throbber
Full Paper
`
`Titanium Nitride Grown by Sputtering for
`Contacts on Boron-Doped Diamond
`
`Vincent Mortet,* Omar Elmazria, Wim Deferme, Michael Daenen,
`Jan D’Haen, Andrada Lazea, Anne Morel, Ken Haenen, Marc D’Olieslaeger
`
`Due to its exceptional properties, semiconducting diamond is expected to be used for
`electrically active devices which can be operated in harsh environments. Such devices need
`reliable ohmic contacts that can also stand hostile environments. Titanium nitride (TiN) is a
`chemically stable material with good electrical conductivity. In this work, TiN contacts on
`boron-doped diamond have been made and characterised. TiN films were deposited by
`reactive magnetron sputtering. Boron-doped diamond layers were deposited by plasma
`enhanced chemical vapour deposition. Optimal deposition conditions have been determined
`to obtain TiN films with low resistivity (100 mV cm), high reflectance in the IR region and
`low stress. TiN contacts show ohmic behaviour after annealing at 750 8C.
`
`Introduction
`
`The exceptional properties of diamond and the possibility
`to obtain diamond films at low pressure on different types
`of substrates, make this material a good candidate for a
`large number of novel applications. Diamond also offers
`the possibility to fabricate electrically active devices which
`can be operated at elevated temperatures,
`in hostile
`environments. Diamond can also be used in biomedical
`applications and it fulfils the main requisites for use in
`human implants due to its biocompatibility and its
`chemical stability.
`
`V. Mortet, W. Deferme, M. Daenen, J. D’Haen, A. Lazea, K. Haenen,
`M. D’Olieslaeger
`Institute for Materials Research, Hasselt University,
`Wetenschapspark 1, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium
`Fax. þ32 (0)11 26 88 99; E-mail: vincent.mortet@uhasselt.be
`V. Mortet, K. Haenen, J. D’Haen, A. Lazea, M. D’Olieslaeger
`IMEC, Division IMOMEC, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590, Diepenbeek,
`Belgium
`O. Elmazria
`LPMIA, Universite´ H. Poincare´, Nancy I, F-54506, Vandoeuvre-
`les-Nancy Cedex, France
`A. Morel
`ENSAM, boulevard du Ronceray, B.P. 3525, F-49035 Angers Cedex ,
`France
`
`is a hard, dense, refractory
`Titanium nitride (TiN)
`material with high electrical conductivity. TiN has good
`optical properties,
`including an attractive gold-tinged
`appearance when pure, and it has a high reflectance in
`the IR range. TiN is thermodynamically stable in air upto
`600 8C and it is inert to corrosive media. Like diamond, TiN
`is a non-toxic and biocompatible material. TiN meets the
`food and drug administration (FDA) guidelines and it has
`been approved for use in numerous medical/surgical
`devices, including implants. TiN is also widely employed in
`semiconductor manufacturing as a ‘diffusion barrier’ layer
`and it has already been used as ohmic contact on GaN and
`SiC.[1,2]
`The use of TiN in combination with diamond is
`attractive for the construction of ohmic contacts, operating
`either at elevated temperatures, in hostile chemical and
`radiation environments or in biological environment.
`In this paper, an optimisation of TiN thin films grown by
`reactive DC-pulsed magnetron sputtering is reported.
`Structural, mechanical, optical and electrical properties
`of TiN films have been measured. Homoepitaxial bor-
`on-doped diamond layers were grown by plasma
`enhanced chemical vapor deposition and they were
`characterised by Fourier transform photocurrent spectros-
`copy (FTPS).[3] Finally, TiN contacts on boron-doped
`diamond have been made and characterised.
`
`Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, S139–S143
`ß 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`DOI: 10.1002/ppap.200730506
`
`S139
`
`

`
`V. Mortet et al.
`
`Experimental Part
`
`The TiN layers were deposited on silicon (100) and fused-silica
`substrates. The substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in trichloro-
`ethylene, acetone and alcohol and they were dried with pure
`nitrogen. The titanium target (10 cm in diameter, 99.99% purity),
`which is held on the water-cooled magnetron cathode, was
`sputtered in a mixture of argon and nitrogen. The argon and
`nitrogen flow rates (FAr and FN, respectively) were controlled by
`two mass flow meters and the total gas flow rate was kept
`constant (50 sccm). The total pressure was controlled with a
`throttling valve situated in front of the turbo-molecular drag
`pump. The target power supply was driven in constant-power
`mode at 250 kHz pulse frequency and 1 600 ns pulse width. The
`distance between the target and the substrate holder can be
`adjusted. The substrates were not heated and their temperature
`was only dependent on the plasma heating.
`Before deposition, the sputtering chamber was evacuated to a
`pressure below 2 10
`6 mbar. The target was cleaned in an argon
`discharge for 10 min and it was pre-sputtered in the same condi-
`tions as the film deposition conditions for additional 10 min.
`During these steps, the substrates are shielded from deposition by
`a shutter. TiN films were deposited under various target power (P),
`total pressure (Pt), target to substrate distance (d) and nitrogen
`ratio (RN¼ FN/(FArþFN)). The investigated deposition conditions
`are summarised in Table 1.
`TiN films were characterised by X-ray diffraction in u–2u scan
`mode with Cu Ka1 radiation and scanning electron microscopy
`(SEM). The films thicknesses were measured by SEM cross-section
`observation. The mechanical stress was calculated from substrate
`curvature measurements using the Stoney formula.[4] The sub-
`strates curvatures were measured by a Dektak3ST profilometer.
`Electrical characterisations of the films were performed using a
`four-points probe. Finally, optical reflectance of TiN films was also
`measured in near IR, visible and ultraviolet range (NIR-Vis-UV).
`Boron-doped diamond layers were grown on (100)
`Ib
`2.5 2.5 0.5 mm3 single crystal diamond samples by plasma
`enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) in a homemade
`NIRIM type reactor.[5] Before deposition, the vacuum chamber is
`6 mbar with a
`evacuated to a base pressure lower than 10
`turbo-molecular pump. Boron doping is achieved using trimethyl-
`boron (TMB) diluted in hydrogen (200 ppm). The thickness of the
`boron-doped layers was calculated from the mass measurement
`assuming that the density of the epilayer is 3.52. Resistivity of the
`p-type layers was measured using the Van der Pauw resistivity
`measurement method. The incorporation of substitutional boron
`
`in the diamond layer was confirmed using FTPS at liquid
`nitrogen temperature. Ohmic titanium/aluminum inter-digitated
`electrodes with a spacial period of 400 mm were obtained by
`lift-off. Electrical characterisation of the diamond layer and TiN
`contacts were made using circular transmission line model
`measurements (c-TLM).[6]
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`TiN Growth
`
`First, TiN films were deposited at different nitrogen
`low pressure (with d¼ 5 cm, P¼
`concentrations at
`450 W). Films deposited at RN¼ 100% are grey, films
`deposited at lower nitrogen concentration have a copper-
`like colour, whereas films deposited at RN¼ 5% are golden
`which is a particularity of stoichiometric TiN. X-ray dif-
`fraction patterns of these films are reported in Figure 1. All
`films deposited at a nitrogen concentration higher than 30%
`do not exhibit any diffraction peak. At lower nitrogen
`concentration, X-ray diffraction patterns show a peak at 2u
`36.68 related to the (111) TiN peak. The most intense peak
`was obtained at RN¼ 5% and it is shifted to lower 2u. This is
`probably due to a high stress in the layer as one can see from
`the inset of Figure 1 where the variation of the films stress as
`a function of the nitrogen concentration is represented. The
`stress is compressive and maximum (1.3 GPa) at RN¼ 5%.
`Second, TiN films were deposited at different target’s
`powers and different total pressures at RN¼ 5%. All these
`films show the X-ray diffraction peak of (111) TiN. The
`optimal target power has been found to be 450 W. As one
`can see on Figure 2(a), the stress of the layer is high
`(2 Gpa) at low pressure whatever the target power is, and
`it decreases to nearly no stress for pressures higher than
`(20–30) 10
`3 mbar. We have observed that films depo-
`sited at higher pressure and without stress, are slightly
`less shiny than the films deposited at lower pressure.
`Figure 2(b) shows the resistivity of the TiN films as a func-
`tion of the total pressure and the target power. The resisti-
`vity of the films is low (100 mV cm) at low pressure and
`rises at the threshold pressure of (20–30) 10
`3 mbar.
`Figure 3 shows the reflectivity spectra of TiN films deposited
`
`Table 1. Summary of the investigated deposition conditions and the optimal deposition conditions.
`
`Studied range
`
`Optimal conditions
`
`Base pressure
`
`Target
`
`Gases
`
`Target-to-substrate distance
`
`Target power
`
`Total pressure
`
`S6 mbar
`2 T 10
`Ti (99.99% pure),Ø 10 cm
`
`Argon - Nitrogen
`
`5–13 cm
`
`375–750 W
`S3 mbar
`(4.7–49) T 10
`
`S140
`
`Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, S139–S143
`ß 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`–
`
`–
`
`5% nitrogen in Argon
`
`5 cm
`
`375–450 W
`
`
`(20–30) T 10S3 mbar
`
`DOI: 10.1002/ppap.200730506
`
`

`
` 4.7 ubar
` 16 ubar
` 23 ubar
` 29 ubar
` 36 ubar
` 39 ubar
` 49 ubar
`
`Titanium Nitride Grown by Sputtering for Contacts on . . .
`
`P=450 W, Pt= 5 µbar, d=5 cm
`
`100
`
`Visible
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`Reflectance (%)
`
`0
`
`20
`40
`60
`80
`N2 concentration (%)
`
`100
`
`1.4
`
`1.2
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`Stress (GPa)
`
`5%
`
`15%
`
`30%
`
`(111) TiN
`
`Si substrate artefact
`
`600
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`Intensity (cps)
`
`50
`
`60
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`2θ (°)
`Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of TiN films obtained at differ-
`ent nitrogen concentrations. Inset: variation of the mechanical
`stress of TiN as a function of the nitrogen concentration in the
`discharge gas.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`500
`
`1000
`1500
`2000
`Wavelenght (nm)
`Figure 3. Variation of the reflectance in UV-visible-NIR range of
`TiN films grown at different total pressures of the deposition
`chamber.
`
`2500
`
`at different pressures. The reflectivity spectra are character-
`istic of a free-electron system in a metal with a reflectivity
`edge at400 nm, due to a screened plasma resonance.[7] One
`can see that the reflectivity in the IR region of TiN films
`deposited at low pressure is higher than those deposited at
`high pressure whatever the target power. The lower
`reflectivity might be due to either surface scattering due
`to the films roughness or different electrical properties of the
`films. TiN films with the lowest resistivity are obtained at
`target powers between 375 and 450 W. Figure 4 show the
`typical SEM pictures of a film deposited at low pressure and
`a film deposited at high pressure. Films deposited at low
`pressure are smooth with very fine grains, whereas films
`deposited at high pressure are rough with large grains.
`
`Properties of films deposited at low pressure and dif-
`ferent target-to-substrate distances (from 5 to 13 cm) have
`been investigated. No significant effects of the target-
`to-substrate distance on the stress, the morphology and
`the reflectivity of the layers have been observed, however
`the distance increase does decrease the crystalline quality
`and the deposition rate.
`In the optimal deposition conditions (P¼ 375–450 W,
`Pt¼ 20 mbar, RN¼ 5%, d¼ 5 cm),
`low stress and high
`reflectivity in the IR range, low resistivity TiN films with a
`(111) crystalline orientation are obtained. The chemical
`stability of TiN films has been tested. TiN films were let in
`Aqua Regia and in an Al etchant solution (H3PO4/HNO3/
`H2O at 60:7:10). TiN films are slowly etched in Aqua Regia
`
`Resistivity (uΩ cm)
`
`600
`
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`00
`
`RN=5 %, d=5 cm
`
` 375W
` 450W
` 600W
` 750W
`
`RN=5 %, d=5 cm
`
`(b)
`
` 375W
` 450W
` 600W
` 750W
`
`(a)
`
`2.0
`
`1.5
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`Stress (GPa)
`
`01
`
`50
`
`0
`
`10
`
`40
`
`50
`
`0
`
`10
`
`40
`
`20
`30
`30
`20
`Pressure (µbar)
`Pressure (µbar)
`Figure 2. Variation of the mechanical stress (a) and the resistivity (b) as a function of the total pressure in the deposition chamber.
`
`Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, S139–S143
`ß 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.plasma-polymers.org
`
`S141
`
`

`
`V. Mortet et al.
`
`come from the quality of the samples
`surface before deposition and/or the
`cleaning process before deposition.
`Figure 5 shows the FTPS spectra of a
`boron-doped diamond layer obtained
`using a B/C ratio of 4 ppm. The
`spectrum exhibits a clear photoionisa-
`tion threshold at 0.37 eV and a peak at
`0.347 eV. The photocurrent
`signal
`shows two series of equidistant minima
`starting at 0.30 and 0.35 eV with a period
`of 165 meV. All these results are a clear
`signature of boron incorporation in
`the diamond layer.[8] The resistivity of
`the diamond layer decreases from 14 to
`0.8 V cm as the TMB concentration
`increases.
`Electrical characterisation of TiN contacts on boron-
`doped diamond layer were made using circular transmis-
`sion line model measurements. The circular contacts were
`obtained by lift-off. Prior to TiN deposition, the surface of
`the doped diamond layers were oxidised in hot H2SO4 and
`KNO3 solution to remove non-diamond carbon. Figure 6
`shows the I–V curves of a boron-doped diamond layer (18
`ppm) with as deposited and annealed (at 450 and 750 8C)
`TiN contacts. As deposited and 450 8C annealed contacts
`are highly resistive, while contacts annealed at 750 8C
`show ohmic contact behaviour. The specific contact
`resistance (rc) could only be determined for the diamond
`layers grown with a B/C 26 ppm: rc 10
`2 V cm2. This
`result is one order of magnitude higher than Ti/Pt/Au
`contacts.[9] This might be due to a low dopant concentra-
`tion[9] or/and a different reactivity of TiN and Ti to form
`ohmic contact.
`
`Figure 4. SEM images of TiN films’ surface deposited at low and high pressure (P¼ 450 W,
`RN¼ 5% and d¼ 5 cm).
`
`(10 nm/h) and they are not etched in the Al etching
`solution while they are etched in hot H2O2.
`
`Homoepitaxial Boron-Doped Diamond Growth and
`Electrical Characterisation
`
`Doped diamond layers were grown in a mixture of 1% of
`methane diluted in hydrogen at a total pressure of
`110 mbar, a microwave power of 500 W and a substrate
`temperature of 1 100 8C. The B/C ratio in the plasma was
`adjusted from 4 to 32 ppm. During deposition, the total
`gases mass flow rate was kept constant at 500 sccm. The
`layers morphology has been observed by optical micros-
`copy. The diamond layers show pits and non-epitaxial
`crystallites on their surfaces. The number of those defects
`varies a lot from one sample to another. Those defects can
`
`Not annealed &
`Annealed @ 450°C
`
`Annealed @ 750°C
`
`10
`
`02468
`
`-2
`
`-4
`
`-6
`
`Voltage (V)
`
`10-1
`
`10-2
`
`10-3
`
`Photocurrent (a.u.)
`
`10-4
`0.3
`
`0.4
`0.5
`0.6
`0.7
`Photon energy (eV)
`Figure 5. FTPS spectra of boron-doped diamond layer (B/C¼
`4 ppm).
`
`0.8 0.9
`
`1
`
`-8
`
`-1.0x10-3
`
`0.0
`5.0x10-4
`-5.0x10-4
`Current (A)
`I–V characteristics of TiN contacts on boron-doped
`Figure 6.
`diamond layer (B/C¼ 18 ppm) after different annealing treat-
`ments.
`
`1.0x10-3
`
`S142
`
`Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, S139–S143
`ß 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`DOI: 10.1002/ppap.200730506
`
`

`
`Titanium Nitride Grown by Sputtering for Contacts on . . .
`
`Conclusion
`
`TiN films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering have
`been studied and characterised. Smooth and conductive
`TiN films with low stress were obtained in optimal
`deposition conditions.
`It has been observed that the
`properties of the TiN films are strongly dependent on the
`nitrogen concentration and the total pressure. TiN contacts
`were deposited using photolithography and lift-off tech-
`niques onto boron-doped diamond obtained by PECVD.
`Experimental results show that ohmic contacts can be
`formed after annealing at temperatures 750 8C. The first
`results show that TiN conctacts can be formed on
`boron-doped diamond and they can be used for electronic
`applications in harsh environments or
`in biological
`environments on a p-type diamond semiconductor.
`
`Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the IWT-
`SBO-project no. 030219 ‘CVD Diamond, a novel multifunctional
`material for high temperature electronics, high power/high
`frequency electronics and bioelectronics’ and the EU FP6 Marie
`
`Curie RTN ‘‘DRIVE’’, MRTN-CT-2004-512224. K.H. is a Postdoctoral
`Fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen).
`
`Received: September 19, 2006; Revised: November 8, 2006;
`Accepted: November 23, 2006; DOI: 10.1002/ppap.200730506
`
`Keywords: films; titanium nitride; characterization; sputtering;
`X-ray
`
`[1] C. A. Dimitriadis, Th. Karakostas, S. Logothetidis, G. Kamarinos,
`J. Brini, G. Nouet, Solid-State Electron. 1999, 43, 1969.
`[2] B. Pe´cz, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 184, 287.
`[3] M. Vanecek, A. Poruba, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 719.
`[4] G. G. Stoney, Proc. R. Soc. 1909, A82, 172.
`[5] Koji Kobasi, ‘‘Diamond Films – Chemical Vapor Deposition for
`Oriented and Heteroepitaxial Growth’’, Elsevier, Amsterdam
`2005,p. 17.
`[6] G. K. Reeves, Solid-State Electron. 1980, 23, 487.
`[7] A. Tarniowy, R. Mania, M. Rekas, Thin solid Films 1997, 311, 93.
`[8] R. Kravets, Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague,
`2005.
`[9] Y. G. Chen, M. Ogura, S. Yamasaki, H. Okushi, Diamond Relat.
`Mater. 2004, 13, 2121.
`
`Plasma Process. Polym. 2007, 4, S139–S143
`ß 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
`
`www.plasma-polymers.org
`
`S143

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket