throbber
Colloids and Surfaces
`A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`www.elsevier.nl/locate/colsurfa
`
`Effect of inorganic additives on solutions of nonionic
`surfactants — XVI. Limiting cloud points of highly
`polyoxyethylated surfactants
`
`Hans Schott *
`School of Pharmacy, Temple Uni6ersity, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`As their degree of polyoxyethylation is increased, the cloud points (CPs) of three homologous series of nonionic
`surfactants (NSs) rise steeply at first but then level off, converging asymptotically to the temperature range of
`114–118°C, which corresponds to the CP of polyethylene oxide with a molecular weight of 104. Six of the 14
`surfactants investigated were octoxynols, five were nonoxynols and three were polyoxyethylene dodecyl ethers. Ten
`had an average number of oxyethylene units per molecule p\20 and a CP\100°C. Three of these CPs were
`measured directly on 2.00% surfactant solutions sealed into ampoules. To avoid additional measurements under
`pressure, the other surfactants had their CPs lowered below the normal boiling point of their 2.00% solutions by
`adding the salting-out, CP-lowering salt NaNO3 at various concentrations, measuring the depressed CPs and
`extrapolating them to zero salt concentration. The CPs decrease linearlv with increasing molality m of NaNO3 up to
`ca. 2.5 m and more steeply at higher concentration. For a given concentration of NaNO3, larger p values result in
`more extensive salting out: The more highly polyoxyethylated a surfactant is, the greater the reduction in CP it
`undergoes. As p increases, the curves of CP in water versus p for the octoxynols and nonoxynols rise steeply and
`nearly linearly, reaching 100 and 103°C at p=16, and then begin to level off. The sharpest inflections are at
`p=22–25. The nonoxynol curve becomes horizontal at p$40 and 115°C while the octoxynol curve rises gently from
`3°C below the nonoxynol curve to merge with it at p=90 and 114°C. The CPs of the three polyoxyethylene dodecyl
`ethers are slightly higher than those of the polyoxyethylated alkylphenols with comparable p values, peaking at
`118°C. The most highly polyoxyethylated surfactant of each series contains 95% polyoxyethylene. Their CP range of
`114–118°C equals that of polyethylene oxides with molecular weights between 8000 and 20 000. Published quantita-
`tive CP–p relations for polyoxyethylated NSs cover only CP values below 100°C and p values below 16. They fail to
`predict the levelling off of the CPs as the p values rise above 16. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Cloud point limits; Highly polyoxyethylated nonionic surfactants; Nonionic surfactants; Nonoxynol cloud points;
`Octoxynol cloud points
`
`* Tel.: +1-2158870116; fax: +1-2157073678.
`
`0927-7757/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PII: S 0 9 2 7 - 7 7 5 7 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 4 9 1 - 5
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2034
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01099
`
`

`
`130
`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`1. Introduction
`
`1.1. Cloud points
`
`Water-soluble polyoxyethylated nonionic sur-
`factants (NSs) are more soluble in cold than in
`hot water. When heated above a characteristic
`lower consolute temperature or cloud point (CP),
`their aqueous solutions separate into a surfactant-
`rich phase and a very dilute solution as the NSs
`change from being primarily water-soluble to be-
`coming primarily oil-soluble. Cooling below the
`CP reverses this process without hysteresis.
`Because of such phase separation, NSs cease to
`perform many of their intended functions above
`the CP: Suspensions stabilized with NSs flocculate
`or coagulate, foams collapse, and O/W emulsions
`break. Incidentally, many of the organic liquids
`being emulsified raise or lower the characteristic
`CP values substantially.
`CPs are commonplace. Most NSs have low
`critical micelle concentrations: At practical use
`levels, the bulk of the surfactants are aggregated
`into micelles. High micellar molecular weights
`cause the dissolved NSs to behave like polymers:
`Low entropies of mixing render micellar solutions
`far more prone to demixing or phase separation
`than solutions of nonaggregated molecules at
`comparable volume fractions.
`
`1.2. Predicting cloud point 6alues
`
`Because of the practical and theoretical impor-
`tance of the CP, procedures for predicting its
`values from the structure of NSs are of interest.
`CPs generally increase with increasing hydrophile-
`lipophile balance (HLB) of the NSs, correspond-
`ing either
`to an increasing number p of
`oxyethylene units per surfactant molecule or a
`shorter hydrocarbon moiety [1,2].
`Within several homologous series pertaining to
`different categories of NSs, the CP was reported
`to be proportional to log p [3,4] and inversely
`proportional to the number n of carbon atoms in
`the hydrocarbon moiety [4]. This
`empirical
`method for estimating CPs was extended and
`refined by including topological indices character-
`izing the hydrocarbon moiety of the surfactants.
`
`Thus, it became feasible to commingle different
`categories of NSs, resulting in a universal relation
`for estimating all CPs based on the p value and
`size and structure of the hydrocarbon moieties [5].
`A statistical approach consisted in using nonlin-
`ear regression analysis to correlate the CP with p
`at fixed n values within different categories of
`linear and branched polyoxyethylated aliphatic
`alcohols. The CP versus p plots were slightly
`concave towards the p axis [6].
`These studies [1,3–6] have a common short-
`coming: they are based on NSs with p015 and
`CPB100°C, presumably because CP data beyond
`these limits are scarce. However, NSs with p
`values up to 100 are commercially available and
`used in industrial
`formulations. Furthermore,
`temperatures exceeding 100°C are routinely used
`during the manufacture of aqueous disperse sys-
`tems stabilized with NSs. For instance, steam
`sterilization of pharmaceutical and cosmetic sus-
`pensions, emulsions and ointments is generally
`carried out by autoclaving atE121°C. Ultrahigh-
`temperature pasteurization employs temperatures
`in the 87–132°C range. In order to prevent desta-
`bilization of such disperse systems by high pro-
`cessing temperatures through surfactant phase
`separation, they should be formulated with NSs
`whose CPs exceed even these high temperatures.
`This points to the importance of knowing the
`CP values of NSs with p in the 16–100 range,
`which exceed the normal boiling points of the
`aqueous surfactant systems. Estimating these CP
`values by extrapolating the published relations
`[1,3–6] would be particularly useful because the
`pertinent CP measurements, which involve pres-
`surized systems, are more difficult to carry out.
`Two observations suggest that the published
`relations between CP and p [1,3–6] cannot be
`extrapolated indefinitely with increasing p values.
`(i) While the CPs within individual homologous
`series of both normally distributed and homoge-
`neous NSs always increase with p, the CP incre-
`ments
`for
`each additional oxyethylene unit
`decrease [1]. (ii) A plot of CP versus p for 7
`normally distributed polyoxyethylated octylphe-
`nols with p values ranging from 7 to 34 rises
`rapidly (although less than linearly) from p=7
`(CP=17°C) to p=19 (CP=101°C), but shows
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`131
`
`signs of levelling off at p=30 (CP=108°C) and
`p=34 (CP=110°C) [7]. This very informative
`1959 publication [7]
`is being completely over-
`looked in the current literature, even though it
`was the first and almost only one to publish CPs
`above 100°C.
`
`1.3. Research plan
`
`The purpose of the present work is to investi-
`gate the CPs of extensively polyoxyethylated NSs,
`which are merely listed as\100°C in the litera-
`ture. Two homologous series based on alkylphe-
`nols were chosen because they are widely used in
`formulations and include surfactants with the
`highest p values available.
`The CPs of highly polyoxyethylated NSs exceed
`the normal boiling points of their solutions. To
`avoid working with pressurized systems, the CPs
`of the solutions were depressed below 100°C by
`adding various amounts of a salting-out elec-
`trolyte and extrapolating them to zero electrolyte
`concentration. This approach is facilitated by the
`linear dependence of CP values on the concentra-
`tions of many 1:1 electrolytes up to ca. 3 m [8,9].
`
`2. Experimental
`
`2.1. Materials
`
`The two series of polyoxyethylated alkylphenols
`used are commercially available in a wide range of
`p values. These surfactants are normally dis-
`tributed. It was not feasible to use monodisperse
`(homogeneous) polyoxyethylated surfactants be-
`cause these are only available with pB9 and have
`CP values well below 100°C.
`Polyoxyethylated octylphenols are designated
`as octoxynols [10,11]. The numbers following the
`word, octoxynol, represent average p values. The
`branched octyl moiety is an isobutylene dimer.
`Octoxynols are supplied by Union Carbide Corp.
`under the tradename Triton X. The highest p
`value of the series is 53 (Surfactant No. 5 in Table
`1).
`Polyoxyethylated nonylphenols are designated
`as nonoxynols [10,11]. The branched nonyl moiety
`is a propylene trimer. Nonoxynols are supplied by
`Rhodia Inc. under the tradename Igepal CO. The
`highest p value of the series is 94 (Surfactant No.
`11 in Table 1).
`
`Table 1
`US Pharmacopeial names, trade names, average number of oxyethylene units per molecule (p) and hydrophile-lipophile balance
`(HLB) of the surfactants
`
`Trade namea
`
`Triton X-102
`Triton X-165
`Triton X-305
`Triton X-405
`Triton X-705
`–
`Igepal CO-730
`Igepal CO-880
`Igepal CO-970
`Igepal CO-987
`Igepal CO-997
`–
`Brij 35
`–
`
`p
`
`12
`16
`30
`35
`53
`90
`15
`29
`47
`70
`94
`11
`23
`80
`
`HLB
`
`14.4
`15.5
`17.3
`17.6
`18.4
`19.0
`15.0
`17.1
`18.1
`18.7
`19.0
`14.4
`16.9
`19.0
`
`Surfactant number
`
`US pharmacopeial name
`
`Octoxynol 12
`Octoxynol 16
`Octoxynol 30
`Octoxynol 40
`Octoxynol 70
`Octoxynol 90
`Nonoxynol 15
`Nonoxynol 30
`Nonoxynol 50
`Nonoxynol 70
`Nonoxynol 100
`Polyoxyl 11 dodecyl ether
`Polyoxyl 23 dodecyl ether
`Polyoxyl 80 dodecyl ether
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`56
`
`78
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`a Triton, Igepal and Brij are registered trademarks of Union Carbide Corp., Rhodia Inc. and ICI Americas Inc., respectively.
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`132
`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`Manufacturers obtain the p values from the
`weight increase during polyoxyethylation of the
`alkylphenols and/or by determining the hydroxyl
`number of the finished products. The surfactants
`contain small amounts of polyethylene glycols.
`These impurities generally have lower molecular
`weights than the surfactants and have two terminal
`hydroxyl groups compared to the surfactants’ one.
`Therefore, the reported p values represent lower
`limits. Polyethylene glycol impurities have negligi-
`ble effects on the CPs of highly polyoxyethylated
`surfactants [7].
`The commercial surfactants were supplied either
`neat or as 70% aqueous solutions. Their moisture
`contents were determined by drying at room tem-
`perature first over Drierite and then over P205. All
`neat products contained B0.1% water.
`Octoxynol 90 (Surfactant No. 6 in Table 1) was
`prepared by polyoxyethylation of molecularly dis-
`tilled octoxynol 3 (Triton X-35) to p=90. The
`catalyst was 0.7% NaOH; the temperature in the
`stirred autoclave was 160–180°C and the pressure
`2–3 atm. The weight
`increase was 11.3-fold
`(1130%). The hydroxyl number of Surfactant 6 was
`13.45 mg KOH/g surfactant.
`Surfactants No. 12 and 14 were made by poly-
`oxyethylating 1-dodecanol under similar condi-
`tions to p=11 and 80, respectively. They are
`designated polyoxyl 11 and 80 dodecyl ether [10] or
`laureth-11 and -80 [11].
`The other chemicals were ACS reagent grade.
`The water was double distilled. NaNO3 was se-
`lected as the salting-out electrolyte to lower the CPs
`- anion occupies an intermediate
`because the NO3
`position in the lyotropic series and neither raises
`nor lowers the CPs of NSs [12]. Thus, the CP
`reductions are due entirely to the salting-out activ-
`ity of the Na+ ions. Plots of CP versus mNaNO3
`are
`linear up to 2.5 m, which simplifies the extrapola-
`tion to m=0.
`
`2.2. Solution preparation
`
`Solutions containing surfactant and salt were
`prepared by adding water and analyzed, ca. 8 m
`NaNO3 solutions to 20.00% surfactant solutions,
`all weighed out to the nearest milligram. As a rule,
`the CPs of normally distributed NSs depend only
`
`slightly on surfactant concentration in the range of
`0.2–7.5% [1,7,13]. The final concentration of all
`surfactants was 2.00% by weight; their percentage
`is based on the weight of water present. All
`mixtures were stored in the dark at 6–9°C for E20
`h prior to measuring the CP to ensure full hydration
`of the micelles.
`
`2.3. Cloud point detemination
`
`CPs were measured visually in triplicate as the
`temperatures at which the solutions suddenly
`turned nearly opaque on heating and the tempera-
`tures at which they just as suddenly cleared on
`cooling, without hysteresis. Observing the precau-
`tions described [14], the six CP values for a given
`solution agreed within 0.2°C.
`Even though the CPs of Surfactants No. 6, 13
`and 14 exceeded the normal boiling points of their
`2.00% aqueous solutions, they were measured di-
`rectly. Salt-free solutions sealed inside glass am-
`poules were heated and cooled at the rate of 0.1°C
`min − 1 in the vicinity of the CP.
`The CPs of aqueous NS solutions are known to
`increase with pressure. However, the rate of in-
`crease, ca. 1×10 − 7°C Pa − 1 [15] is three orders of
`magnitude smaller than the rate of increase of
`saturated steam pressure with temperature. There-
`fore, the CP increase due to pressure developed in
`the sealed ampoules is negligible.
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`3.1. Cloud points 6ersus molality of NaNO3
`
`The Na+ ions salt out the NSs, lowering their
`CPs. The CPs decrease monotonically with increas-
`ing molality m of NaNO3, linearly at first but more
`steeply at higher NaNO3 concentrations. For Sur-
`factant No. 1, which has the lowest degree of
`polyoxyethylation, the linear range extends only up
`to 1.0 m NaNO3. The plots of all other surfactants
`are linear up to ca. 2.5 m (see Figs. 1 and 2).
`The equation for the linear segments is:
`CP=CP0+bm
`(1)
`The intercept CP0 is the (extrapolated) CP at m=0.
`This is the desired quantity.
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`133
`
`variance (ANOVA) employing small-sample t-
`and F-tests, the residual or error variances must
`be homogeneous. It then becomes permissible to
`pool the estimated variances of the slopes and of
`the intercepts of the individual regression lines
`when using ANOVA [16,17]. Since the CP values
`of all octoxynols and nonoxynols except those of
`Surfactants No. 6 and 12–14 were measured by
`the same procedure and with the same precision,
`the expected homogeneity of the residual vari-
`ances was observed.
`
`3.3. (Extrapolated) intercepts: cloud points in
`water
`
`The increase in the intercepts (CP0 values) of
`the octoxynols with increasing p values shown in
`Tables 1 and 2 is significant at the 5% probability
`level. The intercepts of nonoxynols 50, 70 and 100
`(Surfactants No. 9–11) do not differ significantly
`at the 5% probability level. Likewise, the CP0
`value of Surfactant No. 6 is indistinguishable
`
`Fig. 2. Cloud point CP (°C) of nonoxynols as a function of the
`molality m of added NaNO3. The linear segments used for
`extrapolation are shown as solid lines. The dashed lines repre-
`sent linear extrapolation to m=0. Key: , nonoxynol 15
`(Surfactant No. 7); , nonoxynol 30 (No. 8); , nonoxynol
`50 (No. 9); , nonoxynol 70 (No. 10);
`, nonoxynol 100 (No.
`11).
`
`Fig. 1. Cloud point CP (°C) of octoxynols as a function of the
`molality m of added NaNO3. The linear segments used for
`extrapolation are shown as solid lines. Nonlinear segments are
`shown as dotted lines. The dashed lines represent linear ex-
`trapolation to m=0. Key: , octoxynol 12 (Surfactant No.
`1);
`, octoxynol 16 (No. 2); , octoxynol 30 (No. 3); ,
`octoxynol 40 (No. 4); , octoxynol 70 (No. 5).
`
`The empirical extrapolation procedure is vali-
`dated by the following observations: Since the
`CPs of the salt-free solutions of Surfactants No. 1,
`2 and 7 were below the respective normal boiling
`their CP0 values were also measured
`points,
`directly.
`The measured CP0 values agree with corre-
`sponding extrapolated CP0 values within an ex-
`perimental
`error of
`0.2°C (see Table
`2).
`Furthermore, all negative correlation coefficients
`for the linear segments of Fig. 2, described by Eq.
`(1) and based on 4–6 points each, have absolute
`valuesE0.999. This confirms the high precision of
`the CP extrapolations to m=0.
`
`3.2. Statistical comparison of the linear segments
`of the CP 6ersus m plots
`
`In order to compare the linear segments of Fig.
`1 and those of Fig. 2 by means of analysis of
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`134
`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`Table 2
`Data for linear portions of the plots of cloud points versus
`molality of NaNO3 (m) in Fig. 1: Number of points (n),
`intercepts (CPO, extrapolated to m=0) and slopes (b)a
`
`Surfactant number
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`n
`
`5
`–
`4
`–
`4
`4
`6
`–
`5
`–
`4
`4
`4
`4
`–
`–
`–
`
`CPO (°C)
`
`b (°C/m)
`
`89.26
`89.2b
`99.70
`99.5b
`110.09
`111.34
`112.16
`114b
`96.85
`96.8b
`113.45
`115.75
`114.65
`114.28
`98.8b
`113b
`118b
`
`−6.040
`–
`−6.800
`–
`−7.363
`−8.040
`−9.454
`–
`−6.866
`–
`−8.553
`−9.742
`−10.776
`−11.909
`–
`–
`–
`
`a b=d CP/d m from Eq. (1).
`b Cloud points were actually measured in salt-free solutions
`instead of being calculated by extrapolation to m=0.
`
`from those of Surfactants No. 9–11. The highest
`CP0 values of nonoxynols, characteristic of those
`with pE47, are in the range of 11591°C. This
`range also includes the limiting CP0 value for the
`octoxynol series, namely, 114°C of Surfactant No.
`6. The CP of Surfactant No. 14 is only slightly
`though significantly higher.
`As their p values increase, the NS micelles
`increasingly resemble coils of polyethylene glycol
`or polyethylene oxide (PEO) chains. Hence, their
`CPs approach the CPs of the latter.
`The CPs of PEOs decrease with increasing
`molecular weight. Based on interpolation on the
`nearly linear plots of the reciprocal of the CP in
`degrees Kelvin versus the reciprocal of the square
`root of the molecular weight [18], normally dis-
`tributed PEOs with CPs of 115°C and 118°C have
`molecular weights of 18 300 and 14 600, respec-
`tively [19]. For fractionated PEOs, CPs of 115°C
`and 118°C correspond to molecular weights of
`9600 and 8300, respectively [20]. The latter are
`perhaps more representative of the PEO shells of
`NS micelles.
`
`3.4. Slopes and susceptibility to salting out
`
`The slopes of the linear segments in Figs. 1 and
`2, b=dCP/dmNaNO3
`,are listed in Table 2. For
`both octoxynols and nonoxynols, the slopes be-
`come increasingly more negative as the p values
`increase. This trend is significant at the 5% proba-
`bility level. The water solubility of NSs is due to
`their polyoxyethylene moieties. Apparently, the
`bigger these moieties are, the stronger is the salt-
`ing-out or CP-lowering effect of a given increment
`in the concentration of the added Na+ ions.
`This novel effect of the degree of polyoxyethy-
`lation on the surfactants’ susceptibility to being
`salted out,
`is illustrated below: The difference
`DCP between the CP in water (CP0) and the CP in
`2.00 m NaNO3 is proportional to p. The least-
`squares equation of the linear relation is, for the
`five octoxynols of Table 2:
`DCP=11.3+0.139 p (n=5, r=0.987)
`
`(2)
`
`and for the five nonoxynols:
`DCP=13.0+0.120 p (n=5, r=0.980).
`
`(3)
`
`It is unlikely that these two empirical equations
`can be extrapolated to much higher p values.
`
`3.5. Relation between cloud points and degrees of
`polyoxyethylation
`
`According to Fig. 3, the increase in the CP0
`values of the octoxynols and nonoxynols with
`increasing p is nearly linear up to p$16. Both
`curves then begin to level off, with the sharpest
`curvature at p$22–25. They become nearly hori-
`zontal at p$40, where they are only 3°C apart,
`and eventually merge at p=90–94, in the vicinity
`of the CP of low molecular-weight PEO. The
`points for the polyoxyethylated dodecanols (not
`shown) lie at slightly higher temperatures.
`Even when the CP values are plotted against
`the surfactants’ LB instead of their p values to
`compensate for the difference in the size of their
`hydrocarbon moieties, the octoxynol curve lies
`slightly below the nonoxynol curve while the
`curve for the polyoxyethylated dodecanols lies
`slightly above it. This plot is not shown.
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`135
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`4.1. Validity of published cloud point relations
`
`The published relations [1,3–5] are based solely
`on surfactants with p015 and CPB100°C. Their
`points fall exclusively on the steeply ascending,
`nearly linear segments in Fig. 3. Extrapolations
`towards higher p values made on that basis alone
`could do nothing but to extend these steep seg-
`ments: Below p=15, the curves give no hint of
`levelling off. Therefore, such extrapolations are
`bound to produce unrealistically high CP values.
`For instance, Eq. (7) of [4] gives CP estimates of
`179°C, 298°C and 328°C for Surfactants No. 13,
`14 and 6 or 11, respectively, instead of the experi-
`mental values of 113°C, 118°C and 114°C (Table
`2). This shortcoming relegates the published rela-
`tions [1,3–5] to a CP rangeB100°C andp B16,
`for which CP values are easily measured and are
`already extensively tabulated [1,2]. They are use-
`less for estimating CP values\100°C, pertaining
`to NSs with p values between 16 and 100, which
`are more difficult to measure experimentally and
`for which there is, consequently, a dearth of pub-
`lished data.
`
`Fig. 3. Cloud point CPo in water (°C) of octoxynols and
`nonoxynols as a function of the number p of oxyethylene units
`per molecule. Key: , nonoxynols, present work; ,
`nonoxynols, Ref. [1]; , octoxynols, present work; , oc-
`toxynols, Ref. [7]; , octoxynols, Ref. [1].
`
`4.2. Upper cloud point limits for highly
`polyoxyethylated surfactants
`
`The three most highly polyoxyethylated surfac-
`tants, Nos. 6, 11 and 14, have an HLB value of
`19.0,
`indicating that their molecules consist of
`95% polyoxyethylene and 5% alkylphenol or alco-
`hol. Their hydrocarbon moieties are large enough
`to confer surface activity in aqueous solution but
`too small, on a volume-percent basis, to substan-
`tially affect solubilities or CPs: The limiting CPs
`of highly polyoxyethylated NSs are in the 114–
`118°C range, which equals the CPs of PEOs of
`relatively low molecular weight.
`
`4.3. Practical considerations
`
`NSs with CPsE121°C, which remain func-
`tional at steam sterilization temperatures, cannot
`be prepared by more extensive polyoxyethylation
`of alkylphenols or long-chain alcohols: Their CPs
`are capped by the CP of PEO.
`An alternate route for raising the CPs of NSs is
`to shorten their hydrocarbon chains, reducing m
`[1,2,4]. However, this route is severely limited
`because the m and p values of NSs are balanced
`to achieve optimum surface activity. Reducing m
`while maintaining (or even increasing) the value
`of p would soon reduce the surfactants’ surface
`activity excessively, so that they could no longer
`function as suspending agents, emulsifiers, solubi-
`lizers etc.
`One can, however, boost the CP of a NS sub-
`stantially by adding very small amounts of ionic
`surfactants. They form mixed micelles with the
`NS which, by virtue of their slightly ionic charac-
`ter and the resultant intermicellar electrostatic
`repulsion, have considerably higher CPs [21]. For
`instance, either a mere 5×10 − 4 m (0.014%)
`sodium dodecyl sulfate or 5×10− 3 m (0.097%)
`decylammonium chloride boosted the CP of a
`2.00% solution of octoxynol 9 by 26°C. Higher
`concentrations of ionic surfactants produced com-
`mensurately larger CP increases [22].
`In the case of pharmaceutical disperse systems,
`it is germane that the majority of prescription
`drugs are cationic [10]. Most of them are either
`water soluble and form mixed micelles with NSs
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`
`136
`
`H. Schott /Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 186 (2001) 129–136
`
`or are solubilized by NS micelles. Both processes
`confer a slight positive charge to the nonionic
`micelles, boosting their CPs very effectively.
`
`References
`
`[1] H. Schott, J. Pharm. Sci. 58 (1969) 1443.
`[2] N.M. van Os, J.R. Haak, L.A.M. Rupert, Physico-Chem-
`ical Properties of Selected Anionic, Cationic and Non-
`ionic Surfactants, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993 Chap. 3.
`[3] W. Denk, W. Frank, Fette, Seifen, Anstrichmittel 65
`(1963) 46.
`[4] T. Gu, J. Sjo¨blom, Colloids Surfaces 64 (1992) 39.
`[5] P.D.T. Huibers, D.O. Shah, A.R. Katritzky, J. Colloid
`Interface Sci. 193 (1997) 132.
`[6] M. Meerbote, B. Koch, Tenside Surf. Det. 31 (1994) 39.
`[7] M. Aoki, Y. Iwayama, Yakugaku Zasshi 79 (1959) 516.
`[8] M.J. Schick, J. Colloid Sci. 17 (1962) 801.
`[9] H. Schott, A.E. Royce, S.K. Han, J. Colloid Interface Sci.
`98 (1984) 196.
`
`[10] The United States Pharmacopeia, 22nd revision/The Na-
`tional Formulary, 17th edn., The United States Pharma-
`copeial Convention, Inc., Rockville, MD, 1989.
`[11] CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary, 3rd edn., The
`Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Ass., Inc., Washington,
`DC, 1982.
`[12] H. Schott, Colloids Surfaces 11 (1984) 51.
`[13] H. Schott, S.K. Han, J. Pharm. Sci. 65 (1976) 979.
`[14] H. Schott, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 189 (1997) 117.
`[15] S. Kaneshina, O. Shibata, M. Nakamura, Bull. Chem.
`Soc. Japan 55 (1982) 951.
`[16] G.W. Snedecor, W.G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, 6th
`edn, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1972.
`[17] D.G. Kleinbaum, L.L. Kupper, Applied Regression Anal-
`ysis and Other multivariable Methods, Duxbury Press, N.
`Scituate: MA, 1978.
`[18] F.W. Billmeyer, Textbook of Polymer Science, 3rd edn,
`Wiley, New York, 1984, p. 170.
`[19] Y.C. Bae, S.M. Lambert, D.S. Soane, J.M. Prausnitz,
`Macromolecules 24 (1991) 4403.
`[20] S. Saeki, N. Kuwahara, M. Nakata, M. Kaneko, Polymer
`17 (1976) 685.
`[21] W.N. Maclay, J. Colloid Sci. 11 (1956) 272.
`[22] H. Schott, A.E. Royce, J. Pharm. Sci. 73 (1984) 793.
`
`.
`
`Page 8 of 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket