throbber
Publishedon01JanuaryI998.Downloadedonl2/10/201509:58:38.
`
`
`
`
`
`View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
`
`Measurement of chiral amino acid discrimination by cyclic oligosaccharides: a
`
`direct FAB mass spectrometric approach
`
`Masami Sawada,*‘1' Motohiro Shizurna,” Yoshio Takai,‘ Hiroshi Adachi,‘ Tokuji Takeda’’ and Takao
`Uchiyamad
`
`4' Institute ofthe Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka Univemity, Ibaraki, Osaka 567, Japan
`l’ Technochemistry Department, Osaka Municipal Technical Research Institute, Joto-lm, Osaka 536, Japan
`5 Faculty ofScience, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560, Japan
`4 Department ofBiology, Osaka Kyoiku University, Kashihara, Osaka 582, Japan
`
`The novel cyclic oligosaccharides, perrnethylated cycIofruc-
`tans MECF, lb and 2b, discriminate enantiomers of chiral
`amino acid ester hydrochlorides.
`
`Chiral discrimination of amino acids by cyclodextrins (CD) has
`been widely investigated in the field of liquid chromatographic
`and electrophoretic enantioseparations,‘“4 but that by cyclo-
`fructans (CF)5=5 has not as yet been examined. With the
`application of the FAB mass spectrometry (MS)—enantiomer
`labelled (EL) guest method,7—9 one of the rare methods for
`estimation of the chiral recognition ability of new hosts.” we
`found for the first
`time that perrnethylated cyclofiuctans
`(MECF) exhibit various degrees of chiral discrimination
`towards amino acid esters. This is the first successful detection
`
`of the chiral amino acid-discriminating ability of cyclic
`oligosacchaiides on a unified scale covering the two series,
`where various types of complexation mechanism, such as
`charge—dipole electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding
`interactions are operative. An oligosaccharide host (H) is
`complexed with a 1:1 amino acid guest mixture of an
`unlabelled (R)-enantiomer (GR+) and a deuterium labelled
`(S)-enantiomer (Gs_p,.+). The enantioselectivity of a given
`oligosaccharide (host) toward a given racemic amino acid
`(guest)
`is quantitatively estimated from the relative peak
`intensity value {I[(I-I + GR)+]/I[(‘H + G_;D,,)+] = IR/Is_D,,} of the
`two host—guest diastereomeric complex ion peaks in the FAB
`mass spectrum.
`The cyclic oligosaccharide hosts lb—5b were permethylated
`so that their complex ions were sensitively detected by FAB
`MS. Amino acid 2-propyl ester hydrochlorides“ were used as
`guests so that natural abundance correction7 was unnecessary.
`All (S)-enantiomers were labelled with deuterium (2-propyl
`ester: n = 6 or 7). A 1:1 racemic mixture solution of
`enantiomer guests was prepared by mixing an equal amount of
`a 0.67 M MeOH solution of each enantiomer. A 10 pl aliquot of
`the guest solution and a 5 pl aliquot of a 0.20 M host CHCI3
`solution were added to 15 pl ofthe 3-nitrobenzyl alcohol (NBA)
`matrix. A 1 pl sample of the final mixture was used for
`obtaining FAB mass spectra. A typical FAB mass spectrum is
`shown in Fig. 1, and the IR/I5-_D,, values obtained are summa-
`rized in Table 1. MECF6 lb and MECF7 2b showed higher
`(R)-enantioselectivity for [Trp-0-Pr*']* (IR/Is_]);. = 1.38-1.29;
`—AAGe..... = 150-190 cal mol-1) [—AAG,..,., = RI1n(IR/
`I5_D,,) was employed for interconversion]?-9 MECF6 lb for
`[Tle-O-Pri]+ and MECF7 2b for [Ser-O-Pr1‘]+ or [Pro-0-Pr1']+
`provided the next best (R)-enantioselectivities. On the other
`hand.
`IVIECF7 2b for
`[Pgly-O-Pr*']* showed an inverse
`(S)-enantioselectivity (IR/I5,-_D,, = 0.76). B-MECD 4b and
`y-MECD Sb indicated (R)-enantioselectivity for [Ser-O-Pri]+
`and [Pro-O-Pr*']* (IR/I_g_D,, = ca. 1.15; —AAG,.,,, = ca. 80 cal
`mol—1).
`Among many thermodynamic chiral discrimination studies,
`the chiral discrimination of simple amino acids by CDs on the
`
`PAGE 1 OF 2
`
`basis of the host—guest (1:1) intermolecular interactions has
`rarely been reported until now. In one of the reports. Lincoln
`determined the relative binding constant (KRIKS = 0.92 in water
`at 295.5 K) of t!-MECD 3b with 4-fluorophenylglycine
`hydrochloride using the 19F NMR titration method12J3 The
`enantioselectivity of or-MECD 3b for the corresponding [Pgly-
`O-Pr‘]+ under our FAB MS conditions (IR/Is_D,, = 0.94) was in
`a good agreement with the above KR/K5 value. It is worthwhile
`to note that this is further experimental evidence for the parallels
`between the IR/I5_D,. and KR/Ks values which have been
`described previously.7'9 The NOE behavior of at-CD 3a with
`Trp using 1H NMR analysis suggested (R)-enantioselectivity, 14
`
`R0
`
`OR
`
`R0
`
`0
`
`ORG
`0
`
`R0 R0
`
`0
`
`R0
`OR
`0
`
`0
`
`OR
`on
`
`R0
`
`0
`R0
`
`on
`
`0
`
`0
`
`R°
`
`OR
`
`on
`
`OR
`
`n
`
`OR
`1aCF6,n=1,R=H
`bMECF6, n= 1, R= Me
`2aCF7,n=2_R=H
`DMECF7 n=2_ R=Me
`
`OR
`
`Me
`
`3au—CD,n=1,R=H
`bu-MECD_n=1,R
`4a|5-CD_n=2_R=H
`b|S—MECD,n=2_R
`5ay-CD_n=3,R=H
`by-MECD,n3_
`=
`
`= Me
`
`Me
`
`Chem. Commun., 1998
`
`1453
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2046
`
`LUPIN V SENJU
`
`IPR2015—01100
`
`

`
`Table 1 IR/IS-Dn values of permethylated cyclic oligosaccharide hosts with amino acid ester hydrochloride guestsa
`
`Host
`
`Guest (counter
`anion: Cl2)
`
`MECF6
`1b
`
`MECF7
`2b
`
`a-MECD
`3b
`
`b-MECD
`4b
`
`g-MECD
`5b
`
`18-C-6
`
`[Trp-O-Pri]+
`[Pgly-O-Pri]+
`[Phe-O-Pri]+
`[Tle-O-Pri]+
`[Met-O-Pri]+
`[Ser-O-Pri]+
`[Pro-O-Pri]+
`[Gly-O-Pri]+
`
`1.38
`0.99
`1.00
`1.18
`1.04
`1.01
`1.08
`1.01
`
`1.29
`0.76
`1.01
`1.00
`0.95
`1.18
`1.16
`0.99
`
`1.29
`0.94
`1.02
`0.95
`0.91
`0.95
`1.07
`0.97
`
`1.23
`0.91
`1.01
`0.94
`0.91
`1.15
`1.07
`0.98
`
`1.17
`0.89
`1.00
`0.93
`0.92
`0.99
`1.14
`
`0.98
`0.99
`1.02
`0.97
`0.96
`0.96
`0.96
`0.99
`
`a 18-crown-6 (18-C-6) is the typical achiral host employed. Glycine 2-propyl ester (Gly-O-Pri)+ is the typical achiral guest employed. Averaged value (n = 4)
`of 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th scan data. Errors of the IR/IS-Dn values are estimated within ±0.04. Tle = tert-leucine, Pgly = phenylglycine.
`
`101
`
`205
`
`107
`
`247
`
`303
`
`345 409
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`400
`500
`)+
`(H + GR
`
`600
`
`700
`
`800
`
`900
`
`1000
`
`1472
`
`)+
`(H + GS– Dn
`
`1243
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Relative abundance (%)
`
`butyl groups of the corresponding chiral guest. The difference in
`the stereochemical complementarity would be origin of the
`chiral discrimination of MECF6 1b.
`We are studying in detail the mechanism of chiral discri-
`mination of the cyclofructans. We hope that cyclofructans and
`their derivative hosts will be amenable to the further develop-
`ment of new chiral stationary phases and chiral selectors.
`We are very grateful to Mitsubishi Chemical Co. for the kind
`gift of cyclofructans (1a, 2a and the other oligomers).
`
`Notes and References
`† E-mail: m-sawada@sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp
`
`1 D. W. Armstrong, A. M. Stalcup, M. H. Hilton, J. D. Duncan,
`J. R. Faulkner and S. C. Chang, Anal. Chem., 1990, 62, 1610.
`2 A. Berthod, S. C. Chang and D. W. Armstrong, Anal. Chem., 1992, 64,
`395.
`3 S. Fanali, J. Chromatogr., 1989, 474, 441.
`4 V. Schurig and H.-P. Nowotny, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29,
`939.
`5 M. Kawamura, T. Uchiyama, T. Kuramoto, Y. Tamura and K. Mizutani,
`Carbohydr. Res., 1989, 192, 83.
`6 Y. Takai, Y. Okumura, T. Takana, M. Sawada, S. Takahashi, M. Shiro,
`M. Kawamura and T. Uchiyama, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 2967.
`7 X. X. Zhang, J. S. Bradshaw and R. M. Izatt, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97,
`3133.
`8 M. Sawada, Y. Takai, H. Yamada, S. Hirayama, T. Kaneda, T. Tanaka,
`K. Kamada, T. Mizooku, S. Takeuchi, K. Ueno, K. Hirose, Y. Tobe and
`K. Naemura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 7726.
`9 M. Sawada, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 1997, 16, 73.
`10 M. Sawada, Y. Takai, H. Yamada, J. Nishida, T. Kaneda, R. Arakawa,
`M. Okamoto, K. Hirose, T. Tanaka and K. Naemura, J. Chem. Soc.,
`Perkin Trans. 2, 1998, 701.
`11 E. P. Kyba, J. M. Timko, L. J. Kaplan, F. de Jong, G. W. Gokel and
`D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 4555.
`12 C. J. Easton and S. F. Lincoln, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1996, 163.
`13 S. E. Brown, C. J. Easton and S. F. Lincoln, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1995,
`2.
`14 K. B. Lipkowitz, S. Raghothama and J. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992,
`114, 1554.
`
`Received in Cambridge, UK, 23rd April 1998; 8/03023E
`
`0
`
`1100
`
`1200
`
`1300
`
`1400
`
`1500
`m / z
`Fig. 1 An example of a FAB mass spectrum from the FABMS/EL guest
`method. Host: MECF6 1b; guest: [Trp-O-Pri]+. The left peak (m/z 1472) is
`a complex ion (H + GR)+ and the right (m/z 1478) is (H + GS-Dn)+.
`
`1600
`
`1700
`
`1800
`
`1900
`
`2000
`
`which was also in line with our results obtained by FAB MS
`(a-MECD 3b with [Trp-O-Pri]+; IR/IS-Dn = 1.29).
`The crystalline structure of a complex of MECF6 1b with
`Ba2+ (counter anion: SCN2) that was reported previously
`showed that the cation was coordinated at ten points to the host,
`four 3-OMe oxygens of the furanose rings and six oxygens in
`the 18-crown-6 skeleton (Fig. 2).6 In the case of a complex of
`MECF6 with amino acid ester hydrochlorides, it is expected that
`the 3-OMe groups become chiral barriers for the indole or tert-
`
`Fig. 2 (a) Crystalline complex of 1b with barium cation (counter anion:
`SCN2). Hydrogen atoms are not shown. (b) Imaged illustration of a
`complex of 1b with an alkylammonium ion. The nitrogen cation of the
`alkylammonium replaced the barium from (a). The a-carbon of the
`alkylammonium ion was localized at a position of 1.49 Å from the nitrogen,
`an average C–N distance in amino acids.
`
`1454
`
`Chem. Commun., 1998
`
`Published on 01 January 1998. Downloaded on 12/10/2015 09:58:38.
`
`View Article Online
`
`PAGE 2 OF 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket