VWGoA - Ex. 1002
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. - Petitioner
`
`1
`
`

`

`4.
`
`For example, Jurgen describes that different types of multiplexed data
`
`communication systems can be used in automobiles for various functions. Jurgen
`
`describes that Class A networks, for example, are “most appropriate for low-speed
`
`body wiring and control functions,” transmitting data at a bit rate of, for example, 1
`
`Kbps. Jurgen, at pages 26.3 and 26.24. Jurgen also describes that Class B networks
`
`generally have higher speeds, such as Bosch’s CAN protocol, which transmits data at
`
`a bit rate of, for example, 1 Mbps. Page 26.24.
`
`5.
`
`Jurgen also describes that a single—network architecture can be used such
`
`that both Class A and Class B messages can be transmitted on the same network.
`
`Page 26.3
`
`6.
`
`Jurgen also describes a number of communication protocols for vehicle
`
`networks that utilize fiber optics as the transmission medium, including Bosch’s CAN
`
`bus protocol, GM’s J2016 token slot protocol, and the University Wien Austria’s TTP
`
`protocol. Page 26.24.
`
`7.
`
`Waggener discloses the basics of Pulse Code Modulation signals,
`
`in
`
`which acquired data from one or more sensors is multiplexed onto a single channel.
`
`Waggener, page 16.
`
`8.
`
`Waggener describes how multiplexing is used to create “composite data”
`
`for transmission over a common communication link or channel. Page 108. Figure
`
`4.1 of Waggener discloses this single communication channel,
`
`in between the
`
`multiplexer and the demultiplexer.
`
`2
`
`

`

`96M systems
`
`muss M
`rm division
`
`mamas-19 Rx
`
`9.
`
`Waggener also describes that multiplexed data streams can use a concept
`
`called “subcommutation,” in which sensors of different bandwidth can be multiplexed
`
`together efficiently. Page 18. Figure 4.4 of Waggener shows an example of the
`
`subcommutation technique that multiplexes data from three different sources (D, S,
`
`and W) onto a common communications link:
`
` .
`
`
`
`.
`.
`.
`SWMMM came
`
`FIGURE 19‘
`a
`m .
`muMcxnggn array
`
`10.
`
`A single “minor frame” as shown in Figure 4.4 of Waggener is a
`
`“message rate interval.” This minor frame is repeated, in the example shown in
`
`Figure 4.4, ten times.
`
`11.
`
`In Figure 4.4 of Waggener, certain channels are “assigned” to various
`
`time slots in the minor frame. Page 110. This assignment of data to different time
`
`slots means that a portion of the message rate interval (the minor frame) is “devoted”
`
`3
`
`

`

`to a first type of data, which is high rate data (D), while a remaining portion of the
`
`interval is “reserved” for the second type of data, which is low rate data (S or W).
`
`12.
`
`Figure 4.4 shows the channel with the highest sampling rate (D) being
`
`assigned time slots D1 to D8 in the “minor” frame (the message rate interval), while
`
`channels with lower sampling rates (S and W) are subcommutated into later minor
`
`frames. Pages 110-11.
`
`13.
`
`Since all eight time slots containing D data are transmitted in each minor
`
`frame (message rate interval), this constitutes a “complete” message of D data being
`
`transmitted Within a single minor frame (message rate interval). All eight time slots of
`
`D data repeat in every minor frame.
`
`14. While eight time slots of D data are sampled in every minor frame, four
`
`minor frames are required to transmit the four time slots of S data. Because this S
`
`data is subcommutated into one time slot each of four minor frames, four minor
`
`frames (message rate intervals) are required to transmit all four time slots of S data.
`
`In that period of time, four complete messages of D data have been transmitted.
`
`Therefore, only a part of the S—data time slots is transmitted in a single minor frame,
`
`or message rate interval. Four consecutive message rate intervals are required to
`
`transmit a complete message of S data.
`
`l 15.
`
`Additionally, during the same message rate interval in which eight time
`
`slots of D data are transmitted, only one time slot is devoted to the W data. Two
`
`minor frames (message rate intervals) are required to transmit a complete message of
`
`-4-
`
`4
`
`

`

`W data (W1 and W2), and in those two minor frames, two complete messages of D
`
`data have been transmitted. Therefore, only a fragment of a W—data message is
`
`transmitted in a single minor frame, or message rate interval. Two consecutive
`
`message rate intervals are required to transmit a complete message of W data.
`
`16.
`
`It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to
`
`combine Jurgen and Waggener. As I stated above, jurgen describes that it was known
`
`in the automotive field to transmit messages at different message rates on a single
`
`network.
`
`jurgen, page 26.3. Waggener describes methods for transmitting data
`
`acquired from “a wide variety of sensors and sources” over a network using
`
`subcommutation techniques. Waggener, pages 17; 110.
`
`The subcommutation
`
`method disclosed by Waggener can achieve the multiplexing of Class A and Class B
`
`messages of different message rates in the single network architecture described by
`
`Jurgen.
`
`17. Mosch et
`
`a1. describes a data packet protocol
`
`that allows a high
`
`frequency data signal to be superimposed on a lower frequency data signal. Col. 1,
`
`lines 3 to 6; col. 2, lines 16 to 19. For example, Mosch et al. describes high-speed
`
`burst—mode packet data signals superimposed on a lower frequency data signal.
`
`Id.
`
`18.
`
`As an example, Mosch et 31. describes the use of its protocol with optical
`
`signals on a Passive Optical Network (PON), but notes that it can be used with non—
`
`optical signals as well. Col. 3, lines 9 to 11 ; col. 9, lines 8 to 11.
`
`5
`
`

`

`19.
`
`In Mosch et a1., each burst-mode data packet in time slots T1 t0 TN
`
`originates, respectively, from one of several terminal units ONU-l though ONU—N.
`
`Col. 3, lines 12 to 14. Figure 3 (reproduced below) shows the high frequency data
`
`signal superimposed on the low frequency data signal. Col. 3, lines 14 to 21.
`
`In
`
`Figure 3, a burst-mode packet (the high frequency data) is transmitted in each of time
`
`slots T1 and T2 (which correspond to the high message period (HI message period)
`
`of Figure 2 of the ’775 patent), while low frequency data is sampled during the interval
`
`TQ (which corresponds to the time difference between the end of one HI message
`
`period and the beginning of the next HI message period of Figure 2 of the ’775
`
`patent), and which is between two adjacent packets. C01. 3, lines 9 to 21; col. 5 lines
`
`21 to 28. Each burst-mode packet has the same number of bits. Col. 3, lines 14 to 18
`
`and 45 to 50.
`
`
`
`9
`
`n
`
`to
`
`n
`
`m
`
`12
`
`W" 'W3
`
`1a
`
`mm
`
`FIG. 3
`
`”Him "H
`
`”H
`
`55
`
`”1mm!
`
`RESEI 516mm
`macaw
`
`”mi” 51me
`
`PICKEFIMH
`
`mo new g;
`
`20.
`
`Figure 3 shows “message rate intervals,” each having a duration of one
`
`time slot (e.g., T1 or TZ), devoted to a burst—mode packet, plus an interval TQ, which
`
`-6-
`
`6
`
`

`

`is reserved for low frequency data. These “message rate intervals” of total duration
`
`T1 +TQ or T2+TQ are established on the common communication link, which is the
`
`communications channel shown as a single transmission medium in Figure 1 (below).
`
`USU IRANSDHSSION
`
`
`
`ONE!THEM FIG 1
`
`min—ii,
`
`
`
`RESET Hana......“'1an
`
`10 NEW
`NETVDEK
`
`21.
`
`The high speed packet data is
`
`transmitted only in the appropriate
`
`portion of the message rate interval. For example, in the first message rate interval,
`
`the high speed packet data is transmitted only during interval “T1.” Mosch et 21.
`
`states that there must be a quiet interval TQ between packets to prevent interference.
`
`Col. 6, lines 12 to 22.
`
`22.
`
`The message rate interval has a portion “devoted” to a first type of data,
`
`which is the high speed packet data in interval T1, and has an additional portion of
`
`the message rate interval “reserved” for the second type of data, which is the low
`
`frequency data in interval TQ. Col. 5, lines 42 to 48; col. 8, lines 18 to 31. There is
`
`no high speed data transmitted in the low frequency data interval TQ.
`
`23.
`
`Each high speed packet transmitted during the high speed time interval
`
`is provided at a message rate sufficient to form a “complete message” within the
`
`-7-
`
`7
`
`

`

`devoted portion of each message rate interval. A packet has a beginning and an end,
`
`and Mosch et al. states that the reset signal (shown as signal 310 in Figure 3) is applied
`
`“after receiving each packet data burst,” which is used to determine “the end of the
`
`packet.” Col. 4, lines 32 to 40. Mosch et al. does not disclose any breaking or
`
`fragmeniing of the packet data, and refers to the data transmitted during each of the
`
`time slots as “a packet” Col. 1, lines 31 to 34. Because a single packet is transmitted
`
`in each fime slot Tlthrough TN, the packets are “complete.”
`
`24.
`
`Further, Mosch et a1. states that the protocol has a “predetennined
`
`number of bits per packet,” (Col. 3, lines 45 to 50), and that the packet in each
`
`message rate interval is sent by a single ONU. For example, ONU—l transmits in time
`
`slot T1, while ONU—2 transmits in time slot T2. Col. 3, lines 12 to 14. Because each
`
`message rate interval contains a single predetermined packet from a single source, the
`
`high speed packet data is provided as a “complete message” within the devoted
`
`portion of each message rate interval, 3.32, interval T1 in message rate interval 1.
`
`25.
`
`The low frequency data in each message rate interval, which is the
`
`second type of data, consists of only a single sample, and is therefore a fragment of a
`
`message, 229., the time variation of the low—frequency data signal. As shown in the low
`
`frequency sampled output 340 of Figure 3, only a single value is sampled in each quiet
`
`interval TQ. Col. 5, lines 21 to 35.
`
`26. Mosch et al. describes that the low frequency data is sampled only during
`
`the period TQ in each message rate interval. Col. 5, lines 21 to 35. As shown in
`
`_3_
`
`8
`
`

`

`Mosch et al., this low frequency data is sampled once in each message rate interval.
`
`For example, in Figure 3, the low frequency sampled output 340 changes its value
`
`once each message rate interval. Additionally, Mosch et a1. describes that only a single
`
`value for this signal is fed to a Sample and Hold circuit each message rate interval.
`
`Col. 8, lines 18 to 20.
`
`27. Mosch et a1. describes the low frequency data being used for, e.g.,
`
`distance ranging or communicating “audio or terminal status information.” Col. 1, line
`
`57 to col. 2, line 2. Communicating audio or terminal status information would
`
`require more than a single sample and, therefore, would require multiple message rate
`
`intervals in order to communicate the complete message. Thus, the single sample of
`
`low frequency data that is in each message rate interval is a “fragment” of a message.
`
`28.
`
`Further,
`
`the low speed Class A automotive multiplexing protocols
`
`described by Jurgen contain more than a single bit in each message. The SAE J2058
`
`CSC network has a data field length of up to 32 bits. Jurgen, at page 26.24. The
`
`multiplexing of any multi—bit message disclosed in Jurgen on a network in the manner
`
`disclosed in Mosch et al. would allow the low speed message to be spread among
`
`multiple message rate intervals. Therefore, only a fragment of the low speed message
`
`is in a single message rate interval. Efficient transmission of any low—frequency,
`
`multi—bit message using the protocol disclosed in Mosch et al., including many of the
`
`protocols disclosed in Jurgen, would dictate that multiple message rate intervals would
`
`9
`
`

`

`be required to transmit a complete low-frequency, multi—bit message because only a
`
`fragment of the low—frequency data is contained in each message rate interval.
`
`29. Mosch ct al. describes that at least one of the first and second types of
`
`data are transmitted in the respective portions of each message rate interval. For
`
`example, Mosch et al. describes that the ONUs are given time slots “in which to
`
`transmit data” in packet form. Col. 1, lines 25 to 34. Therefore, the ONUs will
`
`transmit their data, the high speed packet data (first type of data), in the respective
`
`portions (T 1 through TN) of each message rate interval.
`
`30.
`
`It would have been obvious to combine Jurgen and Mosch et al. Jurgen
`
`describes that it was known in the automotive field to transmit messages of different
`
`message rates on a single network-
`
`Jurgen, page 26.3. Mosch et al. describes a
`
`particular method for accomplishing this that allows both high speed and low speed
`
`data to be sampled and reconstructed by a receiver.
`
`31.
`
`Further, Jurgen describes that using various multiplexing protocols in
`
`automobiles can reduce cumbersome wiring harnesses. jurgen, at Preface. In order to
`
`accomplish this, Jurgen describes that different types of protocols can be multiplexed
`
`together in a “single network architecture” that “carries both the Class A and Class B
`
`messages on one network.” Page 26.24. The use of the protocol described in Mosch
`
`et al., which multiplexes data at
`
`two different message rates across a common
`
`communication link, would accomplish this same goal.
`
`-10-
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`32.
`
`Additionally, though Mosch et al. is not limited to optical networks (col.
`
`9, lines 7 to 11), Jurgen describes that optical networks can be used for automotive
`
`multiplexing. For example, according to Jurgen, at least the CAN, SAE J2016, and
`
`TTP automotive multiplexing protocols can utilize fiber optics as the transmission
`
`medium. Jurgen, at page 26.24.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and further
`
`that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and
`
`the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under §1001 of
`
`Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated:
`
`April g1, 2015
`
`i 5
`
`Dr. A. Bruce Buckinan
`
`-11-
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`A. Bruce Buckman - Curriculum Vitae
`
`home
`
`Title: Professor (Retired)
`
`Electrical and Computer Engineering - The University of Texas at Austin
`
`Current Business Address: 1800 Brookhaven Drive, Austin TX 78704—2149
`
`Phone: 512-496-6816
`
`Date of Birth: December 7, 194]
`
`Citizenship: United States
`
`Education:
`
`0 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, BS, Electrical Engineering, 1964
`0 University of Nebraska at Lincoln, MS, Electrical Engineering, 1966
`I University of Nebraska at Lincoln, PhD, Electrical Engineering, 1968
`
`Previous Academic Positions:
`
`0 University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering, 1968—1973
`0 University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering, 1973—1974
`I University of Texas at Austin, Associate Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1974—1995
`0 University of Texas at Austin, Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1995—2009
`
`Other Professional Experience:
`
`0 Chief Scientist, Research Applications Inc., Austin TX. May—Sept. 1990. Principal Investigator for a
`Small Business Innovation & Research (SBIR) contract between RAI and the US. Navy to conduct
`proof—of—concept experiments with fiberoptic sensors based on novel interferometer technology. (See
`US. Patent 4,989,979 below).
`0 Scientist, Metamaterials LLC, Austin TX, June - Sept. 2009, R&D of composite electromagnetic
`materials.
`
`0 Expert witness: Patent, trade secret and other intellectual property litigation 2000 - present.
`
`Consulting:
`
`0 MESA instruments, Austin, TX: Semiconductor waveguide phase-shifter , 1974.
`0 Eagle Signal, Austin, TX: Traffic signal optical collimator, 1976.
`a Texas Research Institute, Austin, TX: Fiber—optics life testing methods; ellipsometric measurement of
`relative humidity, 1979-80.
`I BEI, Inc., Little Rock, AR and Havatek, Inc., Austin, TX: Fiber—optic read-head for angular encoder,
`1980.
`
`I Western Electric, Inc., New York, NY: Expert witness (preliminary investigation) in patent litigation
`involving fiber-optic communications system, 1980.
`0 Technology Assessment Group, Inc., Schenectady, NY: Evaluation of VLSI capabilities of acquired
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`company, 1981.
`Thermon Mfg. Co., San Marcos, TX: Distributed Solid State devices for heat trace monitoring and
`control, 1981-1986.
`Technology Assessment Group, Inc., Schenectady, NY: Fiber optics technology assessment for
`General Telephone and Electronics, 1982.
`o Tracor Inc., Austin, TX: Fiber optic sensors for ocean applications, 1982
`Technology Assessment Group Inc., Schenectady, NY: Evaluation of fiberoptic gyroscope design for
`venture capitalist, 1983
`Trane, Inc. Los Angeles CA,: Fiber optic gyroscope evaluation, 1984
`0 Prime Software Innovations, Inc., Austin, TX: Educational software development, 1983-85
`0 US. Autotech Accessories, Inc. Los Angeles, CA: Optical tests of high—mounted automotive taillight
`for compliance with DOT standards, 1985
`Tracor, Inc. Austin, TX: Technological assessment of laser ranging apparatus for height determination
`of a parachute-dropped object, 1985
`Schlumberger Well Services, Inc., Austin,TX. Evaluation of fiber optic system for down—hole data
`transmission, 1986
`
`0 High End Systems, Austin, TX, Dichroic optical coatings, 1986
`0 Scientific Measurement Systems, Inc., Austin, TX,. Lightpipes, 1986—1987
`Thomas-Conrad Corporation, Austin TX. Fiberoptic Local Area Network hardware development,
`1988-89
`
`Microelectronics and Computer Corporation (MCC), Austin TX. Guided-wave optical interconnect
`technology, 1990.
`Kent Hance, atty., Austin, TX. Evaluation of fiber optic component company for possible acquisition,
`1991.
`
`IVPR, Inc., Houston, TX, Business plan preparation and technical competition analysis for fiber optic
`sensor company, 1991.
`0 Research Applications Inc. Austin TX. Fiber optic chemical sensor development, 1992.
`I Microelectronics and Computer Corporation (MCC), Austin TX. Parallel high speed optical data link,
`1993-4.
`
`Texas Research Institute, Austin, TX: Fiber-optic interferometric sensor, 1998.
`o Xidex Corporation, Austin TX. Position-sensitive detectors for Atomic Force Microscopy applications,
`1998-9
`
`Vinson and Elkins LLP, Austin TX. Expert witness, patent litigation, fiber-optic components, 3M vs.
`Seiko, et.ai. 2000—2001.
`
`Vinson and Elkins LLP, Austin TX. Expert witness with Markman hearing testimony, patent litigation,
`biomedical apparatus, Urologix vs. ProstaLund, etnl. 2002.
`Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP, Irvine CA. Expert witness, patent litigation, light-emitting diode
`systems, JamStrait Inc. vs. American Products Co. Inc. 2003
`McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert and Berghoff LLP, Chicago, 111. Expert witness with trial and deposition
`testimony, patent litigation, optical bio—sensing apparatus. Corning, Inc- and Artificial Sensing
`Instruments AG vs. SRU Biosystems, LLC, SRU Biosystems Inc., and SRU Holdings LLC, 2004-
`Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, New York : Expert witnes , patent litigation, electromagnetic radio-
`frequency identification tag reader instrumentation. Avid Identification Systems, Inc. vs. Datamars SA,
`et.ai. 2005
`
`McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert and Berghoff LLP, Chicago, Ill.: Expert witness, inventorship lawsuit,
`optical
`instrumentation for biological and chemical sensor. SRU Biosystems Inc. vs. Hobbs 2005
`Greenberg Traurig LLP, Dallas TX: Expert witness, patent litigation, motion detector cameras. [P
`Holdings, anal. vs. Testa Associates, etnl. 2006
`Baker Botts LLP, Houston TX. Expert witness with deposition testimony, patent litigation, feedback
`control of power supply circuits. 02 Micro vs. Samsung Electronics Co. etnl. 2006—2007.
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`I Arnold LLP and Berg & Androphy LLP, Houston TX. 30—b—6 witness with deposition testimony,
`patent litigation, optical communications devices. Cheetah vs. Infinerra 2006-2007.
`I Jones Day LLP, Dallas TX. Expert witness, patent, trade secret and inventorship litigation, optical
`systems for wafer and disc inspection. KLA-Tencor vs. Arun Aiyer and Verity, Inc. 2007.
`I Locke, Liddell & Sapp LLP, Houston TX. Expert witness, patent litigation, feedback control for
`MEMS accelerometers. [/0 Inc. vs. Sercel 2007
`
`I Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, Dallas TX. Expert witness, International Trade Commission
`Investigation, Investigation. N0. 337—TA-625, 2008: automated animal-activated components
`I Please see Expert Witness page for expert witness engagements after 2008, as well as a more detailed
`description of the cases and work performed.
`
`Honors and Awards:
`
`Sigma Xi, 1967
`NASA Traineeship, 1966-68
`Eta Kappa Nu, 1974
`Biographical Listings:
`
`American Men and Women of Science, 1969
`
`Who's Who in the Midwest, 1970
`
`Who's Who in the South & Southwest, 1975
`
`Outstanding Young Men of America, 1978
`
`Who‘s Who in Technology Today, 1979
`
`I Best Paper Award: Vladimir Mancevski, Chellapan Narayanan, J. Kumar Pavuluri, Wanjun Wang, A.
`Bruce Buckman, and Ilene J. Busch-Vishniac, A High Precision, Six-Degree of Freedom, Single-Sided,
`Noncontact, Optical Sensor Suitable for Automated Assembly and Inspection, First World Automation
`Congress, Wailea, HI, August 1994
`
`University Committee Assignments:
`
`I Administrative:
`
`I BE Dept. Graduate Advisor, June 1977-Sept. 1981
`I ECE Covop Advisor, 1984 — 2009
`
`I Committee assignments:
`
`I University Parking and Traffic Panel, 1976-78
`I College of Engineering Safety Committee, 1977-78
`I College of Engineering Athletic Award Committee, 1985—86
`I College of Engineering Cooperative Education Committee, 1984-2009
`
`Professional Society and Major Governmental Committees:
`
`I Optical Society of America, Technical Advisory Committee for the Far Infrared 1976—78
`I Program Chairman and Digest Editor, 1976 Region V IEEE Conference
`
`Publications:
`
`A. Refereed Archival Journal Publications
`
`15
`
`

`

`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`10.
`
`ll.
`
`AB. Buckman and NM. Bashara, Secondary Emission from Thin Polymer Films Via Surface States,
`Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 577, (1966).
`AB. Buckman and NM. Bashara, Ellipsometry for Modulated-Reflection Studies of Surfaces, J. Opt.
`Soc. Am. 58, 700, (1968).
`A. B. Buckman and NM. Bashara, Electroreflectance Changes in Dielectric Constants of Au and Ag
`by Modulated Ellipsometry, Phys. Rev. 174, 719, (1968).
`. A. B. Buckman and W.D. Bomberger, Optical Properties of Perylene Films in the Visible and Near
`UV, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1432, (1973).
`. A. B. Buckman, NH. Hong and D.W. Wilson, Large Refractive Index Change in Pblz Films by
`Photolysis at 150-180 C, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 914, (1975).
`. A. B. Buckman, Effective Electroopic Coefficient of Multilayer Dielectric Waveguides: Modulation
`Enhancement, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 30, (1976).
`. A. B. Buckman, Theory of an Efficient Electronic Phase Shifter Employing a Multilayer Dielectric
`Waveguide Structure, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MTT-ZS, 480, (1977).
`. A. B. Buckman, On the Origin of the Large Refractive Index Change in Photonzed Pblz Films, J. Opt.
`Soc. Am. 67, 1123, (1977).
`. A. B. Buckrnan, Nonlinearity of Effective Index versus Bulk Index in Multilayer Dielectric
`Waveguides: Large Incremental Index Sensitivity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1187, (1977).
`A. B. Buckman and C. Kuo. Fizeau Interferometry for Measuring Refractive Index and Thickness of
`Nearly Transparent Films, Appl. Opt. 17,3636-3640, (1978).
`A. B. Buckman and C. Kuo, Excitation of Coupled—Surface-Plasmons in Structures Containing Very
`Thin Negative Permitivity Regions, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 343, (1979).
`A. B. Buckman and S. Chao, Ellipsometric Characterization of the Glassy Layer at Co/Si Interface,
`Surface Science 96, 346, (1980).
`A. B. Buckman and R. Montgelas, A Waveguiding Surface Damage Layer in LizTaO3, Applied Optics
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`20, 6, (1981).
`A. B. Buckman and S. Chao, Optical Evidence for an Electronic Phase Transition at the Co—Si
`Interface, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 928, (1981).
`A. B. Buckman, Polarization-selective Lateral Waveguiding in Layered Dielectric Structures, J. Opt.
`Soc. Am. 72, 688, (1982).
`A. B. Buckman, Mode Selection with a Three—Layer Dielectric Waveguide, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 33,
`(1983).
`A. B. Buckman, Three-layer Dielectric Stripline Filter for Guided-Wave Applications, SPIE
`Proceedings 464 , 29, (1984).
`A. B. Buckman, Analysis of a Novel Optical Fiber Interferometer with Common—mode Compensation,
`IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. 7,151 (1989)
`A. B. Buckman and K. Park Common-mode Noise Reduction in Interferometric Fiberoptic Sensors
`using Electrooptic Feedback, SPIE Proceedings. 1169, 64, (1989).
`A. B. Backman , D.G. Pritchett and K. Park, Sensitivity-Enhanced, Common-mode Compensated
`Mach—Zehnder Fiberoptic Sensor Circuit with Electrooptic Feedback, Optics Left. 14, 886, (1989).
`A. B. Buckman, General Sensitivity Enhancement and Common—mode Compensation Principle for
`Interferometric Fiberoptic Sensors, IEEE J. Lightwave Tech.. 8, 1456 , (1990).
`A. B. Buckman, B.H. Tyrone, Jr. and A.J . Seltzer, Enhancing Fiber Optic Interferometer Precision
`Using Electro-optic Feedback and Common Mode Compensation, Proceedings American Society for
`Precision Engineering (ASPE) Topical Meeting on Precision Interferometric Metrology, pp. 18—21
`(1992).
`
`A. B. Buckman and Lisa Giullianelli, Direct Optical-to—Electrical Phase Conversion in a Fiber Optic
`Interferometer, Proceedings American Society for Precision Engineering (ASPE) Topical Meeting on
`Precision Interferometric Metrology, pp. 22-26 (1992).
`C. Narayanan, A. B. Buckman, I. Busch—Vishniac, M.F. Becker, R.W. Bene, and RM. Walser)
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`

`Frequency—Multiplexed Multiple Beam Optical Position Detector using Phase Detection, Proc. SPIE
`1918, 205-214 (1993) .
`25. R.M. Walser,A1aka Valanju, W. Win, M.F. Becker, AB. Buckman and R.W. Bene, New Smart
`Materials for adaptive Microwave Signature Control, Proc. SPIE 1916,128—139 (1993).
`26. R.M. Walser, Alaka Valanju, W. Win, ME Becker, AB. Buckman and R.W. Bene, "New Smart
`Materials for adaptive Microwave Signature Control“, Proc. SPIE. 1916,128~139 (1993).
`27. Michael F. Becker, A. Bruce Buckman, Rodger M. Walser, Thierry Lapine, Patrick Georges and Alain
`Brun, "Femtosecond Switching of the Solid-State Transition in the Smart System Material V02" , Proc.
`SPIE. 2189,400—408 (1994)
`28. Dahong Qian, Wanjun Wang, Ilene Busch—Vishniac and A. B. Buckman, A Novel Method To Measure
`Multiple Light Spots Positions on One Position—Sensitive Detector, [BEE Trans. Instr. Meas. 4, I4
`(1993).
`29. Chellapan Narayannan, A. B. Buckman, Ilene Busch—Vishniac, and Wanjun Wang, Position
`Dependence of the Transient Response of a Position—Sensitive Detector under Periodic Pulsed Light
`Modulation, IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev.. 40, 1688-1694 (1993).
`30. Lisa Giullianelli and A. B. Buckman, Fiber Optic Circuit for Direct Phase Conversion with two
`Outputs in Quadrature, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology,. 11, 1263-1265 (1993).
`31. Michael F. Becker, Rodger M. Walser, Thierry Lapine, Patrick Georges Alain Brun, and A. B.
`Buckman, Femtosecond Switching of the Solid-State Transition in the Smart System Material V02,
`Proc. SPIE 2189,400-408 (1994)
`32. Lisa C. Giullianelli, A. Bruce Buckman, Rodger M. Walser, and Michael F. Becker, Digital
`Demodulation Scheme for Wide Dynamic Range Measurements with a Fiber Optic Interferometer,
`Proc. SPIE. 2191, 314—323 (1994) .
`33. Michael F. Becker, R.M. Walser, AB. Buckman, T. Lapine, P. Georges and A. Brun, Femtoseeond
`laser excitation of the semiconductorvmetal phase transition in V02, Applied Physics Letters, 63, 1507-
`1509 (1994).
`34. Chellapan Narayanan, A. Bruce Buckman and Ilene Busch-Vishniac, Position Detection of Multiple
`Light Beams Using Phase Detection", [EEE Transactions on. Instrumentation and Measurement. 43,
`830—836 (1994).
`35. Michael F. Becker, Rodger M. Walser, A. Bruce Buckman, Thierry Lapine, Patrick Georges and Alain
`Brun, Femtosecond Switching of the Solid-State Transition in V02, Ultrafast Phenomena 94, Barbara,
`Knox, Mourou and Zewail, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York (1994).
`36. M.F. Becker, AB. Buckman, R.M. Walser, T. Lepine, P. Georges, and A. an, "Femtosecond laser
`excitation dynamics of the semiconductor—metal phase transition in V02,“ Journal of Applied Physics,
`
`79, 2404-2408 , (1995).
`37. Chellapan Narayanan, A. Bruce Buckman, and Ilene J. Busch-Vishniac, Noise Analysis for Position—
`Sensitive Detectors, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 46, 1137-1144 (1997).
`38. A. Bruce Buckman, A Course in Computer—Based Instrumentation: learning LabVEEWTM with Case
`Studies, Int. J. Engng. Ed., 16, 228—233 (2000).
`39. A. Bruce Buckman, VI—based Introductory Electrical Engineering Laboratory Course, Int. J. Engng.
`Ed., 16, 212—217 (2000).
`
`B. Editor of Conference Proceedings
`
`1976 IEEE REGION V. CONFERENCE DIGEST, AB. Buckman, Ed., IEEE Publication No. 76CH1068—6
`
`REGS, 1976.
`
`C. Refereed Conference Proceedings
`
`0 A. B. Buckrnan, Analysis of a Novel Optical Fiber Interferometer with Common-mode Compensation,
`Optical Fiber Sensors 1988 Technical Digest Vol.2, paper ThCC-18, 1988
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`

`o M.J. Johnson, W.F. Weldon, and MD. Werst, and A. B. Buckman, Diagonstic System for a 20 Tesla
`Single Turn Coil Magnet Prototype, Proceedings 17th International Conference on Plasma Science,
`May 1990
`0 Vladimir Mancevski, Chellapan Narayanan, J . Kumar Pavuluri, Wanjun Wang, A. Bruce Buckman,
`and Ilene J. Busch-Vishniac, A High Precision, Six—Degree of Freedom, Single—Sided, Noncontact,
`Optical Sensor Suitable for Automated Assembly and Inspection, Proc. First World Automation
`Congress, vol. 1 pp. 145—150 (1994), M. Jamshidi, C. Nguyen, R. Lumia and J. Yuh, eds. This paper
`received the Conference Best Paper Award.
`I Anand Jog, Ilene J. Busch—Vishniac and A. B. Buckman, Non-Contact Profilometry Using Position-
`Sensitive Detectors, Proc. 1998 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference pp. 419—420
`(1998).
`
`D. Other Conference Proceedings
`
`0 V. Mancevski, D. Qian, W. Wang, C. Narayanan, I. Busch-Vishniac and AB. Buckman, A High-
`Precision, Six Degree-of-Freedom,Single—Sided, Non—contact, Optical Sensor Suitable for Assembly
`Automation," Proc. 1993 NSF Design and Manufacturing Systems Conference pp.1613-l619 (1993)
`0 V. Mancevski, D. Qian, W. Wang, C. Narayanan, I. Busch-Vishniac and AB. Buckman, A High-
`Precision, Six Degree—of—Freedom,Single—Sided, Non—contact, Optical Sensor Suitable for Assembly
`Automation," Proc. 1994 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference pp.439-440 (1994)
`- Ilene J. Busch—Vishniac and A. B. Buckman, Demostration of a Prototype Six—Degree of Freedom,
`Single—Sided, Noncontact Position Sensor, Proc. 1997 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees
`Conference, pp. 225—226 (1997).
`o A. Bruce Buckman, An Introductory Electrical Engineering Laboratory Based on Virtual
`Instrumentation, invited paper, Proc. 1997 Conference on Virtual Instrumentation in Education, pp.
`137—148(1997)
`o A. B. Buckman, A Design Laboratory for Electrical Engineering Seniors, Proceedings ASEE Gulf—
`Southwest Section Annual Meeting, March 1988 (conference proceedings)
`I A.B. Buckman, Techniques for Digitizing Controllers for Prototyping, NI Week Embedded
`Engineering and Control Design Summit (2005).
`
`E. Book Chapter
`
`0 NM. Bashara, A.C. Hall, and A. B. Buckman, Ellipsometry, Chapter in Physical Methods of
`Chemistry, Vol. I, Par IIC, Wiley-Interscience Publishers, New York, A. Weissberger and B. Rossiter,
`eds., (1972).
`
`F. Reviews
`
`a Book Review: X—Ray Optics, J .—J. Queisser, ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977. Appeared in Journal of
`the Optical Society of America, 68, 1457, 1978.
`
`G. Technical Reports
`
`0 Applications of Slow Modes for Action Elements in Integrated Optics, Office of Naval Research
`Annual Report on Contract N00014—70—A-0253-0002.
`- Large Optically Induced Refractive Index Change in PbIZ Films, in Texas Biannual of Electronics
`Research, November 15, 1974.
`
`0 Large Refractive Index Change in PM Films by Photolysis at 150 T 1800 C, in Texas Biannual of
`Electronics Research, May 15, 1975.
`0 Large Refractive Index Change in PM by Photolysis: Photoconductivity Measurements, In Texas
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`Biannual of Electronics Research, November 15, 1975.
`Beam Collimation for Improved Traffic Signal Directivity, report to Eagle Signal Corp, October 1976.
`Integrated Optical Beam Addresser, in Annual Report on Electronics Research at The University of
`Texas at Austin, May 1977.
`Mechanism for Large Refractive Index Change in Photolyzed PbIZ in Annual Report on Electronics
`Research at the University of Texas at Austin, May 1977.
`Basic Solid State Materials Research, in Annual Report on Electronics Research at the University of
`Texas at Austin, July 1979.
`Feasibility Study of Relative Humidity Measurement by Ellipsometry, report to Texas Research
`Institute, Inc., May 1980.
`Selection of the Optical Geometry for Ellipsometric Measurement of Relative Humidity, report to
`Texas Research Institute, Inc., August 1980.
`Active Guided Wave Device