`
`Retraction: Sclera-Choroid-RPE Transport of Eight [3-
`Blockers in Human, Bovine, Porcine, Rabbit, and Rat
`Models
`
`David C. Beebe
`E(i'H‘(Jr-.-'n-C‘;'Jief
`
`Retraction of: “Sciera-Cl1oroid—RPE Transport of Eight ii-Blockers in Human, Bovine, Porcine, Rabbit, and Rat Models“ by Rajentira S.
`Kadam, Narayan I’. S. Cheruvu, Henry E Edelhauser, and Uday B. Kompella (hives: Opbtbalmoi W3 Sci. 20i1;‘32:5587—539‘)) doi: 10.
`I 167/iovs.10-6233
`A scientific misconduct investigation by University of Colorado Denver (Anscllutz. Medical Campus) concluded that this paper
`contains falsified and/or fabricated data. Specifically, Figures 1 and 3: some L(1—MS peak areas in the B-blocker transport data
`reported in these figures were falsified to create smooth monotonic transport curves with smaller error bars.
`‘Tables 2, 3; Figures 2, 4, S, 7, 8, and 10: All use the primary transport data from curves in Figures 1 and 3, hence the analyses
`reported will :tl] be contaminated by falsified data from Figure 1 and/or Figure 5.
`The university recommended the paper be retracted from publication and the Editor-in-Cltief, David (2. Beebe, agreed. The
`paper is therefore being retracted by ARVO from IOVS.
`
`Citation: Beebe DC. Retraction: Scleraehoroid-RPE transport of eight [3-blockers in hurnan, bovine, porcine, rabbit, and rat models.
`limes! ()plJflJai'ma! Vi‘: Sci’. 20155621678. doi:l(].1 167/iovs.l(]-6253a.
`
`D01: lD.| l6?.r'itJ\'s.l{I-62333
`Copyright 2015 'l'hi.- Association for Research in Vision and tlphtltalniulogy. Inc.
`www.iovs.o1'p,- | ISSN: 1552-5733.
`
`1678
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
`
`
`
`InvestigativeOphthalmology&VisualScience
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2132
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01100
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
