throbber
UNl'l‘l;‘D S'l‘A'l‘l;‘S PA’l‘l:'N'l‘ AND TRADEMARK OI-'l<‘l(.‘l;‘
`
`UNITED STATF.S DEPARTMENT OF (‘.0MM'ER(‘E
`United Slzles Patent and Trademark Olfce
`
`/\:1.do:m:
`
`Alcumlna, V
`www nspm go
`
`FOR PATENTS
`nin _‘2\l ‘~- I-F4)
`
`APPl.l("r\TI(')N NO.
`
`Fl'l JNG T)I\TE
`
`FIRST N.’\Ml7D l‘.\'VF.NTOR
`
`/\'i'l'0R.\l'F.Y DOCKET NO.
`
`(‘0NFlRM.I\TlO\' NO.
`
`14/105.970
`
`01/28/2014
`
`Shirou s.~\w.~\
`
`2014-0075
`
`4523
`
`513
`‘/SW
`(3/11/2f 14
`Wl:‘NDl:‘R0’1‘H LlND&PON/’\(.‘K)L.L.P.
`I030 15th Street, N.W.,
`
`Suite 400 Pam
`Washington,D(l‘20005-1503
`
`s0I<0Us11.LA\’L»\
`
`P mz Nrwn rn
`
`RT mm
`um
`
`N( )'I'IFI( ‘A'l'I().V l)A'l‘l€
`
`I)liI.lVl£RY M()I)l~L
`
` 03/13/Z01-I
`
`ELECTRON IC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any. is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`ddalecki @ wenderolli .com
`eoa@ wendemthcom
`
`l’l'0L-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`SENJU EXI-I[BIT 2255
`
`LUPW V. SENJU
`IPR20l5—0l 100
`
`

`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`
`Application No.
`
`14/165,976
`
`
`
`
`App|icant(s)
`
`SAWA ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Art unit
`Examiner
`AIA (First lnventorto File)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1627
`LAYLA SOROUSH
`§‘3*”3
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Period for Reply
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE §MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THIS COMMUNICATION.
`
`
`In no event, however may a reply be timely filed
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will. by statute. cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Any reply received bythe Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`—
`
`
`
`Status
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1)|XI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 1/28/14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I] A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2a)|:l This action is FINAL.
`2b) This action is non-final.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3)I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4)|:| Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5)XI Claim(s) O3 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ is/are allowed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s) 1.<9;z1¢‘3is/are rejected.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) _ is/are objected to.
`) j are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`://www.usoto.ciov/ atents/init events/. E‘:/'inde><.'s , or send an inquiry to PPl--lfee<ibacK@usjgtooov.
`htt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application Papers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10)I:I The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11)|:| The drawing(s) filed on j is/are: a)I:l accepted or b)I:I objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85( ).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12)lZ| Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C.§119(a)—(d) or ( ).
`
`
`Certified copies:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a)lXl All
`b)I:| Some” c)I:I None of the:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.|:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.XI Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. 10/525,006.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.l:l Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2( )).
`** See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`
`1) D Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2) IX Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 1/28/14.
`
`
`
`
`U 8 Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-18)
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`
`
`
`3) El jmervjew summary (PTQ.413)
`
`
`
`
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date.
`
`
`
`
`
`D O h
`_
`
`
`‘ 9“:-
`
`
`4)
`
`
`
`
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20140307
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The following is in response to the Preliminary amendments filed on 1/28/2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent
`
`
`
`provisions.
`
`
`
`
`Double Patenting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unjustified or improper time wise extension of the “right to exclude" granted by a patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (c) or 1.321 (cl)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321 (b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`out completely online using web—screens. An eTermina| Disclaimer that meets all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`requirements is auto—processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info—l.jsp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent No. 8129431. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the patent are drawn to an aqueous liquid preparation consisting essentially of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the following two components, wherein the first component is 2—amino—3—(4—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bromobenzoyl)phenylaceticacid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate and the second component is tyloxapol wherein said liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration, and wherein when a quaternary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ammonium compound is included in said liquid preparation, the quaternary ammonium
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compound is benzalkonium chloride whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aqueous liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component; wherein the first component is 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is present in the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v % to about 0.2 w/v
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°/o; the second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amount sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 8497304. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the copending application are drawn to an aqueous liquid preparation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprising 2-amino-3—(4— bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid sodium salt thereof or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate thereof, and polyoxyl 40 stearate, wherein the concentration of the polyoxyl 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stearate is selected from a range of a minimum concentration of 0.02 w/v % to a
`
`
`
`maximum concentration of O.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 w/v% whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aqueous liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component; wherein the first component is 2-amino-3-(4—bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acid or a pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrate is at least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is present in the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v °/o to about 0.2 w/v
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°/o; the second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`amount sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation is formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claims 19-48 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being unpatentable over claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 8669290. Although the claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`claims in the copending application are drawn to a stable aqueous liquid preparation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component; wherein the first
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component is 2—amino-3-(4- bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a pharmacologically
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at least one selected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is the sole
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation; the second component is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount sufficient to stabilize
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is formulated for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ophthalmic administration whereas the claims herein are drawn to a stable aqueous
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`liquid preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wherein the first component is 2—amino—3—(4—bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof; wherein the hydrate is at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation and is present in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the preparation at a concentration from about 0.05 w/v °/o to about 0.2 w/v °/o; the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sufficient to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is
`
`
`
`
`formulated for ophthalmic administration.
`
`
`
`No claims allowed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`examiner should be directed to Layla Soroush whose telephone number is (571 )272—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5008. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 8:30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supervisor, Sreenivasan Padmanabhan, can be reached on (571) 272-0629. The fax
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is
`
`571-273-8300.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`
`
`
`/Layla Soroushl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 1627
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 14/165,976
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket