throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS II LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`
`
`NPS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case Nos. IPR2015-00990 and IPR2015-01093
`Patent No. 7,056,886
`_____________________
`
`DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER E. KIRKPATRICK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`NPS EX. 2033
`CFAD v. NPS
`IPR2015-01093
`
`

`
`
`
`I, Christopher E. Kirkpatrick, hereby declare the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am the custodian of documents for the Coalition for Affordable
`
`Drugs II LLC (CFAD), which is the Petitioner in Case Nos. IPR2015-00990 and
`
`IPR2015-01093. I am also the General Counsel of Hayman Capital Management,
`
`L.P., which is identified as a real party-in-interest in the same proceedings. As part
`
`of my responsibilities in these positions, I am aware of the persons or entities that
`
`have the ability to control the business actions of CFAD.
`
`2.
`
`I am authorized to provide this declaration as a representative of
`
`CFAD, J Kyle Bass and the “Hayman RPI,” which consist of Hayman Credes
`
`Master Fund, L.P., Hayman Orange Fund SPC – Portfolio A, Hayman Capital
`
`Master Fund, L.P., Hayman Capital Management, L.P., Hayman Offshore
`
`Management, Inc. and Hayman Investments, L.L.C., collectively.
`
`3.
`
`I understand that Petitioner made the following statement with respect
`
`to real parties-in-interest in these proceedings:
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), Petitioner certifies that
`Coalition For Affordable Drugs II LLC (“CFAD”), Hayman
`Credes Master Fund, L.P. (“Credes”), Hayman Orange Fund
`SPC – Portfolio A (“HOF”), Hayman Capital Master Fund, L.P.
`(“HCMF”), Hayman Capital Management, L.P. (“HCM”),
`Hayman Offshore Management, Inc. (“HOM”), Hayman
`Investments, L.L.C. (“HI”), nXn Partners, LLC (“nXnP”), IP
`Navigation Group, LLC (“IPNav”), J Kyle Bass, and Erich
`Spangenberg are the real parties in interest (collectively,
`“RPI”). The RPI hereby certify the following information:
`CFAD is a wholly owned subsidiary of Credes. Credes is a
`limited partnership. HOF is a segregated portfolio company.
`
`
`
`1
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`
`
`HCMF is a limited partnership. HCM is the general partner and
`investment manager of Credes and HCMF. HCM is the
`investment manager of HOF. HOM is the administrative
`general partner of Credes and HCMF. HI is the general partner
`of HCM. J Kyle Bass is the sole member of HI and sole
`shareholder of HOM. CFAD, Credes, HOF and HCMF act,
`directly or indirectly, through HCM as the general partner
`and/or investment manager of Credes, HOF and HCMF. nXnP
`is a paid consultant to HCM. Erich Spangenberg is 98.5%
`member of nXnP. IPNav is a paid consultant to nXnP. Erich
`Spangenberg is the 98.5% member of IPNav. Other than HCM
`and J Kyle Bass in his capacity as the Chief Investment Officer
`of HCM and nXnP and Erich Spangenberg in his capacity as
`the Manager/CEO of nXnP, no other person (including any
`investor, limited partner, or member or any other person in any
`of CFAD, Credes, HOF, HCMF, HCM, HOM, HI, nXnP or
`IPNav) has authority to direct or control (i) the timing of, filing
`of, content of, or any decisions or other activities relating to this
`Petition or (ii) any timing, future filings, content of, or any
`decisions or other activities relating to the future proceedings
`related to this Petition. All of the costs associated with this
`Petition will be borne by HCM, CFAD, Credes, HOF and/or
`HCMF.
`
`
`IPR2015-00990, Paper 1 at pp. 3-5; IPR2015-01093, Paper 1 at pp. 3-4.
`
`4.
`
`I further understand that, in response to a motion for Additional
`
`Discovery from the Patent Owner NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Board ordered as
`
`follows:
`
`In particular, as to Request for Production No. 6, we
`authorize additional discovery only as to any agreements,
`in the possession of Petitioner, relating to the control or
`ability to control any aspect of the current proceeding by
`a party not designated as Petitioner or a real party-in-
`interest in the Petition. Such agreements include those
`indicating that any person or party (other than Petitioner
`or designated real parties-in-interest) provided direction
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`
`
`to, or had the authority to provide direction to, Petitioner
`or its counsel in relation to this proceeding, including
`persons or parties who reviewed, or were given the
`opportunity to review, papers filed in this proceeding.
`
`IPR2015-00990, Paper 14 at p. 7; IPR2015-01093, Paper 14 at p. 7.
`
`
`5.
`
`In response to this Order and at the request of Petitioner, I conducted a
`
`diligent search for any agreements in the possession of CFAD, the Hayman RPI or
`
`J Kyle Bass “relating to the control or ability to control any aspect of the current
`
`proceeding[s] by a party not designated as Petitioner or a real party-in-interest in
`
`the Petition[s].” I located no agreements in the possession of CFAD, the Hayman
`
`RPI or J Kyle Bass that meet this definition.
`
`6.
`
`Further, my search located no agreements in the possession of CFAD,
`
`the Hayman RPI or J Kyle Bass “indicating that any person or party (other than
`
`Petitioner or designated real parties-in-interest) provided direction to, or had the
`
`authority to provide direction to, Petitioner or its counsel in relation to th[ese]
`
`proceeding[s].”
`
`7.
`
`The fact that my search did not locate documents responsive to the
`
`Board’s Order comports with CFAD’s identification of the real parties-in-interest
`
`in its Petitions. As stated in the Petitions, only CFAD, Hayman Capital
`
`Management, L.P., J Kyle Bass, nXn Partners, LLC and Erich Spangenberg have
`
`“authority to direct or control (i) the timing of, filing of, content of, or any
`
`decisions or other activities relating to this Petition or (ii) any timing, future filings,
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`
`
`content of, or any decisions or other activities relating to the future proceedings
`
`related to th[ese] Petition[s].” IPR2015-00990, Paper 1 at pp. 4-5; IPR2015-
`
`01093, Paper 1 at p. 4. There is no person or party who reviewed, or was given the
`
`opportunity to review, papers filed in these proceedings, who provided direction to,
`
`or had the authority to provide direction to, Petitioner or its counsel (other than the
`
`Petitioner or designated real parties-in-interest, or their employees and counsel).
`
`8.
`
`In addition, only certain of the designated real parties-in-interest
`
`(CFAD, Hayman Capital Management, L.P., Hayman Credes Master Fund, L.P.,
`
`Hayman Orange Fund SPC – Portfolio A and Hayman Capital Master Fund, L.P.)
`
`are funding the costs for these proceedings. No one other than these designated
`
`real parties-in-interest is funding the costs for these proceedings.
`
`9. Moreover, the counsel who file the papers in these proceedings on
`
`behalf of CFAD are given instructions only by CFAD, Hayman Capital
`
`Management, L.P. (or its employees), J Kyle Bass, nXn Partners, LLC (or its
`
`employees) or Erich Spangenberg.
`
`
`
`Date: July 16, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`Christopher E. Kirkpatrick
`
`
`
`4
`
`Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket