throbber
0163-769X/99/$03.00/0
`Endocrine Reviews 20(6): 876–913
`Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`The Glucagon-Like Peptides
`
`TIMOTHY JAMES KIEFFER* AND JOEL FRANCIS HABENER†
`Departments of Medicine and Physiology (T.J.K.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
`T6G 2S2; and Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology (J.F.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital,
`Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
`
`I. Introduction
`II. History of the Incretin Concept: Discovery of Gastric
`Inhibitory Polypeptide
`III. Discovery of GLP-1
`IV. Structures of GLPs and Family of Glucagon-Related
`Peptides
`V. Tissue Distribution of the Expression of GLPs
`A. Pancreatic a-cells
`B. Intestinal L cells
`C. Central nervous system
`VI. Proglucagon Biosynthesis
`A. Organization/structure of the proglucagon gene
`B. Regulation of glucagon gene expression
`C. Posttranslational processing of proglucagon
`VII. Regulation of GLP Secretion
`A. Overview
`B. Intracellular signals
`C. Carbohydrates
`D. Fats
`E. Proteins
`F. Endocrine
`G. Neural
`H. GLP-2
`VIII. Metabolism of GLPs
`A. GLP-1
`B. GLP-2
`IX. Physiological Actions of GLPs
`A. Overview
`B. Pancreatic islets
`C. Counterregulatory actions of GLP-1 and leptin on
`b-cells
`D. Stomach
`E. Lung
`F. Brain
`G. Liver, skeletal muscle, and fat
`H. Pituitary, hypothalamus, and thyroid
`I. Cardiovascular system
`J. GLP-2
`
`Address reprint requests to: Joel F. Habener, M.D., Laboratory of
`Molecular Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit
`Street, WEL320, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 USA. E-mail: jhabener@
`partners.org
`* Received support from the Medical Research Council of Canada, the
`Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, and the Canadian
`Diabetes Association. E-mail: tim.kieffer@ualberta.ca
`† Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and re-
`ceived support from US Public Health Service grants DK-30834, DK-
`25532, and DK-30457.
`
`X. GLP Receptors
`A. Structure
`B. Signaling
`C. Distribution
`D. Regulation
`E. GLP-2
`XI. Pathophysiology of GLP-1
`XII. GLP-1 as a Potential Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus
`XIII. Future Directions
`
`I. Introduction
`
`IT HAS been 15 yr since the initial discovery of the glu-
`
`cagon-like peptides (GLPs) as potential bioactive pep-
`tides encoded in the preproglucagon gene. The GLPs and
`glucagon are formed by alternative tissue-specific cleavages
`in the L cells of the intestine, the a-cells of the endocrine
`pancreas, and neurons in the brain. Glucagon-like peptide-1
`(GLP-1) is now known to be a potent glucose-dependent
`insulinotropic hormone, which has important actions on gas-
`tric motility, on the suppression of plasma glucagon levels,
`and possibly on the promotion of satiety and stimulation of
`glucose disposal in peripheral tissues independent of the
`actions of insulin. As a consequence of these properties,
`GLP-1 is under investigation as a potential treatment of di-
`abetes mellitus. GLP-2 was recognized only recently to have
`potent growth-promoting activities on intestinal epithelium.
`The interest in the GLPs has grown exponentially. By 1988
`there were 170 publications describing the properties of the
`GLPs. Five years later this number grew to 426 and currently
`(1999) more than 1,000 publications appear in the database
`of the National Library of Medicine (PubMed).
`Since the last comprehensive review of GLP-1 appeared in
`Endocrine Reviews in 1995 (1), many new developments have
`occurred and are described in this review. The purpose of
`this article is to emphasize the newer and what are perceived
`to be the more current and important aspects of the biology
`of the GLPs. For additional information and references, the
`reader is referred to several informative earlier reviews
`(1-12).
`
`II. History of the Incretin Concept: Discovery of
`Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide
`
`As a result of their discovery of secretin in 1902, Bayliss
`and Starling (13) speculated that signals arising from the gut
`after ingestion of nutrients might elicit pancreatic endocrine
`
`876
`
`CFAD Exhibit 1018
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`1
`
`

`

`December, 1999
`
`THE GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDES
`
`877
`
`responses and affect the disposal of carbohydrates. In 1906
`Moore et al. (14) postulated that the duodenum produced a
`‘chemical excitant‘ for pancreatic secretion and attempted to
`treat diabetes by injecting gut extracts. Zunz and Labarre (15,
`16) pursued this factor and prepared an intestinal extract free
`of secretin activity that was able to produce hypoglycemia in
`dogs. Labarre (16) introduced the term ‘incretin‘ to describe
`the humoral activity of the gut that might enhance the en-
`docrine secretion of the pancreas (16). Although other in-
`vestigators also reported the presence of hypoglycemic fac-
`tors in duodenal extracts (17-20), Loew and colleagues (21)
`were unable to lower blood glucose levels in dogs with
`extracts of dog or hog intestinal mucosa obtained by a num-
`ber of methods. Although these later extracts were tested
`only in fasting animals, after this report, interest in isolating
`an intestinal hypoglycemic factor declined.
`The development of a reliable RIA for insulin in the 1960s
`by Yalow and Berson (22), which allowed measurements of
`the circulating levels of this hormone, renewed interest in the
`search for incretins. It was demonstrated by both immuno-
`assay (23, 24) and bioassay (25, 26) that the action of glucose
`on the pancreas could not account completely for the insulin
`response observed in the blood. These reports demonstrated
`that iv glucose administration resulted in a lower plasma
`insulin response than when given by intrajejunal infusion,
`even though lower blood glucose levels were achieved by the
`later (Fig. 1). Perley and Kipnis (27) estimated the alimentary
`component to be close to 50% by subtracting from the insulin
`secretory response seen after oral glucose that insulin re-
`sponse obtained with the infusion of iv glucose, which du-
`plicated the oral blood glucose profile.
`In 1969, Unger and Eisentraut (28) named the connection
`between the gut and the pancreatic islets the ‘enteroinsular
`axis.‘ Creutzfeldt (29) suggested that this axis encompasses
`nutrient, neural, and hormonal signals from the gut to the
`islet cells secreting insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, or pan-
`
`creatic polypeptide (Fig. 2). Furthermore, Creutzfeldt (29)
`defined the criteria for fulfillment of the hormonal or incretin
`part of the enteroinsular axis as: 1) it must be released by
`nutrients, particularly carbohydrates, and 2) at physiological
`levels, it must stimulate insulin secretion in the presence of
`elevated blood glucose levels.
`One hormone that clearly fits the requirements to be an
`incretin is glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
`(GIP). GIP was originally isolated as an ‘enterogastrone,‘ or
`hormone secreted in response to fat or its digestive products
`in the intestinal lumen that inhibits gastric acid secretion (30).
`Brown and colleagues (31-33) isolated GIP from impure
`preparations of cholecystokinin (CCK) that contained acid-
`inhibitory activity using the canine Heidenhain pouch as a
`bioassay. GIP was shown to be a potent inhibitor of gastric
`acid and pepsin secretion and was thus originally named
`‘gastric inhibitory polypeptide‘ (34, 35). Earlier, Dupre´ and
`Beck (26) had demonstrated that a crude preparation of CCK
`also possessed insulinotropic activity. In 1972, Rabinovitch
`and Dupre´ (36) found that this insulinotropic action could be
`removed by further purification of the CCK. This observation
`resembled the loss of the acid-inhibitory activity reported
`previously by Brown and Pederson (33) during the purifi-
`cation of GIP from CCK and led Dupre´ et al. (37) to the
`hypothesis that GIP may also possess insulin-releasing ca-
`pabilities. In 1973, Dupre´ et al. (37) demonstrated that a
`purified preparation of porcine GIP infused intravenously in
`humans in concert with glucose stimulated the release of
`significantly greater quantities of immunoreactive insulin
`than when the same dose of glucose was administered alone.
`The insulin response was sustained for the duration of the
`GIP infusion and was not observed during the euglycemic
`state (37). The glucose-dependent nature for the insulino-
`tropic activity of GIP was later demonstrated in vivo in dogs
`(38) and humans (39) and in the perfused rat pancreas (40).
`Furthermore, GIP released in response to the oral ingestion
`
`FIG. 1. Demonstration of the incretin
`concept. Blood glucose and insulin re-
`sponses after either intravenous or in-
`trajejunal glucose infusion in normal
`subjects. Although plasma glucose lev-
`els after intravenous glucose infusion
`were higher than those after intrajeju-
`nal glucose infusion, the latter gener-
`ated a larger insulin response. Based on
`these results, McIntrye et al. (23) sug-
`gested that a humoral substance was
`released from the jejunum during glu-
`cose absorption, acting in concert with
`glucose to stimulate insulin release
`from pancreatic b-cells. [Reproduced
`with permission from N. McIntyre et al.:
`Lancet 2:20-21, 1964 (23) © The Lancet
`Ltd.].
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`2
`
`

`

`878
`
`KIEFFER AND HABENER
`
`Vol. 20, No. 6
`
`FIG. 2. The enteroinsular axis. After
`ingestion of nutrients, hormone secre-
`tion from different cell types of the pan-
`creatic islets [A (a), B (b), D (d), PP] may
`be modified by one or more modalities
`of: I, endocrine transmission; II, neuro-
`transmission; and III, direct substrate
`stimulation. [Reproduced with permis-
`sion from W. Creutzfeldt: Diabetologia
`16:75-85, 1979 (29) © Springer-Verlag].
`
`of fat yielded no increase in plasma insulin levels unless
`intravenous glucose was also administered (41-43). The glu-
`cose dependency of GIP-stimulated insulin secretion ap-
`peared to provide an important safeguard against inappro-
`priate stimulation of insulin release during a high-fat, low-
`carbohydrate meal. The recognition of
`this additional
`important physiological function of GIP led to the alternate
`designation glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
`(GIP) (44).
`In accordance with the roles of GIP as an enterogastrone and
`an incretin, immunoreactive GIP cells have been located in the
`upper small intestine of ruminants (45), humans, pigs, dogs
`(46), and rats (47). In the gastrointestinal tract of dog and man,
`immunoreactive GIP is present in cells predominantly in the
`midzone of the duodenal villi and, to a lesser extent, in the
`jejunum (48). Levels of GIP rise several fold shortly after in-
`gestion of a meal containing fat (41-43) or glucose (38, 49, 50).
`It appears glucose may act directly at the level of the GIP-
`secreting K cells to stimulate GIP release (51, 52).
`Studies employing GIP antisera to immunoneutralize en-
`dogenous GIP indicated that intestinal hormones other than
`GIP contribute substantially to the incretin effect (53, 54).
`These findings were supported by the observation that in-
`sulinotropic activity remained in intestinal extracts after re-
`moval of GIP by immunoadsorption (55). Finally, a major
`contribution to the incretin effect from the lower gastroin-
`testinal tract was shown in studies of patients after varying
`degrees of resection of the small intestine (56). The incretin
`effect of oral glucose correlated positively to the total length
`of residual small bowel rather than to an integrated release
`of GIP. Patients with preserved ileal residues had much
`larger incretin effects than patients with no ileal residues,
`despite equal integrated increases in plasma GIP, findings
`indicative of the presence of incretins other than GIP in the
`ileum (56).
`
`III. Discovery of GLP-1
`
`In the interim between the discovery in the 1970s of GIP
`as an important intestinal incretin hormone to the actual
`discovery of GLP-1, it was suspected that there must be a
`second incretin hormone in addition to GIP (54-56). The
`ushering in of the era of recombinant DNA technology in the
`late 1970s provided the means necessary for the identifica-
`tion of the ‘missing‘ incretin hormone. In the early 1980s, the
`cloning of cDNAs encoding the preproglucagons from pan-
`creata of the anglerfish was accomplished (57, 58). The an-
`glerfish was found to have two separate nonallelic prepro-
`glucagon genes, I and II, both encoding a glucagon and a
`glucagon-related peptide (GRP) (58). Notably, the glucagon-
`related peptide encoded in the anglerfish, preproglucagon-I,
`located carboxy proximal to the sequence of glucagon, bore
`a strong homology to the sequence of GIP, leading Lund et
`al. (57) to suggest that the anglerfish GRP-1 may be an in-
`testinal incretin hormone. In support of this supposition
`Lund et al. (59) showed that similar preproglucagon mRNAs
`were expressed in the anglerfish pancreas and intestine, a
`finding that strongly supported the prediction that GRP
`could be an incretin hormone. Subsequently, preprogluca-
`gon mRNAs were cloned from human (60) and rat (61) gut
`and shown to be identical in sequences to the mRNAs in
`pancreas.
`Shortly after the discovery of anglerfish GRP, the prepro-
`glucagon cDNAs of mammals were cloned (62-64) as well as
`the human gene (65). It became clear that the anglerfish
`GRP-I is a homolog of the GLP-1s encoded in the mammalian
`preproglucagons, which were subsequently proven to be
`potent insulinotropic incretins. There was, however, some
`uncertainty regarding the identification of the bioactive iso-
`form of GLP-1 that had true insulinotropic actions. Based on
`the amino acid sequence of the mammalian preprogluca-
`gons, the sites that would be predicted for posttranslational
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`3
`
`

`

`December, 1999
`
`THE GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDES
`
`879
`
`processing into peptide hormones were somewhat ambigu-
`ous. At the time it was generally believed that the yet-to-
`be-identified prohormone convertases (PCs) that enzymati-
`cally split prohormones into bioactive peptides required two
`adjacent basic amino acids, combinations of arginine, and
`lysine. The GLP-1 sequence begins with a histidine as the
`amino-terminal residue, as do most of the peptide hormones
`in the glucagon-related superfamily of hormones (Fig. 3). In
`the preproglucagon sequence, the first histidine is preceded
`by two basic amino acids, Lys-Arg, followed by four resi-
`dues, another single basic residue, arginine, and a second
`histidine. The thinking at that time was that the putative
`bioactive peptide that would theoretically be cleaved from
`the preproglucagon during posttranslational processing
`would be at the Lys-Arg yielding a peptide of 37 or 36 amino
`acids, depending on whether the C-terminal glycine was
`present or absent and whether the penultimate C-terminal
`arginine was amidated in the absence of the C-terminal gly-
`cine. Thus, the 1-37 and 1-36 GLP-1 peptide isoforms were
`the first to be synthesized and tested for biological activity.
`The results of the experimental testing were disappointing.
`One report questioned whether GLP-1 had any relevant ac-
`tivity: ‘How glucagon-like is glucagon-like peptide?‘ (66), as
`it had no effect on plasma glucose and insulin levels when
`administered to rabbits. Another report showed a weak stim-
`ulation of insulin secretion in cultured rat pancreatic islets at
`superpharmacological doses (25 nm) of GLP-1(1-36)amide
`and suggested that an N-terminally truncated peptide, GLP-
`1(7-36)amide, may be more active (67), as was suggested
`for GLP-1(7-37), an N-terminally truncated form of GLP-1(1-
`37) (67). These ideas were based upon alignment of the se-
`quence of GLP-1 with the other members of the glucagon
`superfamily of peptide hormones (see Fig. 3), which revealed
`that the best alignment was with the histidine at position 7,
`and not position 1 of GLP-1 (12, 63, 67). In 1986 it was
`discovered that GLP-1 was indeed further N-terminally trun-
`cated by posttranslational processing in the intestinal L cells
`(68, 69). In contrast to GLP-1(1-37), GLP-1(7-37) and (7-
`36)amide were found to be potent insulinotropic hormones
`in the isolated perfused pancreas of rats (70) and pigs (71),
`
`and in humans (72). Further, it was suggested that the weak
`insulinotropic actions of GLP-1(1-37) at micromolar concen-
`trations were probably artefactual due to a 0.1% level of
`nonspecific cleavage of GLP-1(1-37) to GLP-1(7-37) by non-
`specific cathepsins in the serum-implemented tissue culture
`media (73). At present it is well established that the GLP-1
`isoforms GLP-1(7-37) and GLP-1(7-36)amide are the bioac-
`tive insulinotropic peptides derived from preproglucagon in
`the intestine and the hind brain. The functions of the lesser
`GLP-1 isoforms GLP-1(1-37) and GLP-1(1-36)amide remain
`unknown.
`
`IV. Structures of GLPs and Family of Glucagon-
`Related Peptides
`
`The GLPs belong to a larger family referred to as the
`glucagon superfamily of peptide hormones. These hormones
`are classified within this family based on their considerable
`sequence homology, having anywhere from 21% to 48%
`amino acid identity with glucagon. Included in this family
`are: glucagon, GLP-1(7-37) and -(7-36)amide, GIP, exendin-3
`and -4, secretin, peptide histidine-methionine amide (PHM),
`GLP-2, helospectin-1 and -2, helodermin, pituitary adenyl
`cyclase-activating polypeptides
`(PACAP)-38, and -27,
`PACAP-related peptide (PRP), GH-releasing factor (GRF),
`and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) (Fig. 3). These
`peptide hormones are produced in the gut, pancreas, and the
`central and peripheral nervous systems and exhibit a wide
`variety of biological actions in which several act as neuro-
`transmitters. Notably, even peptide hormones that are co-
`encoded within the same precursor, such as the peptide
`hormones derived from the cleavages of preproglucagon,
`differ significantly in the physiological processes that they
`regulate. For example, the major function of glucagon is to
`maintain blood glucose levels during fasting, whereas GLP-1
`functions primarily during feeding to stimulate insulin re-
`lease and to lower blood glucose levels. On the other hand,
`GLP-2 appears to regulate the growth of intestinal epithelial
`cells.
`
`FIG. 3. Amino acid sequences of the members of the superfamily of glucagon-related peptides. Sequences include human glucagon, human GLPs,
`human GIP, exendins (Heloderma horridum), human secretin, human peptide histidine methionine (PHM), helospectins (Heloderma horridum),
`helodermin (Heloderma suspectum), human PACAP, human PACAP-related peptide (PRP), human GRF, and human VIP. Residues identical
`to those of glucagon in the same position are shaded. Standard single letter abbreviations are used for amino acids (IUPAC-IUB Commission
`on Biochemical Nomenclature): A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S,
`Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`4
`
`

`

`880
`
`KIEFFER AND HABENER
`
`Vol. 20, No. 6
`
`Exendin-3, exendin-4, helospectin-1, helospectin-2, and
`helodermin were all isolated from lizard (Heloderma) venom.
`They are potent secretagogues of the exocrine pancreas (74).
`Helodermin shares 53% and 42% homology with human
`PACAP and VIP, respectively, and has high affinity for the
`VIP2 receptor (75). Exendin-4 is 53% homologous to mam-
`malian GLP-1 and acts as a high-affinity agonist on the GLP-1
`receptor (76, 77). Exendin-4 and GLP-1 may interact with
`specific receptors yet to be identified in guinea pig pancreatic
`acini tissue (78). In contrast, the amino-terminally truncated
`form of exendin-3(9-39) is a potent antagonist of GLP-1 ac-
`tions (76, 77). Lizard helodermin, exendin, VIP/PHI,
`PACAP, and glucagon/GLP-1 cDNAs have been cloned,
`revealing that separate genes exist for these peptides (79, 80).
`To date, no evidence has been uncovered for the existence of
`mammalian homologues of the lizard helodermin or exendin
`(79, 80). It appears that helodermin and exendin-4 are not the
`evolutionary precursors to mammalian PACAP/VIP or
`GLP-1 but represent a distinct family of peptides. It seems
`likely that the high-affinity and biological activities of helo-
`dermin and exendin-4 on the mammalian VIP2 and GLP-1
`receptors, respectively, are a result of convergent evolution
`(80).
`It is proposed that the proglucagon gene arose by the
`duplication of an ancestral gene approximately 800-1,000
`million years ago (81). The structural organization of the
`genes of the glucagon superfamily of peptide hormones sug-
`gests that the ancestral gene consisted of four exons, which
`encoded the 59-untranslated region of the mRNA, the signal
`peptide, the hormone and the 39-untranslated region of the
`mRNA, respectively (82). The glucagon superfamily of hor-
`mones may have arisen by duplication and amplification of
`this basic gene, followed by a further duplication and am-
`plification of the exon encoding the glucagon hormone do-
`main to generate the multiple GLPs observed in preproglu-
`cagon (82). Based on statistical analysis of DNA sequences of
`the preproglucagon genes from bovine, human, hamster, and
`anglerfish, Lopez et al. (83) postulated that the two anglerfish
`genes arose from gene duplication approximately 160 million
`years ago (83). Furthermore, this analysis suggested that the
`GLP-2 sequence originated by duplication of the glucagon or
`GLP-1 sequence before the earliest divergence of fish (83).
`However, until recently, it was believed that GLP-2 was not
`expressed in either fish or birds (11, 84). Irwin and Wong (85)
`discovered that, unlike pancreatic proglucagon of fish and
`birds, the intestinal proglucagon does contain the sequence
`of GLP-2. Therefore, fish and bird proglucagon mRNAs from
`pancreas and intestine have different 39-ends that are due to
`alternative mRNA splicing (85). The recent cloning of the
`frog (Xenopus) proglucagon cDNAs revealed the presence of
`three distinct GLP-1 peptides in addition to glucagon and
`GLP-2 (86). It has been postulated that the first exon dupli-
`cation event resulting in the appearance of glucagon and GLP
`occurred at least 405-800 million years ago (81, 83). A du-
`plication of the GLP-containing exon, giving rise to GLP-1
`and GLP-2, may have occurred between 365 (divergence of
`mammals and amphibians) and 405 (divergence of cartilag-
`inous fish and tetrapods) million years ago (81). The amino
`acid sequences of the preproglucagon genes are highly con-
`served among mammals (Fig. 4), and the products derived
`
`from proglucagon, glucagon (Fig. 5), and GLP-1 (Fig. 6) are
`highly conserved throughout the evolution of animal spe-
`cies. The amino acid sequence of glucagon is highly con-
`served during the evolution of tetrapods (3 substitutions
`between salamander and human), even more than the se-
`quences of either GLP-1 (7 substitutions) or GLP-2 (15 sub-
`stitutions). The high degree of conservation of the glucagon
`and GLP sequences during evolution indicates the impor-
`tance of the physiological processes regulated by these hor-
`mones.
`The conservation of GLP-1 also reflects the fact that es-
`sentially the entire amino acid sequence of GLP-1 is required
`for full biological activity. Removal of the N-terminal histi-
`dine (5 GLP-1 8-37) results in drastic loss of receptor binding
`and insulinotropic activity (87-90). The positive charge of the
`imidazole side chain of the histidine residue appears to be
`crucial for GLP-1 actions (91). Likewise, N-terminal trunca-
`tion of this histidine from the related insulinotropic peptide
`exendin-4(1-39) reduces agonist activity by approximately
`10-fold (92). Notably, N-terminal truncation of exendin-4 by
`two residues yields a peptide that binds with the same af-
`finity as full-length exendin but antagonizes GLP-1 action
`(92). In contrast, an N-terminal truncation of GLP-1 by two
`residues reduces binding affinity to approximately 1% that
`of the intact molecule (92, 93). Also, addition of an amino acid
`to the N terminus of GLP-1(6-37) also reduces biological
`activity (87, 89). Truncation at the C terminus also reduces the
`biological activity of GLP-1 considerably (87, 88, 90, 93).
`Substitution in the N-terminal part of the GLP-1 molecule
`with the corresponding glucagon residues impaired the af-
`finity for the GLP-1 receptor only moderately whereas ex-
`changes in the C-terminal portion of GLP-1 decreased the
`affinity for the GLP-1 receptor more than 100-fold (94). In
`contrast, the binding affinity of GLP-1 to its receptor is more
`sensitive to GIP-like changes in the N-terminal region than
`to changes in the C-terminal region (95).
`Another approach to understanding the structure-activity
`relationships of GLP-1 has been obtained from studies of
`peptide analogs in which individual amino acids are sub-
`stituted. These studies revealed that the residues in positions
`1 (His), 4 (Gly), 6 (Phe), 7 (Thr), 9 (Asp) 22 (Phe), and 23 (Ile)
`are important for the binding affinity and biological activity
`of GLP-1 (96-98). Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic reso-
`nance of GLP-1 in a membrane-like environment (a dode-
`cylphosphocholine micelle) revealed that GLP-1 consists of
`an N-terminal random coil segment (residues 1-7), two he-
`lical segments (7-14 and 18-29), and a linker region (15-17) –
`a structure similar to that observed for glucagon (99). Thus
`far, attempts to generate smaller active fragments of GLP-1
`that retain potent insulinotropic activity have failed (89, 98,
`100).
`
`V. Tissue Distribution of the Expression of GLPs
`
`A. Pancreatic a-cells
`
`Pancreatic a-cells were discovered in 1907 as histolog-
`ically distinct cells from the b-cells of the islets of Lang-
`erhans (101). It was not until 1962 that a-cells were shown
`by immunofluorescence staining studies to be the source
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`5
`
`

`

`December, 1999
`
`THE GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDES
`
`881
`
`FIG. 4. Amino acid sequences of proglucagon from seven mammalian species. GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses. Major
`proglucagon products are indicated by bars; GRPP, glicentin-related pancreatic peptide; IP-1 and IP-2, intervening peptides; GLP-1 and GLP-2,
`GLPs. Shaded residues are completely conserved between the seven species. Standard single letter abbreviations are used for amino acids
`(IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature): A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met;
`P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
`
`of glucagon (102). The a-cells are one of four distinct
`polypeptide-secreting islet cell types: glucagon-secreting
`a-cells, insulin- and amylin-secreting b-cells, somatosta-
`tin-secreting d-cells, and pancreatic-polypeptide-secreting
`F cells. These cells are arranged in highly organized pat-
`terns within the islets. In rodents, a-cells and d-cells exist
`on the surface or mantle of the islet surrounding the core
`of b-cells, although the patterns of distribution of the a-,
`d-, and b-cells differ among animal species (103-105). Un-
`certainties in the islet vascular architecture and the direc-
`tion of blood flow within the islets (106) still cloud the
`functional significance of the anatomic arrangement of
`hormone-producing islet cells.
`mRNA encoding proglucagon can be detected by PCR
`early in the wall of the embryonic foregut at the 20-somite
`stage and is restricted to the area of the duodenum from
`which the pancreas will develop 10-12 h later (107). The
`pancreas arises as two outbuddings of the gut tube shortly
`after it is formed early in development at embryonic day 9
`(ED 9) in the mouse (for review see Ref. 108). By ED 10, the
`budding anlaga fuse to become the dorsal and ventral pan-
`creas with their respective ducts. By immunofluorescence,
`glucagon-positive cells are identifiable at ED 10.5 in the dor-
`sal bud and at ED 11.5 in the ventral bud (109). Individual
`hormone-containing cells are located within the epithelium
`of pancreatic ducts, and clusters of endocrine cells are found
`in the pancreatic interstitium. Starting on ED 16.5, islets begin
`to form, and by day 18.5 the islets consist of centrally located
`b-cells with the adult ‘one cell-one hormone‘ phenotype
`(109). The expression of specific transcription factors is in-
`volved in the determination of cell lineages that determine
`the development of islet-specific cells of the endocrine pan-
`creas. For example, recent findings indicate that disruption
`
`of the gene for the transcription factor Pax6 in mice results
`in a near-complete failure in the development of a-cells (110),
`whereas disruption of Pax4 results in the absence of mature
`b- and d-cells (111) (Fig. 7). Mice lacking the transcription
`factor Nkx2.2 have diabetes due to arrested differentiation of
`pancreatic b-cells (112).
`As illustrated in Fig. 8, cell-specific processing of proglu-
`cagon in pancreatic a-cells leads primarily to the production
`of glucagon. However, immunoreactive GLP-1 is detectable
`in rat pancreatic a-cells by immunocytochemistry (113).
`Fully processed GLP-1 (7-36 amide and 7-37) is also visual-
`ized in pancreatic rat extracts by using chromatographic
`techniques and RIAs (114, 115). A recent investigation de-
`tected predominantly GLP-1 (1-36) amide in extracts of rat
`pancreas (116). Using similar techniques, small amounts of
`N-terminally extended GLP-1 (1-36 amide and 1-37) are also
`found in extracts from porcine and human pancreas (117,
`118). In addition, immunoreactive GLP-1 is secreted from the
`arginine-perfused rat pancreas and glucose-stimulated iso-
`lated rat islets, as detected by RIA (113, 114). The relatively
`small quantity of GLP-1 produced by the pancreas might
`have important local actions within the islets.
`
`B. Intestinal L cells
`
`Intestinal cells are reported to react with glucagon-specific
`C-terminal antisera, although the intestinal immunodeter-
`minant responsible for the immune reaction appears to differ
`chemically from pancreatic glucagon (152, 153). Antibodies
`directed against the midpart of glucagon and antibodies
`against the nonglucagon part of the glicentin molecule reveal
`a large population of endocrine cells in the small and large
`bowel that express proglucagon and its fragments (154-156).
`
`The Endocrine Society. Downloaded from press.endocrine.org by [${individualUser.displayName}] on 12 February 2015. at 12:28 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. . All rights reserved.
`
`6
`
`

`

`882
`
`KIEFFER AND HABENER
`
`Vol. 20, No. 6
`
`FIG. 5. Amino acid sequences of vertebrate glucagons. Classes are as indicated and residues identical to those of human glucagon in the same
`position are shaded. Standard single letter abbreviations are used for amino acids (IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature):
`A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; P, Pro; Q, Gln, R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and
`Y, Tyr. Reference numbers indicate the source of the corresponding sequence.
`
`In contrast to the pancreas where GLPs represent minor
`products, GLPs are fully processed in abundance in the in-
`testine, representing the major source of circulating GLPs
`(115-117). By virtue of their ultrastructure as assessed by
`electron microscopy, these cells are designated as L cells that
`clearly differ from pancreatic a-cells in the morphology of the
`granules (154, 156-158). The intestinal L cells are flask shaped
`and open-type, the microvilli reach the intestinal lumen, and
`a domain rich in endocrine granules exists near the basal
`lamina (159, 160) (Fig. 9). The shape of the L cells suggests
`that the cells can respond to changes in the environment
`within the intestinal lumen, resulting in a basal discharge of
`their granular contents.
`The L cells are the second most abundant population of
`endocrine cells in the human intestine, exceeded only by the
`population of enterochromaffin cells. A high abundance of L
`cells is present in the distal jejunum and ileum, and an in-
`creasing abundance of L cells is demonstrable along the
`colon, with the highest concentration in the rectum (160-163).
`L cells first appear in human fetuses at the 8th week of
`gestation in the ileum, the 10th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket