throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`203441Orig1s000
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`Page 1
`
`NPS EX. 2063
`CFAD v. NPS
`IPR2015-01093
`
`

`
`MEMORANDUM
`
`Date: December 20, 2012
`
`To: NDA 203441
`
`From: Terrance Ocheltree, Ph.D., R.Ph.
`Director
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`ONDQA
`
`
`Subject: Tertiary review and Concurrence of ONDQA recommendation for NDA 203441,
`Gattex® teduglutide, for injection, 5 mg per vial (10 mg/mL after reconstituted). Teduglutide is a
`new molecular entity (NME).
`
`Teduglutide in NDA 203441 is proposed for the treatment of adult patients with short bowel
`syndrome (SBS) and improvement of intestinal absorption of fluid and nutrients.
`
` I
`
` have assessed the ONDQA reviews of NDA 203441 by Yichun Sun, Ph.D. and concur with the
`ONDQA recommendation of Approval. The initial ONDQA CMC review was entered into
`DARRTS on July 27, 2012, with a recommendation for a Complete Response due to an absence
`of a recommendation from the Office of Compliance on the manufacturing and testing sites,
`pending labeling issues and pending results for the methods validation consult. A methods
`validation consult was sent to the Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis (DPA), Office of Testing
`and Research. According to the Method Validation Report Summary entered into DARRTS by
`Michael Trehy, Ph.D. on November 21, 2012 the two HPLC methods were determined to be
`acceptable for quality control and regulatory purposes by Kallol Biswas, Ph.D. An ONDQA
`Biopharmaceutics review was not preformed due to the proposed dosage form. On December
`14, 2012 the Office of Compliance entered an Overall Recommendation of “Acceptable” into
`EES after the applicant withdrew the
` drug substance
`manufacturing site from the application. A second CMC review was entered into DARRTS on
`December 14, 2012 updating the status of the recommendation from the Office of Compliance,
`resolution of labeling issues and acceptability of the methods.
`
`Teduglutide for injection is supplied in a sterile, single-use 3-mL, USP Type I glass vial
`containing 5 mg of teduglutide as a white lyophilized powder in a 30-vial kit and a single-vial
`kit. The lyophilized powder is intended to be reconstituted with 0.5 mL of sterile Water for
`Injection (sWFI), USP, immediately before administration by subcutaneous injection. Each vial
`of teduglutide also contains 3.88 mg L-histidine, 15 mg mannitol, 0.644 mg monobasic sodium
`phosphate monohydrate, and 3.434 mg dibasic sodium phosphate heptahydrate. The sWFI is
`provided in a prefilled syringe. The product should be used within 3 hrs after reconstitution.
`
`
`The drug substance, teduglutide is manufactured by
`. A
` month retest date is recommended when the drug substance is stored
`at -20° ± 5°C or below.
`
`
`Reference ID: 3235434
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`The drug product, teduglutide for injection, is manufactured by Hospira, Inc, McPherson, KS.
`The Sterile Water for Injection (SWFI) prefilled syringes are manufactured by
`(mo
`
`The teduglutide and SWFI are co-packaged at
`
`Ma’
`
`A 36 months expiration dating period for the product stored refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F and
`46°F), prior to dispensing. Once dispensed to the patient the product may be stored at room
`temperature up to 25°C (77°F)
`ml’.
`
`The drug product is packaged in two configurations, a single—vial kit and a 30-vial kit. The
`single vial kit comes as one package (single box) with the non-drug components included in the
`box. The 30-vial kit comes as two packages, one for the drug product vials and another for the
`non-drug components. The box containing the non-drug components is stored at room
`temperature. The box containing the drug product vials must be stored refrigerated until
`dispensed. The packaging configuration then requires the dispensing pharmacist to remove the
`drug vials from their outer container, add the drug vials to the larger box containing the non-drug
`components, add a use by date to the outer carton and then dispense the whole kit which will be
`stored at room temperature by the patient
`('’m
`
`The kits are as described below:
`
`The product to be dispensed either a single-vial kit or a 30-vial kit. The single-vial kit is pre-
`assembled and ready to be used. It contains:
`One-vial kit (NDC 68875-0101-4):
`0 One single-use vial of drug
`
`0 One disposable prefilled syringe containing 0.5 mL Sterile Water for Injection USP for
`reconstitution, with a separate needle (22G x 11/2 in) to attach to the syringe
`0 One sterile disposable 1-mL syringe with needle (26G x 5/8 in) for dosing
`0 Four alcohol swabs
`
`The 30-vial kit is to be assembled by a pharmacist with the following two cartons:
`Carton of Drug (NDC 68875-0101-2):
`0 Thirty single-use vials of drug
`Carton of Ancillary Supplies (NDC 68875-0101-3):
`
`0
`
`disposable prefilled syringes containing 0.5 mL Sterile Water for Injection
`separate needles (22G x 11/2 in) to attach to the syringes for reconstitution
`
`0 Thirty sterile disposable l—mL syringes with needle (26G x 5/8 in)
`0 Sixty alcohol swabs
`
`Reconstitution of the lyophilized drug with 0.5 mL of preservative-free Sterile Water for
`Injection, provided in a prefilled syringe, is required prior to subcutaneous administration of the
`drug. Reconstituted GAITEX is a sterile, clear, colorless to light straw-colored 10 mg/mL
`solution, which is essentially fiee from particulates. Upon reconstitution with the 0.5 mL Sterile
`Water for Injection provided in the prefilled syringe, a maximum of 0.38 mL of the reconstituted
`solution which contains 3.8 mg of teduglutide can be withdrawn from the vial for dosing.
`
`Reference ID: 3235434
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`The container carton labels for the two packaging configurations are not well designed.
`Valuable information is contained on the sides and bottom panels instead of the front (top) panel.
`Messages to the pharmacist related to storage and dispensing are not readily visible. Nor are
`instructions completely clear. For example, there is a place on the front label for the pharmacist
`to apply a
`(“(0. However, these issues do not
`affect the approval decision for this application.
`
`During the writing of this review it was also noted that the drug vials contained incorrect storage
`conditions.
`("M
`
`This was initially justified by stating that having multiple storage
`conditions on the label may confuse the patient and that the patient was the person most likely to
`see the individual vials (due to them being packaged in a kit). After a discussion with relevant
`members of the review team, it was determined that the vials should be labeled according to the
`requirements for long term stability. The Applicant was contacted on December 19, 2012 to
`inform them of this necessary change and also to request that the front panels contain a storage
`condition statement directed to the patient. The vial label was updated to state “Prior to
`dispensing, store at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F). Do not freeze” on December 20, 2012. The
`following statement will be added to the outer cartons front panel: "Attention patients: Store at
`room temperature up to 25°C (77°F). Do not freeze." Section 16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE
`AND HANDLING of the package insert will be revised to be consistent with the outer cartons.
`
`I concur with the determination that the information as provided in the NDA is adequate to
`assure the identity, strength, purity, and quality of the drug product and support the
`recommended drug product shelf life as described above for the proposed commercial product
`when it is stored at controlled room temperature.
`
`There is one ONDQA related Post Marketing Commitment (PMC). The PMC calls for:
`“Elemental Impurities specifications will be expanded to include limits and testing for all metals,
`as recommended in USP <232>." This is to be implemented by the Applicant by March 31,
`2013.
`
`I concur with the determination that the information as provided in the NDA is adequate to
`assure the identity, strength, purity, and quality of the drug product and support the
`recommended drug product shelf life as described above for the proposed commercial product
`when it is stored at controlled room temperature.
`
`The secondary review of the CMC reviews was perfonned by Moo-Jhong Rhee, Ph.D.
`
`Reference ID: 3235434
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`TERRANCE W OCHELTREE
`12/20/2012
`
`Reference ID: 3235434
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`
`Memorandum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 14, 2012
`
`From: Yichun Sun, Ph.D.
`
`Review Chemist, ONDQA
`
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`
`ONDQA
`
`Through: Moo-Jhong Rhee, Ph.D.
`Chief, Branch IV
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`ONDQA
`
`
`To: CMC Review #1 of NDA 203441
`
`Subject: Final Recommendation
`
`At the time when the CMC review #1 was written, there were three pending issues listed
`as follows:
`
`
`1) The overall acceptable recommendation of Establishment Evaluation was still
`pending.
`
`2) There were issues on the Label/Labeling that needed to be resolved.
`
`3) Report of Method Validation from the Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis,
`Office of Testing and Research, CDER was still pending.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (Elemental Impurities) was raised by the review
`* Safety concern of
`team after the CMC review #1 was written.
`
`
`Establishment Evaluation
`After inspection, one of two the drug substance sites,
`is not acceptable due to GMP violations. A T-con was held with the NDA applicant on
`December 12, 2012 to discuss the options for the applicant to pursue. As there is another
`drug substance manufacture site
` for the
`NDA, the applicant decided to withdraw the unacceptable drug substance manufacture
`site during the T-con. An amendment to withdraw
` site was received on
`December 13, 2012.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`On December 14, 2012, the Office of Compliance gave an overall “Acceptable”
`recommendation for all the facilities involved in the manufacture and test of the drug
`substance and drug product (Attachment - 1).
`
`Evaluation of Label/Labeling
`On November 9, 2012, the NDA applicant submitted an amendment providing the
`finalized mock up container and carton labels. Additionally, the applicant also agreed to
`all the CMC changes made to the package insert. All the labels/labeling issues are now
`satisfactorily resolved. The CMC sections of the final package insert, and mock up
`container and carton labels are attached (Attachment - 2).
`
`HPLC Method Validation
`On November 14, 2012, the report of method validation for the two HPLC methods used
`for quantitation of impurities in both drug substance and drug product in NDA 203441
`was received. The two HPLC methods were satisfactorily validated by Dr. Kallol
`Biswas from the Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Office of Testing and Research,
`CDER (Attachment - 3).
`
` Elemental Impurities
`The issue of safety concern of elemental impurities in the drug substance has been
`satisfactorily resolved (Attachment - 4).
`
`Recommendation:
`All the previous pending issues are now satisfactorily resolved, and therefore, from the
`ONDQA’s perspective, this NDA is recommended for APPROVAL.
`
` *
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`2
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`Attachment - 1 §Summa1_'x Regort of Establishment Evaluation)
`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`NPS PHARMS INC
`550 HILLS DR 3RD FL
`BEDMINSTER_ NJ 07921
`Gaitex (teduglutide)
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Brand Name:
`Estab. Name:
`Generic Name:
`
`Product Numbov: Dosage Form: Ingredient: Strength:
`001: POWDER. FOR INJECTION SOLUTION. LYOPHILIZEDI
`TEDUGLUTIDE; IOMG
`
`NDA 203441/000
`180
`
`I 3
`
`0-NOV-Z011
`30-DEC-2012
`
`31 -OCT»2012
`
`c. TRAN-ZWANETZ
`Y. SUN
`M. KOWBLANSKY
`
`Project Manager
`Revsew chemist
`Team Leader
`
`(HI-‘D-800)
`
`3017963877
`3017961388
`3017961390
`
`Application:
`Org. Code:
`Priority:
`Stamp Date:
`PDUFA Date:
`Action Goal:
`District Goal:
`
`FDA Contacts:
`
`Overall Recommendation:
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`on 14-DEC-2012
`
`by D. SMITH
`
`(HFD—323)
`
`3017965321
`
`PENDING
`
`PENDING
`
`PENDING
`
`WITHHOLD
`
`PENDING
`
`WITHHOLD
`
`PENDING
`
`PENDING
`
`PENDING
`
`on 04-DEC-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 20-SEP-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on O2-MAR-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 02-MAR-2012
`
`Dy EES_PROD
`
`on O2~MAR-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 25-JAN-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 23-JAN-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 23-JAN-2012
`
`by EES_PROD
`
`on 23-JAN-2012
`
`Dy EES_PROD
`
`Establishment:
`
`cm:
`
`:51:
`
`9”’
`
`151(4)
`
`DMF No:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`Profile:
`
`Last Milestone:
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`DRUG SUBSTANCE MANUFACTURER
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`2o..IUL.2o12
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`AADA:
`
`(|I)(4)
`
`OAI Status:
`
`NONE
`
`December 14. 2012 10:07 AM
`
`FDA Confidential - Internal Distribution Only
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`Reference ID: 3231 508
`
`Page 8
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Eehbllehment:
`
`CFN:
`
`1925262
`
`FEI:
`
`‘lQ5282
`
`HOSPIRA WORLDWDE. INC
`
`DIE No:
`
`MCPHERSON. . UNITED STATES 674609301
`
`AADA:
`
`Responsiblities:
`
`FIMSHED DOSAGE MANUFACTURER
`
`ON Status:
`
`NONE
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI Status:
`
`NONE
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI Status:
`
`NONE
`
`Profile:
`
`Lag; mggggme;
`
`Milestone Date:
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`23-MAR-2012
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`Eshbllshment:
`
`CFII:
`
`El:
`
`
`
`21-MAY-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`CFII:
`
`El:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`30-JAN-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`DIE No:
`
`Responslblltles:
`
`Profile:
`
`Mllestone Date:
`
`Declslm:
`
`Reason:
`
`Establishment:
`
`Dlf No:
`
`Responelbiitles:
`
`Profile:
`
`Lug flflgsmngg
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Declslon:
`
`Reason:
`
`December 14. 2012 10:01 AM
`
`FDA Confidential - Internal Disttibution Only
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`Page 9
`
`Page 9
`
`

`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Establishment:
`
`cm:
`
`FEI: -
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI status:
`
`NONE
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`24-SEP-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`Prom-= _ on-am-u=
`
`~o~e
`
`
`
`24-SEP-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`CFN:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`04-DEC-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI status:
`
`NONE
`
`DH-' No:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`Profile:
`
`Lug m|.,¢.n.;
`
`Mnestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`Establishment:
`
`DIE No:
`
`Responsibllltles:
`
`Profile:
`
`L”: ""310",;
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`December 14. 2012 10:07 All
`
`FDA confidential - Imemal Dlsttlbuilon Only
`
`Page 3 oi 6
`
`Refelenoe ID: 3231508
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 10
`
`

`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Eshhllchment:
`
`CFN:
`
`FE: -
`
`
`
`OC RECOMMENDAHON
`
`24-JAN-201 2
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`BASED ON PROFILE
`
`December 14. 2012 10:07 AM
`
`FDA conildential - Internal Dlstrihutlon Only
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`Page 1 1
`
`DIE No:
`
`Responslblities:
`
`Proflie:
`
`Lg“ Mflggtongg
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`Establishment:
`
`DIF No:
`
`Responslbllties:
`Profile:
`
`L.“ 33,530.“;
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`Reason:
`
`Establishment:
`
`DRF No:
`
`Responsibllues:
`
`Profile:
`
`Last Mlestone:
`
`Milestone Date:
`
`Decision:
`
`R0180":
`
`DC RECOMMENDATION
`
`07-FEB-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`CFN:
`
`FE:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`
`24-JAN-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`BASED ON FILE REVIEW
`
`CFN:
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI status:
`
`NGJE
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI Statue:
`
`NONE
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI status:
`
`NGIE
`
`Page 11
`
`

`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`cm: 2 sen: _
`
`
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI status:
`
`NONE
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`04050-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT REc0MMENDA11ON
`
`Eshhllshmont:
`
`DIS No:
`
`Responsibilities:
`
`Profile:
`
`L.“ flflggfgngg
`Milestone Date:
`
`o¢¢|;|on:
`
`Reason:
`
`
`Establishment:
`
`CHI:
`
` DIE No:
`
`Raponslhllmos:
`
`Profile:
`
`AADA:
`
`OAI sum:
`
`NONE
`
`L.“ Mflggfong;
`Mllestone Date:
`
`Declsionz
`
`Re-son:
`
`OC RECOMMENDATION
`04-DEC-2012
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`December 14. 2012 10:07 AM
`
`FDA Confidential - Internal Distributlon Only
`
`Page 5 of S
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`Page 12
`
`Page 12
`
`

`
`Attachment - 2 CMC Sections of the Finalized Labelin and Labels
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`Page 13
`
`

`
`Attachment - 3 (1\_/Iethod Validation)
`
`According to the method validation report provided by Dr. Kallol Biswas from the
`Division of Pharmaceutical Anal sis, Office of Testin and Research, CDER, the I-IPLC
`
`
`
`
`Therefore, it is concluded that the two I-IPLC methods used
`
`or quantrtatron o impurities in both drug substance and drug product in NDA 203441
`are satisfactorily validated and acceptable to be used to ensure the purity of the drug
`substance and drug product in the NDA.
`
`Attachment - 4 [Elemental Impurities}
`
`Safety concern0- was raised by the review team. Detailed information
`regarding this issue and its resolution are summarized as follows:
`
`An IR letter dated May 15, 2012 was sent to re uest the NDA applicant to add a test
`method and an acceptance criterion for
`to the drug substance
`specification. In the responding amendment dated June 18, 2012, the applicant
`Pharmaceuticals) agreed to add a test method and acceptance criterion for
`to the drug substance specification. However, the applicant proposed to implement this
`change as a post approval commitment. FDA had accepted the proposal as a post
`approval commitment in June 2012.
`
`S
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`22
`
`Page 14
`
`Page 14
`
`

`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`23
`
`(b) (4)
`
`Page 15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`24
`
`(b) (4)
`
`Page 16
`
`

`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`YICHUN SUN
`12/14/2012
`
`MOO JHONG RHEE
`12/14/2012
`Chief, Branch IV
`
`Reference ID: 3231508
`
`Page 17
`
`

`
`
`
`NDA 203-441
`
`Gattex® (teduglutide [rDNA origin]) for injection
`
`NPS Pharmaceuticals
`
`Yichun Sun, Ph.D.
`
`Branch IV
`
`Division of New Drug Quality Assessment II
`
`Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
`
`CMC REVIEW OF NDA 203-441
`
`For the Division of Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Products
`(HFD-180)
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`1/271
`
`Page 18
`
`Page 18
`
`

`
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... .. 2
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet ................................................................................................................................. ..4
`
`The Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... .. 8
`
`1. Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................ .. 8
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability .................................................................................. .. 8
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post—Marketing) Commitments. Agreements, and/or Risk Management
`Steps, if Approvable .................................................................................................................................... .. 8
`
`II. Summary of Chemistry Assessments ................................................................................................................. .. 8
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s) ........................................................................ .. 8
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used ................................................................... .. 10
`
`Gattex (teduglutide [IDNA origin]) for injection is a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog indicated for: 10
`
`E1 The treatment of adult patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). ......................................................... ..10
`
`D Improvement of intestinal absorption of fluid and nutrients. .................................................................... .. 10
`
`The recommended dose of Gattex is 0.05 mg/kg given subcutaneously once daily. It can not be used for
`intravenous or intramuscular injection. It is a single-use vial. The product should be used within 3 hrs
`after reconstitution. ................................................................................................................................... .. 10
`
`C. Basis for Not-Approval Recommendation ................................................................................................. .. 10
`
`1]]. Administrative ................................................................................................................................................. ..11
`
`A. Reviewer’s Signature ................................................................................................................................. ..11
`
`B. Endorsement Block .................................................................................................................................... .. 11
`
`Chemistry Assessment ........................................................................................................................................... .. 12
`
`1. Review Of Common Technical Document-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 3.2: Body Of Data ............................... .. 12
`
`s DRUG SUBSTANCE [Teduglutide,
`
`""“’] ........................................................................... .. 12
`
`"”“’] ..................................................................... ..12
`S.l General Information [Teduglutide
`This section is satisfactory. ....................................................................................................................... ..12
`S.2 Manufacture [Teduglutide.
`°”“’] ................................................................................. ..13
`S.2.1 Manufacturers ................................................................................................................................. .. 13
`S.3 Characterization [Teduglutide,
`""("] ........................................................................... ..51
`S.4 Control of Drug Substance [Teduglutide,
`Mm] .......................................................... ..66
`S.5 Reference Standards or Materials [Teduglutide,
`"”‘°] .............................................. ..108
`S.6 Container Closure System [Teduglutide.
`"”“’] ......................................................... .. 119
`s.7 Stability [Teduglutide,
`""“’] ...................................................................................... ..12o
`P DRUG PRODUCT [Gattex (teduglutide[rDNA o1ign]) for injection] ...................................................... ..134
`
`Reference ID: 31 66028
`
`2/271
`
`Page 19
`
`Page 19
`
`

`
`,“"1
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`
`""""\
`
`P.1 Description and Composition of the Drug Product [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA on'gn]) for injection]
`................................................................................................................................................................. .. 134
`
`P.2 Pharmaceutical Development [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] .......................... ..135
`P.3 Manufacture [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] ...................................................... ..163
`P.4 Control of Excipients [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] ........................................ ..186
`P.5 Control of Drug Product [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA on'gn]) for injection] ................................... ..187
`P.6 Reference Standards or Materials [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] ..................... .. 209
`P.7 Container Closure System [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] ................................ .. 210
`P.8 Stability [Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA orign]) for injection] ............................................................ .. 214
`A APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................................... ..234
`
`R REGIONAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. ..236
`
`H. Review Of Common Technical Doclnnent-Quality (Ctd-Q) Module 1 ......................................................... .. 236
`
`A. Labeling & Package Insert ...................................................................................................................... .. 236
`
`B. Environmental Assessment Or Claim Of Categorical Exclusion............................................................. .. 263
`
`III. List Of Deficiencies To Be Resolved ............................................................................................................ .. 265
`
`IV. Attachment: .................................................................................................................................................... .. 266
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`3/271
`
`Page 20
`
`Page 20
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`Chemistry Review Data Sheet
`
`. NDA2 203-441
`
`_ REVIEW #: 1
`
`. REVIEW DATE: 27-July-2012
`
`. REVIEWER2 Yichun Sun, Ph.D.
`
`_ PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS:
`
`Previous Docmnents
`
`Document Date
`
`IND 58,213
`
`27-April-1999
`
`17-November-2003
`
`EOP 2 meeting Memorandum (IND 58,213)
`
`. SUBMISSION(S) BEING REVIEWED:
`
`Submission Reviewed
`@ 30-November-2011
`18-June-2012
`29-June-2012
`
`10-1111 -2012
`
`_ NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`
`Name: NPS Pharmaceuticals
`
`Address:
`
`550 Hills Drive, 3rd Floor
`
`Bedminster, NJ 07921
`
`Representative: Sandra C. Cottrell, MA, Ph.D.
`
`Telephone: 908-450-5300
`
`_ DRUG PRODUCT NAME/CODE/TYPE:
`
`a) Proprietaly Name: Gattex
`b) Non-Proprietary Name (USAN): Teduglutide
`c) Code Name/# (ONDQA only): N/A
`d) Chem. TypelSubmission Priority (ONDQA only):
`
`4/271
`
`Reference ID: 31 66028
`
`Page 21
`
`Page 21
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`0 Chem. Type: 1
`
`0 Submission Priority: Standard Review
`
`9. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION: 505 (b)(l)
`
`10. PHARMACOL. CATEGORY: Analogue of the human glucagon-like peptide-2
`
`11. DOSAGE FORM: For injection
`
`12. STRENGTH/POTENCY: 5 mg per vial (10 mg/mL after reconstituted)
`
`13. ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Subcutaneous injection
`
`14. Rx/OTC DISPENSED:
`
`_)_(_Rx
`
`OTC
`
`15. SPOTS SPECIAL PRODUCTS ON—LINE TRACKING SYSTEM :
`
`X
`
`SPOTS product — Form Completed
`
`Not a SPOTS product
`
`16. CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`
`FORMULA, MOLECULAR WEIGHT:
`
`Teduglutide
`
`
`
`Primary Sequence of Teduglutide
`
`Empirical formula: C154H252N44O55S
`Molecular weight: 3752 Daltons
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`5/271
`
`Page 22
`
`Page 22
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`17. RELATEDISUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
`
`A. DMFs:
`
` @ STATUS WW
`
`ITEM
`
`2 DATEREVIEW
`
`mm
`
`
`
`-K1
`II
`H-
`
`
`
`
`j
`-fl
`
`
`
`
`W"
`
`I
`
`
`
`Action codes for DMF Table:
`
`1 — DMF Reviewed.
`
`Other codes indicate why the DMF was not reviewed, as follows:
`2 —Type 1 DMF
`3 — Reviewed previously and no revision since last review
`4 — Suflicient information in application
`5 — Authority to reference not granted
`6 — DMF not available
`
`7 — Other (explain under "Comments")
`
`2 Adequate, Inadequate, or N/A (There is enough data in the application, therefore the DMF
`did not need to be reviewed)
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`6/271
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 23
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`B. Other Documents: NA
`
`18. STATUS:
`
`ONDQA:
`CONSULTSI CMC
`
`REVIEWS
`N/A—1‘
`In
`In
`In
`“I
`Methods ValidationIt
`DMEPA n_
`EA
`Claim for Categorical
`See p.263
`Y. Sun
`Exclusion is granted.
`
`
`
`0 li Microbiolo
`
`March 30,2012
`
`B anS.Rile ,Ph.D.
`
`Note: The request of methods validation consult was sent to the Division of Pharmaceutical
`Analysis (DPA), Office of Testing and Research on February 23, 2012. The results of method
`validation from DPA are pending. The NDA is recommended for approval without completion of
`the validation of the methods.
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`7/271
`
`Page 24
`
`Page 24
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`The Chemistry Review for NDA 203-441
`
`The Executive Summagz
`
`I. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation and Conclusion on Approvability
`This NDA has provided sufficient information to assure identity, strength, purity, and
`quality of the drug product.
`
`However, the Office of Compliance has not made an overall ‘acceptable’ recommendation
`for the facilities involved in this application as of this review date.
`
`The label/labeling issues have not been resolved yet.
`
`Therefore, from the ONDQA perspective, this NDA is not recommended for approval in
`its present form per 21 CFR 314.125 (b)(6),(13) until all those remaining issues are
`satisfactorily resolved.
`
`B. Recommendation on Phase 4 (Post—Marketing) Commitments, Agreements, and/or
`
`Risk Management Steps, if Approvable
`The applicant was requested to add a test method and an acceptance criterion for M")
`to the drug substance specification in the IR letter dated May 15, 2012.
`
`"M to the
`The applicant agreed to add a test method and acceptance criterion for
`drug substance specification in the amendment dated June 18, 2012. The applicant is
`currently developing a suitable procedure for teduglutide drug substance and plans to test
`representative batches, establish acceptance criteria, and will subsequently add this test to
`the drug substance specification. The applicant proposes to implement this as a post
`approval commitment.
`
`H. Summary of Chemistry Assessments
`
`A. Description of the Drug Product(s) and Drug Substance(s)
`
`Drug Substance
`
`The active ingredient used in Gattex (teduglutide [IDNA origin]) for injection, which is
`indicated for the treatment of adult patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) and for
`improving intestinal absorption of fluid and nutrients, is teduglutide (IDNA origin).
`Teduglutide (rDNA origin) is a 33 amino acid glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog
`manufactured using a strain ofEscherichia coli (E. coli) modified by recombinant DNA
`technology.
`W0
`The manufactlning process of teduglutide includes the following steps:
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`8/271
`
`(I!) (4)
`
`Page 25
`
`Page 25
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`Teduglutide drug substance is a clear, colorless to li
`tedu utide in
`ueous buffer.
`
`t straw colored li uid co
`
`Drug Product
`
`The drug product, Gattex (teduglutide [rDNA origin]) for injection, is proposed to be used
`to treat short bowel syndrome (SBS) and, to improve intestinal absorption of fluid and
`nutrients. Teduglutide for injection is supplied in a sterile, single-use 3-mL, USP Type I
`glass vial containing 5 mg of teduglutide as a white lyophilized powder. Each vial also
`contains 3.88 mg L-histidine, 15 mg mannitol, 0.644 mg monobasic sodium phosphate
`monohydrate, and 3.434 mg dibasic sodium phosphate heptahydrate. The lyophilized
`powder is intended to be reconstituted with 0.5 mL of sterile Water for Injection (sWFI),
`USP, which is provided in a prefilled syringe, immediately before administration by
`subcutaneous injection. The reconstituted drug product is a nominal 10 mg/mL, sterile,
`clear, colorless to light straw-colored solution. The reconstituted solution has a pH of
`approximately 7.4. Up to 0.38 mL of the reconstituted solution can be withdrawn using a
`co-packaged dosing syringe for subcutaneous injection. The drug product is manufactured
`using an aseptic process. The manufacture of teduglutide for injection is comprised of the
`following steps:
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3166028
`
`9/271
`
`Page 26
`
`Page 26
`
`

`
`
`
`Chemistry Assessment Section
`
`(5) (4)
`
`The identity, strength, purity and quality of the drug
`product are adequately controlled by the drug product specification. The proposed
`expiration dating period of 36 months is supported by the long-term stability data
`provided. The proposed storage time period and condition
`for the drug product by patients is also supported by the stability data. The results of in-
`use stability study of the reconstituted drug product demonstrated that the reconstituted
`drug product is stable for up to 24 hours at room temperature. The drug product would
`qualify for categorical exclusion from the preparation of an environmental assessment
`according to 21 CFR 25.31(b).
`
`(II) (4)
`
`B. Description of How the Drug Product is Intended to be Used
`
`Gattex (teduglutide [IDNA origin]) for injection is a glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket