throbber
Paper No. _____
`Filed: August 13, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VI LLC
`
`PETITIONER
`
`V.
`
`CELGENE CORPORATION
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`___________________
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: IPR2015-01096
`PATENT NO. 6,315,720
`FILED: OCTOBER 23, 2000
`ISSUED: NOVEMBER 13, 2001
`INVENTORS: BRUCE A. WILLIAMS, JOSEPH K. KAMINSKI
`
`TITLE: METHODS FOR DELIVERING A DRUG TO A PATIENT WHILE
`AVOIDING THE OCCURRENCE OF AN ADVERSE SIDE EFFECT KNOWN
`OR SUSPECTED OF BEING CAUSED BY THE DRUG
`___________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S CURRENT EXHIBIT LIST OF AUGUST 13, 2015
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e)
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`PETITIONER’S CURRENT EXHIBIT LIST
`(August 13, 2015)
`
`
`Exhibit Description
` U.S. Patent No. 6,315,720 to Bruce A. Williams and Joseph
`K. Kaminski, filed on Oct. 23, 2003, and issued on Nov. 13,
`2001 (the “’720 patent”)
` U.S. Patent No. 6,315,720 Prosecution History (“’720
`prosecution history”)
` U.S. Patent No. 6,045,501 to Marc Elsayed and Bruce
`Williams, filed on Aug. 28, 1998, and issued on Apr. 4,
`2000 (“Elsayed”)
` U.S. Patent No. 6,063,026 to Mark A. Schauss and Patricia
`Kane, filed on Mar. 22, 1996, and issued on May 16, 2000
`(“Schauss”)
` U.S. Patent No. 6,202,923 to Joseph H. Boyer et al., filed on
`Aug. 23, 1999, and issued on Mar. 20, 2001 (“Boyer”)
` “THALOMID™ (thalidomide) Capsules Revised Package
`Insert” (Jul. 15, 1998) (“Thalomid PI”)
` “Guideline for the clinical use and dispensing of
`thalidomide,” R.J. Powell and J.M.M Gardner-Medwin,
`Postgrad Med. J. (1994) 79, 901–904 (“Powell”)
` “Pharmacists’ role in clozapine therapy at a Veterans
`Affairs medical center,” Benjamin R. Dishman et al., Am. J.
`Hosp. Pharm. (Apr. 1, 1994) 51, 899–901 (“Dishman”)
` U.S. Patent No. 5,832,449 to David W. Cunningham, filed
`on Nov. 13, 1995, and issued on Nov. 3, 1998
`(“Cunningham”)
` U.S. Patent No. 6,055,507 to David W. Cunningham, filed
`on Aug. 20, 1998, and issued on Apr. 25, 2000
`(“Cunningham Divisional”)
` “A Pregnancy-Prevention Program in Women of
`Childbearing Age Receiving Isotretinoin,” Allen A.
`Mitchell et al., New Eng. J. Med. (Jul. 13, 1995) 333:2,
`101–06 (“Mitchell”)
` “S.T.E.P.S.TM: A Comprehensive Program for Controlling
`and Monitoring Access to Thalidomide,” Jerome B. Zeldis
`et al., Clinical Therapeutics (1999) 21:2, 319–30 (“Zeldis”)
`
`Date
`Filed
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
` Transcript of the FDA’s “Forty-Seventh Meeting of the
`Dermatologic and Opthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee,”
`Sept. 4, 1997 (“FDA Meeting Part 1”)
` Transcript of the FDA’s “Forty-Seventh Meeting of the
`Dermatologic and Opthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee,”
`Sept. 5, 1997 (“FDA Meeting Part 2”)
` “CDC Meeting: 03/26/1997 Minutes and Agenda Regarding
`Thalidomide” (“CDC Meeting”)
` “Assessing the Effectiveness of a Computerized Pharmacy
`System,” Reed M. Gardner et al., Decision Support Systems
`in Critical Care, 1994, M.M. Schabot et al., eds.
`(“Gardner”)
` “Review of computer applications in institutional
`pharmacy—1975–1981,” Ken W. Burleson, Am. J. Hosp.
`Pharm. (1982) 39:53–70 (“Burleson”)
` “Challenges of thalidomide distribution in a hospital
`setting,” Daniel P. Keravich and Charles E. Daniels, Am. J.
`Health-Syst. Pharm. (Sept. 1, 1999) 56:1721–75
`(“Keravich”)
` “The Assessment of Refill Compliance Using Pharmacy
`Records: Methods, Validity, and Applications,” John F.
`Steiner and Allan V. Prochazka, J. Clin. Epidemiol. (1997)
`50:1, 105–16 (“Steiner”)
` “Therapeutic Antibiotic Monitoring: Surveillance Using a
`Computerized Expert System,” Stanley L. Pestotnik et al.,
`Am. J. Med. (Jan. 1990) 88:43–48 (“Pestotnik”)
` Declaration of Jeffrey Fudin, R.Ph., B.S., Pharm.D.,
`DAAPM, FCCP, FASHP (“Fudin Decl.”)
` Curriculum Vitae for Jeffrey Fudin, R.Ph., B.S., Pharm.D.,
`DAAPM, FCCP, FASHP (“Fudin CV”)
` “Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement,”
`Celgene Corp. v. Natco Pharma Ltd., NJD-2-10-cv-05197,
`Jul. 18, 2011 (“Celgene Claim Construction Brief”)
` “Interactive Voice Response Systems in Clinical Research
`and Treatment,” James C. Mundt, Psychiatric Services (May
`1997) 48:5, 611–12, 623 (“Mundt”)
` “Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Approval
`Package for: Application Number NDA 20-785
`Approval Letter(s),” Sept. 19, 1997, and Jul. 16, 1998
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`04/23/15
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`(“FDA Thalomid Approval Letters”)
` Orange Book Drug Product Listing Corresponding to the
`‘501 Patent, as published by the U.S. Food and Drug
`Administration on August 4, 2015
` Orange Book Drug Product Listing Corresponding to U.S.
`Patent No. 6,315,720, as published by the U.S. Food and
`Drug Administration on August 4, 2015
` Pricing Information for Revlamid® (lenalidomide) capsules
`from “Information for Vermont Prescribers of Prescription
`Drugs,” from Medi-Span and Celgene Corporation (July 1,
`2015)
` Pricing Information for Thalomid® (thalidomide) capsules
`from “Information for Vermont Prescribers of Prescription
`Drugs,” from Medi-Span and Celgene Corporation (July 1,
`2015)
` Pricing Information for Pomalyst® (pomalidomide)
`capsules from “Information for Vermont Prescribers of
`Prescription Drugs,” from Medi-Span and Celgene
`Corporation (July 1, 2015)
` Celgene Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. et al., Complaint,
`filed January 18, 2007, U.S. Dist. Ct. New Jersey, Case No.:
`2:33-av-00001
` Celgene Corp. v. Natco Pharma Ltd., U.S. Dist. Ct. New
`Jersey, Complaint, Case No: 2:10-cv-05197-SDW-SCM
` Celgene Corp. v. Lannett Holdings Inc., et al., Complaint,
`U.S. Dist. Ct. New Jersey, Case No. 2:15-cv-00697-SDW-
`SCM
` Celgene v. Barr, Stipulated Dismissal, dated and filed May
`21, 2010, in U.S. Dist. Ct. New Jersey Case No. 2:07-cv-
`00286-SDW-MCA
` International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers
`Local 1 Health Fund v. Celgene Corp., Class Action
`Antitrust Complaint, filed November 7, 2014, U.S. Dist. Ct.
`New Jersey, 2:14-cv-06997-KSH-CLW
` Celgene Letter Motion dated September 3, 2014, to
`Bifurcate and Stay Expert discovery re: REMS Patents, in
`Celgene Corp. v Natco Pharma Ltd., U.S. Dist. Ct. New
`Jersey, Case No: 2:10-cv-05197-SDW-SCM
` October 24, 2014, Court Order granting Celgene Motion to
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`4
`
`
`

`
`
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`
`1050
`1051
`
`1052
`
`Bifurcate and Stay Expert discovery re: REMS Patents, in
`Celgene Corp. v Natco Pharma Ltd., U.S. Dist. Ct. New
`Jersey, Case No: 2:10-cv-05197-SDW-SCM
` Orange Book Patents Corresponding to Celgene’s
`Thalomid® (thalidomide) capsules, as published by the U.S.
`Food and Drug Administration on August 6, 2015
` Orange Book Patents Corresponding to Celgene’s
`Revlamid® (lenalidomide) capsules, as published by the
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration on August 6, 2015
` Orange Book Patents Corresponding to Celgene’s
`Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) capsules, as published by the
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration on August 6, 2015
` To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition
`and Patent Law and Policy—A Report by the Federal Trade
`Commission October 2003
` “Evergreening: A Deceptive Device in Patent Rights,”
`Gaurav Dwivedi et al., Tech. in Society (2010) 32:324-330
` “Pay-for-Delay: How Drug Company Pay-Offs Cost
`Consumers Billions,” FTC Staff Study January 2010
` May 28, 2015 Statement of the Federal Trade Commission
`on FTC v. Cephalon, Inc.
` “The Impact of Exempting the Pharmaceutical Industry
`from Patent Reviews,” Dean Baker, Center for Economic
`and Policy Research (July 2015)
` Declaration of Juan (Julie) Wu, Ph.D., M.S. (“Wu Decl.”)
` Review of Recent Judicial Decisions on Patent Law:
`Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Intellectual Property,
`Competition, and the Internet of the H. Comm. on the
`Judiciary, 112th Cong. 29 (2011)
` America Invents Act: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on
`Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet of the
`H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 112th Cong. 52 (2011)
` LexisNexis SHEPARD’S® Report on Neumann v. Vidal,
`710 F.2d 856 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
` Curriculum Vitae of Juan (Julie) Wu, Ph.D., M.S.
` Diether et al, “It’s SHO Time! Short-Sale Price Tests and
`Market Quality,” J. Fin., 64: 37-73 (2009)
` Timeline Summarizing Legislation and Regulation on Short
`Selling
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`5
`
`
`

`
`1053
`
`1054
`
`1055
`
`1056
`
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1062
`
`1063
`
`1064
`
`1065
`
`
`
`
`
` Excerpts from 2010 SEC 2010 Amendments to Regulation
`SHO, final rule 34-61595
` Karpoff et al, “Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct,” J.
`Fin. 65: 1879-1913 (2010)
` Fang et al, “Short Selling and Earnings Management: A
`Controlled Experiment,” J. Fin., (forthcoming, 2015)
` Ekkehart Boehmer and Juan (Julie) Wu, “Short Selling and
`the Price Discovery Process,” Rev. Fin. Stud. 26: 287-322
`(2013)
` Boehmer et al., “Shackling Short Sellers: The 2008 Shorting
`Ban,” Rev. Fin. Stud. 26: 1363-1400 (2013)
` Massa et al., “The Invisible Hand of Short Selling: Does
`Short Selling Discipline Earnings Management?” Rev. Fin.
`Stud. (forthcoming, 2015)
` Massa et al., “Governance through Threat: Does Short
`Selling Improve Internal Governance?” (INSEAD Working
`Paper 2013/83/FIN)
` He et al., “Short Sellers and Innovation: Evidence from a
`Quasi-natural Experiment,” (Kelley School of Business
`Research Paper No. 2014-14)
` Dechow et al., “Short-Sellers, Fundamental Analysis and
`Stock Returns,” J. Fin. Econ. 61:77–106 (2001)
` Akbas et al., “Peer stock short interest and future returns,”
`(Working Paper, 2015)
` Engelberg et al., “How are Shorts Informed? Short-Selling,
`News and Information Processing,” J. Fin. Econ. 105: 260-
`278 (2012)
` Diether et al., “Short-Sale Strategies and Return
`Predictability,” Rev. Fin. Stud. 22: 575-607 (2009)
` Hedge funds and independent analysts: How independent
`are their relationships?: Hearing before the S. Comm. on
`the Judiciary, 109th Cong. 25 (2006) – June 28, 2006
`Testimony by Professor Owen A. Lamont, Yale School of
`Management
`
`
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`08/13/15
`
`6
`
`
`

`
`August 13, 2015
`
`
`
`Dr. Parvathi Kota (Reg. No. 65,122)
`Paul J. Skiermont (pro hac vice requested)
`SKIERMONT PUCKETT LLP
`2200 Ross Ave. Ste. 4800W
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`P: 214-978-6600/F: 214-978-6621
`Back-Up Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Sarah E. Spires/
`Sarah E. Spires (Reg. No. 61,501)
`SKIERMONT PUCKETT LLP
`2200 Ross Ave. Ste. 4800W
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`P: 214-978-6600/F: 214-978-6601
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 13, 2015, a copy of PETITIONER’S
`
`CURRENT EXHIBIT LIST OF AUGUST 13, 2015 PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.63(e) , was served by filing this document through the Patent Review
`
`Processing System, as well as emailing copies to nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`
`and aminsogna@jonesday.com.
`
`
`
`Date: August 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Sarah E. Spires/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket