`indomethacin, tlurbiprofen and diclofenac) are being developed for
`ocular use because of their activity as anti-inflammatory agents including their abitity to prevent cystoid
`macular edema.
`
`in the past, as in the case with other ophthalmic drugs that contain a -COOH group, antiinflammatory
`solutions of NSAlDs for cccuiar use have proven to be incompatible with quaternary ammonium compounds
`such as BAG. This incompatibility is due to the fact that the -COOH group can form a complex with the
`quaternary ammonium compounds, rendering the preservative less available to serve its function, and
`reducing the activity of the active ingredient. Indomethacin ophthalmic formulations have been prepared,
`however,
`these are suspensions, not solutions. Ocufen Ophthalmic solution, an NSAID (flurbiprofen)
`approved by the FDA for ophthalmic use, incorporates thimerosai (with EDTA) as its preservative system. In
`U.S. patent 4,454,151 there is a disclosure of an ophthalmic formulation using ketorolac, benzalkonium
`chloride (as the preservative) and polysorbate 80, however the solution became cloudy or turbid after a
`short period of time.
`It has remained desired to provide a stable, clear, antimicrobially effective ophthalmic formulation with a
`prolonged shelf life for -COOH group containing ophthalmic drugs, especially NSAlDs, using BAC as the
`preservative.
`It has now been discovered that stable, clear and antimicrobially effective, NSAID-containing ophthalmic
`formulations can be prepared which include BAG. These solutions have an improved shelf Eife, exhibiting no
`cioudiness or turbidity over extended periods.
`In one aspect of the invention, these compositions include an ophthalmologically effective amount of a
`NSAID, BAC (preservative) and a stabilizing amount of Octoxynol 40 (nonionic surfactant), all in an aqueous
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`vehicle.
`
`is an ophthalmic Composition including an ophthalmologicaily effective amount of
`Another aspect
`ketorolac or an isomer, an ester, or a pharmaceutically acceptable satt thereof, benzalkonium chloride as a
`preservative and a stabilizing amount of Octoxynol 40 as a nonionic surfactant.
`The ophthalmic pharmaceutical
`formuiations of
`the invention can be used for treating ophthalmic
`diseases in mammals. These diseases are those that are either caused by. associated with or accompanied
`by inflammatory processes,
`including. among others, glaucoma, cystoid macular edema, uveitis, diabetic
`retinopathy and conjunctivitis, or any trauma caused by eye surgery or eye injury.
`
`Definitions
`
`As used herein. the term "NSAED" means an ophthalmologically acceptabie non-steroidal anti-inflam-
`matory drug. The NSA!D's include, ior example, flurbiproien, keiorolac, diclotenac, indomethacin, and the
`isomers, esters, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
`As used herein, the term "q.s." means adding a quantity sufficient to achieve a stated function. e.g., to
`bring a solution to the desired volume (i.e.. 100%).
`As used herein, the term "treatment" or "treating" means any treatment of a disease in a mammal,
`including:
`(i) preventing the disease. that is, causing the clinical symptoms of the disease not to develop;
`(ii) inhibiting the disease, that is, arresting the development of clinicat symptoms; and/or
`(iii) relieving the disease, that is, causing the regression of clinical symptoms.
`As used herein, the term "effective amount" means a dosage sufficient to provide treatment for the
`disease state being treated. This will vary depending on the patient, the disease and the treatment being
`effected.
`
`As used herein. the term "antimicrobially effective" means ability to withstand the U.S. Pharmacopia
`antimicrobial chalienge.
`As used herein, the term "stabili2ing" means keeping a formulation clear and antimicrobiaily effective
`for its minimum reasonabie shelf life, e.g., at ieast one year.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Formulations
`
`The formulations of the present invention include an NSAID active agent in an efiective amount for
`ophthalmic treatment, beuzaikonium chioride, a stabilizing amount of Octoxynol 40, optionally inoiuding
`other excipients such as a chelating agent, a tonicilier, a buffering system, a viscosity agent as well as other
`stabilizing agents. Ophthaimic solutions and suspensions typically contain an aqueous vehicle rather than an
`oiiy vehicie. Ophthalmic formulations must be sterile, and it intended for muttiple dosing regimens, must be
`antimicrobiatly effective for their minimum reasonable shelf life, e.g., at least one year, and preferably two to
`three years or more. The ingredients used in the formulations of
`the present
`invention are typically
`commercially availabie or can be made by methods readily known to those skilied in the art.
`Pharmaceutical ophthalmic formulations typicaliy contain an effective amount, e.g., 0.001% to 10%
`wtlvot, preferabiy 0.002% to 5% wt/vol, most preferably 0.005% to 1% wt/vol of an active ingredient (e.g.,
`the NSAID of the present invention). The amount of active ingredient will vary with the particular formulation
`and the disease state for which it is intended. The total concentration of solutes should be such that.
`if
`possible, the resulting solution is isotonic with the tacrimal fluid (though this is not absoluteiy necessary)
`and has a pH in the range of 6 to 8.
`The formulations of the present invention are prepared as solutions incorporating the above-described
`ingredients within the following approximate ranges:
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`Ingredient
`
`Active Agent
`BAC
`
`Octoxynol 40
`Other Excipients
`
`Purified Water
`
`0.001% to 10.0% wb’voi.;
`0.001% to 1.0% wb’vo1.;
`0.001% to 1.0% wtlvo1.;
`0% to 10.0% wtfvo|.; and
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`Optional other excipients, such as a cheiating agent and a tonicifier, are used in the following approximate
`proportions:
`
`

`
`EP 0 308 984 B1
`
`
`
`'“9eie“t
`Chelating agent
`Tonicifier
`TN NaOH or 1N HCi
`
`
`
`0.01% to 1.0%wt/vol.;
`q.s. to achieve isotonicity with lacrimal fluid; and
`q.s. to adjust pH to 6.0 to 8.0.
`
`
`
`In a preferred ophthatmic NSAID solution. the ingredients are combined in the following proportions:
`
`
`
`0.002% to 5.0‘% wt/v0l.;
`0.002% to 1.0% wtlvo|.;
`0.001% to 1.0% wtlvo|.;
`0.01% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`q.s. for isotonicity with lacrimai tiuid;
`q.s. to adjust pH to 7.4204; and
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`
`
`NSAiD
`BAG (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxynoi 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA Na-2
`NaC|
`1N NaOH or 1N HCI
`Purified Water
`
`
`
`
`
`In another preferred ophthalmic NSAID solution, the ingredients as combined in the following propor-
`tions:
`
`
`
`
`
`0.005% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`NSAID
`0.002% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`BAC (50% aq. scln.)
`0.001% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`Octoxynoi 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`0.01% to 1.0% w'tNol.;
`EDTA Nag
`q.s. for isotonicity with lacrimai fluid;
`NaC|
`
`1N NaOH or 1N HG]
`q.s. to adjust pH to 7,420.4; and
`Purified Water
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`In a more preferred ophthalmic NSAED solution,
`proportions:
`
`the ingredients are combined in the following
`
`NSAID
`
`BAG (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% aq. soin.)
`EDTA Naz
`NaCl
`1N NaOH or 1N 3-tCl
`
`Purified Water
`
`0.50% wb’voi.;
`0.02% wt(vol.;
`0.01% wt(voi.;
`0.i0% wtfvol.;
`q.s. for isotonicity with lacrimal fluid;
`q.s. to adjust pH to 7420.4; and
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`The invention relates primarily to formulations having as the active agent ophthalmologically acceptable
`drugs (including the isomers. esters and pharmaceutically acceptabie salts thereof) that can form a complex
`with BAC, particularly NSAIDs and drugs with a carboxyl group.
`NSAIDS useful in the practice of this invention include, for example, ketoroiac (and the other compounds
`described as being ophihaimotogicaily effective in U.S. Patent No. 4,454,151 to Waterbury, issued June 12,
`1984,
`the pertinent portions of which are incorporated herein by reference).
`indomethacin,
`tlurbiprofen
`sodium, and diciofenac, including the isomers, esters and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
`The nonionic surfactant used in the formulations of the present invention, (i.e.. Octoxynol 40) is a
`octylphe-noxypoly(ethyleneoxyjetltanol, the mote ratio of ethytene oxide to ootyiphenol being 40. Octoxynol
`40 is manufactured and sold by GAF under the trade name igepal® CA897 (a 70% aqueous solution of
`Octoxynol 40).
`Among the optional excipients, the chelating agents useful in the formulations of the present invention
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 131
`
`include 8—hydroxyquino|ine sulfate, citric acid. and preferably disodium edetate. Under certain conditions,
`the chelating agent may also enhance the anti-microbiai effect due to its ability to render essential rnetai
`ions unavaiiable to the microbes.
`
`in the formulations of
`
`the present
`
`Buffering systems optionally useful
`example, citrate, borate, or phosphate.
`Toniciliers optionally useful
`in the formulations of the present invention include dextrose. potassium
`chloride and/or sodium chloride. preferably sodium chloride.
`Viscosity agents optionalty useful
`in the formuiations of the present invention include the cellulose
`derivatives such as hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, sodium carboxymethylceltulose, and hydroxyethylcel-
`lulose.
`
`invention are based on, for
`
`in the formulations of the present invention include stabilizing agents
`Other optional excipients useful
`such as antioxidants, e.g., sodium metabisulfate and ascorbic acid, depending on the NSAID used.
`These formulations are prepared by dissoiving the solutes (e.g., the NSAED, BAC, the Octoxynol 40, the
`chelating agent. and the buffering agent) in a suitable quantity of water, adjusting the pH to about 6 to 8,
`preferably 6.8 to 8.0 and most preferably 7.4, making a final volume adjustment to 100% with additional
`water, and sterilizing the preparation using any suitable method known to those in the art.
`the
`It has been discovered that ophthalmic formulations incorporating the preservative system of
`invention are physically stable (Le...
`remain ctear) and functionally stable (i.e.,
`remain antimicrobially
`effective) for at least the minimum reasonable sheif life of such products.
`
`Preferred Formulations
`
`The preferred chelating agent of the invention is disodium edetate.
`The preferred ophthaimic sotutions of the invention include a NSAID, benzalkoniurn chioride, Octoxynel
`40 and disodium edetate.
`
`In a preferred ophthalmic NSAID solution, the ingredients are combined in the foltowing proportions:
`
`
`
`
`
`NSAID
`BAG (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% aq. sotn.)
`EDTA Nag
`NaCl
`1N NaOl-i or 1N HCI
`Purified Water
`
`
`
`
`
`0.002% to 5.0% wtfvol.;
`0.002% to 1.0% wtr’vol.;
`0.001 % to 1.0% wtivolx,
`0.01 % to 1.0% wtfvoi.;
`q.s. tor isotonlcity with lacrimal fluid;
`q.s. to adjust pH to 71420.4; and
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`
`
`
`
`in another preferred ophthatmic NSAID solution, the ingredients are combined in the following propor-
`tions:
`
`NSAlD
`
`BAG (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA Nag
`NaGi
`1N Naoll or 1N HCI
`
`Purified Water
`
`0.005% to 1.0% wtlvol_;
`0.002% to 1.0% wt.’voi.;
`0.001% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`0.01% to 1.0% wt/vol.;
`q.s. for isotonicity with lacrimal fluid:
`q.s. to adiust pH to 7.4304; and
`q.s. to 100%.
`
`A preferred ophthalmic NSAlD solution has the following formulation:
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`NSAED
`
`BAG (50% act. soln.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% ad. soin.)
`EDTA N32
`NaCl
`1N NaOH or 1N HCI
`
`Purified Water
`
`0.50% wt/vol.
`0.02% wt/vol.
`0.01% wt/vol.
`0.10% wt/vol.
`
`q.s. for isotonicity with lacrimal fluid
`q.s. to adjust pH to 7.4104
`q.s. to t00%
`
`Most preferred is the ophthalmic sofution according to the above formulation wherein the NSAID is
`Ketorolac Tromethamine or an isomer thereof.
`
`Utility and Administration
`
`This invention is directed to NSAlD ophthalmic formulations useful for treating ophthalmic diseases in
`mammals. These diseases are either caused by. associated with or accompanied by inflammatory
`processes,
`including. among others, glaucoma, cystoid macular edema, uveitis. diabetic retinopathy and
`conjunctivitis, or any trauma caused by eye surgery or eye injury.
`The treatment is both curative and preventative. Where applied, for example, pre-surgically or imme-
`ciiatety post-traumaticaliy,
`i.e. before inflammation develops, it prevents develprnent of inflammation. When
`applied directly to the eye suffering from any of the named ophthalmic diseases.
`it suppresses already
`developed inflammatory processes.
`Ophthalmic formulations are typically administered by topical application to the eyelids or for instillation
`into the space (cul-do-sac) between the eyeball and the eyelids, of topically applied ophthalmic solutions,
`suspensions or ointments. or by subconjunctival injection.
`The dosage level will. of course. depend on the concentration of the drops, the condition of the subject
`and the individual magnitude of responses to treatment. However, typical dosage ranges might be about 2
`to 10 drops of 0.5% solution of active ingredient per day.
`their preparation and administration, see
`For a more detailed discussion of ophthalmic formulations.
`Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th Ed.. pages 1489-1504. (1975).
`
`Testing
`
`Ophthalmic formulations such as the solutions of the present invention are typically tested for physical
`stability. chemical stability, and preservative efficacy, both when they are first manufactured and after a
`lixed period of time (e.g., after two years). They are generaliy considered to be safe and clinically
`acceptable if proven to be well tolerated in the eye.
`Physical stability is determined by observation of a solution after expiration of a fixed period of time. A
`solution is considered to be physically stabie if its appearance (e.g., color and clarity) does not change and
`if the pH remain constant. within acceptable timits. Chemical stability involves a routine chemical analysis of
`the solution. to be sure that its active ingredient and the excipients have not changed after a fixed period of
`tirne.
`
`Preservative efficacy is tested by the procedure described in the U.S. Pharmacopia Cornpendiary,
`whereby a sototion is challenged with a microbe and a determination is made as to whether the microbe
`survives in it.
`
`The following examples are given to enable those skilled in the art to more clearly understand and to
`practice the present invention. They should not be considered as a limitation on the scope of the invention,
`but merely as being illustrative and representative thereof.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`This example illustrates the preparation of a representative pharmaceutical formulation for ophthalmic
`administration containing the NSAID Ketorolac Tromethamine.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`Ketorolac Tromethamine
`BAC (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA Nae
`
`NaCl
`
`0.50% wtlvol.
`0.02% wtivoi.
`0.01% wt/voi.
`0.10% wtfvoi.
`0.79% wt/vot.
`
`The above ingredients are mixed, adding purified water until they are dissolved. the pH is adiustecl to
`72410.4 and the balance of the formulation is made up with purified water. adding a quantity sufficient to
`make 100% volume. The soiution is then sterilized.
`Other NSAIDS or their isomers. salts or esters, such as those described above, can be used as the
`active compound in the preparation of the iormuiation of this example.
`
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`This example illustrates the preparation of a representative pharmaceutical formulation for ophthalmic
`administration containing the NSND Ketorolac Tromethamine.
`
`
`
`'"9'e<ie"t
`Ketorolac Tromethamine
`BAC (50% aq. soln.)
`Octoxyno] 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA N32
`NaCl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0.50% wtlvoi.
`0.02% wtlvoi.
`0.02% wt/voi.
`0.20% wt/vol.
`0.79% wt/voi.
`
`
`
`The above ingredients are mixed. adding purified water until they are dissolved, the pH is adjusted to
`71410.4 and the balance of the formulation is made up with purified water. adding a quantity sufficient to
`make 100% volume. The solution is then sterilized.
`Other NSAIDS or their isomers. salts or esters, such as those described above. can be used as the
`active compound in the preparation of the formulation of this example.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`This example iliustrates the preparation of a representative pharmaceutical formulation for ophthalmic
`administration containing the NSAID Ketoroiac Tromethamine.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`.—'“9r9d*e"t
`Ketorolac Tromethamine
`
`BAC (50% aq. soin.)
`Octoxynol 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA N32
`
`NaC|
`
`0.10% wtivoi.
`
`0.004% wt/voi.
`0.004% wt./vol.
`0.05% wtlvoi.
`0.88% wt/voi.
`
`The above ingredients aie mixed, adding purified water unfit they are dissolved, the pH is adjusted to
`7.4x0.4 and the balance of the formulation is made up with purified water, adding a quantity sufficient to
`make 100% volume. The soiution is then sterilized.
`Other NSAIDs their isomers. salts or esters. such as those described above. can be used as the active
`compound in the preparation of the formulation of this example.
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`This exampie illustrates the preparation of a representative pharmaceutical formulation to: ophthalmic
`administration containing the NSAID fiurbipiofen sodium.
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`Fluzrbiprofen Sodium
`BAC (50% aq. sotn.)
`Gctoxynoi 40 (70% aq. soln.)
`EDTA Na;
`
`NaCl
`
`0.03% wt/vol.
`0.02% wt/vol.
`0.01% wt/vol.
`0.10% wt/vol.
`0.90% wt/vol.
`
`The above ingredients are mixed, adding purified water until they are dissolved, the pH is adjusted to
`7.4:0.4 and the balance of the formutation is made up with purified water, adding a quantity sufficient to
`make 100% volume. The solution is then sterilized.
`
`Other ophthalmic drugs and NSAlDs, such as those described above. can be used as the active
`compound in the preparation of the formulation of this example.
`
`EXAMPLE 5
`
`Physical stability of the formulations of the present invention is measured by preparing clear formula-
`tions,
`in the concentrations shown in the tabte below, sealing them in sterilized containers. and observing
`the ciarity of the solution after a period of one month and again after five months. Solutions that remain
`clear are considered stable in this procedure.
`The formulations of the present invention have proven to be stabte when tested in accordance with the
`above procedure. Formulations using surfactants other than the nonionic surfactant of the invention dict not
`remain clear and were not stable.
`
`Three surfactants were evaluated for their ability to dissolve the ketorolac - benzalkonium chloride
`complex and maintain a physicaily clear solution over an extended period of time. The three surfactants
`tested were: Octoxynol 40; Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80); and Myrj 52. Two concentrations of each surfactant
`were incorporated into the ophthalmic formulation. and these were placed at various temperatures for future
`visual observations.
`
`
`- 0.004%
`0.02%
`0.0035%
`
`
`very turbid
`turbid
`turbid
`
`
`
`clear
`
`
`
`0.001596
`
`0.01%
`
`0.01“lo
`
`clear
`
`very turbid
`turbid
`turbid
`
`At the 5 month time period it was apparent that the Octoxynol 40 surfactant was superior to the other
`two surfactants. At 5 months, Tween 80 and Myri 52 displayed turbidity when stored at RT. The presence of
`turbidity suggested the inability to solubilize a precipitate formation between the Ketorolac moiety and
`benzatkoniurn chloride.
`
`A further study has shown a 2 year shelf life for the ophthalmic formulation. Precipitate formation and
`turbidity are not a problem with this formutation. Preservative efficacy is maintained throughout the 2 year
`shelf life.
`
`EXAMPLE 6
`
`Preservative efficacy of the formulations of the present invention is measured by preparing formulations.
`e.g., according to the foregoing Examples, and subjecting them to the U.S. Pharmacopia antimicrobial
`challenge.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`The formulations of the present invention demonstrate preservative efficacy when tested in accordance
`with the above procedure.
`
`EXAMPLE 7
`
`T0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`The objective of this clinical efficacy study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ketorolac
`with a controt solution in reducing inflammation following cataract removal and intraocular lens implantation.
`All patients underwent an extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation 1 day foltowing
`initiation of treatment.
`
`Ophthalmic examinations were performed preoperativeiy (within 3 weeks of surgery) and during the first
`week (postoperative days 1
`to 8), second week (postoperative days 4 through 12), and third week
`(postoperative days 15 through 27) or treatment. Particular attention was given to signs and symptoms
`consistent with inttammation. Among the ocular characteristics assessed on a scaie of none, mild. moderate,
`or severe were:
`iid edema, corneal edema, conjunciival injections. ciliary flush, and the presence of cells
`and flare in the anterior chamber.
`
`is by definition a
`iridocyclitis)
`iritis, cyclitls,
`inflammation (i.e.,
`Fiuorophotometry: Anterior segment
`disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier. When inflammation is present, a careful slit lamp examination wiil
`reveal cells and flare within the anterior chamber of the eye. The clinical grading of cells and flare is a
`measure of degree of anterior segment
`inflammation; but consistent grading of these observations is
`difficult, even by experts.
`Ocuiar fluorophotometry is based on the fact that the blood—aqueous barrier becomes permeabie to
`intravascular cells and proteinaceous fluid (explaining the observed celis and flare) and aiso to intravascular
`fiuorescein. Furthermore,
`the appearance of iiuorescein within the anterior chamber is a more sensitive
`indication of the breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier than the gross observation of cells and flare, and
`is consistently quantifiable. For these reasons, a Flurortron® Master (Coherent, Sunnyvale. California),
`complete with software modifications designed for this study was used. Following oral administration of
`fluorescein, the fluorophotometer was used to determine the integrity of the aqueous ‘carrier by measuring
`the concentration of fiuorescein in the anterior chamber.
`
`The fluorophotometry data were analyzed using the Wllcoxon Flank Sum Test or anaiysis of variance
`(ANOVA) of rank-transformed data by calculating the percentage difference in tluorescein concentration
`between the patient's two eyes, according to the formula:
`
`Percent difference = [(fluorescein concentration of operated eye — lluorescein concentration of unoperated
`eye)l'f|uorescein concentration of unoperated eye] x 100.
`
`This calculation allowed and corrected for any interpatient variation in the timing and concentration of
`fluorescein administered.
`
`in this study, the ketorolac
`129 patients began treatment for 21 days with either ketorolac or vehicle.
`formulation used was that illustrated in Example 1 above. During the first week 118 patients and during the
`second week 110 patients were evaluated for postoperative inflammation with ophthatmic examinations and
`tiuorophotometry. During the third week, 83 patients were evaluated with ophthalmic examinations alone. At
`2 weeks ketorolac provide significantly greater anti-inflammatory activity than the vehicle as measured by
`fluorophotometry (p = 0.019). when patients were excluded who had greater than 40% difference in
`fluorescein concentration between eyes at baseline, the p-value during week 2 rose to 0.06. in addition, the
`vehicle-treated patients had more ocular inflammation seen on slit lamp examination, e.g., eyelid edema (p
`= 0.001), conjunctival injection (p = 0.001), and Descemet folds (p "—‘ 0.002) than did the ketorolac-treated
`patients. Finally, there were significantly more complaints (p = 0.01) and more sever complaints consistent
`with ocular inflammation (photophobia,
`iritis, conjunctival injection) in the vehicle—treated group than in the
`ketorolac-treated group.
`in summary, ketorolac solutions proved significantly superior to vehicle in treating postoperative
`inflammation as quantltated by fiuorophotometry, by routine slit lamp examination, by patients having fewer
`and milder adverse events, and by infrequent need of additional corticosteroid therapy to control inflamma-
`tion.
`
`55
`
`EXAMPLE 8
`
`This was a double—blind, parallel comparison with vehicle to evaluate the efficacy of ketorolac 0.5%
`ophthaimic solution in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. Ketorolac 0.5% solution or a
`
`

`
`EP 0 306 984 B1
`
`vehicie solution of the same pH and tonicity were instilled four times daiiy into the eyes of patients with
`ailergic conjunctivitis (ocular itching with and without eosinophils seen in conjunctival scrapings) for 7 days.
`Thirty patients with allergic conjunctivitis participated in the study. Following admission to the study,
`patients reported to the investigator for baseline, mid-week, and final one-week examinations. At each of
`these visits. patients received ophthaimic examinations (visual acuity, external eye exam using slit iamp
`biornicroscopy, measurement of intraocular pressure, and undllated ophthaimoscopic examination). Labora-
`tory tests included a conjunctiva! scraping performed at baseiine and the final exam.
`All patients completed the study. There were no adverse events or toxicities in patients treated with
`vehicle while stinging on one occasion was reported from ketorclac 0.5% ophthalmic soiution. Ketorolac
`treatment was associated with a decrease in free eosinophilic granules as compared to vehicle (p = 0.025
`Fisher's Exact Test. two-tailed).
`The results of this study show that ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution apptied four times daily for seven
`days produces a decrease in eosinophilic granules as compared to vehicle in the treatment of allergic
`conjunctivitis.
`
`EXAMPLE 9
`
`This study was a double-blind, paired comparison design travel to evatuate the tolerance of ketorolac
`0.5% ophthalmic solution and its vehicle in 26 healthy subjects. Solutions were instilled three times daiiy for
`21 days. Complete ophthalmic examinations were done pretreatment and on days 3, 10, 17, 24 (2 days
`after ending treatment). and 45 (23 days after ending treatment). No statistically significant difference in
`symptoms (burning, stinging,
`itchiness, scratchiness. photophobia) or signs (tearing, ocular discharge,
`conjunctival vasodilation, chernosis, keratitis, fluorescein staining, i‘-lose Bengal staining) was found between
`ketorolac and vehicle.
`
`EXAMPLE 10
`
`An ocular formulation containing 5 mg/ml ketorolac tromethamine was administered at a dose of 0.1
`ml/eye every one—half hour for a total of 12 doses to both eyes of 6 New Zealand albino rabbits. The
`iorrnulation contained benzalkonium chloride as the preservative system. Two additionai groups of animals
`served as saline and vehicle controls, respectively.
`Eyes were examined after the last dose was administered and on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 foliowing closing.
`Results indicated that no eye irritation or toxicity resulted from ketorclac tromethamine administration.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Claims
`
`1. A liquid ophthalmic NSAID formulation comprising a NSAID in an effective amount for ophthatmic
`treatment, benzalkonium chloride, a stabiiizing amount of Octoxynol 40, and an aqueous vehicle.
`
`40
`
`-'15
`
`2. The ophthalmic NSAID formulation of Claim 1
`
`including disodium edetate.
`
`3. The ophthalmic NSAID formulation of any one of Claims 1 and 2 wherein said NSAiD is selected from
`ketorolac.
`indomeihacin. flurbiprofen, and dlclofenac, or their isomers, pharmaceutically acceptable
`salts, or esters.
`
`4. The ophthalmic NSAED formulation of any one of Claims 1
`Tromethamine.
`
`to 3 -wherein said NSAID is Ketorolac
`
`50
`
`5. The ophthalmic NSAID formuiation of

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket