throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper 18
` Entered: 9 November 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AMERICAN MEGATRENDS, INC., MICRO-
`STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD, MSI COMPUTER CORP.,
`GIGA-BYTE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and G.B.T., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`KINGLITE HOLDINGS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-01094
`Patent 6,401,202 B1
`____________
`
`ERRATA
`
`Paper 16, entitled Decision – Institution of Inter Partes Review
`
`,
`– 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, contained an error. The heading which begins on
`
`,
`Page 2 indicated the paper was a draft. The paper, in fact, was the final
`
`decision and should be treated as such. Please see the attached page.
`
`/Amy Kattula/
`Paralegal Specialist
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-01094
`Patent 6,401,202 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Vivek Ganti
`vg@hkw-law.com
`
`Gregory Ourada
`go@hkw-law.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Christopher Frerking
`chris@ntknet.com
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-01094 DRAFT
`Patent 6,401,202 B1
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`American Megatrends, Inc., Micro-Star International Co., Ltd, MSI
`
`Computer Corp., Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd., and G.B.T., Inc.
`
`(collectively “Petitioner”) filed a Corrected Petition (Paper 9, “Pet.”) to
`
`institute an inter partes review of claim 1–40 of U.S. Patent No. 6,401,202
`
`B1 (Ex. 1001, “the ’202 patent”) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 311 et seq. Patent
`
`Owner, Kinglite Holdings Inc., filed a Preliminary Response to the Petition.
`
`(Paper 15, “Prelim. Resp.”.) We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
`
`Section 314(a) provides that an inter partes review may not be instituted
`
`“unless . . . there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail
`
`with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” After
`
`considering the Petition, the Preliminary Response, and associated evidence,
`
`we conclude that Petitioner has demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it
`
`would prevail in showing unpatentability of the claims 1, 9–11, 19–21, 29–
`
`31, 39, and 40.
`
`A. Related Proceedings
`
`The parties state that the ’202 patent has been asserted in Kinglite
`
`Holdings Inc. v. Giga-Byte Technology Co. Ltd., Case No. 1:14-cv-04989
`
`(C.D. Cal.), and Kinglite Holdings Inc. v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd.,
`
`Case No. 1:14-cv-03009 (C.D. Cal.). Pet. 4–5; Paper 11, 1.
`
`B. The ʼ202 Patent
`
`The ’202 patent discloses “a method and apparatus to perform
`
`multitasking in a basic input and output system (BIOS).” Ex. 1001,
`
`Abstract. “Interrupt signals are enabled at predetermined interrupt times”
`
`such that “[a] first task is performed in response to the interrupt signals at
`
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket