throbber
I lllll llllllll Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
`US009060992B2
`
`c12) United States Patent
`Sanguinetti et al.
`
`(IO) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`*Jun. 23, 2015
`
`(54) TREATMENT OF SHORT BOWEL
`SYNDROME PATIENTS WITH
`COLON-IN-CONTINUITY
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Elizabeth Lemaire Sanguinetti, Salt
`Lake City, UT (US); Thomas B.
`Marriott, Sandy, UT (US); Jennifer
`Lopansri, Salt Lake City, UT (US);
`Consuelo Maria Blosch, Mercer Island,
`WA (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`Bedminster, NJ (US)
`
`( *) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 1032 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis(cid:173)
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 12/938,117
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Nov. 2, 2010
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2011/0172152Al
`
`Jul. 14, 2011
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(62) Division of application No. 11/262,980, filed on Nov.
`1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,847,061.
`
`(60) Provisional application No. 60/623,233, filed on Nov.
`1, 2004.
`
`(51)
`
`(52)
`
`(58)
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`Int. Cl.
`A61K 35138
`C07K 141575
`A61K 38126
`U.S. Cl.
`CPC ...................................... A61K 38126 (2013.01)
`Field of Classification Search
`None
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,789,379 A
`6,077,949 A
`6,184,201 Bl*
`7,411,039 B2
`7,847,061 B2 *
`
`8/ 1998 Drucker et al.
`612000 Munrose et al.
`212001 Drucker et al.
`8/2008 Thim et al.
`12/2010 Sanguinetti et al.
`
`514/11.7
`
`530/308
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Jeppesen, et al., JPEN, 1999, 23, Sl01-Sl05.*
`Jeppesen, et al., J. Nutr., 2003, 133, 3721-3724.*
`Buchman, 2004, MedGenMed, 6(2), 10 pages.*
`Sigalet, 2001, Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, 2(4), 505-
`509.*
`Burrin, Domestic Animal Endocrinology 24 (2003) 103-122.*
`Retrieved from website:
`'http://www.yourdictionary.com/negli(cid:173)
`gible' 1 page, retrieved on Jun. 9, 2014.*
`Ferrone, et al., "Teduglutide for the treatment of short bowel syn(cid:173)
`drome", The Annals ofPharmacotherapy, 2006, vol. 40, No. 6, 1105-
`1109.
`International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opin(cid:173)
`ion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/039222
`dated May 1, 2007.
`International Search Report issued in International Application No.
`PCT/US2005/039222 dated Jul. 17, 2006.
`Jeejeebhoy, "Short bowel syndrome: a nutritional and medical
`approach", CMAJ, 2002, 166(10) 1297-1302.
`Jeppesen, et al., "Impaired meal stimulated glucagon-like peptide 2
`response in Heal resected short bowel patients with intestinal failure",
`Gut, 45:559-563, 1999.
`Jeppesen, et al., "Elavated plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and 2
`concentrations in Ileum resected short bowel patients with a pre(cid:173)
`served colon", Gut, 47:370-376, 2000.
`Jeppesen, et al., "Glucagon-like peptide 2 improves nutrient absorp(cid:173)
`tion and nutritional status in short bowel-patients with no colon",
`Gastroenterology, vol. 120, No. 4, 2001, 806-815.
`Jeppesen, et al., "ALX-600, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV resistant
`glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog, improves intestinal func(cid:173)
`tion in short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients with a jejunostomy",
`Database Bio sis (Online) Biosciences Information Service, Philadel(cid:173)
`phia, PA, Apr. 2002, Database accession No. PREV200200518922.
`Jeppesen, et al., "Teduglutide (ALX-0600), adipeptidylpeptidaseIV
`resistant glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue, improves intestinal func(cid:173)
`tion in short bowel syndrome patients", Gut, vol. 54, No. 9, 2005,
`1224-1231.
`Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 dated Nov. 1,
`2006.
`Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 dated May 15,
`2007.
`Office Action (final) issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 dated Feb.
`4, 2008.
`Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 dated Oct. 29,
`2008.
`Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 dated Aug. 4,
`2009.
`Request for Continued Examination filed in U.S. Appl. No.
`111262,980 filed Aug. 4, 2008.
`Response to Office Action filed in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 filed
`Mar. 1, 2007.
`Response to Office Action filed in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 filed
`Nov. 15, 2007.
`Response to Office Action filed in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 filed
`Apr. 29, 2009.
`Response to Office Action filed in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 filed
`Jan. 4, 2010.
`
`(Continued)
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Primary Examiner - Satyanarayana R Gudibande
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm - Stoel Rives LLP
`
`EP
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`1231219
`WO 9639031
`WO 9739091
`WO 9943361
`WO 0149314
`WO 02066511
`WO 2004035624
`WO 2004085471
`
`8/2002
`12/1996
`10/1997
`9/1999
`7/2001
`8/2002
`412004
`10/2004
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`Intestinal absorption is enhanced in short bowel syndrome
`patients presenting with colon-in-continuity by treatment
`with a GLP-2 receptor agonist, such as teduglutide.
`
`26 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`CFAD Exhibit 1078
`CFAD v. NSP
`IPR2015-01093
`
`1
`
`

`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Response to Restriction Requirement filed in U.S. Appl. No.
`111262,980 filed Oct. 11, 2006.
`Restriction Requirement issued in U.S. Appl. No. 111262,980 issued
`Sep. 11, 2006.
`Scott, et al., "GLP-2 Augments the adaptive response to massive
`intestinal resection in rat", Am. J. Physiol. (Gastrointestinal Liver
`Physiology 38): G91 l-G921, 1988.
`
`Yang, et al., "Novel Agents in the treatment of intestinal failure:
`humoral factors", Gastroenterology, vol. 130, No. 2, 2006, Sl l 7-
`Sl21.
`Teduglutide, (online), NPS Pharmaceuticals, Oct. 3, 2003, accessed
`May 16, 2011, http://replay.web.archive.org/2003 l 003111216/
`http://www.npsp.com/drug_development/dd_alx0600.php.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun.23,2015
`
`Sheet 1of2
`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`Figure 1.
`
`Fecal
`output
`
`Intestinal
`Absorption
`
`0.6 1.3*** 0.3
`
`Urine
`output
`
`6
`
`2.8 2.1 ** 3.1
`
`1.4 2.0*** 1.4
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2 -~ cu
`.:.:: --
`
`3:! 1
`C>
`
`"§,0.---------------_.,..~ ...... ---------------
`·-
`~
`Q;-1
`~
`
`-2
`
`-3
`
`B
`A
`s
`E
`L
`I
`N
`E
`
`F
`T
`R
`0
`E
`L
`A
`L
`T
`0
`M w
`E
`N
`T
`
`B
`A
`s
`E
`L
`I
`N
`
`T
`R
`E
`A
`T
`M
`E
`
`F
`0
`L
`L
`0
`w
`
`B
`A
`s
`E
`L
`I
`N
`
`T
`F
`0
`R
`E
`L
`A
`L
`T
`0
`M w
`E
`
`3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun.23,2015
`
`Sheet 2of2
`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`Figure 2.
`
`16
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`Fecal
`output
`5.5 4.6· 5.7
`
`Intestinal
`Absorption
`6.2 7.0 5.9
`
`F
`0
`L
`L
`0
`w
`
`B
`A
`s
`E
`L
`I
`N
`E
`
`T
`R
`E
`A
`T
`M
`E
`N
`T
`
`8
`A
`s
`E
`L
`I
`N
`
`T
`R
`E
`A
`T
`M
`E
`
`F
`0
`L
`L
`0 w
`
`4
`
`

`
`1
`TREATMENT OF SHORT BOWEL
`SYNDROME PATIENTS WITH
`COLON-IN-CONTINUITY
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`2
`benefit of pharmacologic doses ofGLP-2 receptor agonists in
`these patients is not obvious and has not been studied.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to products and methods useful
`medically to treat patients presenting with short bowel syn(cid:173)
`drome. More particularly, the invention relates to glucagon(cid:173)
`like peptide 2 (GLP-2) and other GLP-2 receptor agonists 10
`effective to improve intestinal function particularly in
`patients presenting with short bowel syndrome with colon(cid:173)
`in-continuity.
`
`BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
`
`It has now been determined that intestinal absorption is
`enhanced in SBS patients presenting with colon-in-continu(cid:173)
`ity when those patients are treated with a GLP-2 receptor
`agonist.
`Thus, in one aspect, the present invention provides a
`method for enhancing intestinal absorption in a patient with
`short bowel syndrome, comprising the steps of selecting
`for
`treatment a short, bowel syndrome patient presenting with at
`15 least about 25% colon in continuity with renmant small intes(cid:173)
`tine, and treating said patient with a GLP-2
`receptor
`agonist to enhance intestinal absorption by said patient.
`In a related aspect, the present invention provides for the
`20 use ofa GLP-2 receptor agonist in the preparation ofa medi(cid:173)
`cament for enhancing intestinal absorption in short bowel
`syndrome patients presenting with at least about 25% colon in
`continuity with renmant small intestine.
`In a preferred embodiment, the GLP-2 receptor agonist is
`25 [Gly2]hGLP-2, known as teduglutide.
`
`The estimated prevalence of short bowel syndrome (SBS)
`patients with non-malignant disease
`requiring home
`parenteral nutrition (HPN) is at least 40 per million of the U.S.
`population. SBS usually results from surgical resection of
`some or most of the small intestine for conditions such as
`Crohn's disease, mesenteric infarction, volvulus, trauma,
`congenital anomalies, and multiple strictures due to adhe(cid:173)
`sions or radiation. Surgical resection may also include resec(cid:173)
`tion of all or part of the colon. SBS patients suffer from
`malabsorption that may lead to malnutrition, dehydration and
`weight loss. Some patients can maintain their protein and
`energy balance through hyperphagia; more rarely they can
`sustain fluid and electrolyte requirements to become indepen(cid:173)
`dent from parenteral fluid.
`Although long-term parenteral nutrition (PN) is life saving
`in patients with intestinal failure, it is expensive, impairs
`quality of life and is associated with serious complications
`such as catheter sepsis, venous occlusions and liver failure.
`Treatments that amplify absolute intestinal absorption, and
`eliminate or minimize the need for PN have great potential
`significance to SBS patients.
`The endogenous meal-stimulated hormone, glucagon-like 40
`peptide-2 (GLP-2), raises considerable interest for SBS
`patients. GLP-2 functions to slow gastric emptying, reduce
`gastric secretions, increase intestinal blood-flow and stimu(cid:173)
`late growth of the small and large intestine. In animal studies,
`GLP-2 administration induces mucosa! epithelial prolifera- 45
`tion in the stomach and small and large intestine by stimula(cid:173)
`tion of crypt cell proliferation and inhibition of enterocyte
`apoptosis.
`SBS patients with end-jejunostomy and no colon have low
`basal GLP-2 levels andlimitedmeal-stimulated GLP-2 secre- 50
`tion due to removal of GLP-2 secreting L-cells, which are
`located primarily in the terminal ileum and colon. This GLP-2
`deficiency results in a minimal adaptive response following
`resection and could explain the gastric hypersecretion, rapid
`intestinal transit and lack of intestinal adaptation observed in 55
`these SBS patients.
`Jeppesen et al. (Gastroenterology 2001; 120:806-815)
`have described positive benefit in an open-label study using
`pharmacologic doses of native GLP-2 in SBS jejunostomy
`patients. There was significant improvement in intestinal wet
`weight absorption and a more modest improvement in energy
`absorption that led to an increase in body weight, lean body
`mass and a rise in urinary creatinine excretion.
`In contrast, SBS patients with colon-in-continuity have
`elevated basal endogenous GLP-2 levels resulting in an adap(cid:173)
`tive response to resection characterized by improved wet
`weight gain and energy absorption. The potential for added
`
`BRIEF REFERENCE TO THE DRAWINGS
`
`Embodiments of the invention are now described with
`30 reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
`FIG. 1 illustrates results measured in terms of fecal wet
`weight, intestinal wet weight absorption and urine weight in
`the individual patients at Baseline (Days-3 to 0), during
`treatment (Days 18 to 21), and at follow-up (Days 39 to 42).
`FIG. 2 illustrates results measured in terms of fecal energy
`excretion and intestinal absorption in the individual patients
`at Baseline (Days-3 to 0), during treatment (Days 18 to 21 ),
`and at follow-up (Days 39 to 42).
`
`35
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`The positive effect ofGLP-2 receptor agonists on intestinal
`absorption in SBS patients that retain at least some, e.g.,
`>25%, of their colon is particularly surprising. These patients
`have essentially retained GLP-2 producing tissue and,
`indeed, show elevated basal levels of the endogenous GLP-2
`that can be as high as meal stimulated levels in normal,
`healthy individuals and that, in normal individual, is respon(cid:173)
`sible for maintenance of the intestinal lining required for
`intestinal absorption. There is nevertheless significant clini(cid:173)
`cal benefit for these patients, manifest principally as
`enhanced intestinal absorption as indicated by increased
`absolute wet weight absorption, when they are treated in
`accordance with the present method.
`More particularly, patient candidates for the present treat-
`ment are those presenting with SBS resulting from small
`intestine resection which may be secondary to Crohn's dis(cid:173)
`ease, vascular ischemic disease, malrotation or volvulus,
`trauma, congenital anomalies, or multiple strictures due to
`60 adhesions or radiation and who require parenteral nutrition to
`meet their needs. As patients presenting with short bowel
`syndrome, such patients typically retain, following resection,
`a length of small intestine that is within the range from at least
`about 25 cm and at most about 200 cm., e.g., from about
`65 50-150 cm. Such SBS patients include those patients present(cid:173)
`ing withjejunostomy, in which part of the jejunum is resected
`and generally all of the ileum, and/or ileostomy in which part
`
`5
`
`

`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`3
`of the ileum is resected and the jejunum may or may not be
`present. SBS patients with jejunostomy or ileostomy gener(cid:173)
`ally do not have any remaining colon, but if they do, it is not
`in continuity with the remnant small intestine.
`SBS patients selected for treatment by the present method
`are those who retain, in continuity with remnant small intes(cid:173)
`tine, at least some length of their colon, such as at least about
`25%, and desirably 30%, 35%, 40%, 45% and preferably at
`least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or more. The remaining
`length of colon typically will be determined from the surgical 10
`records of a patient candidate. Expressed in other terms,
`preferred candidates for the present treatment are short bowel
`syndrome patients who retain colon sufficient to produce
`endogenous GLP-2 at levels that are at least greater than the
`negligible levels produced by patients with no colon, and 15
`ideally are similar to those GLP-2 levels produced by healthy
`volunteers. Endogenous GLP-2 levels for normal, healthy
`individuals are 15±2 pmol/L fasted, and 61±19 pmol/L fed.
`Candidates for the present treatment thus are SBS patients
`that retain sufficient functional colon to produce at least about 20
`10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% or more of such levels in the fed
`state, e.g., at least about 5 pmol/L fed, and desirably 10, 15,
`20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 and 70 pmol/L endog(cid:173)
`enous GLP-2 in the fed state.
`In a preferred embodiment, treatment candidates are those
`short bowel syndrome patients who retain at least 50% or
`more of colon length in continuity with remnant small intes(cid:173)
`tine. Such a treatment candidate is identified herein as a
`patient with ;;:50% colon-in-continuity. In other preferred
`embodiments, the SBS patient with colon in continuity has a
`remnant small intestine at least about 50 cm in length which,
`desirably but not essentially, incorporates at least a portion of
`the ileum.
`The patients can be selected for treatment by the present
`method at any time following the surgical resection. That is,
`patients that are undergoing adaptation, as well as those who
`have had sufficient time to adapt following the surgery, are
`acceptable treatment candidates.
`Treatment of short bowel syndrome patients presenting
`with colon-in-continuity, in accordance with the present
`method, is effective to enhance intestinal absorption, particu(cid:173)
`larly of fluid including water and salts, but including nutrients
`as well. This effect is revealed particularly as a treatment(cid:173)
`mediated, statistically significant increase in absolute wet
`weight absorption, which is determined by subtracting fecal
`wet weight from diet wet weight using a vigorous nutrient
`absorption test. The effect of treatment is also generally seen
`as a reduction in fecal wet weight, an increase in urine wet
`weight, a reduction in energy excretion (measured as herein
`described), and in other respects noted in the examples herein.
`The present treatment method entails dosing the selected
`patient with a GLP-2 receptor agonist using a treatment regi(cid:173)
`men effective to enhance intestinal absorption. Such GLP-2
`receptor agonists are characterized as molecules that bind
`with, preferably selectively, and stimulate the human GLP-2
`receptor, as reported by Monroe et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,
`949 issued Jun. 20, 2000, incorporated herein by reference.
`Briefly, GLP-2 receptor agonists are revealed as agents that
`trigger production of, or trigger an elevation in the level of, a
`second messenger coupled to the human GLP-2 receptor,
`when exposed to a host cell that produces that receptor natu(cid:173)
`rally or is transfected with DNA encoding that receptor.
`In one embodiment of the invention, the GLP-2 receptor
`agonist is human GLP-2. In other embodiments, the GLP-2
`receptor agonist is a vertebrate, e.g., manmialian, homo log of
`human GLP-2. Thus, GLP-2 receptor agonists useful in
`embodiments of the present invention include GLP-2 having
`
`4
`the sequence found in GLP-2 endogenous to human, cow, pig,
`primate, sheep, rodents including mouse, rat, degu and the
`like, and other vertebrate species.
`In other embodiments, the GLP-2 receptor agonist is an
`analog ofhuman GLP-2, which incorporates at least one, and
`usually not more than 5, e.g., 1, 2 or 3, amino acid substitu(cid:173)
`tions or additions, and may also have a C-terminal truncation
`of from 1 to 5 or more amino acids.
`In a preferred embodiment, the GLP-2 receptor agonist is a
`GLP-2 peptide analog that is altered to prolong serum half(cid:173)
`life. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the GLP-2 pep(cid:173)
`tide incorporates an amino acid substitution that renders the
`peptide resistant to the endogenous enzyme dipeptidyl pep-
`tidase IV (DPP-IV). Such analogs incorporate an appropriate
`substitution of the Ala2 residue desirably, but not essentially,
`by a genetically encoded amino acid, to permit recombinant
`production of the desired protein. Amino acids that can use(cid:173)
`fully substitute at Ala2 to provide GLP-2 analogs that retain
`GLP-2 receptor agonist activity and are less susceptible to
`DPP-IV include GLy, D-Ala, Val, Glu, Lys, Arg, Leu and Ile.
`Still other GLP-2 analogs include those substituted at MetlO
`by an amino acid that is less sensitive to oxidation.
`In alternative embodiments, the GLP-2 peptide, or GLP-2
`25 peptide analog is derivatized, for instance at an internal or
`substituted lysine, to prolong serum half-life by conjugation
`with lipophilic groups, with polyethylene glycol groups, with
`albumin or with any other functional group having the desired
`effect of reducing the rate at which the peptide is degraded
`30 endogenously following its administration. Such derivatized
`forms may be derivatized analogs of GLP-2, which carry
`substitutions, such as conserved or non-conserved lysine sub(cid:173)
`stitutions, having no appreciable negative effect on GLP-2
`receptor activation but allowing for conjugation of the desired
`35 functional group. It will be appreciated that these derivatized
`forms of GLP-2 or of GLP-2 analogs are considered to be
`GLP-2 receptor agonists if they exert their endogenous effect
`through the GLP-2 receptor after administration, even if this
`GLP-2 receptor agonist property is not displayed while in the
`40 pro-drug, pre-administration form.
`A wide variety of useful active GLP-2 analogs and deriva(cid:173)
`tives have been described in the literature, as revealed in U.S.
`Pat. No. 5,789,379 issued Jun. 20, 2000 and related W097/
`39031 published Oct. 23, 1997 which teach site-specific
`45 GLP-2 analogs; in W002/066511 published Aug. 27, 2003
`which teaches albumin-derivatized forms of GLP-2 and ana(cid:173)
`logs, and in W099/43361 published Oct. 14, 1999, W004/
`035624 published Apr. 29, 2004 and W004/085471 pub(cid:173)
`lished Oct. 7, 2004 which describe lipophilic-derivatized
`50 forms ofGLP-2 and analogs.
`In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present
`invention, the GLP-2 receptor agonist is [Gly2]hGLP-2,
`known as teduglutide.
`The dosing regimen effective to treat the SBS patients with
`55 colon-in-continuity entails delivering the selected GLP-2
`receptor agonist to the patient for a time and at a dose suffi(cid:173)
`cient to enhance intestinal absorption. As noted in the
`examples herein, and according to a preferred embodiment of
`the present invention, one suitable treatment regimen entails
`60 once daily administration of teduglutide, by subcutaneous
`injection in the abdomen, thigh or arm, at a dose in the range
`from 30 to 150 ug/kg/day for a period of about 21 days. It is
`anticipated that effective daily doses ofteduglutide, as well as
`human GLP-2 per se and other GLP-2 receptor agonist with
`65 comparable properties, will lie generally in the broader range
`from about 5 to 500 ug/kg/day e.g., from 10 to 400 ug/kg/day,
`such as 20 to 300 ug/kg/day.
`
`6
`
`

`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`5
`It will be appreciated from these results that a similarly
`beneficial effect can be expected when using either tedug(cid:173)
`lutide, or when using a related GLP-2 receptor agonist, in an
`alternative dosing schedule. With respect to teduglutide per
`se, administration twice daily or still more frequently can be
`beneficial. Twice daily (every 12 hours) dosing usefully deliv-
`ers about 5 to 250 ug/kg/dose. Benefits can also accrue to
`schedules that entail shorter or, more desirably, longer term
`dosing, such as from about 14 days to many months or even
`years. Maintenance dosing also is desirable, in which patients
`receive either continued or follow up dosing. Follow-up dos(cid:173)
`ing usefully occurs at regular frequencies such as weekly,
`biweekly, every month, every three months, etc. Continued
`dosing usefully provides to the patient a dose efficient to
`maintain the benefits of increased absorptive surface area
`with increased intestinal absorption that arise from initial
`treatment, and can be effected by dosing the patient at least
`once within every 1-28 days, e.g., every other day, 2-3 times
`per week, once per week, etc. Continued or follow-up dosing
`can be important to preserve the medical benefits mediated by 20
`the GLP-2 receptor agonist; as noted in the examples,
`improvements in intestinal absorption following treatment
`with teduglutide for instance, can be lost rapidly, for example
`within four weeks following cessation of dosing.
`The teduglutide dosing regimen herein described is useful 25
`to determine effective dosing schedules for other GLP-2
`receptor agonists for which pharmacokinetics properties are
`either already known or can be determined, by relating phar(cid:173)
`macologic, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic proper(cid:173)
`ties, in accordance with standard practise in drug develop- 30
`ment.
`It will be appreciated that the route of administration, and
`the particular dosage form of the GLP-2 receptor agonist, will
`be chosen to preserve and desirably optimize the effect of the
`drug. Administration by injection, such as subcutaneous,
`intramuscular, intravenous, etc., is suitable. Alternatively, the
`drug may be administered by infusion or by any other route
`that delivers the drug to the target site on the serosal side of the
`intestinal tissue, such as by depot injection. If delivered by
`injection, the drug can be formulated as a lyophilized powder
`for reconstitution by the user, and as either unit or multiple
`doses. One formulation of teduglutide, for instance, is
`described in WOOl/49314 published Jul. 12, 2001, and pro(cid:173)
`vides a powder for reconstitution in which teduglutide is
`present with L-histidine, mannitol and sodium phosphate.
`This is usefully provided as a 3 mL glass vial containing 10
`mg teduglutide, for reconstitution with 1 mL water for injec(cid:173)
`tion and self-administration. An alternative formulation pro(cid:173)
`vides 10 mg of teduglutide in a smaller volume of aqueous
`vehicle, such as 0.5 mL water for injection.
`Most suitably, the chosen treatment parameters, including
`choice of GLP-2 receptor agonist, and dosing schedule, are
`selected to provide optimal enhancement of intestinal absorp(cid:173)
`tion, e.g. to provide for an increase in the volume of fluid and
`the nutrients absorbed by the patient, which is revealed for
`instance as a decrease of at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% or
`more in fecal wet weight, and/or an increase of at least about
`5%, 10% or more in urine weight.
`Embodiments of the invention are exemplified below:
`Patients
`Study subjects were recruited from centers in the U.S. and
`Denmark that care for patients receiving PN. All patients had
`undergone extensive resection of the small intestine without
`any surgical resection of the stomach, duodenum or pancreas.
`Study inclusion criteria were: Over 18 years of age; diag(cid:173)
`nosis of SBS that could be secondary to Crohn's disease,
`volvulus, injury or vascular ischemia, remnant small intestine
`
`6
`of 150 cm or less; no clinical evidence of active inflammatory
`bowel disease (IBD) or fistulas; no history ofradiation enteri(cid:173)
`tis, or sprue; no alcohol or drug abuse; no significant renal,
`hepatic or cardiac diseases; no glutamine for at least four
`weeks prior to screening; no growth factors or participation in
`any clinical trial within three months of screening (except use
`of teduglutide in patients in the rechallenge group). SBS
`patients with ;;:50% colon-in-continuity had a demonstrated
`fecal weight exceeding 1 kg/day and fecal energy loss
`10 exceeding 2 MJ/day [478 Kcal/day].
`Women of childbearing age had to have a negative blood
`~-human chorionic gonadotropin test before inclusion in the
`study and used effective contraceptives during the study.
`Usual medications such as proton pump inhibitors, codeine,
`15 loperamide, and oral and parenteral supplements were kept
`constant. Local Ethics Committees or Institutional Review
`Boards approved the protocol. Procedures were in accor(cid:173)
`dance with ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of
`1964 as modified by the 48'h World Medical Association in
`1996. Each eligible patient signed an informed consent form
`prior to study.
`Study Protocol
`This was an open-label, pilot study to determine the safety
`and effect of teduglutide in patients with short bowel syn(cid:173)
`drome (SBS). The patient's history was reviewed and a physi(cid:173)
`cal examination performed to determine eligibility before
`inclusion in the study. Estimated residual small intestine and
`colon lengths were determined by reviewing operative
`reports and available radiographic studies. Eligible patients
`were admitted as inpatients to hospital wards or General
`Clinic Research Centers (GCRC) on three separate occa-
`sions, 18 days apart, for the last four days and three nights of
`the baseline period and at the end of the treatment and follow(cid:173)
`up periods. Treatment consisted of recombinant teduglutide
`35 (supplied by NPS Allelix, Mississauga, ON, Canada) formu(cid:173)
`lated as a lyophilized powder with L-histidine, mannitol, and
`monobasic and dibasic sodium phosphate (Lot 8502901).
`Water was added to reconstitute the drug for administration
`by subcutaneous ( s.c.) injections in the abdomen or thigh. Ten
`40 SBS patients withjejunostomy received 0.03 mg/kg/d, 0.10
`mg/kg/d or 0.15 mg/kg/d once daily for 21 days. Five SBS
`patients with ;;:50% colon-in-continuity received teduglutide
`0.10 mg/kg/d once daily for 21 days. During each inpatient
`period, patients underwent 72-hour nutrient balance and
`45 D-Xylose absorption studies, and a proximal or distal endo(cid:173)
`scopy to ascertain the condition of the intestinal mucosa and
`obtain biopsy samples. In jejunostomy patients, biopsies
`were obtained through the jejunostomy stoma or by upper
`gastrointestinal endoscopy. In patients with colon-in-conti-
`50 nuity, colo-rectal biopsies were obtained. Teduglutide treat(cid:173)
`ment began on Day 1 (immediately after the baseline period)
`and continued once-daily for 21 days. On the first and last day
`of dosing, all patients had blood collections for plasma levels
`and pharmacokinetic parameters and to test for any antibod-
`55 ies to teduglutide or E. coli protein. Patients were monitored
`for safety (adverse events, physical exams, vital signs, ECGs,
`laboratory results, and injection site examinations) during the
`inpatient periods and during outpatient visits on days 7 and
`14.
`The 72-hour nutrient balance studies were completed with
`each patient eating their usual diet, calculated from a seven(cid:173)
`day food diary completed by the patient during the screening
`period. It was intended that patients eat the same quantity and
`quality of food and beverages during each admission. During
`65 the 72-hour balance periods, all oral intake (duplicate meals
`and beverages and declined food), fecal/stomal output, and
`urine were collected and weighed. All stool samples were
`
`60
`
`7
`
`

`
`US 9,060,992 B2
`
`8
`
`7
`refrigerated during the collection period. Stools and diets
`were separately homogenized and analyzed for energy con(cid:173)
`tent (by bomb calorimetry), nitrogen (by the macro(cid:173)
`Kjeldahl's method), fat (by the gravimetric technique), and
`sodium and potassium (by atomic absorption).
`D-Xylose was used to test intestinal carbohydrate absorp(cid:173)
`tion. After an overnight fast, patients drank a test solution of
`25 g D-Xylose in 200-mL distilled water over a 2-3 minute
`period. A blood sample was taken at two hours and urine
`collected for 5-hours following ingestion.
`Morphological Analysis
`Endoscopic examinations were performed in each subject
`at the completion of baseline, treatment and follow-up
`phases. All tissue samples for measurement of villus height
`and crypt depth were prepared and analyzed in a blinded
`fashion by the same pathologist. Villus height and crypt depth
`were measured using light microscopy (eyepiece microme(cid:173)
`ter) as the mean of ten well-oriented villi and crypts. The
`number of mitotic figures per 100 crypt epithelial cells was
`calculated.
`Statistics
`Using the SAS (Version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.)
`statistical program, a Student's paired t test was employed
`that compared treatment to baseline values, and follow-up to
`baseline values. No comparisons were made between patients
`on different doses or with different anatomy due to the limited
`number of patients in the study. Data are expressed as
`mean±SD. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.
`Results
`Patients
`Sixteen SBS patients (nine females, seven males) enrolled
`in this open-label, multicenter, dose-ranging pilot study and
`received teduglutide. Four U.S. sites recruited 6 patients and
`one Danish site recruited 10 patients. The baseline character(cid:173)
`istics of these 16 patients treated are given in Table 1. These
`patients were subdivided into an end-jejunostomy group of 10
`(Group 2) and ;;,;50% colon-in-continuity group of 5 (Group
`3 ). There were originally 11 jejunostomy patients, but patient
`03 was found on biopsy to have a renmant segment of colon,
`later estimated to be 30%. This individual was not included in
`any subgroup analysis. As judged from analysis of duplicate
`meals adjusted for declined food, some patients had better
`dietary consistency than others. Patients who had an oral food
`intake where the dietary wet weight and energy content at
`treatment did not differ more than 10% from baseline values
`were termed "high dietary compliance". Ten patients had a
`high dietary compliance ( <l 0% variability from baseline
`value), 5 with end jejunostomy and 5 with ;;,;50% colon-in(cid:173)
`continuity (Group 4).
`The demographics of the two groups ofSBS patients, those
`with end jejunostomy and those with colon-in-continuity,
`were similar with ages ranging from 27-74 years, weights
`ranging from 38.9-79 .2 kg, heights ranging from 158-180 cm,
`BMI ranging from 15.0-26.9 kg/m2
`, years since last intestinal
`resection ranging from 2.4-20 years (except one patient 0.9
`years post-resection, whose results were similar to others who
`received0.15 mg/kg/day), andrenmantjejunum lengths rang(cid:173)
`ing from 25-150 cm. The causes for intesti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket