throbber
t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`a v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m
`
`The Surgeon, Journal of the Royal Colleges
`of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
`
`w w w . t h e s u r g e o n . n e t
`
`Short bowel syndrome
`
`Claire L. Donohoe, John V. Reynolds*
`
`Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St James’ Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
`
`a r t i c l e i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 17 February 2010
`Accepted 13 June 2010
`
`Keywords:
`Short bowel syndrome
`Intestinal adaptation
`Intestinal failure
`Intestinal transplant
`Parenteral nutrition
`Intestinal lengthening
`
`is a state of malabsorption following intestinal
`The short bowel syndrome (SBS)
`resection where there is less than 200 cm of intestinal length. The management of short
`bowel syndrome can be challenging and is best managed by a specialised multidisci-
`plinary team. A good understanding of the pathophysiological consequences of resec-
`tion of different portions of the small intestine is necessary to anticipate and prevent,
`where possible, consequences of SBS. Nutrient absorption and fluid and electrolyte
`management in the initial stages are critical to stabilisation of the patient and to
`facilitate the process of adaptation. Pharmacological adjuncts to promote adaptation are
`in the early stages of development. Primary restoration of bowel continuity, if possible,
`is the principle mode of surgical treatment. Surgical procedures to increase the surface
`area of the small intestine or improve its function may be of benefit in experienced
`hands, particularly in the paediatric population. Intestinal transplant is indicated at
`present for patients who have failed to tolerate long-term parenteral nutrition but
`with increasing experience, there may be a potentially expanded role for its use in the
`future.
`ª 2010 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and
`Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Introduction
`
`The short bowel syndrome is a malabsorptive state usually
`following massive resection of the small intestine.1 It gener-
`ally occurs when there is less than 200 cm of bowel in situ.2
`Intestinal failure may be defined as a condition where faecal
`energy loss occurs and the patient is unable to increase oral
`intake or absorptive capacity sufficiently to maintain their
`nutritional status by the enteral route alone. These patients
`may become dependent on parenteral nutrition support to
`maintain their energy balance. Malabsorption of macronutri-
`ents and micronutrients may predominate as a clinical
`manifestation, whereas other patients may struggle to main-
`tain fluid and electrolytes homeostasis.
`
`Newer definitions of the syndrome have been proposed
`in order to better define and diagnose patients according to their
`likely requirement for surgical intervention and to evaluate new
`therapies.1 These definitions are included in Table 1.
`
`Epidemiology
`
`the syndrome is
`The exact population prevalence of
`unknown. However, this may be estimated from numbers of
`patients on home total parenteral nutritioneof whom
`approximately one quarter to one-third have short bowel
`syndrome. Thus the estimated population prevalence is
`approximately 1 per million.3 SBS is more likely to occur in
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ353 872271250.
`E-mail address: reynoljv@tcd.ie (J.V. Reynolds).
`1479-666X/$ e see front matter ª 2010 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of
`Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.surge.2010.06.004
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`271
`
`Table 1 e Proposed consensus definitions of Short bowel
`syndrome and intestinal failure.1
`
`Short bowel syndrome-intestinal failure results from surgical
`resection, congenital defect or disease-associated loss of
`absorption and is characterised by the inability to maintain
`protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte or micronutrient balances
`when on a conventionally accepted, normal diet.
`Intestinal failure results from obstruction, dysmotility, surgical
`resection, congenital defect, or disease-associated loss of
`absorption and is characterised by the inability to maintain
`protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte or micronutrient balance.
`
`women (2:1), most likely due to the shorter length of the small
`intestine in women.4
`Short bowel syndrome (SBS) results from resection of
`unviable intestine secondary to vascular
`insufficiency,
`Crohn’s disease, malignancy or radiation in adults.3 In the
`paediatric population congenital intestinal anomalies such as
`gastroschisis or atresia, or necrotising enterocolitis lead to
`insufficient intestinal length to maintain nutrition.5
`
`Colon in continuity
`
`The concept of colon in continuity is important to under-
`standing the adaptation process which occurs in short bowel
`syndrome. The colon becomes an important digestive organ
`after loss of a critical mass of small bowel. It can help
`compensate for the lack of small bowel by reabsorbing water,
`electrolytes and short-chain fatty acids. By hormonal mech-
`anisms, it can slow intestinal transit and stimulate intestinal
`adaptation. Up to 65% of carbohydrate intake may be lost in
`the faeces if not degraded by colonic bacteria.6 The flora of the
`colon ferment malabsorbed carbohydrates to short-chain
`fatty acids, which when absorbed, can provide up to 500 kcal/
`day.7 Medium chain fatty acids are water soluble and thus can
`be absorbed in the colon and these may be used as dietary
`supplements in cases of long-chain fatty acid malabsorption,
`which is not usually the case in SBS as these patients have
`intact pancreatic function. Accordingly, patients who have
`a jejunostomy and therefore, no colon in continuity, do not
`have the ability to reabsorb large amounts of gastrointestinal
`secretions. If they lose a critical mass of jejunum (with
`<100 cm remaining) they may have a net secretory response
`to food.
`
`Pathophysiology
`
`Loss of the ileocaecal valve
`
`Consequences of the SBS arise from an inability to absorb
`adequate macro- and/or micronutrients. There may be an
`inability to maintain nutritional intake and this may include
`vitamin and mineral deficiencies or could result in fluid and
`electrolyte imbalances. Additionally, loss of gastrointestinal
`hormonal production may alter bowel motility, transit and
`gastroduodenal emptying. The degree of functional impair-
`ment is dependent on a number of factors: length of intestine,
`segments of intact bowel, the absorptive quality of the
`remnant bowel, and inter-individual variability in efficiency of
`absorptive capacity and adaptation. Patients at greatest risk
`for developing malabsorption are summarised in Table 2.
`
`Normal intestinal physiology
`
`The normal small bowel length is estimated to be approxi-
`mately 600 cm. Macronutrients such as carbohydrate,
`nitrogen and fat are predominantly absorbed within the first
`100e150 cm of jejunum. The gastrointestinal tract processes
`8e9 L of fluid per day. The majority of water ingested is
`reabsorbed and over 80% of this absorption occurs in the small
`bowel with only 100e200 ml of fluid egested in faecal
`material daily.
`
`Table 2 e Patients at highest risk of developing short
`bowel syndrome.28
`Anastomosis
`
`PLUS length of residual
`small intestine
`
`Duodenostomy or jejunoileal
`Jejunocolic or ileocolic
`End jejunostomy
`
`<35 cm
`<60 cm
`<115 cm
`
`If the ileocaecal valve is resected, small bowel bacteria may
`overgrow due to small intestine dilation and slower motility.8
`Bacterial overgrowth has several negative consequences
`including competition for nutrients, inflammation, gastroin-
`testinal bleeding, bacterial translocation and endotoxaemia,
`liver injury and D-lactic acidosis.9
`
`Jejeunal resection
`
`Most of the food absorbed daily is absorbed by the long villi of
`the jejunum, where most of the digestive enzymes are
`concentrated.10 Following resection there is an initial and
`temporary reduction in nutrient absorption, until
`the
`remaining small intestine can adapt. In addition, hypertonic
`solutions, such as that provided by naso-enteral feeding, can
`exacerbate fluid losses by stimulating fluid secretion by the
`jejunum.11 Loss of jejunum also means loss of gastrointestinal
`feedback hormones, which can lead to rapid gastric emptying
`of liquids, which may then overwhelm the absorptive capacity
`of the remaining small bowel.
`
`Ileal resection
`
`Under normal physiological conditions most of the 8e9 L of
`secretions which are secreted by the small intestine are
`reabsorbed by the ileum. Absorption of vitamin B12 and bile
`salts occur at the ileum. Bile acids and fats are absorbed and
`pass directly to the liver via the enterohepatic circulation. If
`there is less than 100 cm of ileum left in situ the ability to
`reabsorb secretions is exceeded and there is a net secretory
`response to food. The loss of enterohepatic circulation will
`lead to bile salt deficiency and fat malabsorption.12 Feedback
`mechanisms usually detect malabsorption, termed the ileal-
`colonic brake. For example, malabsorbed fat reaching the
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`272
`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`ileum usually causes a delay in gastric emptying and intes-
`tinal
`transit
`times in order to increase gut absorptive
`capacity.13 However, ileal resection may lead to loss of these
`hormonal feedback checks including peptide YY, glucagon-
`like peptide-I and neurotensin.14
`
`Consequences
`
`Increased secretions, reduced absorption of nutrients and
`fluid and loss of hormonal feedback mechanisms all combine
`to create diarrhoea with a high osmotic load.15 Simple
`carbohydrates which are digested to sugars contribute to the
`osmotic load and favour small bacterial overgrowth. Products
`of this overgrowth again contribute to osmotic diarrhoea.
`Therefore, these patients should have higher protein and fat
`content in their diet instead of simple carbohydrates.
`
`Adaptation
`
`Following resection of large amounts of small intestine, the
`gastrointestinal
`tract undergoes a process of adaption
`whereby the ileum can increase slightly in length and diam-
`eter and adapts functionally to absorb macronutrients. This
`evolves over a one to two year period. Experimental models
`show epithelial hyperplasia 24e48 h after resection.16e18 The
`length of villi and thus the absorptive area increases. Animal
`models show that this process is stimulated by enteral
`nutrition by providing energy for enterocyte reproduction and
`stimulate the release of trophic factors.19 Fat-stimulated
`glucagon-like peptide-II can lead to hyperplasia.20,21 A number
`of other growth and trophic factors have been implicated in
`the process in animal models including enteroglucagon,
`epidermal growth factor, glutamine, growth hormone, chole-
`cystokinin, gastrin, neurotensin,
`leptin and insulin-like
`growth factor.14,22,23 Few studies have been carried out in
`humans. Trophic hormone release is stimulated more effec-
`tively by fat than either protein or carbohydrate in animal
`models.24 In patients with a jejunostomy, limited adaptation
`occurs and they are less likely to require less nutritional
`support with time.25
`The process of adaptation is gradual and can take place
`over up to two years.26 Thus those who require parenteral
`nutrition support may achieve independence as the adapta-
`tion process compensates. However, studies have shown that
`of those who require this support in the home setting only 20%
`become parenteral nutrition independent in the long-term.27
`
`Prognosis
`
`The likelihood of being able to resume a normal oral diet after
`resection of large amounts of the small bowel can be predicted
`by certain parameters. Factors favouring the ability to resume
`oral nutrition include adequate length of the remaining bowel;
`the presence of colon and intact ileocaecal valve, and co-
`morbidities. The prognosis may be good where there is an
`intact duodenum, a jejunal length of greater than 200 cm, and
`an intact colon. The likelihood of requiring long-term paren-
`is high if there is less than 50e60 cm
`teral nutritional
`
`remaining jejunum even if there is colon in continuity.28 If the
`colon is not present, the bowel can only adapt if there is at
`least 100 cm of small intestine remaining. The adaptation
`process means that up to 70% of those with SBS initially
`requiring total parenteral nutrition can be successfully
`weaned off and converted to complete enteral nutrition.
`However, after two years of parenteral nutrition the proba-
`bility of intestinal failure is 94%.28 Intestinal conditions that
`run counter to successful adaptation include Crohn’s disease,
`radiation enteritis, carcinoma or pseudo-obstruction. These
`patients do not seem to mount an adequate adaptation
`response to loss of intestinal function.
`Citrulline is a non-protein amino acid produced by intes-
`tinal mucosa. Thus plasma levels indicate whether there is
`functioning mucosa present. Crenn et al. used plasma citrul-
`line levels to predict whether patients with short bowel
`syndrome after two years would go on to develop permanent
`intestinal failure. In a study of 57 patients, a plasma citrulline
`level of <20 mmol/L had a positive predictive of 95% and a level
`greater than this, an 86% negative predictive value for
`permanent intestinal failure.29 These results were recently
`replicated in over 500 patients with intestinal
`failure
`conditions.30
`The reason it is critical to try to wean patients back onto
`enteral nutrition is due to the high complication rate associ-
`ated with long-term parenteral nutrition use. In a series of 68
`patients with intestinal insufficiency 32.4% died e half due to
`the consequences of intestinal failure or home parenteral
`nutrition. Those with lower survival tended to be those on
`total parenteral nutrition, those with less than 50 cm of intact
`bowel, those with an end enterostomy or those in whom the
`aetiology of short bowel syndrome was radiation enteritis or
`ischaemia. In this series of patients the survival rate was 88%
`at 3 years and 78% at five years.27 However, it must be noted
`that the majority of these patients died from their underlying
`condition rather than to directly due to complications of
`parenteral nutrition.
`
`Complications of short bowel syndrome
`
`A: Early
`
`Early complications include dehydration and electrolyte
`derangements. Intra-venous fluid supplementation (to either
`enteral or parenteral nutrition) may be required to maintain
`the patient’s hydration status. In particular, magnesium,
`calcium and potassium may be difficult to control in patients
`with SBS.
`Electrolytes are secreted in high concentrations by the
`jejunum and ileum and if there is inadequate intestinal
`length, there may be net electrolyte losses. Knowledge of
`electrolyte physiology is important to effectively supplement
`electrolytes. Total body electrolyte levels of magnesium and
`potassium may be reduced even if serum levels are main-
`tained. Thus, excess electrolyte losses may be diagnosed by
`reduced urinary electrolyte levels. Oral electrolyte replace-
`ment can be problematic as it can cause osmotic diarrhoea
`necessitating intra-venous supplementation. Replacement
`should be done slowly as an abrupt increase in plasma levels
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`273
`
`removes the stimulus for active electrolyte uptake in the loop
`of Henle thus increasing urinary excretion and further
`depleting body stores. Cellular uptake is slow and therefore
`repletion requires sustained correction. Electrolyte correction
`is of particular importance to prevent potentially life-threat-
`ening arrhythmias developing.
`Hypomagnesaemia is a particular problem with jejunos-
`tomies. It is compounded by the hyperaldosteronism which
`occurs secondary to dehydration. Magnesium salts may
`worsen diarrhoea and thus parenteral supplementation may
`be required. Vitamin D supplementation may increase intes-
`tinal absorption of magnesium. Hypercalcaemia secondary to
`hyperparathyroidism in response to low serum magnesium
`levels should be anticipated and corrected.
`Loss of negative feedback to gastric secretions in SBS leads
`to transient hypergastrinaemia and thus gastric hypersecre-
`tion for up to 6 months following resection.31 The consequence
`of this may be peptic ulceration and oesophagitis and therefore
`prophylactic gastric protection is important. Proton pump
`inhibitors have been shown to improve water absorption.32
`
`B: Late
`
`related
`Chronic complications from SBS include TPN-
`complications, bacterial overgrowth, micronutrient deficiency
`and metabolic complications. Parenteral nutrition bypasses
`first pass liver metabolism and longterm TPN can lead to
`steatosis, cholestasis and cirrhosis. Recurrent episodes of
`sepsis from line infections, bacterial overgrowth and biliary
`stasis all contribute to the development of liver disease.33
`Fifteen percent of patients on TPN for greater than one year
`develop end-stage cirrhosis which carries with it a 100% two-
`year mortality rate.34 More than 50% of those on TPN for more
`than 5 years develop complicating liver disease. This may be
`minimised but not eradicated by reducing excess dextrose and
`lipid feeding. Moreover patients with SBS seem to develop
`cholestatic liver disease at a greater rate versus other long-
`term TPN patients. This is postulated to be due to recurrent
`sepsis from bacterial overgrowth or lack of supplementary
`enteral nutrition in SBS patients. In one study, liver biopsies
`demonstrated chronic cholestasis in 65% after 6 months of
`TPN in patients with a bowel remnant of less than 50 cm.35
`Gallstones and related problems are also more common due
`to the interrupted enterohepatic circulation, which alters bile
`composition.12
`The other major complication of parenteral nutrition is
`catheter related. Sepsis accounted for one-third of the deaths
`in a series of SBS patients with a 50% 5-year mortality rate.28 On
`average SBS patients on TPN had one hospitalisation per year
`for infection. Occlusion of the delivery catheter by thrombosis
`is not an uncommon problem with an incidence of 0.2 episodes
`per 1000 catheter days. If catheter thrombosis is not due to
`malpositioning then it is a risk factor for developing superior
`vena cava thrombosis and mandates warfarin prophylaxis.
`Bacterial overgrowth can lead to carbohydrate malab-
`sorption and episodes of sepsis from bacterial translocation. It
`should be suspected in SBS patients with blind loops or no
`ileocaecal valve and pyrexia of unknown origin or refractory
`diarrhoea or weight loss.36 Bacteria can interfere with chylo-
`micron formation and thus decrease absorption of fatty acids.
`
`An inflammatory response may lead to loss of intestinal
`architecture and further loss of absorptive capacity or may
`even present as a colitis or ileitis.37 Prevention is by regular
`bowel washout using a gastrotomy tube or treatment with
`short courses of broad spectrum antibiotics. Some patients
`will require courses of antibiotic every month. The role of
`probiotics in this setting is unproven. A low carbohydrate diet
`decreases the nutrient source for intestinal flora.
`The greatest risk of developing a micronutrient deficiency
`is after
`the transition to enteral
`feeding. The degree
`of malabsorption is not easily predictable. In patients with a
`short length of small intestine serum levels of magnesium,
`calcium, zinc, selenium and fat soluble vitamins should be
`measured every 3 months.38 If there are any concerns about
`large amounts of enteral losses, urinary excretion of the water
`soluble electrolytes may give a better indication of total body
`stores. Since water soluble vitamins are absorbed in the
`proximal jejunum they are rarely deficient. If there is greater
`than 60 cm of terminal ileum resected it must be anticipated
`that B12 supplementation will be required.39 Resection of the
`proximal jejunum may lead to folate deficiency. Patients
`should undergo yearly bone density monitoring.
`Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens, Streptococcus
`bovis and other gram positive colonic bacteria ferment non-
`absorbed carbohydrate to D-lactic acid.40 This creates an acidic
`environment, rich in short-chain fatty acids, which supports
`the proliferation of the intestinal flora. If significant amounts
`of lactic acid are absorbed, a metabolic acidosis may develop
`which presents with encephalopathy, headache, ataxia and
`dysarthria.41 Broad-spectrum antibiotics against intestinal
`flora treat the bacterial overgrowth.40
`Oxalates normally bind to calcium. If fat is malabsorbed,
`calcium binds to free fatty acids, thus oxalate passes into the
`colon and is absorbed. This colonic absorption is enhanced by
`bile acid malabsorption. Higher serum levels and thus
`increased renal excretion increases the risk of developing
`nephrolithiasis. Other consequences of the SBS such as
`metabolic acidosis and a low urinary pH conditions favour
`nephrolithiasis.42
`Loss of a large amount of intestine may reduce serum
`citrulline concentrations to the extent that ammonia cannot
`be detoxified adequately via the urea cycle. If this is accom-
`panied by renal impairment, the excess ammonia may not be
`excreted. Arginine administration corrects ammonia levels.43
`
`Management strategy
`
`The goal of management of patients with short bowel
`syndrome is to allow them resume a normal lifestyle. To that
`end the provision of adequate macro- and micronutrients and
`sufficient fluid to prevent dehydration are basic pre-requi-
`sites. It is important to correct and prevent acid-base distur-
`bances. Steps in the management of SBS are summarised in
`Fig. 1.
`
`Early goals
`
`Where it is anticipated that a patients is susceptible to short
`bowel resection following massive bowel resection it is
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`274
`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`Fig. 1 e Early management of short bowel syndrome.
`
`recommended to begin total parenteral nutrition within the
`first 24 h (Fig. 2). TPN will usually be required for the first 7e10
`days.44 A plan to measure and replace fluid losses and elec-
`trolytes every 2 h should be instituted, thus almost mandating
`high-dependency level care. Blood glucose levels should be
`monitored every 4 h and an insulin-sliding scale should
`be commenced if glucose levels are persistently elevated. Initial
`TPN requirements should be 25e35 kcal/kg/day, of which 1e1/
`5 g/kg/day should be provided as protein. Protein absorption is
`the nutrient which is least affected by reduction in gastroin-
`testinal function, thus there is no requirement for peptide
`based regimes. If less than 75 cm of jejunum remains the
`patient is likely to require longterm parenteral nutrition and
`saline supports. Supplemental fluid will be required parenter-
`ally if less than 100 cm of jejunum remains and oral rehydration
`solution will be necessary if less than 200 cm remains.25
`
`Once the patient is stable, enteral nutrition should be
`slowly introduced e initially at a low rate continuously. The
`initial rate should be 5% of the patient’s daily caloric intake.
`Enteral feeding rates can then be incrementally advanced
`every 3e7 days. The diet should be of high protein and fat
`content (providing 40% of daily caloric intake) to try to mini-
`mise osmotic diarrhoeal complications.45 If the underlying
`disease process involves inflammation of the intestine leading
`to reduced enzymmatic secretions, an elemental diet may be
`considered. If the colon is intact, fibre supplementation can be
`considered to slow intestinal transit. Parenteral nutrition
`should be concomitantly weaned as enteral nutrition is
`advanced. Continuous enteral nutrition via tube stimulates
`the adaptation process more than isocaloric amounts of
`nutrition delivered orally.46 Successfully weaning is indicated
`by the amount of enteral fluid loss. Enteral fluid loss reflects
`
`Fig. 2 e Non-transplant surgical treatment options.
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`275
`
`the degree of carbohydrate malabsorption. If there is a suspi-
`cion of excess fluid secretion as opposed to carbohydrate
`malabsorption being the cause of enteral
`losses, faecal
`content may be tested for glucose.
`Attempts to prevent liver disease arising as a complication
`of parenteral nutrition were formalised in one centre as an
`intestinal rehabilitation programme which involved aggres-
`sive use of enteral nutrition, control of bacterial overgrowth
`and prevention of catheter sepsis.47 It remains to be seen
`whether these results are generalisable in a non-specialist
`centre. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been used to treat chole-
`static liver disease and results in a series of children showed
`some improvement in liver disease.48 Results in adults show
`some benefits.49
`
`motility. These opiate-based medications can be addictive and
`thus should be weaned as soon as possible.
`Octreotide inhibits pancreatic secretions but also increases
`small bowel transit time. It should only be considered if more
`than 3 L of supplementary intra-venous fluid intake is
`required to maintain hydration. Octreotide decreases protein
`synthesis in the intestine and may potentially inhibit the
`adaptation process.59 Studies have shown that is does not
`decrease TPN requirements and therefore has no role to play
`in increasing nutrient absorption.
`Patients with steatorrhoea secondary to bile acid malab-
`sorption following ileal resection should have cholestyr-
`amine. This will bind bile salts and increase their
`enterohepatic circulation.
`
`Methods to promote adaptation
`
`the input of gastrointestinal
`Greater understanding of
`hormones in the process of adaptation has lead to attempts to
`promote adaptation. Glutamine and glucose are fuel sources
`for small intestinal enterocytes. Combinations of glutamine,
`growth hormones and diets high in carbohydrates have been
`used to aim to stimulate the adaptation process after uncon-
`trolled series reported some beneficial effects.50e52 However
`the benefits have not been replicated in controlled trials in
`humans.53e55
`Animal studies have suggested a role for the enter-
`oendocrine peptide, glucagon-like petide-2 in the bowel
`adaption response. A long-acting analogue of GLP-2, tedu-
`gluide is also available. A small (n ¼ 8) double blind RCT
`showed a modest improvement in intestinal absorption and
`nitrogen balance.21 GLP-2 treatment reduced faecal weight by
`approximately 1 kg/day, thus helping eleven parenteral
`nutrition-dependent SBS patients maintain their fluid and
`electrolyte balances with lower oral intake in a recent study.56
`There were no changes in intestinal morphology or body
`composition. A potential confounding factor for uncontrolled
`trials is that the amount of improvement due to adaptation
`without the GLP-2 stimulus is not known. A multi-centre
`placebo controlled randomised controlled trial using tedu-
`glutide is underway at present.57
`
`Oral rehydration solution
`
`Oral rehydration solution (ORS)may be required if there is less
`than 100 cm of residual jejunum in situ as net secretion will be
`greater than intake. The jejunum is permeable to salt, which is
`freely passively absorbed. The addition of glucose to a salt
`solution promoted further active salt absorption by solvent
`drag. The optimal NaCl concentration is that equal to small
`intestinal secretions (90 mmol.l).58 Patients should not drink
`plain water and should have ORS whenever thirsty.2 Studies in
`normal volunteers have shown that ORS can decrease intra-
`luminal duodenojejunal fluid flow rate.
`
`Pharmacological adjuncts
`
`Fluid management may be aided by introducing anti-motility
`agents to slow intestinal transit. Loperamide, diphenoxylate
`or codeine can successfully be combined to reduce intestinal
`
`Surgical treatment options
`
`Broadly speaking there are two categories of surgical
`management in short bowel syndrome: transplant and non-
`transplant. Non-transplant options aim to increase nutrient
`and fluid absorption by wither restoring intestinal continuity
`or by slowing intestinal transit or increasing intestinal surface
`area.60 In a series of 160 patients with SBS from one centre,
`28% underwent surgical treatment.60 Patients selected are
`usually those dependent on parenteral nutrition.61 In general
`terms the patient should be stable and their nutritional status
`should be optimised pre-operatively.61 These surgeries are
`often technically challenging due to the nature of the insult
`which led to the original intestinal resection. Restoration of
`intestinal continuity is a logical initial approach to minimising
`the effect of short bowel syndrome and has a relatively low
`morbidity and mortality. Bianchi et al. have described the
`technique of controllable expansion-recycle which they
`suggest should be used to promote adaptation prior to
`carrying out techniques using autologous intestinal tech-
`niques.62 A large bore tube is passed into the obstructed end of
`the distal jejunum and opened onto the abdominal wall as an
`end jejunostomy. A smaller tube is place into the colon and
`opened as an end colostomy onto the abdominal wall. Intes-
`tinal content is recycled via the two tubes at a slow rate. The
`jejunostomy tube can be occluded for periods to induce
`controlled bowel expansion. The system can be maintained
`for a number of months prior to definitive autologous intes-
`tinal reconstruction. There have been no studies published to
`support its efficacy.
`
`Methods to slow intestinal transit
`
`Segmental reversal of small bowel is one strategy to slow
`intestinal transit. There is not a great deal of evidence to
`support its use with only approximately 40 case reports
`reporting only short term follow-up results. If attempted it
`should be done after full adaptation has occurred. Approxi-
`mately 10 cm of intestine can be reversed as longer segments
`tend to obstruct. The reversed segment should be placed as far
`distally as possible to decrease the symptoms of obstruction.
`In one series of eight patients four weaned from total paren-
`teral nutrition at a median of 8 months of follow-up. Three
`patients had transient intestinal obstruction.63
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`276
`
`t h e s u r g e o n 8 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 2 7 0 e2 7 9
`
`A segment of colon interposed in either an isoperistaltic or
`antiperistaltic direction can be used to slow intestinal transit.
`Reports exist for just 12 patients, which included eleven infants
`under one year old, and reported no mortality or morbidity and
`good results in 4 of the children and in the one adult who
`underwent surgery.64e68 Between 8 and 24 cm of colon was
`used and the isoperistaltic segment had better outcomes.
`Intestinal valves act as a partial mechanical obstruction to
`disrupt the normal motility of the small intestine and prevent
`retrograde reflux of intestinal content. In those cases reported
`nipple valves or intussuscepted valves were used and most
`patients required surgery to remove the valve due to
`obstructive symptoms.60,69,70
`
`Methods to increase intestinal area
`
`The Longtitudinal Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (LILT)
`procedure has been used mainly in children to increase
`intestinal
`length, particularly where significantly dilated
`residual intestine with dysmotility and bacterial overgrowth is
`present.71 The intestine and its mesenteric arterial blood
`supply is divided longitudinally along its mesenteric border.
`This creates a double lumen which is reanastomosed, which
`increases the function but not the surface area of the
`remnant.72 Experience of this procedure has been recorded in
`over 100 cases, however, but experience in adult populations
`is limited. Patients not suitable are those with intestinal
`diameter <3 cm, with length of residual intestine <40 cm,
`length of dilated bowel <20 cm, those with hepatic failure.
`Devine et al. reported a series of 16 children with good
`outcomes reported e 14 were successfully weaned off paren-
`teral nutrition. There was improved stool volume and intes-
`tinal transit. There was a 10% rate of anastomotic stenosis.73 A
`further series of 53 paediatric patients showed that at long-
`term follow-up 79% remained parenteral nutrition free, with
`a high quality of life.74 In this same group of patients, the LILT
`procedure succeeded in restoring liver function parameters in
`those with liver fibrosis pre-operatively.75
`The Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP) procedure
`utilises a series of transverse enterotomies with primary
`longtitudinal anastomosis to increase the intestinal area.76 A
`multi-institutional registry of STEP procedures reported 38
`cases, of whom 29 had short bowel syndrome.77 There was an
`increase in the percentage of calories taken enterally from
`31e67%. A single institution reported their experience of LILT
`(or the Bianchi) and STEP procedures in 64 patients of whom
`14 were adults.78 Both procedures were deemed successful in
`improving the ability to use enteral nutrition and treat
`complications of parenteral nutrition. There was a surgical
`c

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket