throbber
Paper No. __
`Filed: June 16, 2016
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VI LLC
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CELGENE CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01096
`Patent 6,315,720
`________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Request for Oral Argument Case IPR2015-01096
`Patent 6,315,720
`
`
`Patent Owner, Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”), hereby requests that oral
`
`argument be held before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s October 27, 2015 Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`22). As set forth in its Order, the Board has currently scheduled the oral hearing
`
`for July 21, 2016. This request encompasses each of the issues addressed in
`
`Petitioner’s Petition (as applicable after institution) and Reply, Patent Owner’s
`
`Response, and all exhibits thereto, including declarations and depositions. The
`
`specific issues Patent Owner wishes to address are set forth below, without waiver
`
`or prejudice.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`ISSUES TO BE ARGUED
`
`The correct definition of a person of ordinary skill in the art for this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Claim construction – The proper construction of the term
`
`“prescription approval code.”
`
`3. Whether Petitioner’s Reply contains improper reply evidence and
`
`arguments.
`
`4. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving the challenged
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,315,720 (Ex. 1001) unpatentable as
`
`obvious over Thalomid PI (Ex. 1006) in view of Cunningham (Ex.
`
`
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Request for Oral Argument Case IPR2015-01096
`Patent 6,315,720
`
`
`1009) and further in view of Keravich (Ex. 1018), Zeldis (Ex. 1012),
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`and Mundt (Ex. 1024).
`
`Patent Owner’s and Petitioner’s Motion(s) to Exclude Evidence, if
`
`any.
`
`Responses to any issues raised by Petitioner in its Request for Oral
`
`Argument or at the oral hearing.
`
`Any other issues that the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`written decision.
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board provide audio-visual
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen.
`
`Finally, Celgene notes that the patent at-issue in this IPR is also being
`
`reviewed in IPR2015-01102 and -1103. Further, Celgene owns another patent that
`
`is currently being reviewed in IPR2015-01092. The trial for those three
`
`proceedings has also been scheduled for July 21, 2016. Celgene respectfully
`
`requests a combined hearing for all four proceedings, with 45 minutes of oral
`
`argument time per side in the combined oral hearing.
`
`Date: June 16, 2016
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)/
` F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)
` Andrew S. Chalson (pro hac vice)
` Eric C. Stops (Reg. No. 51,163)
` Frank C. Calvosa (Reg. No. 69,064)
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Request for Oral Argument Case IPR2015-01096
`Patent 6,315,720
`
`
` QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
` SULLIVAN, LLP
` 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
` New York, NY 10010
` Tel: (212) 849-7000
` Fax: (212) 849-7100
` nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
` ericstops@quinnemanuel.com
` andrewchalson@quinnemanuel.com
` frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Anthony M. Insogna (Reg. No. 35,203)
`J. Patrick Elsevier (Reg. No. 44,668)
`JONES DAY
`12265 El Camino Real
`Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 314-1200
`Fax: (858) 314-1150
`aminsogna@jonesday.com
`jpelsevier@jonesday.com
`
`Gasper J. LaRosa
`JONES DAY
`222 E 41st Street
`New York, NY 10017
`Tel: (212) 326-3939
`Fax: (212) 755-7306
`gjlarosa@jonesday.com
`
`Attorneys for Celgene Corporation
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VI LLC
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CELGENE CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01096
`Patent 6,315,720
`________________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies that PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.70 was served on June 16, 2016 by filing this document through the Patent
`
`Review Processing System, as well as e-mailing a copy to
`
`sabdullah@skiermontderby.com, sspires@skiermontderby.com,
`
`pkota@skiermontderby.com, and pskiermont@skiermontderby.com.
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)/
` F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)
` QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
` SULLIVAN, LLP
` 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
` New York, NY 10010
` General Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Lead Counsel for
`Celgene Corporation
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 16, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket