throbber
123
`
`Ophthalmic Solution Following Topical Instillation into the Eyes of New Zealand White Rabbits
`
`Bakla yan G.A.
`Bausch & Lomb Inc.
`
`'
`--
`'.'..'!.1'E'$3.i$'I:E5E':{
` n.“
`Bromfenac,
`like most of the NSAIDs, are weakly acidic
`drugs, which ionize at the pH of the lachrymal fluid and
`therefore have limited permeability through the anIonIc
`cornea, which has an isoelectric point
`(pI) of 3.2.
`Reducing the pH of
`the formulation Increases the
`unionized
`fraction
`of
`the
`drug which
`enhances
`permeatIon. 4
`solution) 0.09%,
`Xibrom""
`(bromfenac ophthalmic
`administered twice daily, was approved by the Food and
`Drug Administration (FDA) on March 24, 2005 for the
`treatment
`of
`patients with
`post—cataract
`ocular
`Inflammatlon, and In January 2006 for the treatment of
`ocular pain following cataract surgely 5
`Bromdaym (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09%
`administered once daily, was approved by the FDA on
`October 16, 2010 for the treatment of postoperative
`inflammation and reduction of ocular paln Ir patlents
`who have undergone cataract extraction. 6
`An advanced formulation of bromfenac (PROLENSATM
`[bromfenac ophthalmic solution] 0.07%) has been
`developed which contalns a lower pH (7.8) compared to
`earlier formulations. The lower pH facilitates corneal
`penetration. PROLENSA also has a lower concentration
`compared
`to
`other
`available
`formulations
`of
`bromfenac.7
`
`
`14C-labeled bromfenac 0.07% was analyzed to verify the
`radIoactive purity prior to its use in the study.
`3rior to treatment, 18 animals were weighed and randomly
`asslgned to 6 treatment groups.
`A physical examlnatlon was performed on each animal
`including a pre—treatment ophthalmic examination (slit lamp
`anc
`indirect ophthalmoscopy). Acceptance
`crIterIa
`for
`olacement on study were as follows:
`+ Scores of S 1 for conjunctival swelling
`VJ Scores of 0 for all other observation variables
`Each rabbit received topical ocular doses of a 50pL test agent
`dose into the conjunctival sac using a calibrated pipette and
`he eyelid was held closed for 5-10 seconds following the
`dose.
`
`3 rabbits (both eyes) were assessed per time point over a 24
`wour period
`Animals were euthanized at the following 6 tIme poInts:1 hr
`:t 5 mIn, 2 hrs :l: 15 min, 4 hrs :l: 15 min, 8 hrs :l: 15 min, 12
`'Irs :l: 15 mln, or 24 hrs :l: 15 mln following dosing.
`The irIs/ciliary body,
`lens, vltreous, retlna, choroid, sclera,
`conjunctiva, and cornea were collected from each eye and
`weighed.
`bromfenac
`14C—labeled
`of
`The
`ocular pharmacokinetics
`0.07°/o, pH=7.8 was assessed at 6 time points over a 24
`hour tIme interval.
`
`
`10.0000 I
`
`< queous Humor
`
`1 6000
`
`mo ‘I000
`E‘
`‘l’U}
`3-
`
`0,0100
`
`(10010 .
`
`0,0002 ‘
`
`
`
`
`
` -r '.:3.”!'F1¢'Ji
`
`?".5E’§i=.f¢f9*.';'-C To evaluate the 24-hour ocular distribution
`and concentratIons of 14C-Iabeled low-concentratlon,
`modified bromfenac ophthalmic solution following topical
`instillation In New Zealand White rabbit eyes.
`.
`Eighteen New Zealand whlte rabbits were
`randomly assigned to 6 treatment groups (3 animals per
`treatment group). A single dose of 50pL of the dosing
`solution was topically administered Into the conjunctival
`sac of both eyes
`of each animal. Animals were
`euthanized and the aqueous humor was collected at 1
`hour :l: 5 mlnutes, 2 hours i 15 mlnutes, 4 hours :I: 15
`minutes, 8 hours :I: 15 minutes, 12 hours :l: 15 minutes,
`or 24 hours
`:l:
`15 mlnutes
`following dosing. The
`iris/clliary body,
`lens, vitreous, retina, choroid, sclera,
`conjunctlva,
`and cornea
`(target
`tissues) were also
`collected from each eye for analysis. Dosing solutions
`were
`analyzed
`to
`confirm radiochemical
`purlty;
`radioactlve concentratlon of
`the dosing solutions was
`calculated uslng liquid scintillation countlng (LSC).
`:
`“J:
`Radioactive
`residues
`of
`1“C—Iabeled
`bromfenac, expressed as mean parts per million [(ppm)
`pg/g] was seen In all target tIssues of the eyes, with the
`highest concentrations found in the cornea, conjunctiva,
`and sclera. The concentratlons In the tIssues diminished
`to varying degrees over the 24 hour study period, with
`the exceptlon of the lens, which increased insIgnIficantly
`from the 1 hour time point. The levels detected in the
`lens
`and vltreous humor were
`low and close
`to
`background levels.
`€,‘.£.‘v;r’:.’;3¢.'I:’-,'E1)3’:.'
`SIgnIfIcant penetratIon and measurable
`amounts of “C-labeled bromfenac were detected in most
`ocular target tIssues over 24 hours, with highest levels
`In the cornea, conjunctlva, and sclera. The 14C—low
`concentration bromfenac residues in ocular tissues were
`sImIlar to those prevIously reported wIth 0.09% 14C-
`bromfenac,
`the currently available concentration of
`bromfenac formulation.
`"'
`.a-.
`.
`.,.'
`V «I
`..
`Ema? f/¢.1i.r.r.§.If.w.‘:
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`inflammatory drug
`Bromfenac is a non—steroidal anti
`(NSAID) with an extenslve history of cllnical efficacy; It
`acts by blocking prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting
`cyclooxygenase
`1
`and 2
`In
`the arachidonIc
`acId
`pathway.
`a
`contains
`of bromfenac
`structure
`The
`chemical
`bromine atom at
`the C4 posItIon, which Imparts
`dIstinguishing characterlstics from other ophthalmic
`NSAIDs
`including improved potency and enhanced
`lipophillcity
`molecule,
`of
`the
`which
`facilitates
`
`Animal use for this study was approved by the facility's In
`tutional Anlmal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conformed to the ARVO “Statement on the Use of Animals in Ophthalmlc and Visual Research.
`Presented at the 2013 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting; May 5-9, 2013; Seattle, WA
`
`v=¢~sIrI‘s/CiIiery Body
`-.«:4:4.4-Lens
`
`-1-Retina
`~ ~Chnroicl
`
`an:-:»~Sclera
`
`'/oi’-'-C0l'l1ea
`
`-Conjunctiva
`
`Hours
`
`
`pg/g of drug-derived radioactivity following
`The mean
`adminIstration of 1“C—bromfenac was seen in all tissues of
`the eyes at
`low levels, with the highest ooncentratIons
`found In the cornea, COl'l]Ul’lCtlVa, and sclera (Flgure 1).
`The concentrations in the tissues diminished to varying
`degrees over the 24 hour study period. Levels In the lens
`were very low and remained essentially unchanged. The
`radIoactivity detected by LSC In both the lens and the
`vitreous humor was very low and close to background
`values.
`
`
`The bromfenac 0.07°/o formulation has been shown to
`Improve the
`penetratIon Into ocular
`tIssues thereby
`allowing for a lower concentration with comparable tissue
`concentratIons to those seen with BROMDAY.
`
`BRUMLJAY,
`to XIBRUM and
`SImIlar
`formulation of bromfenac 0.07% provIdes
`concentratlons throughout ocular t|SSU$ for 24 hours
`which allows for once daily dosing.
`PROLENSA (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.07% was
`FDA approved on April 5“, 2013 for once daily dosing for
`the treatment of postoperative inflammation and reduction
`of ocular paln In patIents who have undergone cataract
`surgery.
`
`
`Significant penetration and measurable amounts of
`14C-labeled bromfenac were detected in most ocular
`target tissues over 24 hours, with highest levels in the
`cornea, conjunctiva, and sclera. The 0.07% 14C-
`bromfenac residues in ocular tissues were similar to
`those previously reported with 0.09% ”C—bromfenac.
`
`
`1.
`Baklayari GA, Patterson HM, Song CK, Gow JA, McNamara TR.
`Pharmacol Ther2008;24(4):392-398.
`2. Donnenfeld, E.D., Holland, 5.1., Stewart, R.H., et.a|. Ophthalmology.
`2007; 114:l653-1662.
`3.
`Kim, s.J., Flach, A.J., Jampol,
`l_.M. Surv Ophthalmol.
`133.
`Ahuja M, Dhake AS, Sharma SK. Majumdar DK. AAPS J 2008;10:229-41.
`XIBROMW Pracribing Information. ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2010
`BROMDAYW Prescribing Information. Bauscri and Lomb, Inc. 2011.
`\lo\U1-b
`PROLENSAW Pr$Cribing Information, Bausch and Lomb, Inc. 2013
`Financial support: Bausch & Lomb Inc., In/Ine, CA, USA
`Financial disclosura: GA Baklayan is an employee of Bausch & Lomb, Inc
`George A Baklayan, Ph D
`Pharrnaceutlcal Development, Bausch & Lornb, Inc
`50 Technology Dr 1nIne,cA 92618
`Phone (949)788—5314
`george baklayan@bausch corn
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2223
`
`LUPIN V. SENJU
`
`IPR2015-01099
`PROLO280755
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2223
`LUPIN v. SENJU
`IPR2015-01099

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket