throbber
William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
` U N I T E D S T A T E S P A T E N T A N D T R A D E M A R K O F F I C E
`
` B E F O R E T H E P A T E N T T R I A L A N D A P P E A L B O A R D
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
`
`I N N O P H A R M A L I C E N S I N G , I N C . , )
`
`I N N O P H A R M A L I C E N S I N G L L C , )
`
`I N N O P H A R M A I N C . , I N N O P H A R M A L L C )
`
`M Y L A N P H A R M A C E U T I C A L S I N C . a n d )
`
`M Y L A N I N C . , )
`
` P e t i t i o n e r , ) C a s e N o .
`
`v s . ) I P R 2 0 1 5 - 0 0 9 0 2
`
`S E N J U P H A R M A C E U T I C A L C O . , L T D . , )
`
`B A U S C H & L O M B , I N C . , a n d B A U S C H )
`
`& L O M B P H A R M A H O L D I N G S C O R P . , )
`
` P a t e n t O w n e r . )
`
`* * * C A P T I O N C O N T I N U E D * * * )
`
`_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ )
`
`
`
` V I D E O T A P E D D E P O S I T I O N O F W I L L I A M B . T R A T T L E R , M . D .
`
` T u e s d a y , F e b r u a r y 2 3 , 2 0 1 6
`
` M i a m i , F l o r i d a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`IPR2015-01099
`IPR2015-01097
`IPR2015-01100
`IPR2015-01105
`
`Lupin EX1120
`Page 1
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 2
`
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
`Page 4
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`On behalf of Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
`Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and
`Bausch & Lomb Pharma Holdings Corp.:
`JUSTIN J. HASFORD, ESQUIRE
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
`202-408-4000 (P) 202-408-4400 (F)
`justin.hasford@finnegan.com
`
`On behalf of Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc.:
`NATASHA E. DAUGHTREY, ESQUIRE
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10018
`212-813-8800 (P) 212-355-3333 (F)
`ndaughtrey@goodwinprocter.com
`(PRESENT BY TELEPHONE)
`
`On behalf of InnoPharma Licensing, Inc.,
`InnoPharma Licensing LLC, InnoPharma Inc.,
`InnoPharma LLC, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.,
`and Mylan Inc.:
`JOSEPH M. JANUSZ, ESQUIRE
`Alston & Bird LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-4000
`704-444-1000 (P) 704-444-1738 (F)
`joe.janusz@alston.com
`
`Also present:
`Jeffrey Menton, CLVS
`
`
` I N D E X
`
`WITNESS NAME: WILLIAM V. TRATTLER, M.D.
`
`Page 5
`
` EXAMINATION BY: PAGE
` BY MR. JANUSZ .................................. 9
` -o0o-
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
`EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit No. 1 Declaration of William D. 11
` Trattler, M.D.
`
`Exhibit No. 2 Declaration of William D. 11
` Trattler, M.D.
`
`Exhibit No. 3 Prolensa prescribing 20
` information
`
`Exhibit No. 4 Eight-page document previously 40
` marked Senju Exhibit 2113
`
`Exhibit No. 5 Bromday prescribing 53
` information
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`8
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`________________________________
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., )
`BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED, and )
`BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS ) C.A. Nos.
`CORP., ) 1:14-cv-00667
` ) 1:14-cv-04149
` Plaintiffs, ) 1:14-cv-05144
`vs. )
` )
`LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN )
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., )
` )
` )
` Defendants. )
` )
`vs. )
` )
`INNOPHARMA LICENSING, INC., ) C.A. Nos.
`INNOPHARMA LICENSING, LLC, ) 1:14-cv-06893
`INNOPHARMA, INC., and ) 1:15-cv-03240
`INNOPHARMA, LLC, )
` Defendants. )
`________________________________)
`
`
`
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM B. TRATTLER, M.D.
` Tuesday, February 23, 2016
` Miami, Florida
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 3
`
`1 The Videotaped Deposition of WILLIAM B.
`2 TRATTLER, M.D. was taken on February 23, 2016,
`3 commencing at 12:19 p.m. at the Dadeland Marriott,
`4 9090 South Dadeland Boulevard, Miami, Florida,
`5 before Michele Anzivino, Registered Professional
`6 Reporter, and Notary Public in and for the State of
`7 Florida.
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
` E X H I B I T S (Continued)
`
`Page 6
`
`EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit No. 6 Prescribing information for 57
` Xibrom
`
`Exhibit No. 7 Prescribing information for 60
` bromfenac ophthalmic solution
`
`Exhibit No. 8 Document previously marked 91
` Senju 2060
`
`Exhibit No. 9 Document previously marked as 93
` Senju Exhibit 2134
`
`Exhibit No. 10 Document previously marked as 99
` Senju 2030
`
`Exhibit No. 11 Curriculum vitae 102
`
`Exhibit No. 12 Opening expert report 120
`
`Exhibit No. 13 Reply expert report 122
`
`///
`
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Page 8
`
`1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This begins video media
`2 disc number one, volume one. This is the
`3 videotaped deposition of William V. Trattler,
`4 that's T-r-a-t-t-l-e-r, M.D. in the matter of
`5 Innopharm Licensing, Inc. et al versus Senju
`6 Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, et al, Case Number
`7 IPR2015-00903 and 14-CV-0667-JBS-KMW et al in the
`8 United States Patent and Trademark Office before
`9 the Patent Trial and Appeals Board and the U.S.
`10 District Court for the District of New Jersey.
`11 Today is February 23, 2016. The time is
`12 12:19 p.m. This video deposition is taking place
`13 at the Dadeland Marriott at 9090 South Dadeland
`14 Boulevard, Miami, Florida. This video deposition
`15 has been at the request of Joseph Janusz from the
`16 law firm of Alston & Bird, LLP. My name is Jeff
`17 Menton. I am the certified legal video specialist,
`18 and the court reporter is Michele Anzivino. We're
`19 from Gregory Edwards LLC.
`20 Would counsel please state their appearance
`21 for the record and state whom you represent
`22 starting with the noticing attorney, and then will
`23 the court reporter please swear the witness in.
`24 MR. JANUSZ: Joe Janusz of Alston & Bird on
`25 behalf of the Innopharm entities which are a
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 9
`
` E X H I B I T S (Continued)
`
`EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit No. 14 Document, Bates 135
` PROL0333863 - 869
`
`Exhibit No. 15 Document, Bates 140
` PROL0333854 - 862
` -o0o-
`
`1 petitioner in the IPR proceedings and a defendant
`2 in the District Court litigation.
`3 MS. DAUGHTREY: And this is Natasha Daughtrey
`4 from Goodwin Proctor on defendant of the Lubin
`5 defendant in the District Court litigation.
`6 MR. HASFORD: Justin Hasford of Finnegan on
`7 behalf of Senju and Bausch & Lomb in both the IPR
`8 and the District Court proceedings.
`9 Thereupon,
`10 WILLIAM V. TRATTLER, M.D.,
`11 having been duly sworn or affirmed, was examined and
`12 testified as follows:
`13 THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.
`14 DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Good morning, Dr. Trattler. How are you?
`15
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. Great, thank you.
`16
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. I'm going to go over a few ground rules ahead
`17
`
` Q. Q.
`18 of time. Ha -- have you ever depose -- been deposed
`19 before?
`
` A. A. I have, yes.
`20
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. So I'm going to run through this
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 quickly. I'm sure it's all stuff you've heard before.
`23 You understand that you're under oath in giving your
`24 testimony today, right?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`25
`
` A. A.
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 10
`
`
` Q. Q. Okay. I'm going to ask you a series of
`1
`
` Q. Q.
`2 questions today, and I'm going to ask that those
`3 questions be answered. Even though intermittently your
`4 counsel may interject objections, unless he instructs
`5 you not to answer the question I'd ask that you answer
`6 the question.
`
` A. A. Okay.
`7
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. We'll -- we're also going to need verbal
`8
`
` Q. Q.
`9 answers so that the court reporter doesn't have any
`10 trouble recording what our discussion is here today.
`11 She can't effectively record head nods or shakes or
`12 anything like that, so -- and then we'll take breaks
`13 periodically throughout the day. And the only thing
`14 that I'd ask -- and -- and if you need a break please
`15 let me know obviously. The only thing I'd ask is that
`16 if there is a question pending that you answer the
`17 question before we go into a break.
`
` A. A. Perfect.
`18
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Have you ever submitted an -- well,
`19
`
` Q. Q.
`20 let me start with this actually.
`21 MR. HASFORD: Joe, if it will speed things
`22 along, we can stipulate that he's here pursuant to
`23 this notice.
`24 MR. JANUSZ: Very well, then.
`25 MR. HASFORD: Okay.
`
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`
`Page 12
`
`1 been marked as Exhibits 1 and 2. We'll refer to them
`2 here as Trattler Exhibits 1 and 2, but Trattler Exhibit
`3 1 is Senju Exhibit 2116 in the IPR 2015-00902
`4 proceeding. And Trattler 2 is the same Senju Exhibit
`5 Number 2116 in the 903 proceeding.
`6 These are your declarations that you
`7 submitted in the IPR proceedings, correct?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`8
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And you understand that -- that the
`9
`
` Q. Q.
`10 opinions that -- that you've offered -- and just let me
`11 back up a minute.
`12 Obviously there have been a lot of opinions,
`13 you know, submitted in this case on -- on your behalf.
`14 And so I'd like to try to streamline things as much as
`15 I can. And so, you know, part of what I'm going to do
`16 here is just to try to get you, if you're willing to,
`17 to confirm that the opinions you offered in each of
`18 these declarations are largely similar if that's -- if
`19 that's something you're comfortable with.
`
` A. A. Yes, they are.
`20
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And -- okay. Now, if I can touch a
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 little bit on your -- on your background. You --
`23 you're an ophthalmologist, correct?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`24
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And have you -- I presume you've
`25
`
` Q. Q.
`
`Page 11
`
`Page 13
`
`1 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Okay. So have you ever submitted a -- a
`2
`
` Q. Q.
`3 declaration in an IPR proceeding before?
`
` A. A. No, this is my first time.
`4
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And have you ever testified in a
`5
`
` Q. Q.
`6 patent case in a District Court proceeding before?
`
` A. A. This is my first time, as well.
`7
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so you -- you have testified at a
`8
`
` Q. Q.
`9 deposition previously, they just weren't really patent
`10 cases; is that correct?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`11
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Have you ever testified at a trial
`12
`
` Q. Q.
`13 before?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`14
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And -- and none of those were related
`15
`
` Q. Q.
`16 to patent issues?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`17
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Were any of those related to
`18
`
` Q. Q.
`19 ophthalmic solutions containing bromfenac?
`
` A. A. No.
`20
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay.
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 (Exhibit No. 1 marked for identification.)
`23 (Exhibit No. 2 marked for identification.)
`24 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Dr. Trattler, you've been handed what have
`25
`
` Q. Q.
`
`1 performed cataract surgeries before?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`2
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Approximately how often -- and we'll
`3
`
` Q. Q.
`4 start in -- in roughly a month. How -- how often
`5 during the course of a month do you perform cataract
`6 surgery?
`
` A. A. Approximately 60 cases a month.
`7
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. 60 cases a month?
`8
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. Six-zero, yes.
`9
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Six-zero? Okay.
`10
`
` Q. Q.
`11 And would that, you know, equate to across
`12 all 12 months of the year?
`
` A. A. Correct. You know, we're not -- we're not
`13
`
` A. A.
`14 very seasonal here in Miami.
`
` Q. Q. Right. Fair enough.
`15
`
` Q. Q.
`16 And -- and approximately when in your career
`17 did you first perform cataract surgeries?
`
` A. A. So during my residency. My residency was
`18
`
` A. A.
`19 from 1993 to 1996. So typically during my second year
`20 of residency is when you start your first cases.
`
` Q. Q. Okay.
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. So in the 1994 to '95 range.
`22
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And where was your residency?
`23
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. At -- at Scheie Eye Institute which is in
`24
`
` A. A.
`25 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Part of the University of
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 14
`
`1 Pennsylvania.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. If I can have you turn to Trattler
`2
`
` Q. Q.
`3 Exhibit 1, which is your declaration in the 902 case,
`4 and just -- just so we are clear, on the front of
`5 Trattler Exhibit 1 if you look at the very bottom you
`6 see the case number ending in 902.
`
` A. A. Yes.
`7
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And so when I refer to the 902 case, that's
`8
`
` Q. Q.
`9 what I'm looking at.
`
` A. A. Okay.
`10
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Similarly with the 903 case.
`11
`
` Q. Q.
`12 So if I can direct your attention to
`13 paragraph 41 of the declaration, and that appears at
`14 page 13.
`
` A. A. Okay.
`15
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And so in -- in paragraph 41 you acknowledge
`16
`
` Q. Q.
`17 that Prolensa is formulated -- formulated at a pH of
`18 7.8, correct?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`19
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And it's your opinion that that formulation
`20
`
` Q. Q.
`21 is closer to that of natural tears which you identify
`22 as 7.4 as compared to the pH of Xibrom and Bromday
`23 which are 8.3; is that correct?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`24
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Are you aware that the pH levels of
`25
`
` Q. Q.
`
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`
`Page 16
`
`1 It's your opinion that making an
`2 ophthalmic -- application of an ophthalmic solution
`3 more comfortable for a patient would increase patient
`4 compliance; is that right?
`
` A. A. Definitely.
`5
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And -- and the idea behind that is
`6
`
` Q. Q.
`7 likely that obviously if a patient's more comfortable
`8 with the drug that they're applying to themselves
`9 they're not going to have any issues applying it; is
`10 that right?
`
` A. A. Correct. If a -- if a medication stings and
`11
`
` A. A.
`12 burns on every application, they may be less likely to
`13 put it into their eyes.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so it's -- it's your opinion in
`14
`
` Q. Q.
`15 this declaration -- in this -- in this paragraph of
`16 your declaration that Prolensa's pH level of 7.8 being
`17 closer to that of natural tears being 7.4 at least in
`18 part contributes to the elimination of burning --
`19 burning and stinging experienced by patients using
`20 Prolensa; is that right?
`
` A. A. Yeah, my th -- my understanding is that that
`21
`
` A. A.
`22 would -- by being closer to the natural pH it can help,
`23 and -- you know, as far as reduced burning and
`24 stinging.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And can you explain -- when you say it
`25
`
` Q. Q.
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 17
`
`1 natural tears in humans can fluctuate beyond the 7.4
`2 that you've identified?
`
` A. A. I think that, you know, pH can be affected by
`3
`
` A. A.
`4 a variety of different things, but I think the average
`5 is considered by most experts to be around 7.4.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. But it can -- it can go -- for
`6
`
` Q. Q.
`7 example, it can be lower than 7.4 in certain patients?
`
` A. A. 7.4 is an -- is an average.
`8
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay.
`9
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. Is -- I think that's an the understanding
`10
`
` A. A.
`11 that when we talk about, you know, patients and their
`12 tears it's typically considered that 7.4 is the
`13 average.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Now, is it your opinion that -- strike
`14
`
` Q. Q.
`15 that.
`16 It's your opinion that if -- well, let me
`17 direct your attention to the last sentence in -- in
`18 paragraph 41. And if you can read that out loud, it
`19 starts with the reduced pH.
`
` A. A. Yes. "The reduced pH and amount of
`20
`
` A. A.
`21 surfactant in Prolensa eliminated the burning and
`22 stinging sensation making it more comfortable ensuring
`23 greater patient compliance".
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so let's talk generally about
`24
`
` Q. Q.
`25 that.
`
`1 can help, can you explain what you mean by that?
`
` A. A. Well, obviously there are some formulations
`2
`
` A. A.
`3 of medications that are at pH of 7.4 that still cause
`4 burning and stinging. So you can have irritating
`5 solutions that have a pH of 7.4. So it's a combination
`6 of -- of factors.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And generally speaking, I mean, would
`7
`
` Q. Q.
`8 your opinion be that -- obviously that there are --
`9 well, let me -- let me -- strike that.
`10 Generally speaking, would your opinion be
`11 that the closer you get to the natural -- the pH of
`12 natural tears, the more likely a solution would be
`13 comfortable for the user?
`14 MR. HASFORD: Objection. Incomplete
`15 hypothetical.
`16 THE WITNESS: Right. So it all depends on so
`17 many factors. So if we the had same solution,
`18 potentially, and again we have to evaluate it, but
`19 if it's closer to the natural -- you know, the pH
`20 of -- of our natural tears is it more likely to be
`21 comfortable. But obviously it depends on, you
`22 know, the actual formulation, it depends on the --
`23 what product we're looking at and all the other
`24 things that go into a formulation.
`25 So again, you could have formulations exactly
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 18
`
`1 at 7.4 that could be painful and irritating. You
`2 could have pHs -- you could have formulations that
`3 are well off of the pH of 7.4 that's pretty
`4 comfortable in general. So, you know, it's really
`5 going to be this whole factor for try -- you know,
`6 to try to optimize, you know, can help to get the
`7 pH closer to 7.4.
`8 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so just -- just so -- just so that
`9
`
` Q. Q.
`10 we have an understanding here, I guess the opposite may
`11 be true if we were talking about solutions where the pH
`12 levels were significantly removed from what the
`13 natural -- what the pH of a natural tear would be; is
`14 that -- is that right?
`
` A. A. Potentially. Again, it all depends on -- on
`15
`
` A. A.
`16 so many different factors. I mean, every -- you have
`17 to look at every formulation. What is the medication.
`
` Q. Q. Right.
`18
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. What are -- what's involved in the -- in the
`19
`
` A. A.
`20 solution.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so, for example, if we were --
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 hydrochloric acid, for example, right? And that's -- I
`23 don't know what the exact pH level is but we can --
`24 would you agree that it's closer to 1 than it is to the
`25 7.4, which is the pH of natural tears, correct?
`
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`
`Page 20
`
`1 yes, all de -- everything is relative to the
`2 situation.
`3 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Why don't we --
`4
`
` Q. Q.
`5 (Exhibit No. 3 marked for identification.)
`6 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Dr. Trattler, you've been handed what's been
`7
`
` Q. Q.
`8 marked as Trattler Exhibit 3, and Trattler Exhibit 3 is
`9 identified on the bottom right-hand side as Senju
`10 Exhibit 2013.
`11 Do you recognize this to be the prescribing
`12 information for Prolensa?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`13
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Would you turn to Section 6.1? Do you see
`14
`
` Q. Q.
`15 Section 6 says adverse reactions? 6.1, clinical trial
`16 experience?
`
` A. A. Right.
`17
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And do you see that there are two separate
`18
`
` Q. Q.
`19 paragraphs under 6.1?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`20
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Would you go ahead and read the second
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 paragraph for me out loud?
`
` A. A. "The mostly commonly reported adverse
`23
`
` A. A.
`24 reaction following the use of Prolensa following
`25 cataract surgery include" --
`
`Page 19
`
`Page 21
`
`
` A. A. Hydrochloric acid is an acid so it would be
`1
`
` A. A.
`2 more acidic, yes.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so would you agree that -- that a
`3
`
` Q. Q.
`4 solution containing hydrochloric acid with a much lower
`5 pH would likely cause burning and stinging?
`6 MR. HASFORD: Objection, incomplete
`7 hypothetical.
`8 THE WITNESS: Yeah, so I've never instilled
`9 hydro -- hydrochloric acid in someone's eye so I
`10 can't even comment on that. I don't think it's --
`11 I mean, it seems it could be very dangerous. So I
`12 don't know how to comment on that because it's --
`13 hydrochloric acid is an acid and it causes damage
`14 to the eye. So I don't know how -- how to answer
`15 that question.
`16 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Would you be comfortable prescribing a drug
`17
`
` Q. Q.
`18 that had a pH level of 1 for ophthalmic formulation?
`19 MR. HASFORD: Objection, incomplete
`20 hypothetical.
`21 THE WITNESS: It all -- it all depends what
`22 it is. If it was a lifesaving drug that could sa
`23 -- let's say it was a drug that cured blindness but
`24 it had a pH of 1, it was the only thing available,
`25 and it burned but it was the only thing available,
`
`1 THE REPORTER: I'm sorry. You've got to --
`2 THE WITNESS: Sorry.
`3 THE REPORTER: -- just read it slower.
`4 THE WITNESS: Sure. "The most commonly
`5 reported adverse reactions following the use of
`6 Prolensa following cataract surgery include
`7 anterior chamber inflammation, foreign body
`8 sensation, eye pain, photophobia, and vision
`9 blurred. Those reactions were reported in 3 to 8
`10 percent of patients".
`11 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. And so you understand this is -- this to be a
`12
`
` Q. Q.
`13 listing of adverse reactions that were experienced
`14 during the clinical trials that are described as the
`15 most commonly reported; is that right?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`16
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And -- and -- but this is not a list
`17
`
` Q. Q.
`18 of all possible adverse reactions when -- when using
`19 Prolensa; is that right?
`
` A. A. There -- there could be others, but I mean I
`20
`
` A. A.
`21 guess I have this as their label. So I -- you know, I
`22 have this to fall back on as far as the -- what's being
`23 reported in the -- in the prescribing information.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And -- and just to be clear from --
`24
`
` Q. Q.
`25 from your reading of that paragraph, is there anything
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 22
`
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`
`Page 24
`
`1 in that paragraph that indicates to you that the
`2 adverse reactions listed there are the only adverse
`3 reactions identified in the clinical trials of
`4 Prolensa?
`5 MR. HASFORD: Objection, vague and ambiguous.
`6 THE WITNESS: Clearly -- so the way this is
`7 prepared is the FDA -- my understanding is the FDA
`8 evaluates clinical trials and decides what it feels
`9 is relevant to put into the prescribing information
`10 so that we as practitioners, as doctors, can
`11 evaluate a drug based on -- on the prescribing
`12 information to prescribe patients as dosing
`13 information and adverse reactions. So if it's not
`14 listed here there --i t's possible something could
`15 happen in the clinical trial but clearly the FDA
`16 didn't feel it was important enough to list to warn
`17 us as physicians in how we prescribe and treat
`18 patients.
`19 BY MR. JANUSZ:
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And so -- and these -- the adverse
`20
`
` Q. Q.
`21 reactions listed here are identified as having been
`22 experienced by 3 to 8 percent of patients during
`23 testing, right?
`
` A. A. Correct.
`24
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Can you identify from this disclosure
`25
`
` Q. Q.
`
`1 means there's inflammation. It's not per -- it's a
`2 sign, not a symptom.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. Let's move to foreign body sensation.
`3
`
` Q. Q.
`4 Can you describe what that is?
`
` A. A. For -- foreign body sensation. That's
`5
`
` A. A.
`6 the def -- that's what it is.
`
` Q. Q. And can you provide any other explanation
`7
`
` Q. Q.
`8 maybe to somebody who's never seen that before? How
`9 would you describe foreign body sensation to somebody
`10 who --
`
` A. A. Right. It's exactly as it says. A foreign
`11
`
` A. A.
`12 body sensation. Sensation feels like maybe again
`13 foreign body sensation.
`
` Q. Q. So -- and when you -- when you say foreign
`14
`
` Q. Q.
`15 body sensation are you -- would that include, for
`16 example, the sensation of a foreign body in the eye or
`17 on -- somewhere in and around the eye?
`
` A. A. Right. It could -- again, it's -- every
`18
`
` A. A.
`19 patient interprets that sensation, but it's basically a
`20 sensation of like something -- a foreign body -- like a
`21 foreign body, some type of particulate that they may
`22 feel or something like that.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And would you -- well, let me -- let
`23
`
` Q. Q.
`24 me go back.
`25 If, for example, a patient has an eyelash in
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 25
`
`1 which of these adverse reactions was the most commonly
`2 reported by patients?
`
` A. A. It just has these all grouped together.
`3
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. But there's no -- there's no
`4
`
` Q. Q.
`5 identification of any of those being more commonly
`6 reported than another in this paragraph, right?
`
` A. A. Right. So the purpose of this again is to
`7
`
` A. A.
`8 alert physicians for us to talk to patients, you know,
`9 on what adverse reactions patients may experience with
`10 drops so we can decide first of all which medication
`11 we're going to use and second, counsel patients.
`
` Q. Q. Can you -- let's look at the first one there.
`12
`
` Q. Q.
`13 So the first one identified is anterior chamber
`14 inflammation; is that right?
`
` A. A. Yes.
`15
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. Can you describe anterior chamber
`16
`
` Q. Q.
`17 inflammation?
`
` A. A. Anterior chamber inflammation would be when
`18
`
` A. A.
`19 you -- when a patient is seen in the slit lamp we can
`20 evaluate how much inflammation is inside the eye.
`
` Q. Q. And is this -- is anterior chamber
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`22 inflammation a comfortable side effect of any
`23 ophthalmic solution?
`
` A. A. It has -- anterior chamber inflammation can
`24
`
` A. A.
`25 be asymptomatic or symptomatic. So it's not -- it just
`
`1 their eye, would that be a foreign body sensation?
`
` A. A. That can be one of -- one type of, you know,
`2
`
` A. A.
`3 foreign body sensation. Just usually a minimal, you
`4 know, nothing too bothersome type of thing.
`
` Q. Q. Okay.
`5
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. So, you know, we all have eyelashes in our
`6
`
` A. A.
`7 eyes every day so it's something that you may feel when
`8 you blink a little bit, and it's nothing too
`9 problematic.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And would you say that foreign body
`10
`
` Q. Q.
`11 sensations are generally comfortable for patients?
`
` A. A. I think they're -- you know, they're --
`12
`
` A. A.
`13 again, nothing -- again, we get eyelashes in our eyes
`14 every day. You might notice it, you might blink your
`15 eyes once or twice. It's nothing too bothersome.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And are -- are there any foreign body
`16
`
` Q. Q.
`17 sensations that you've -- that have been reported to
`18 you by patients that were uncomfortable for -- for
`19 patients?
`
` A. A. Well, if it gets more, then we're going to
`20
`
` A. A.
`21 call it not foreign body sensation. We're going to
`22 call it pain, right? So you're going to -- foreign
`23 body sensation is just a minimal, you know, sensation.
`24 It's not a -- it's not a real -- you know, it's not
`25 even to the level of discomfort. It's a sensation that
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`William B. Trattler, M.D. - February 23, 2016
`
`Page 26
`
`1 somebody might feel.
`
` Q. Q. And so let's go ahead and talk about eye
`2
`
` Q. Q.
`3 pain. Can you -- I presume eye pain is a -- is a -- is
`4 a broad descriptor. Can you -- can you explain what --
`5 what eye pain is?
`
` A. A. A patient reporting pain in and around the
`6
`
` A. A.
`7 eye.
`
` Q. Q. Okay. And can you provide any sort of
`8
`
` Q. Q.
`9 specific examples of what might constitute eye pain?
`
` A. A. I mean, it's a very non-specific word. You
`10
`
` A. A.
`11 know, it's -- that's, you know, a level higher than
`12 foreign body -- body sensation. It's a pain -- pain or
`13 a -- you know, a patient would report that they -- you
`14 know, again, they're typically filling out a
`15 questionnaire, that the eye feels -- you know, they're
`16 feeling pain in their eye. So, for example, someone's
`17 had -- this is -- some of these are patients undergoing
`18 cataract surgery so other eye can feel as if they have
`19 some pain in their eye from catar -- following cataract
`20 surgery.
`
` Q. Q. Following the cataract surgery.
`21
`
` Q. Q.
`
` A. A. Right.
`22
`
` A. A.
`
` Q. Q. And so let's -- let me take a step back on
`23
`
` Q. Q.
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket