throbber
Page 1 of 24
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2298
`
`LUPIN V. SENJU
`
`IPR2015-01099
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2298
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01099
`
`Page 1 of 24
`
`

`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Activities conducted as part of pharmaceutical marketing and promotion
`
`are an important component of educating and informing consumers and
`health care professionals about new treatments. Direct—to—consumer (DTC)
`
`advertisements aim to inform patients of important treatment options,
`while pharmaceutical sales representatives work to get accurate, up-to-
`
`date information on medicines to health care professionals.
`
`These efforts have also been the subject of debate, with some questioning
`
`their value. This booklet offers facts about pharmaceutical marketing and
`promotion. We believe these facts are important to consider as the value
`
`of marketing and promotion are debated.
`
`Since our last publication on marketing and promotion,‘ the pharmaceutical
`industry has worked to improve the dissemination of information about
`
`medical advances and to address concerns. One important change was the
`
`unanimous approval by PhRMA’s Board of Directors of Guiding Principles
`
`on Direct to Consumer Advertisements About Prescription Medicines. These
`
`voluntary Principles express the commitment of PhRMA members to deliver
`
`DTC communications that are a valuable contribution to public health.
`
`In addition, in 2008 PhRMA adopted a newly revised Code on Interactions
`
`with Health Care Professionals. The strengthened code reflects a
`
`commitment to maintaining the highest ethical standards in all
`marketing practices and to promote the best patient care possible.
`
`This publication shows the role of marketing and promotion in speeding the
`
`dissemination of valuable improvements in medical care. It also highlights
`
`the important role that marketing plays in getting patients to discuss a
`
`range of health issues with their physicians, resulting in patients receiving
`needed treatment.
`
`We hope that the information contained in this booklet will enhance
`
`dialogue surrounding pharmaceutical marketing and promotion by
`
`providing a perspective that often is not heard. We look fon/vard to further
`
`exploration of how best to get patients into needed treatment, and how to
`
`more rapidly and appropriately disseminate valuable medical technology.
`
`‘Pharmaceutical Rsearch and Manufacturers of America, “Tough Questions — Straight Answers Pharmaceutical Marketing 8: Promotion,‘ (Washington, DC: PhRMA, Fall 2004)»
`http:.".-".vww.phrma.orglfi |esITough_0uestions.pdf.
`
`Page 2 of 24
`
`Page 2 of 24
`
`

`
`NOILDITCIOHLNI
`
`—I
`
`>c
`
`u
`I-
`I11
`0‘H
`
`nO2-
`
`1
`H1
`
`2-
`
`1
`VI
`
`TABLE or CONTENTS
`
`KEY FACTS 1
`
`MARKETING TO HEALTH CARE
`PROVIDERS & PRESCRIBING PATTERNS 3
`
`Pharmaceutical sales representatives provide
`doctors with important information about
`new treatment options that is factored
`into prescribing, but studies find that many
`other factors, including insurers’ policies,
`affect prescribing decisions, often with
`greater impact. In fact, about 2 out of
`3 medicines prescribed in the US. are
`generic—much higher than in nearly
`all other developed countries.
`
`INFORMATION TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 5
`
`Government regulates the marketing of
`pharmaceuticals, and companies strive
`to provide reliable, valuable information.
`Delivering this information is key to making
`physicians aware of the latest advances.
`
`SAMPLES 6
`
`Samples provide many benefits to patients,
`allowing them to begin treatment sooner and
`helping them find the right medicine.
`
`"GIFTS" TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS 7
`
`PhRMA’s member companies are committed
`to following the highest ethical standards
`and all legal requirements in their interactions
`with health care professionals. In 2008, they
`adopted a newly revised code that, among
`other things, redefines the narrow category
`of educational items company representatives
`can give to health care professionals.
`
`DTC & PHYSICIAN I PATIENT RELATIONSHIP 8
`
`Many physicians and patients report that DTC
`advertising enhances their communication.
`
`UNDERDIAGNOSIS & UNDERTREATMENT 9
`
`Studies report significant underdiagnosis
`and undertreatment of serious conditions
`that affect millions of Americans. While
`
`these conditions, such as diabetes and
`cardiovascular disease, can often be treated
`
`effectively, left untreated they generate poor
`health outcomes and high health costs for
`avoidable hospitalizations. Pharmaceutical
`marketing and promotion help address this
`problem by raising awareness of disease
`symptoms and treatments, and prompting
`patients to visit their doctor.
`
`PATIENT EDUCATION & EMPOWERMENT 12
`
`DTC advertising creates awareness of diseases
`and treatment options, helps get patients into
`needed treatment, and empowers patients
`with information.
`
`DTC & PRESCRIBING PATTERNS 13
`
`A majority of physicians report not feeling
`pressure to prescribe requested medications.
`In fact, many physicians recommend lifestyle
`changes and other treatments when patients
`request a specific medicine.
`
`DTC ADVERTISING & DRUG PRICES I SPENDING 15
`
`Government agencies and independent
`experts report no direct relationship between
`drug marketing and drug prices.
`
`SPENDING ON PROMOTION AND R&D 17
`
`Pharmaceutical companies are very research-
`intensive and spend significantly more on
`research and development than on marketing
`and promotion.
`
`GOVERNMENT & INDUSTRY REGULATION 19
`
`Pharmaceutical marketing is closely regulated
`by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) to help assure that promotional
`materials are accurate, fairly balanced, and
`limited to information that has been approved
`by the FDA. Many pharmaceutical companies
`have also adopted voluntary pharmaceutical
`industry guidelines that lay out standards for
`interactions with health care providers and
`appropriate DTC marketing.
`
`Page 3 of 24
`
`Page 3 of 24
`
`

`
`KEY FACTS
`
`The facts below are a preview of the full content contained within
`
`this brochure. For more information on each Key Fact, go to the
`
`corresponding page number listed.
`
`Marketing to Health Care Providers
`
`either always useful (52%) or often useful
`
`8: Prescribing Patterns
`
`o A 2008 physician survey by KRC Research
`
`(17%). 95% of physicians surveyed agreed
`that samples allow patients to start immediate
`
`found that the vast majority of physicians say
`
`treatment and 84% said that samples provide
`
`their clinical knowledge (92%) and a patient's
`
`them with useful first-hand experience.
`
`unique situation (88%) greatly influence their
`
`o A recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey found
`
`prescribing decisions. 35% point to patients’
`
`that 75% of physicians frequently (58%) or
`
`coverage and fonnulary as an important
`
`sometimes (17%) give patients samples to
`
`factor in prescribing, while just 11% say that
`
`pharmaceutical company representatives greatly
`
`assist them with their out-of-pocket costs.
`(See pg 6)
`
`influence them. Surveys by Boston Consulting
`
`Group and Tufts Center for the Study of Drug
`
`Development echo these findings.
`
`- 1/3 of physicians report that they do not
`
`always discuss treatment options that are
`
`not covered by an insurer.
`
`o Approximately 67% of all prescriptions used
`
`in the United States are generic. This is a sharp
`
`increase in recent years—49% of prescriptions
`
`in 2000 were for generics—and one of the
`
`highest generic use rates in the world.
`(See pgs 3-4)
`
`Information to Health Care Providers
`
`Physician I Patient Relationship
`
`- According to an FDA survey, a vast majority
`
`(over 90%) of patients who asked about a
`
`drug reported that their physician "welcomed
`
`the question.’’
`
`- The FDA survey also polled 500 physicians
`and found that:
`
`- 73% believed that DTC ads helped
`
`patients ask thoughtful questions.
`
`o 53% of physicians considered the
`number one benefit of DTC ads to be
`
`the better discussions they had with
`
`their patients about their health.
`
`- Nearly 90% of physicians are either very satisfied
`(29%) or somewhat satisfied (59%) with
`
`- 91% of physicians said the patient did not
`
`try to influence the course of treatment in
`
`the information they received from company
`
`a way that would have been harmful.
`
`representatives, according to the KRC survey.
`
`(See pg 8)
`
`The BCG survey yielded similar results with over
`
`90% of physicians believing infonnation from
`
`representatives to be either very valuable (38%)
`or somewhat valuable (53%).
`(See pg 5)
`
`Samples
`
`o The 2008 KRC physician survey found 69%
`
`of physicians believe free drug samples are
`
`1
`
`THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Underdiagnosis & Undertreatment
`
`o American patients receive about 1/2 of
`recommended care, according to a landmark
`
`2003 study by RAND Health.
`
`- The RAND Study also found that for quality
`standards related to medication, patients on
`
`average failed to receive recommended care
`30% of the time.
`
`Page 4 of 24
`
`Page 4 of 24
`
`

`
`Underdiagnosis & Undertreatment Continued
`
`Another RAND study published in the
`Annals of Internal Medicine found that
`
`50% of all quality problems in the use of
`
`medicines was accounted for by underuse,
`
`compared to 3% accounted for by overuse.
`
`A Harvard University/Massachusetts
`
`General Hospital and Harris Interactive
`
`Survey found that:
`- 1/4 of patients who visit their doctor
`
`after seeing a DTC ad receive a new
`
`diagnosis.
`46% of physicians felt that DTC
`
`advertising increased patients’
`
`compliance with prescribed treatment.
`
`By treating patients according to guidelines
`
`and by eliminating the underuse of
`
`high blood pressure medicines, 89,000
`lives could be saved and 420,000
`
`hospitalizations avoided annually.
`(See pgs 91 7)
`
`Patient Education
`
`A 2007 KRC Research survey found that:
`o
`1 in 4 consumers sought more
`
`DTC & Prescribing Patterns
`
`A 2006 Government Accountability Office
`
`(GAO) report found that only 2-7% of
`consumers who saw a DTC advertisement
`
`requested and ultimately received a
`
`prescription for the advertised drug.
`
`A 2002 study on the effect of DTC
`
`advertising on demand for pharmaceuticals
`
`revealed that DTC advertising may increase
`
`demand for a particular brand drug, but
`
`only if it has a "favorable status" on the
`
`insurer's formulary.
`(See pgs 73-14)
`
`DTC Advertising & Drug Prices / Spending
`
`According to the Federal Trade
`
`Commission, ”[DTC advertising] can
`
`empower consumers to manage their own
`
`health care by providing information that
`
`will help them, with the assistance of their
`doctors, to make better informed decisions
`
`about their treatment options...Consumers
`
`receive these benefits from DTC advertising
`
`with little, if any, evidence that such
`
`advertising increases prescription drug
`
`information after seeing a DTC ad.
`
`prices." [Emphasis Added]
`
`4 in 5 consumers agree that
`
`advertising for prescription medicines
`
`can educate people about health
`
`conditions and treatment options.
`
`A Prevention Magazine physician
`
`survey found that 70% of doctors feel
`
`that ads help educate patients about
`available treatments. 67% felt that the
`
`advertisements helped them have better
`
`"The pharmaceutical industry is one of the
`most research—intensive industries in the
`
`United States. Pharmaceutical firms invest
`
`as much as five times more in research and
`
`development, relative to their sales, than
`
`the average U.S. manufacturing firm."
`— Congressional Budget Office, 2006
`
`Total promotional spending 2006 —
`$12.0 billion
`
`discussions with their patients.
`
`- DTC — $4.8 billion
`
`Sl3V:lA3)l
`
`- Office promotion, hospital promotion,
`
`and journal advertising — $7.2 billion
`
`Total R&D spending 2007 — $58.8 billion
`(See pgs 75-16)
`
`The FDA’s 2004 survey showed that in
`88% of cases when patients ask their
`
`physicians about a medicine as a result
`
`of seeing a DTC advertisement, they
`
`have the condition that the drug treats.
`
`A Prevention Magazine patient survey
`
`found that 80% of patients who see
`medicines advertised on television are
`
`aware of the risk information presented,
`
`compared to 66% aware of the benefits.
`(See pg 12)
`
`Page 5 of 24
`
`Page 5 of 24
`
`

`
`MARKETING TO HEALTH CARE
`
`PROVIDERS & PRESCRIBING PATTERNS
`
`Pharmaceutical sales representatives provide doctors with important information
`
`about new treatment options that is factored into prescribing, but studies find
`
`that many other factors, including insurers’ policies, affect prescribing decisions,
`
`often with greater impact. In fact, about 2 out of 3 medicines prescribed in the
`
`US. are generic—much higher than in nearly all other developed countries.
`
`CHART 1: Factors Physicians Consider in Prescribing Medicines
`Percent Saying Great Deal or Some Influence on Prescribing Decisions
`
`Cllnlal knowledg I
`experience
`Paflenfs unique sltuation
`
`Peer-reviewed journals
`Cllnlal practice guidelines
`
`Colleagues & peers
`Paflenfs flnandal status
`
`Information from
`pnannaoeutlcal ca reps
`Pauenfs personal options
`
`
`
`
`Infonnation from Insurance
`co. 5. PBM Reps
`
`i..—
`
`I Great Deal
`I '»
`
`Source: Phamraceutical Research and Manufacturers orAmen'ca, KRC Research: Survey of Physicians’ Opinions About
`Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Acfivities and lnforrnafion, n=501, 2008.
`
`Pharmaceutical marketing to health care
`
`patient's unique situation. Journal articles, clinical
`
`providers is an important part of keeping
`
`guidelines and formularies are all factors that
`
`physicians up-to-date about new treatments and
`
`physicians consider more than pharmaceutical
`
`their risks and benefits. However, it is only one
`
`company representatives’ [See Chart 1].
`
`factor among many in the health care system.
`For instance, health plans may strongly
`
`Two surveys one by The Boston Consulting
`Group (BCG) and the other by the Tufts
`
`influence prescribing through formulary design
`
`Center for the Study of Drug Development,
`
`and utilization management strategies, among
`
`echoed these findings. In the BCG survey,
`
`other factors. A recent KRC Research survey
`
`54% of physicians reported that formularies
`
`sponsored by PhRMA found that by far the most
`
`have a major impact on prescribing decisions,
`
`important factors in prescribing are a physician's
`
`50% identified peers, and 47% identified
`
`clinical knowledge and experience and the
`
`clinical guidelines, compared to 14% who
`
`‘ KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research CompanyActivities and Infonnation,' n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers ofAmerit'a.
`
`3
`
`THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 6 of 24
`
`Page 6 of 24
`
`

`
`said pharmaceutical representatives have a
`
`a study in Health Affairs noted that physician
`
`major impact? The Tufts Center for the Study
`
`counterdetailing by insurance companies and
`
`of Drug Development found that among
`
`pharmacy benefit managers to encourage the
`
`factors influencing prescribing decisions in 2007,
`
`use of generic is "gaining momentum." In the
`
`physicians considered the following to be "very
`
`public sector, some Medicaid programs have
`
`important": continuing medical education
`
`recently hired physicians and pharmacists to visit
`
`(68%), information from peers (43%), and
`payer's decisions (37%). Only 13% of physicians
`
`doctors’ offices and encourage them to prescribe
`generics.‘-* Counterdetailing by payers and their
`
`considered information from pharmaceutical
`
`agents to influence prescribing decisions is not
`
`companies "very important.“
`
`Research published in Health Affairs reports that
`
`subject to FDA regulation, while detailing by
`pharmaceutical companies is FDA—regu|ated.
`
`one-third of physicians do not always discuss
`
`Counterdetailing is only one of many payer
`
`treatment options when those options would
`
`tactics to influence physician prescribing. The
`
`not be covered by the patient’s insurer.5
`
`It is also important to note that approximately
`
`67% of all prescriptions dispensed in the
`
`U.S. in 2007 were for generic drugs,‘‘ up
`from 49% in 2000.7 Moreover, the U.S. has
`
`one of the highest generic market shares of
`
`any developed country? These facts clearly
`
`demonstrate that the regulated information
`
`conveyed through pharmaceutical company
`
`marketing of brand medicines is only one of
`
`many factors that physicians consider when
`
`making prescribing decisions.
`
`The range of influences on prescribing extends
`
`beyond those identified above. For example,
`
`Health Affairs study also reported that Blue
`Cross Blue Shield of Florida sends letters to
`
`doctors who are low prescribers of generics.
`
`In addition, other health plans plan to
`
`distribute generic drug samples to contracted
`physicians.‘° According to The Wall Street
`
`Journal, during a three—month program in
`
`2007, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan paid
`doctors for switching patients from the brand
`
`statin they had been taking to a different
`
`statin’s generic copy.“ The physician survey by
`
`KRC Research found that 80% of physicians
`
`have been asked by an insurer to switch a
`
`prescription to a different drug—not merely a
`
`generic copy of the drug they prescribed.”
`
`CHART 2: Brand and Generic Shares of Prescriptions Filled: 1996-2007
`
`
`
`HHVDHl'|V3H019N|l3)lZlVW
`
`
`
`SNH3J.lVd9N|El|tDS3Eld’8SHElG|l\0Hd
`
`—I— Branded Products
`
`Source: PhRMA Analysis of National Prescription Audit" data from IMS Health, data through 3"’ Quarter of 2007.
`’Boston Consulting Group, 2002 BCG Proprietary Physician Survey, n=399, 2002.
`‘Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, atlloak 2008, (Tufts CSDD: Boston, 2008)‘
`5 M,Wynia et al., "Do Physicians Not Offer Useful Services Because of Coverage Restrictions?," HealIhAl/airsZ2, no.4 (Ju|ylAugust 2003): 190197.
`‘Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Ana/ysisofll/arional Prescrplion Audit“ data /ram IM5 Health, data through 3rd Quarter of 2007.
`7IMS Health, October, 2007.
`' M. Danzon and M.F. Furukawa, ' Price and Availability of Pharmaceuticals: Evidence from Nine Countries,’ HealthA/fails Web Exclusive, 29 October 2003,
`httpzi/content.heaIthaffairsorg/cgiIreprintih|thaff.w3.521vi (accessed 25 March 2008).
`9). Malkin et al., “The Changing Face of Pharmacy Benefit Design,‘ Hea/n‘zAf/airs23, no.1 (2004) 194-199, page 198.
`'0 Ibid
`"V. Fuhrmans, ‘Doctors Paid To Prescribe Generic Pills,’ The Wall Streetloumal, 24 January 2008.
`"KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research CompanyActivities and Information,‘ n=501, 2008, sponsored by
`Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers ofAmerica.
`
`Page 7 of 24
`
`Page 7 of 24
`
`

`
`INFORMATION TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
`Government regulates the marketing of pharmaceuticals, and companies
`strive to provide reliable, valuable information. Delivering this information
`is key to making physicians aware of the latest advances.
`“There is a clear need for interactions between
`
`physicians and the pharmaceutical industry
`to ensure the free fl ow of valid scientifi c
`information. When the information is accurate
`and complete, physicians have the necessary
`tools to make the right prescribing decisions.”20
` – American Medical Association, Testimony
`
`economist David Cutler and then-Stanford researcher
`Mark McClellan. Through promotional activities for a
`then-new treatment for depression, “Manufacturers
`of SSRIs [depression medications] encouraged
`doctors to watch for depression and the reduced
`stigma afforded by the new medications induced
`patients to seek help.”17 As a result, diagnosis and
`treatment for depression doubled over the 1990s.
`However, underdiagnosis and undertreatment remain
`high: 16.2% of Americans suffer from a depressive
`disorder, of those, only 51.6% receive treatment.18
`
`Physicians evaluate information from a range of sources,
`including continuing medical education, journal articles,
`clinical practice guidelines, and company representatives.
`They consider many aspects of information from
`representatives to be useful: 95% say information about
`drug interactions is useful, 95% value information about
`the latest drugs and treatments, 92% fi nd answers to
`specifi c questions they have useful, and 90% appreciate
`information about patient assistance programs.19
`
`According to the Institute of Medicine, science
`and technology have been advancing at an
`unprecedented pace in recent years.13 Despite this,
`diffusion into practice is slow: One study found that
`medical research takes 17 years to be incorporated
`into clinical practice.14 Pharmaceutical marketing
`plays a valuable role by delivering the newest
`information on medicines to physicians and helping
`to translate new technologies into practice.
`
`This information must be reliable. State and federal
`government regulations govern the marketing of
`products, and serious consequences exist for non-
`compliance. Only a product’s scientifi cally proven
`properties, verifi ed by the FDA, can be discussed
`in its marketing. Furthermore, pharmaceutical
`representatives strive to provide the most accurate
`information in order to build credibility and earn the
`trust of physicians over time.
`
`Published research has looked at whether
`physicians see value in pharmaceutical
`promotional and marketing efforts. A 2008 KRC
`Research survey reported that nearly 90% of
`physicians were either very satisfi ed (29%) or
`somewhat satisfi ed (59%) with the information
`they received from company representatives.15 A
`2002 BCG survey yielded similar results.16
`
`The value of disseminating information to
`physicians is evident in a study by Harvard
`
`13 Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, March 2001).
`14 E.A. Balas and S.A. Boren, “Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement,” Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-centered Systems, (Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer, 2000), 65–70.
`15 KRC Research, “Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information,” n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers of America.
`16 Boston Consulting Group, 2002 BCG Proprietary Physician Survey (400 respondents), 2002, as reported in “Pharmaceutical Marketing and Promotion, Creating Access to
`Innovation,” Economic Realities in Health Care Policy 3, no. 1, (Pfi zer: 2003): 11.
`17 D. Cutler and M. McClellan, “Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?” Health Affairs 20, no.5 (September/October 2001): 11-29.
`18 R.C. Kessler, P. Berglund, O. Demler et al., “The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R),” The Journal of the
`American Medical Association 289, no.23 (18 June 2003): 3095-3105.
`19 KRC Research, “Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Company Activities and Information,” n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
`20 American Medical Association, “Paid to Prescribe?: Exploring the Relationship Between Doctors and the Drug Industry,” Statement to the Special Committee on Aging, United
`States Senate, (Washington, DC: Statement of Robert M. Sade, 27 June 2007) http://aging.senate.gov/events/hr176rs.pdf, (accessed 29 August 2007).
`
`5 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 8 of 24
`
`

`
`,.,_
`
`>2EU
`ms;
`"U
`mg
`oz
`55U
`,-HZ
`I-4
`‘A0
`
`I|
`
`'|'|
`>I’
`—l
`I
`
`Samples provide many benefits to patients, allowing them to begin
`
`treatment sooner and helping them find the right medicine.
`
`SAMPLES
`
`Another role that pharmaceutical promotion
`
`samples provide them with useful first—hand
`
`often plays is providing samples to physicians.
`Doctors may distribute samples to patients for
`
`experience. According to the chairman of the
`
`Asthma and Allergy Foundation's Medical-
`
`several reasons—for instance, to get patients
`
`Scientific Council, samples are "an important
`
`started on therapy right away, to optimize
`
`way of trying to find out which [medicines]
`
`dosing or choice of drug before committing to
`
`work for patients?”
`
`a particular course of treatment, and sometimes
`
`to help patients who might not be able to afford
`medicines on their own.
`
`A 2008 KRC Research survey found 69% of
`
`Although the main role of samples is to allow
`
`patients to try a medicine before filling a full
`
`prescription and to start treatment right away,
`in some cases physicians provide samples to
`
`physicians believe free drug samples are either
`
`help patients who are financially struggling. A
`
`always useful (52%) or often useful (17%).2‘
`
`recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey found
`
`S31dWVS
`
`Ninety-five percent of physicians surveyed
`
`agreed that samples allow patients to start
`immediate treatment and 84% said that
`
`that 75% of physicians frequently (58%) or
`
`sometimes (17%) give patients samples to assist
`
`them with their out—of—pocket costs.” In the
`
`survey by KRC Research, 93% of physicians
`
`said drug samples helped them assist those
`
`patients who are uninsured or in need of
`financial assistance.“
`
`"[Samp|es provide] a clear and
`
`direct benefit to patients who have
`
`— American Medical Association, Testimony
`
`a medically indicated need for
`
`treatment, but lack the resources
`
`to obtain the necessary care."Z5
`
`" KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ Opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research CornpanyActivities and Information,’ n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers ofAmerica.
`'7 J. Saranow and AD. Marcus ‘lite Higher Cost of Sneezing —As Nonprescription Clarhin Hits Shelves, Insurers Jack up Prices of Other Allergy Drugs,’ The Wdl Street Journal, 10
`December 2(X)2.
`'3 Kaiser Family Foundation, Nafionalsurvey a/Physicians,Top|ines, November 2006, httpd/vimwkftorglkaiserpollslupload/7584.pdf (accessed 10 December 2007).
`“KRC Research, ‘Physicians’ opinions About Pharmaceutical and Biotech Research Coinpartyimctivities and Information,’ n=501, 2008, sponsored by Pharmaceutical Research
`and Manufacturers ofAmerica.
`“American Medical Association, ‘mid to Prescribetz Exploring the Relationship Between Doctors and the Drug Industry,‘ Statement to the Specia/Committee onAging, United
`5115 Senate, (Washington, DC: Statement of Robert M. Sade, 27 June 2007) httpdlagingsenategov/eventsllrl76rs.pdfi (accessed 29 August 2007).
`
`Page 9 of 24
`
`Page 9 of 24
`
`

`
`“GIFTS” TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
`
`PhRMA’s member companies are committed to following the highest
`ethical standards and all legal requirements in their interactions with
`health care professionals. In 2008, they adopted a newly revised code
`that, among other things, redefi nes the narrow category of educational
`items company representatives can give to health care professionals.
`
`In 2008, the PhRMA Board adopted a newly
`revised Code on Interactions with Health Care
`Professionals (the “PhRMA Code”), refl ecting
`a commitment to working with health care
`professionals for the benefi t of patients. The
`PhRMA Code starts with the fundamental
`principle that a health care professional’s care
`of patients should be based—and should be
`perceived as being based—solely on each
`patient’s medical needs and the health care
`professional’s medical knowledge.
`
`The PhRMA Code reaffi rms that interactions
`between company representatives and health
`care professionals should be focused on
`providing information on products, scientifi c and
`educational information, and supporting medical
`education. Thus, the revised Code prohibits
`distribution of non-educational items, such
`as pens, mugs, and other “reminder” objects
`adorned with a company logo to health care
`professionals. The Code acknowledges that such
`items may foster misperceptions that company
`interactions with health care professionals are not
`based on informing them about medicines.
`
`Informational discussions by company
`representatives provide health care professionals
`with valuable information about new medicines
`that can lead to improved patient care. The new
`
`Code states that company representatives are
`permitted to offer an occasional meal as long
`as it is modest, and only offered in the offi ce or
`hospital setting, in conjunction with educational
`presentations. Limiting these meals to the
`offi ce or hospital setting, instead of restaurants,
`ensures that the meal is merely incidental to
`the substantive communication between the
`representative and the health care professionals
`in a professional setting.
`
`The revised PhRMA Code reaffi rms that
`representatives should not give health care
`professionals any items for personal benefi t
`or provide tickets to any recreational or
`entertainment events. It allows a company to
`engage health care professionals for bona fi de
`consulting services, provided that the company
`has a legitimate need for the services, the
`arrangement is not a reward or inducement to
`prescribe a particular medicine, and compensation
`is based on the fair market value of those services.
`
`The revised PhRMA Code contains a compliance
`mechanism, requiring companies that state their
`intentions to follow the Code to certify annually that
`they have policies and procedures in place to foster
`compliance. PhRMA will identify on its website the
`companies that intend to follow the Code and the
`status of their compliance certifi cations.
`
`7 THE FACTS ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL MARKETING & PROMOTION
`
`Page 10 of 24
`
`

`
`“GIFTS” TO HEALTH
` CARE PROVIDERS
`
`DTC & PHYSICIAN /
`PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
`
`8
`
`DTC & PHYSICIAN / PATIENT RELATIONSHIP
`
`Many physicians and patients report that DTC advertising enhances
`their communication.
`
`According to an FDA survey
`
`of patients, over 90% of patients
`
`who asked about a drug reported
`
`that their physician “welcomed
`
`the question.”26
`
`– FDA Survey, 2004
`
`to the positive benefi t that advertisements
`for prescription drugs have on patients. The
`survey revealed several clear trends: “African
`American physicians see DTC advertising as
`providing substantial educational benefi ts;
`physicians believe that DTC advertising
`helps rather than hurts the doctor-patient
`relationship; and African American physicians
`see the benefi ts of DTC advertising
`outweighing its drawbacks.”29
`
`Pharmaceutical advertising increases
`communication between the physician and
`patient. According to a 2004 FDA survey of
`patients, over 90% of patients who asked
`about a drug reported that their physician
`“welcomed the question.”26
`
`An FDA survey polled 500 physicians and found
`that 73% believed DTC ads help patients ask
`thoughtful questions, and 53% of physicians
`considered the number one benefi t of DTC ads
`to be the better discussions they had with their
`patients about their health. The overwhelming
`majority of physicians (91%) said the patient
`did not try to infl uence the course of treatment
`in a way that would have been harmful.27
`
`Many doctors fi nd that, overall, DTC
`advertising benefi ts patients and helps
`strengthen the patient/physician relationship.
`Research published in 2004 in Health Affairs
`reported that 70% of surveyed doctors
`reported that ads help educate patients about
`available treatments. Sixty-seven percent felt
`that the advertisements helped them have
`better discussions with their patients.28
`
`Another physician survey published in 2006 in
`the Journal of the National Medical Association
`echoed these fi ndings, reporting that 66% of
`African American physicians surveyed attested
`
`26 K. Aikin, J.L. Swasy, A.C. Braman, “Patient and Physician Attitudes and Behaviors Associated with DTC Promotion of Prescription Drugs – Summary of FDA Survey
`Research Results, Final Report,” (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and
`Research, 19 November 2004) http://www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/Final%20Report/FRfi nal111904.pdf (accessed 30 October 2007).
`27 Ibid.
`28 J. S. Weissman et al., “Physicians Report on Patient Encounters Involving Direct-to-Consumer Advertising,” Health Affairs Web Exclusive, 28 April 2004, http://content.
`healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.w4.219v1 (accessed 25 March 2008).
`29 Albert Morris et.al., “For the Good of the Patient, Survey of the Physicians of the National Medical Association Regarding Perceptions of DTC Advertising, Part II, 2006”
`Journal of the National Medicine Association 99, no. 3 (March 2007), http://www.nmanet.org/images/uploads/Publications/OC0287.pdf (accessed 25 March 2008).
`
`Page 11 of 24
`
`

`
`UNDERDIAGNOSIS & UNDERTREATMENT
`
`Studies report signifi cant underdiagnosis and undertreatment of serious
`conditions that affect millions of Americans. While these conditions, such
`as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, can often be treated effectively, left
`untreated they generate poor health outcomes and high health costs for
`avoidable hospitalizations. Pharmaceutical marketing and promotion help
`address this problem by raising awareness of disease symptoms and
`treatments and prompting patients to see their doctor.
`
`Getting patients into needed therapy is one of
`the most important r

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket