throbber
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
`Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 977–992, 2004
`doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2004.05.002
`available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com
`
`12
`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome
`after extensive small bowel resection
`
`Jutta Keller1
`
`MD
`
`Heidi Panter1
`
`Peter Layer* MD, PhD
`Professor of Medicine, Head of the Department of Internal Medicine
`
`Israelitic Hospital, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany
`
`Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a global malabsorption syndrome that results from extensive
`intestinal resections. It used to be a typical complication of repetitive bowel resections in patients
`with Crohn’s disease. However, due to improved medical and surgical therapies for these patients
`it currently occurs more frequently as a consequence of vascular disorders in adults (intestinal
`infarction) and congenital aberrations in children, respectively. Adequate therapy depends on the
`degree of (small) bowel losses and on resulting functional disturbances. Moreover, it must be
`adjusted to the postoperative adaptation process, which consists of three phases: The immediate
`acute phase lasts less than 4 weeks and serves to stabilise the patient. The subsequent year should
`be used to induce maximal adaptation by gradually increasing nutrient exposure. When maximal
`stimulation of nutrient absorption has been achieved, permanent maintenance nutrition
`treatment should be defined individually, dependent on extent and quality of nutritive deficits.
`In patients with Crohn’s disease, optimal treatment of the underlying disease is of pivotal
`importance in order to avoid a further reduction of absorptive capacity or other complications.
`Current investigations aim at improving the adaptation process by administration of specific diets
`and growth hormones. With these, it appears possible to treat even some patients with very
`short bowel,
`i.e.
`less than 50 cm of small
`intestine left, with oral nutrition, only. Still, a
`considerable proportion of patients will need long-term parenteral nutrition. If young patients
`experience intolerable complications of parenteral nutrition, intestinal transplantation may be
`considered as a high risk therapy of last choice.
`
`Key words: short bowel syndrome; malabsorption; intestinal resections; Crohn’s disease; acute
`phase; intestinal adaptation; maintenance treatment; oral/enteral/parenteral nutrition; vitamin
`supplementation; growth hormones; glutamine; drug therapy; intestinal transplantation.
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: C49-40-5112-5211; Fax: C49-40-5112-5227.
`E-mail addresses: keller@ik-h.de (J. Keller), panter@ik-h.de (H. Panter), layer@ik-h.de (P. Layer).
`1 Tel.: C49-40-51125-315; Fax: C49-40-51125-413.
`
`1521-6918/$ - see front matter Q 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`978 J. Keller, H. Panter and P. Layer
`
`The short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a global malabsorption syndrome due to insufficient
`absorptive capacity and/or disturbed gastrointestinal regulation resulting from
`extensive small bowel resections. SBS may occur after resection of more than 50%
`and is obligatory after resection of more than 70% of the small intestine or if less than
`100 cm of small bowel are left. It is particularly severe after resection of the ileocecal
`region or if the colon has been removed additionally. Apart from global malnutrition,
`clinical symptoms may be caused by specific deficiencies depending on the site of
`intestinal loss.
`In the past, repetitive intestinal resections in patients with Crohn’s disease were the
`main cause of SBS. However, because of the improvements of conservative and surgical
`therapy of Crohn’s disease, SBS in adult patients now occurs more frequently as a result
`of vascular disorders (embolism/thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery/throm-
`bosis of the mesenteric veins) or intestinal strangulation (volvulus,
`incarceration).
`Rarely, traumas necessitate extensive bowel resections.
`In children congenital
`aberrations (e.g.
`intestinal atresia, aganglionosis, malrotation) or necrotising enter-
`ocolitis are the predominant causes of SBS.
`There are no exact current data regarding the incidence and prevalence of SBS.
`However, data derived from patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (which in
`about one-third of the cases is necessary because of SBS) indicate an incidence of
`severe SBS of 1–2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year.1
`Progresses in modern surgery as well as in intensive care have crucially improved the
`prognosis of patients with SBS. The adequate therapy depends on the degree of (small)
`bowel
`losses and of resulting functional disturbances and is adjusted to the
`postoperative adaptation process, which comprises three phases:
`
`A. Acute phase:
`† starts directly after resection
`† generally lasts less than 4 weeks
`† serves for the patient’s stabilisation.
`
`B. Adaptation phase
`† lasts 1–2 years
`† maximal stimulation of
`intestinal adaptation is achieved by gradually increasing
`intestinal nutrient exposure.
`
`C. Maintenance phase
`† follows adaptation phase
`† permanent dietetic treatment must be individualised
`† effective therapy of acute exacerbations and optimal maintenance therapy of Crohn’s
`disease are of pivotal importance.
`
`life.2 Longtime therapy,
`Not surprisingly, SBS is associated with low quality of
`which should aim at the patient’s social reintegration,
`is a demanding challenge
`to the treating physician. This is due to severe and interacting metabolic changes
`after extensive small bowel resection which may be even more severe in patients
`with preexisting inflammatory bowel disease. An additional
`impairment of
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome after extensive small bowel resection 979
`
`the absorptive capacity by progression of the underlying illness must be avoided, if
`possible.
`
`% The short bowel
`is a malabsorption syndrome due to
`syndrome (SBS)
`insufficient absorptive capacity and/or disturbed gastrointestinal
`regulation
`resulting from extensive bowel resections.
`% The incidence of severe SBS is estimated to be 1–2 per 100,000 inhabitants.
`
`PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS
`
`Quantitative loss of absorptive capacity
`
`The small bowel owns a large functional reserve capacity. Thus, resection of up to 50%
`of the small bowel is usually tolerated without any symptoms, and in most patients
`resection of up to 50–70% leads to transient malabsorption, only. However, a residual
`length of the small bowel of less than 200 cm may result in SBS, and if less than 70–
`100 cm of small bowel are left (resection of more than 70–80%) almost all patients
`develop SBS. Moreover, almost all patients with less than 60 cm of small bowel need
`long-term parenteral nutrition. However, not only the length of the remaining small
`bowel decides about the severity of symptoms but also the absence or presence of the
`colon. In SBS patients, the colon adopts important digestive functions (absorption of
`short-chain fatty acids as an energy source) and increases absorption of water and
`electrolytes so that more extensive small bowel losses can be tolerated.
`
`% SBS is obligatory after resection of more than 70% of the small intestine or if less
`than 100 cm of small bowel are left.
`% Additional resections of the ileocecal region or the colon increase severity.
`
`Qualitative loss of absorptive capacity
`
`Moreover, not only overall extension of bowel resections but also the resection of
`specific intestinal sites influences the development of SBS. Losses of the duodenum or
`the terminal ileum, in particular the ileocecal valve, impair absorption much more than
`loss of other parts of the small bowel. This is due to the fact that both, the duodenum
`and the ileocecal region possess specific absorptive functions and play a crucial role in
`the regulation and integration of postprandial gastrointestinal motility and secretion.
`These functions may not or only partly be replaced by other parts of the small bowel.
`Diarrhoea and steatorrhoea, the cardinal symptoms of SBS, are caused by low
`absorptive capacities for water, electrolytes and nutrients. In patients with 60–100 cm
`of small bowel left and preserved colon, about 70% of applied energy is reabsorbed, but
`absorption of individual food components may vary.3,4 While proteins are absorbed by
`60–70%, malabsorption of fat and carbohydrates may reach 50% of ingested nutrients.
`Carbohydrate malabsorption is of limited importance in patients with preserved colon
`because up to 80% of carbohydrates not absorbed by the small bowel can be absorbed
`after bacterial metabolism to short chain fatty acids and thus contribute to energy
`supply.5 By contrast, fat malabsorption not only leads to steatorrhoea and malnutrition
`but is also associated with deficiencies of the fat soluble vitamins A, D, E and K.
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`980 J. Keller, H. Panter and P. Layer
`
`Vitamins B1, B2, B6 and C are absorbed by the entire small bowel, therefore
`deficiencies of these vitamins are relatively rare. Lack of trace elements, in particular
`zinc and selenium, occurs in patients with SBS and results in epithelial and mesenchymal
`dysfunction as well as immunodeficiency.6
`About 60% of SBS patients show hyperoxaluria with an increased risk of calcium-
`oxalate kidney stones as a result of increased oxalate absorption. This is a consequence
`of decreased intraluminal availability of calcium caused by binding of calcium to
`malabsorbed fatty acids.
`In healthy subjects calcium binds to oxalate to form
`unabsorbable calcium oxalate. In SBS patients, lack of free intraluminal calcium allows
`increased absorption of unbound oxalate.
`Calcium, magnesium and iron as well as folic acid are predominantly absorbed by the
`duodenum and deficiencies are a typical consequence of expanded proximal small
`bowel resections. Malabsorption of calcium may be particularly severe because
`absorption is further hampered by binding of calcium to malabsorbed fatty acids and by
`vitamin D deficiency. In contrast, the specific uptake mechanisms allowing absorption of
`vitamin B12 and of bile acids are limited to the terminal ileum. The loss of the ileum
`leads to a vitamin B12 deficiency and to spill-over of unabsorbed bile acids into the
`colon, which causes cholerheic diarrhoea. After resections of more than 60–100 cm of
`the ileum the loss of bile acids usually exceeds synthesis and the bile acid pool
`decreases. This increases the risk of cholesterol gall stones and causes or deteriorates
`steatorrhoea. On the other hand,
`increased colonic bile salt levels may solubilise
`unconjugated bilirubin, prevent calcium complexing, and promote its absorption and
`enterohepatic cycling, thus explaining the 3–10 fold increase in bilirubin levels observed
`in the bile of patients with ileal Crohn’s disease.7,8 Putatively, increased bilirubin levels in
`the bile following extensive distal small bowel resections may lead to the formation of
`pigment gallstones.
`In patients with Crohn’s disease affecting the terminal
`ileum
`additional functional losses due to chronic inflammation may further impair vitamin B12
`and bile acid absorption even if small bowel resection is limited.
`In addition, the duodenum plays an important role in the stimulation of digestive
`responses, in particular of pancreatic enzyme output. Thus, the loss of the duodenum
`may lead to maldigestion of nutrients which further impairs absorption.
`In healthy humans, exposure of the terminal ileum to nutrients induces inhibition of
`digestive secretory and motor functions (the so-called ileal brake).9–11 The lack of the ‘ileal
`brake’ following ileal resections causes gastric hypersecretion and accelerated small bowel
`transit. Both mechanisms may substantially deteriorate diarrhoea in patients with SBS.
`
`% Losses of the duodenum or the terminal ileum impair absorption much more than loss
`of other parts of the small bowel because specific absorptive and regulatory functions
`of these intestinal sites cannot be replaced by other parts of the small bowel.
`% Absorption of major food components varies in SBS. Fat malabsorption is usually
`particularly severe, not compensated by colonic mechanisms and associated with
`deficiencies of the fat soluble vitamins A, D, E and K.
`% Deficiencies of the water soluble vitamins B1, B2, B6 and C are relatively rare.
`% By contrast, hyperoxaluria with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis is observed in 60%
`of patients.
`% Calcium, magnesium and iron as well as folic acid deficiencies are a typical
`consequence of expanded proximal small bowel resections.
`% The loss of the ileum leads to vitamin B12 deficiency and to spill-over of
`unabsorbed bile acids into the colon, which causes cholerheic diarrhoea.
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome after extensive small bowel resection 981
`
`In addition, such patients have an increased risk of gallstone formation
`(cholesterol and pigment stones).
`% In patients with Crohn’s disease functional losses due to chronic inflammation may
`further impair absorptive functions even if small bowel resection is limited.
`
`Adaptation
`
`Adaptation of the remaining intestine is mainly stimulated by exposure of the residual
`mucosa to macronutrients and occurs on several levels.12,13 In particular, the remaining
`bowel increases in length and diameter and there is hyperplasia of small
`intestinal
`mucosa with increased number and size of crypts and villi. In addition, individual cells
`can increase certain absorptive functions (e.g. for sodium and calcium), though not
`all.14,15 The overall result of these adaptive mechanisms is an increased mucosal surface,
`and an increased absorptive capacity per surface. In addition,
`intestinal motility is
`slowed which increases contact time of nutrients with the mucosa and thereby
`improves absorption. Important neurohormonal mediators which are released by the
`terminal ileum and which at least partly also have trophic effects are glucagon-like
`peptide 1 and 2 (GLP-1 and GLP-2), peptide YY (PYY) and neurotensin.16–22 However,
`this important mechanism is only operative if the ileocecal region is preserved, which at
`least partially explains why these patients fare so much better. In combination, adaptive
`responses increase absorptive capacity by several hundred percent and are the basis of
`long-term management. They develop over 1–2 years following onset of SBS or even
`beyond, as is suggested by a longitudinal study on calcium absorption.23
`Animal studies and preliminary uncontrolled studies in SBS patients suggested that
`growth hormones might accelerate and improve the adaptation process.24–28 However,
`controlled clinical trials did not confirm this fully.29–31 Moreover, in patients with active
`Crohn’s disease a disturbed or delayed adaptation process has to be expected. This is
`also true for patients with radiation enteritis, carcinoma or chronic intestinal pseudo-
`obstruction.
`
`% Adaptation of the remaining intestine requires exposure to macronutrients.
`Adaptive responses develop over 1–2 years following intestinal resection and
`increase absorptive capacity by several hundred percent as a result of increased
`mucosal surface, increased absorptive capacity per surface and slowed intestinal
`motility.
`% Important neurohormonal mediators involved are glucagon-like peptide 1 and 2
`(GLP-1 and GLP-2), peptide YY (PYY) and neurotensin.
`
`THERAPY
`
`In concert with the adaptation process, the treatment of the SBS involves three phases.
`The immediate acute phase lasts less than 4 weeks and serves to stabilise the patient.
`The subsequent year should be used to induce maximal adaptation by gradually
`increasing nutrient exposure. When maximal stimulation of nutrient absorption has
`been achieved, permanent maintenance nutrition treatment should be defined
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`982 J. Keller, H. Panter and P. Layer
`
`individually, dependent on extent and quality of nutritive deficits. In patients with SBS
`due to Crohn’s disease, effective therapy of the underlying disease is essential.
`The main therapeutic goals in SBS patients are adequate supply of
`† nutrients
`† water and electrolytes
`† vitamins and trace elements and
`† avoidance of acid–base dysbalance.
`
`Because of the low incidence and heterogeneity of the disease, randomised placebo
`controlled trials have hardly been performed in patients with short bowel syndrome.
`Instead, most recommendations are based on open clinical trials, several reflect
`experts’ opinions only.
`
`Acute phase
`
`Therapeutic options are depicted as an algorithm in Figure 1. The dominant clinical
`problem in the acute phase is massive diarrhoea32 which is not only due to insufficient
`nutrient absorption but may also evolve or be aggravated by several other
`pathomechanisms, i.e. massive gastric hypersecretion, malabsorption of bile acids and
`the loss of the ‘ileal brake’ mechanism. Consequently, during the acute phase, patients
`receive parenteral nutritional support and gastric acid secretion inhibitors (Table 1). If
`necessary the somatostatin-analogue octreotide can be applied in order to reduce the
`intraluminal fluid load.33
`
`% The dominant clinical problem in the acute phase is massive diarrhoea which is
`treated by parenteral nutritional support, gastric acid secretion inhibitors and, in
`severe cases, the somatostatin-analogue octreotide.
`
`Acute phase
`1./2. Postoperative day
`
`2./3. Postoperative day
`Adaptation phase
`4./5. Postoperative day
`
`Later on
`
`Maintenance phase
`
`Table 1. Dietary therapy in short bowel syndrome.
`
`Infusion therapy using Ringer, glucose and amino acid solutions, substitution
`of water soluble vitamins and trace elements
`Start of total parenteral nutrition
`
`Oral/enteral nutrition with gradually increasing nutrient loads: isoosmolar
`salt–glucose-solutions, tea, carbohydrate solutions, medium chain trigly-
`cerides, amino acids
`Predominantly long chain triglycerides, free fatty acids, small amounts of
`medium chain triglycerides in patients with preserved colon, saccharose,
`maltose, glutamine, pectin, substitution of vitamins and minerals as needed,
`in particular calcium
`
`Oral nutrition in stable patients: many small meals, high fat diet, small
`amounts of medium chain triglycerides in patients with preserved colon,
`fluids can usually be taken with meals, substitution of vitamins and minerals
`as needed, in particular calcium
`Avoidance of nutrients rich in oxalate if distal small intestinal resection
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome after extensive small bowel resection 983
`
`Adaptation phase
`
`Depending on the condition of the patient, first attempts to start oral or enteral
`nutrition are made early, e.g. around the 4th or 5th postoperative day (Table 1). It can
`be difficult to determine the adequate initial quantities of oral or enteral nutrition. If the
`volume or osmotic load exceeds absorptive capacity, the patients may respond with
`diarrhoea, exsiccosis and metabolic disturbances, Thus, oral
`intake must be very
`gradually increased to 30–40 kcal/kg/d (with respect to ideal body weight) by frequent
`small solid meals. It is debated whether separated intake of solids and liquids helps to
`reduce diarrhoea.34 Anyway, liquids should not be sweetened with disaccharides in
`order to prevent osmotic diarrhoea. Tap water lacks electrolytes and should be
`avoided, too. Instead, isoosmolar saline–glucose-solutions are usually of advantage.35
`Because there is a tendency for metabolic acidosis, bicarbonate should be added during
`the first months of the adaptation phase. Slowing of intestinal motility with loperamide
`or codein in addition to suppression of gastric acid output may be helpful in controlling
`diarrhoea.
`If oral nutrition is not sufficient to ensure adequate energy supply and/or not
`tolerated by the patient, continuous enteral nutrition (EN) can be used in the adaptive
`phase. As an alternative to permanent nasogastric feeding pump devices, patients may
`place the tube necessary for enteral nutrition themselves for each night, or a
`percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be performed. Continuous infusion is
`started at a very low rate and progressively increased over a 2–3 week period to the
`target rate. If EN is the only source of energy, up to 45–60 kcal/kg/d may be required
`eventually to achieve an uptake of 30–40 kcal/kg/d because a malabsorption rate of 30%
`has to be taken into account. Although continuous enteral infusion of nutrient solution
`is superior to bolus administration, aggravation of diarrhoea may still be a problem of
`enteral nutrition. However, in a recent study, Levy et al have used continuous EN as
`initial adaptive phase nutrition starting 2 weeks after operation in patients with both
`more or less than 80 cm of intestine left. They observed that stool volume gradually
`decreased with time in the patients with more than 80 cm of remaining intestine, and at
`least did not increase in those patients with a very short bowel.36
`The amount of carbohydrates excreted with faeces correlates directly with stool
`volume and, thus, with diarrhoea. Rice starch is absorbed best compared with other
`carbohydrates37,38 and is particularly suitable for dietary therapy. On the other hand,
`soluble dietary fibres which are degraded to short chain fatty acids by the colonic flora
`can contribute considerably to energy supply in patients with intact colon (up to 500–
`1000 kcal/d).39–41 Moreover, these patients may profit from the addition of medium
`chain triglycerides.42
`Glutamine has been shown to be a major source of energy for the enterocyte.
`Accordingly, experimental data in animals and uncontrolled studies in SBS patients
`suggested that enteral or parenteral substitution of glutamine might accelerate and
`ameliorate adaptation processes.43–45 However, subsequent randomised controlled
`trials could not confirm these positive effects.46,47 If glutamine was combined with
`growth hormone, even negative effects such as peripheral oedema occurred.48–50
`Positive effects were not sustained beyond the treatment period.51 Consequently,
`these therapeutic options cannot be recommended without restrictions. On the other
`hand, a recent study demonstrated an increase in intestinal nutrient absorption and
`body weight in patients requiring home parenteral nutrition and receiving low doses of
`growth hormone only. 52
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`984 J. Keller, H. Panter and P. Layer
`
`Small bowel length > 60-80 cm
`Ileocecal region preserved
`Colon (partially) preserved
`
`yes
`
`no
`
`• TPN during acute phase only
`• isotonic salt-glucose-solutions
`• control and compensation of electrolyte
`and water deficiencies
`• H2-blocker / PPI for the first 6 months
`• Antidiarrheal drugs
`• Adequate nutrient supply
`• MCT
`• Avoidance of oxalate in diet
`• 800-1200 mg calcium p.o.
`
`• longer lasting partial or total parenteral
`nutrition
`• isotonic salt-glucose-solutions
`• control and compensation of electrolyte
`and water deficiencies
`• H2-blocker / PPI for the first 6 months
`• Antidiarrheal drugs
`• 800-1200 mg calcium p.o.
`• intensive training for home parenteral
`nutrition
`
`Reduction and termination of
`parenteral nutrition (if possible)
`
`tolerated
`
`not tolerated
`
`• Continuation of oral nutrition and above
`mentioned measures
`• Control and substitution of vitamin and trace
`element deficiencies
`• Annual measurements of bone density
`
`• Continuation of (partial) parenteral
`nutrition and above mentioned measures
`• Control and substitution of vitamin and
`trace element deficiencies
`• Annual measurements of bone density
`
`In case of complications:
`Hepatobiliary system : cholestasis, steatosis, liver failure → oral nutrition, reduce
`dextrose and fat content of TPN; cholelithiasis → cholecystectomy
`
`Bones : check calcium and vitamin D, if necessary substitute bisphosphonate i.v.
`Infections : improve handling of catheter
`Catheter occlusion : try to flush, adaptation of TPN solution, anticoagulation
`
`Improvement
`
`No improvement /
`deterioration
`
`Continuation of above mentioned measures
`
`Small bowel (and liver) transplantation
`
`Figure 1. Therapeutic options and algorithm in short bowel syndrome.
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome after extensive small bowel resection 985
`
`Moreover, GLP-2 has been demonstrated to have antisecretory, transit modulating
`and intestinotrophic effects. As illustrated in preliminary studies, GLP-2 may prove to
`be important in the attempt to optimise remnant intestinal function in the future.53,54
`However, controlled clinical trials are lacking, so far.
`
`% First attempts to start oral or enteral nutrition should be made around the 4th or
`5th postoperative day.
`% Oral
`intake must be very gradually increased. Frequent small solid meals are
`advisable. If this is not sufficient to ensure adequate energy supply or not tolerated,
`continuous enteral nutrition can be used.
`% Growth hormone (and GLP-2) may improve the adaptive process.
`
`Maintenance phase
`
`As mentioned above, most patients with a manifest SBS will have to cope with an
`average malabsorption of 30% of nutrients ingested. This means that for a target
`absorption rate of 30–40 kcal/kg/d (ideal body weight), about 45–60 kcal/kg/d must be
`ingested, preferentially distributed over many small meals and including adequate and
`regular supplementation of vitamins, minerals and trace elements (Table 2).
`In
`particular, if no distal ileum is left, vitamin B12 must be supplemented parenterally. As
`explained above, calcium should be given generously by mouth (800–1200 mg/d) not
`only to substitute for decreased calcium absorption but also in order to prevent
`increased absorption of oxalate resulting in nephrolithiasis. Oral substitution of
`its laxative effect.55 Modern concepts of
`magnesium may be difficult because of
`nutrition of patients with SBS use high fat diets during the maintenance phase which are
`superior in energy supply to the traditional low fat approach. To achieve this pivotal
`goal, the aggravation of steatorrhoea resulting from increased fat intake may have to be
`accepted.56,57 Moreover, small amounts of medium chain triglycerides are absorbed by
`the colon and may be included in the diet as an additional energy source in patients with
`the colon in continuity.58 On the other hand, excessive intake of medium chain
`triglycerides may induce nausea, vomiting and ketosis.59
`Bacterial overgrowth may lead to an unexpected increase in nutrient requirements
`or decrease in body weight. It is particularly likely if the orocecal valve has been
`
`Table 2. Substitution of vitamins and trace elements in short bowel syndrome (modified according to
`Buchman et al59).
`
`Vitamin A
`Vitamin B12
`Vitamin C
`Vitamin D
`Vitamin E
`Vitamin K
`Selen
`Zink
`
`10,000–50,000 U/d if liver function is normal
`300 mg s.c. per month following resection of terminal ileum
`200–500 mg/d
`1600 U/d
`30 IU/d
`10 mg/week
`60–100 mg/d
`220–440 mg/d
`
`Doses given above are for orientation, only. The exact individual requirements must be evaluated and
`doses adjusted according to regularly performed appropriate laboratory measurements.
`
`Page 9
`
`

`
`986 J. Keller, H. Panter and P. Layer
`
`Table 3. Drug therapy in short bowel syndrome.
`
`Drug
`
`Loperamide
`H2-antagonists
`Ranitidine
`Famotidine
`Omeprazole
`Octreotide
`Cholestyramine
`Pancreatin
`Metronidazole
`
`Oral application if not stated otherwise.
`
`Recommended dose per day
`
`4 –16 mg
`
`300 – 600 mg
`40 – 80 mg
`20 – 40 mg
`2–3!50–100 mg subcutaneously
`4–16 g
`25,000 – 40,000 U per meal
`800 –1200 mg
`
`resected. In many patients with bacterial overgrowth repetitive or even continuous use
`of antibiotics is necessary.60
`
`Drug therapy
`
`Absorption of nutrients as well as symptoms resulting from malabsorption can be
`improved by drugs acting on various levels. Therefore rational treatment approaches of
`SBS often include the combination of drugs which influence gastrointestinal secretory
`and motor functions (Table 3). Loperamide and codeine act on opiate receptors and
`slow intestinal transit.61 H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors decrease
`gastric acid hypersecretion.62,63 Colestyramine is effective in cholerheic diarrhoea
`through the binding of bile acids. It may, however, deteriorate steatorrhoea particularly
`in patients with extensive ileal resections and should be used cautiously. On the other
`hand, in single patients, substitution of bile acids appears to increase water and nutrient
`absorption.64 Somatostatin and its analogue octreotide strongly inhibit not only gastric
`acid secretion but all digestive secretions as well as gastrointestinal transit and
`therefore strongly reduce intraluminal fluid load.65–67 They can be especially helpful in a
`problematic subgroup of patients with very little remaining small bowel with or without
`preservation of the colon. However, octreotide is expensive and, moreover, there is
`evidence that tachyphylaxis develops within weeks. Thus, it may rather be of value in
`critical stages during the adaptation phase than for permanent treatment.68 The
`supplementation of pancreatic enzymes with meals may compensate for postcibal
`asynchrony,
`i.e. disturbed coordination of gastrointestinal transit of nutrients and
`pancreatic enzyme secretion and, thus, improve digestion.69
`Broad spectrum antibiotics are of value for the control of bacterial overgrowth.
`They should be used rigorously, particularly in patients receiving parenteral nutrition in
`order to reduce the risk of chronic liver failure.70
`
`% Because of an average malabsorption rate of 30% most SBS patients need
`hyperalimentation including adequate and regular supplementation of vitamins,
`minerals and trace elements.
`% To achieve adequate energy supply, diets need to contain sufficient amounts of fat.
`Patients with preserved colon may profit from the addition of low amounts of
`medium chain triglycerides.
`
`Page 10
`
`

`
`Management of the short bowel syndrome after extensive small bowel resection 987
`
`% Calcium should be given generously by mouth not only to substitute for
`malabsorption but also to avoid hyperoxaluria and nephrolithiasis.
`% Absorption and symptoms can be improved by the following drugs: Loperamide and
`codeine can be used to slow intestinal transit. H2-receptor blockers and proton
`pump inhibitors decrease gastric acid hypersecretion. Colestyramine reduces
`cholerheic diarrhea but may deteriorate steatorrhea. In single patients, substitution
`of bile acids appears to increase water and nutrient absorption. Pancreatin
`preparations may improve digestion. Somatostatin analogues strongly reduce the
`intraluminal fluid load and can be helpful in patients with very little remaining bowel.
`Antibiotics are needed in patients with small bowel bacterial overgrowth.
`
`Maintenance parenteral nutrition
`
`According to the data of a recent study, the combined use of a specific diet, growth
`hormone and glutamine may enable totally oral nutrition even in patients with less than
`50 cm of small bowel left.71,72 However, despite all efforts to optimise modes of enteral
`nutrition and drug therapy, there is a substantial group of patients left who cannot cope
`with oral or enteral nutrition alone, but require parenteral nutrition at certain intervals
`or continuously.73 These patients require—dependent on their occupation—30–
`40 kcal/kg/d; 32 kcal/kg/d are recommended for total parenteral nutrition. In addition,
`electrolytes, minerals, vitamins and trace elements must be supplemented.
`Continuous home parenteral nutrition demands strict selection and intensive
`training of the patient, together with systematically organised, competent nursing
`support, e.g. patients must be willing and able to cooperate and to learn, understand
`and practice the principles of asepsis. Follow-up series suggest that with adequate
`support, complications such as infection, dislocation, obstruction, thrombosis, etc. can
`be limited to an acceptable range.74–76 Even with continuous parenteral nutrition, care
`has to be taken to regularly expose the remaining intestinal mucosa to nutrients in
`order to maintain remaining absorptive, secretory and motor functions and to avoid
`parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.
`
`% A substantial group of patients requires parenteral nutrition at certain intervals or
`continuously. In addition, electrolytes, minerals, vitamins and trace elements must
`be supplemented.
`% Continuous home parenteral nutrition demands strict selection and intensive
`training of the patient, together with systematically organised, competent nursing
`support.
`% Even patients receiving total parenteral nutrition need regular exposition of the
`remaining intestinal mucosa to nutrients in order to avoid complications.
`
`Surgical therapy
`
`The primary goal of conventional surgical interventions is to increase nutrient and
`water absorption by slowing gastrointestinal transit and/or increasing the absorptive
`surface. The following surgical procedures were performed with limited success in
`small groups of patients, so far: interposition of antiperistaltic small bowel segment or
`of colon, construction of

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket