throbber
Construction Analysis
`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`64 Mbit DRAM
`
`Report Number: SCA 9702-524
`
`e m i c o nductorIn
`
`dustr y
`

`
`S
`
`i n c e 1964
`
`bal S
`
`rvingtheGlo
`
`e
`
`S
`
`15022 N. 75th Street
`Scottsdale, AZ 85260-2476
`Phone: 602-998-9780
`Fax: 602-948-1925
`e-mail: ice@primenet.com
`Internet: http://www.ice-corp.com/ice
`
`IPR2015-01087 - Ex. 1034
`Micron Technology, Inc., et al., Petitioners
`1
`
`

`
` INDEX TO TEXT
`
` TITLE
`
`INTRODUCTION
`MAJOR FINDINGS
`
`TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION
`Assembly
`Die Process and Design
`
`ANALYSIS RESULTS I
`Assembly
`
`ANALYSIS RESULTS II
`Die Process and Design
`
`ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
`
`TABLES
`Overall Evaluation
`Package Markings
`Die Materials
`Horizontal Dimensions
`Vertical Dimensions
`
` PAGE
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`2 - 4
`
`5
`
`6 - 9
`
`10
`
`11
`12
`12
`13
`14
`
`- i -
`
`2
`
`

`
` INTRODUCTION
`
`This report describes a construction analysis of the Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50, 64 Mbit
`DRAM. Three devices packaged in 50-pin TSOP plastic packages using an LOCCB design
`were received for the analysis. Parts were date coded 9651.
`
` MAJOR FINDINGS
`
`Questionable Items:1
`
`• Metal 3 aluminum thinned up to 95 percent2 at some via edges (Figure 14). We suspect
`that this is not really a problem but the manufacturer should be consulted.
`
`Special Features:
`
`• LOCCB (Lead on chip, center bonded) package design.
`
`• Tight metal pitch (0.8 micron M2 and 0.7 micron M1). Metal 1 was composed of
`damascene tungsten on a titanium-nitride barrier.
`
`• Deep (7 microns) poly-filled trench capacitors. Cell size 1.1 micron2.
`
`• Shallow trench oxide isolation.
`
`• Extremely close contact-to-edge of gate spacing in array (approximately 500Å), made
`possible by densified oxide sidewall etch stops with a thin nitride.
`
`1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns. They should be discussed
` with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.
`
`2Seriousness depends on design margins.
`
`- 1 -
`
`3
`
`

`
` TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION
`
` Assembly:
`
`• The devices were packaged in 50-pin, plastic, Thin Small Outline Packages (TSOP)
`with gull-wing leads for surface mount applications.
`
`• The leadframe design was LOCCB (lead-on-chip, center bond). Multiple internal
`leadframe “fingers” were employed at power pins as well as some other pins. The
`die surface was connected to the bottom of the leadframe using a double backed
`Kapton-type tape. A thin, patterned polyimide die coat was used.
`
`• Lead-locking design was present at all pins. No header/paddle was employed.
`
`• Die separation by sawn dicing (full depth).
`
`• Wirebonding by the thermosonic ball bond method using 1.1 mil gold wire.
`
`• Numerous pins were not connected.
`
` Die Process
`
`• Layout design: The 166 mm2 (8.8 x 18.8 mm) die used a design employing eight
`blocks of cell arrays, with the peripheral circuitry forming a cross in the middle of
`the die, facilitating the center bond assembly.
`
`• Fabrication process: Oxide filled shallow trench CMOS process employing
`multiple-wells in a N-epi on a P substrate.
`
`• Final passivation: A layer of silicon-nitride over a layer of silicon-dioxide.
`
`• Metallization: Three levels of metal were employed on the die. Metals 2 and 3
`consisted of a layer of dry-etched aluminum with titanium-nitride caps and barriers.
`
`- 2 -
`
`4
`
`

`
` TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION (continued)
`
`Metal pitch for M2 was 0.8 micron, while M1 had a 0.7 micron pitch. Standard vias
`were used with Metal 3, while Metal 2 employed tungsten plugs at vias. Metal 1
`consisted of a damascene tungsten with a titanium-nitride barrier. Tungsten plugs
`were used at Metal 1 contacts.
`
`•
`
`Intermetal dielectrics: Intermetal dielectric layers (IMD1 and IMD2) each consisted
`of a thick layer of deposited glass followed by a thin glass. Both intermetal
`dielectrics had been planarized by CMP (chemical mechanical planarization).
`
`• Pre-metal dielectric: Dielectric under M1 consisted of a thin layer of glass over a
`thick layer of silicon-dioxide and densified oxides. A thin nitride layer was apparent
`over the densified oxide. This structure appears to have been planarized by CMP.
`
`• Polysilicon: Three layers of polysilicon were employed. The first layer was used to
`fill the trenches (probably deposited in two steps as reported by IBM), forming the
`individual trench capacitor plates in the array (i.e. not really a “layer”). The second
`layer consisted of a polycide (tungsten silicide) which formed all gates on the die.
`The third layer was used exclusively in the cell array to form small connecting links
`(“straps”) between the drains of the select gates and the trench capacitors.
`
`• Diffusions: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions formed the sources/drains of
`transistors. Diffusions were not silicided. Sidewall spacers had been used to
`provide the LDD spacing. As mentioned, a thin nitride layer was deposited over the
`densified oxide. It provides both an etch stop to insulate gates from the tungsten
`plugs making contact to the source/drain diffusions, facilitating what IBM calls
`“borderless contacts”, and also provides a sealing layer to stop contaminants from
`the CMP process.
`
`• Wells: A complex well structure is present. The substrate is P type with a thin
`apparent N-epi. A P-well is diffused into the epi for the N-channel select transistors
`in the array. The P substrate appears to act as the common plate for the trench
`capacitors.
`
`- 3 -
`
`5
`
`

`
` TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION (continued)
`
`Standard wells and possible retrograde wells are used in peripheral circuit areas. No
`step was noted in the oxide at well boundaries.
`
`• Fuses: Poly 2 (polycide) redundancy fuses were used on the devices. Some laser
`blown fuses were found. Cutouts in the passivation and dielectrics were present
`over all fuses. There was an “undercut” at the base of the cutout over the fuses. It
`appears that Metal 1 tungsten was deposited over the fuses and was used as an etch
`stop for the cutout. The tungsten layer was subsequently removed by a wet etch
`leaving the void (“undercut”).
`
`• Memory cells: The memory cells consisted of a “trench capacitor" DRAM design
`referred to by IBM as a “Buried Plate Trench” (BPT) cell. Metal 3 was not used
`directly in the individual cell arrays. Metal 2 formed “piggyback” word lines. Metal
`1 formed the bit lines, poly 2 (polycide) formed the word lines and select gates. The
`individual capacitor plates were formed by poly 1 filled trenches. The common
`capacitor plate was the P-substrate. IBM has reported that an N-well forms the
`common plate of the trench capacitors by out diffusion from the cell trenches. It
`does not appear that this process feature is present on this device, since no evidence
`of the N-well region could be revealed in cross-section. A thin oxide-nitride-oxide
`sandwich was apparently used for the capacitor dielectric. Trenches were offset
`from the select gates so a small poly 3 link (“strap”) was used to connect the drains
`of the select gates to the trench capacitor poly. Trenches were 7.0 microns deep, but
`only had a 0.2 micron x 1 micron surface area. Select gates were formed in the
`shallow P-wells and bit contacts were of the “borderless” type. Cell size was 0.75 x
`
`1.45 micron (1.1 micron2).
`
`- 4 -
`
`6
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS I
`
` Assembly:
`
` Figures 1 - 4
`
`Questionable Items:1 None.
`
`Special Features:
`
`• LOCCB leadframe design.
`
`General Items:
`
`• Overall package quality: Good. No defects were found on the external portions of
`the packages. External (gull-wing) pins were well formed and tinning of the leads
`was complete. No voids or cracks were noted anywhere.
`
`• Wirebonding: Thermosonic ball bond method using 1.1 mil gold wire. Bonds were
`well formed and placement was good.
`
`• Die attach: The die was attached to the underside of the leadframe with a double side
`Kapton-type tape. No problems were found.
`
`• Die dicing: Die separation was by full depth sawing and showed normal quality
`workmanship. No large chips or cracks were present at the die edges.
`
`• A thin, patterned, polyimide die coat was apparently employed over the die surface.
`No problems were noted.
`
`• Metal bus lines were beveled slightly at die corners (no slots noted) to relieve stresses.
`A poly 2 “waffle pattern” was present in the inactive circuit areas of the die. This
`pattern is apparently employed to aid the CMP planarization purposes.
`
`1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns. They should be discussed
`with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.
`
`- 5 -
`
`7
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS II
`
` Die Process and Design:
`
` Figures 5 - 46
`
`Questionable Items:1
`
`• Metal 3 aluminum thinned up to 95 percent2 at some via edges (Figure 14).
`
`Special Features:
`
`• Tight metal pitch and damascene Metal 1 (tungsten).
`
`• Deep trench cell capacitors. Cell size 1.1 micron2.
`
`• Oxide filled shallow trench isolation.
`
`General Items:
`
`• Fabrication process: Oxide filled shallow trench isolation CMOS process employing
`multiple-wells in a P substrate with shallow N-epi. No significant problems were found in
`the process.
`
`• Design implementation: Die layout was clean and efficient. Alignment was good at all levels.
`
`• Surface defects: No toolmarks, masking defects, or contamination areas were found.
`
`• Final passivation: A thin patterned polyimide die-coat covered a layer of silicon-
`nitride over a layer of silicon-dioxide. The passivation integrity test indicated defect-
`free passivation. Edge seal was also good, as the passivation extended into the
`
`1These items present possible quality or reliability concerns. They should be discussed
`with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.
`
`2Seriousness depends on design margins.
`
`- 6 -
`
`8
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
`
`scribe lane to seal the metallization.
`
`• Metallization: Three levels of metallization were used. Metal 2 and 3 consisted of
`aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and barrier. Metal 1 consisted of damascene
`tungsten on a titanium-nitride barrier. Standard vias were used between M3 and
`M2. Metals 2 and 1 used tungsten plugs.
`
`• Metal patterning: Metals 2 and 3 were patterned by a normal dry etch. The
`observed feature that indicates the use of the damascene technique is the fold
`observed in the center of the metal 1 lines - shown in Figures 20, 24, 39, 41 and 44.
`
`• Metal defects: None. No notching or voiding of the metal layers was found. No
`silicon nodules were noted following the removal of the aluminum.
`
`• Metal step coverage: Metal 3 aluminum thinned up to 95 percent at some via edges;
`however, the cap and barrier reduced total metal thinning to approximately 85
`percent. MIL-STD allows up to 70 percent thinning for contacts of this size. No
`metal 2 or 1 thinning was noted due to the use of tungsten plugs.
`
`• Contacts: Via cuts under M3 were slope-etched through the interlevel dielectric. No
`overetching of the vias was noted. Plugs under M2 and M1 had straight walls.
`Spacing to gate edges is only approximately 500Å where needed (e.g., in the cell
`array). No problems were found at any contacts or vias.
`
`•
`
`Intermetal dielectric: Intermetal dielectric layers (IMD1 and IMD2) consisted of a
`thick layer of deposited glass followed by a thin glass. They were planarized by
`CMP. No problems were found with these layers. No SOG was used.
`
`- 7 -
`
`9
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
`
`• Pre-metal dielectric: This dielectric consisted of a thin layer of glass over a thick
`layer of silicon-dioxide followed by a thin nitride layer and densified oxides, on top
`of the polycide and diffusions. It appeared to be planarized by CMP and showed no
`evidence of any problems.
`
`• Polysilicon: A total of three different layers of polysilicon were employed in this
`process. The first poly layer (poly 1) was used to fill the trenches of the memory
`cells and thus formed one side of the cell capacitor. Poly trenches were probably
`filled in two poly depositions. No problem areas were found in this layer. Poly 2
`was a polycide (polysilicon with a tungsten-silicide on top) used throughout for
`transistor gates and for redundancy fuses. No problems were identified in this layer
`either. The third poly layer (poly 3) was a highly doped layer that was used
`exclusively to form very small connecting links (“straps”) between the drains of the
`select gates and the poly 1 capacitor plates in the cell array.
`
`•
`
`Isolation: Oxide filled shallow trench isolation was used and was very well
`implemented. No steps were visible in this field oxide at the well boundaries.
`
`• Source/drain: Implanted N+ and P+ diffusions were used for sources and drains.
`An LDD process was used and employed oxide sidewall spacers that appeared to be
`partially removed. A thin layer of nitride was deposited over the densified oxide. It
`provided an etch stop for protection against shorting the gates to the extremely
`closely spaced tungsten plugs contacting sources and drains. It is also useful as a
`sealing layer when using CMP. Diffusions were not silicided. No problems were
`found in any of these areas.
`
`• Wells: Multiple-wells were used in a P substrate with a thin N-epi layer. Only
`some P-wells could be delineated well enough to obtain a depth measurement.
`
`- 8 -
`
`10
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
`
`• Fuses: Poly 2 redundancy fuses were present on the die. Some laser blown fuses
`were noted. Cutouts (passivation and intermetal dielectric) were present over all
`fuses. There was an “undercut” at the base of the cutout over the fuses. It appears
`that Metal 1 tungsten was deposited over the fuses and was used as an etch stop for
`the cutout. The tungsten layer was subsequently removed by a wet etch leaving the
`void (“undercut”).
`
`• Memory cells: As mentioned, these parts used a trench cell design which is
`essentially the same as that used by IBM and Siemens. Whereas in trench cell
`designs from other manufacturers, the poly fill is always the passive common plate
`connected to a DC voltage or memory-enable, and the drains of the select gates
`connect via diffusion to the implant in the substrate around the trench, in this case,
`the P substrate around the trench is the common plate. This requires that this
`substrate region needs to be fairly low resistance and thus can not be the same as
`the body terminal of the select gates. Also, as described by IBM,* isolation of this
`“substrate” (well) is desirable for operating characteristics. This is accomplished by
`forming an N-well around the trenches by out diffusing N+ through the trench
`walls. It does not appear that this last process feature was employed on this device,
`since no evidence of the N-well region could be revealed in cross-section. Select
`gates are N- type formed in the P-well so that the total vertical diffusion structure in
`the array is as follows. From the surface there are: N+ source/drains in the P-well
`which is within the N-epi on a P substrate. Since the poly filled trenches form the
`individual cell capacitor plates, a poly link (“strap”) is used to connect select gate
`drains to the trench poly. In addition to the above, the aspect ratio of the cell trenches
`was high (approximately 14:1 ), and the tungsten contact plugs were placed directly
`against the densified oxide/thin nitride layer that protected the edges of the select
`gates. Since the layout uses an offset between the various cell elements it is
`impossible to illustrate the entire cell structure in one cross section plane. Due to the
`
`- 9 -
`
`11
`
`

`
` ANALYSIS RESULTS II (continued)
`
`high aspect ratio we were unsuccessful in showing any complete poly trench depth
`from the top to the bottom in one direction (see Figure 45); however, the full trench
`depth is clearly illustrated in Figures 42 and 43. With the tight structures present
`correct interpretation is difficult, however, an excellent and detailed explanation of
`the IBM 64M DRAM cell was published by E. Adler et. al. in the IBM Journal of
`Research and Development, Volume 39, No 1/2, January/March 1995. No
`problems were found in any of the structures, and cell size was measured to be 0.75
`
`x 1.45 micron (l.1 micron2).
`
`*IBM Journal of Research and Development, Volume 39, No 1/2, January/March 1995.
`
`- 10 -
`
`12
`
`

`
` PROCEDURE
`
`The devices were subjected to the following analysis procedures:
`
`External inspection
`
`X-ray
`
`Decapsulate
`
`Internal optical inspection
`
`SEM inspection of assembly features and passivation
`
`Delayer to metal 3 and inspect
`
`Metal 3 removal and inspect barrier
`
`Delayer to metal 2 and inspect
`
`Metal 2 removal and inspect barrier
`
`Delayer to metal 1 and inspect
`
`Metal 1 removal
`
`Delayer to poly/substrate and inspect poly layers and substrate.
`Die sectioning (90(cid:176) for SEM)*
`
`Measure horizontal dimensions
`
`Measure vertical dimensions
`
`Material analysis
`
`*Delineation of cross-sections is by silicon etch unless otherwise indicated.
`
`- 11 -
`
`13
`
`

`
` OVERALL QUALITY EVALUATION: Overall Rating: Normal/Good
`
` DETAIL OF EVALUATION
`
`Package integrity
`Package markings
`Die placement
`Wirebond placement
`Wire spacing
`Wirebond quality
`Die attach quality
`Dicing quality
`Die attach method
`Dicing method:
`Wirebond method
`
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`N
`N
`N
`Double backed tape.
`Sawn (full depth)
`Thermosonic ball bonds using 1.1 mil gold wire.
`
`Die surface integrity:
`Toolmarks (absence)
`Particles (absence)
`Contamination (absence)
`Process defects (absence)
`General workmanship
`Passivation integrity
`Metal definition
`Metal integrity
`Metal registration
`Contact coverage
`Contact registration
`
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`NP*
`N
`G
`G
`
`*Metal 3 aluminum thinned up to 95 percent.
`
`G = Good, P = Poor, N = Normal, NP = Normal/Poor
`
`- 12 -
`
`14
`
`

`
` PACKAGE MARKINGS
`
` TOP
`
`TOSHIBA T82253
`9651KBD
`JAPAN
`TC5165165AFT-50
`
` DIE MATERIALS
`
`Overlay passivation:
`
`Silicon-nitride over silicon-dioxide.
`
`Metal 3:
`
`Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and barrier.
`
`Intermetal dielectric 2:
`
`Silicon-dioxide.
`
`Metal 2:
`
`Aluminum with a titanium-nitride cap and barrier.
`Tungsten plugs at vias.
`
`Intermetal dielectric 1:
`
`Silicon-dioxide.
`
`Metal 1:
`
`Tungsten with a titanium-nitride barrier and tungsten
`plugs.
`
`Pre-metal dielectric:
`
`Silicon-dioxide over a thin nitride on densified oxide.
`
`Polycide:
`
`Tungsten silicide on poly 2.
`
`Note: Diffusion did not use a salicide process.
`
`- 13 -
`
`15
`
`

`
` HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS
`
`Die size:
`
`Die area:
`Min pad size:
`Min pad window:
`Min pad space:
`Min metal 3 width:
`Min metal 3 space:
`Min metal 3 pitch:
`Min metal 2 width:
`Min metal 2 space:
`Min metal 2 pitch:
`Min metal 1 width:
`Min metal 1 space:
`Min metal 1 pitch:
`Min via (M3 - M2):
`Min via (M2 - M1):
`Min contact:
`Min poly 2 width:
`Min poly 2 space:
`Poly 1 width (trench):
`Min gate length* - (N-channel):
` - (P-channel):
`
`Cell size:
`Cell pitch:
`
`8.8 x 18.8 mm (348 x 742 mils)
`
`166 mm2 (258,216 mils2)
`0.11 x 0.11 mm (4.5 x 4.5 mils)
`0.1 x 0.1 mm (4 x 4 mils)
`0.1 mm (3.8 mils)
`1.4 micron
`1.5 micron
`2.9 microns
`0.4 micron
`0 4 micron
`0.8 micron
`0.4 micron
`0.3 micron
`0.7 micron
`0.65 micron
`0.4 micron
`0.45 micron
`0.35 micron
`0.35 micron
`0.25 micron
`
`0.4 micron
`0.45 micron
`1.1 micron2
`0.75 x 1.45 micron
`
`*Physical gate length.
`
`- 14 -
`
`16
`
`

`
` VERTICAL DIMENSIONS
`
` Layers
`
`Passivation 2:
`Passivation 1:
`Metal 3 - cap:
`- aluminum:
`- barrier:
`Intermetal dielectric 2:
`Metal 2 - cap:
` - aluminum:
`- barrier:
`- plugs:
`Intermetal dielectric 1:
`Metal 1 - tungsten:
`- barrier:
`- plugs:
`Pre-metal dielectric:
`Poly 3:
`Oxide on poly 2:
`Poly 2 - silicide:
`- poly:
`Poly 1 - (trench):
`Shallow trench oxide (isolation):
`N+ S/D diffusion:
`P+ S/D diffusion:
`P- well:
`N- epi:
`
`0.5 micron
`0.45 micron
`0.07 micron (approx.)
`1.0 micron
`0.07 micron (approx.)
`0.7 micron
`0.07 micron (approx.)
`0.35 micron
`0.04 micron (approx.)
`0.45 micron
`0.5 micron
`0.2 micron
`0.04 micron (approx.)
`0.7 - 0.9 micron
`0.4 - 0.85 micron
`0.4 micron
`0.25 micron
`0.06 micron (approx.)
`0.1 micron
`6.8 microns
`0.4 micron
`0.15 micron
`0.15 micron
`1.5 micron
`2 microns
`
`- 15 -
`
`17
`
`

`
` INDEX TO FIGURES
`
`ASSEMBLY
`
`Figures 1 - 4
`
`DIE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION
`
`Figures 5 - 7
`
`PHYSICAL DIE STRUCTURES
`
`Figures 8 - 46
`
`COLOR DRAWING OF DIE STRUCTURE
`
`Figure 33
`
`FUSES
`
`Figures 34 - 36a
`
`MEMORY CELL STRUCTURES
`
`Figures 37 - 46
`
`- ii -
`
`18
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`PIN 1
`
`Figure 1. Package photograph and x-ray view of the Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50 64M
`DRAM. Mag 4x.
`
`19
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Au WIRES
`
`LEADFRAME
`
`DIE
`
`Mag. 35x
`
`LEADFRAME
`
`Au WIRE
`
`DIE
`
`Mag. 50x
`
`Figure 2. Perspective SEM views illustrating assembly structure. 60°.
`
`20
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Au WIRE
`
`LEADFRAME
`
`Mag. 600x
`
`Au
`
`PAD
`
`Mag. 800x
`
`Figure 3. SEM views of typical wirebonds. 60°.
`
`21
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 1400x, 60°
`
`EDGE OF
`PASSIVATION
`
`PASSIVATION
`
`SCRIBE LANE
`
`112233
`
`Mag. 3200x
`
`SUBSTRATE
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`METAL 3
`
`METAL 1
`
`Mag. 6500x
`
`TRENCH
`OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`“PLANARIZATION
`PATTERN”
`
`Figure 4. SEM views of the edge seal structure.
`
`22
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Figure 5. Whole die photograph of the Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50 64M DRAM. Mag. 13x.
`
`23
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 500x
`
`Mag. 400x
`
`Mag. 320x
`
`Figure 6. Die identification markings.
`
`24
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 800x
`
`Figure 6a. Alignment keys from the die surface and typical die corner structure.
`
`Mag. 200x
`
`25
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 800x
`
`Mag. 13,000x
`
`METAL 3
`
`POLY
`“PLANARIZATION
`PATTERN”
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`DENSIFIED OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`Figure 7. Optical and SEM section views illustrating planarization pattern.
`
`26
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`VOID
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`N+
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`Mag. 13,000x
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`IMD 2
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`M2 PLUG
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`Mag. 13,000x
`
`POLY 2 GATES
`
`N+ S/D
`
`METAL 3
`
`IMD 2
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`IMD 1
`
`Mag. 16,000x
`
`POLY 2
`GATE
`
`N+ S/D
`
`Figure 8. Silicon etch section views illustrating general device structure.
`
`27
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`METAL 2
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`METAL 1
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`METAL 3
`
`IMD 2
`
`METAL 2
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`IMD 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`Mag. 13,000x
`
`METAL 1
`
`IMD 1
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`METAL 1
`
`POLY 2 GATES
`
`Figure 9. Glass etch section views illustrating general device structure.
`
`28
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 3000x
`
`Mag. 15,000x
`
`Figure 10. SEM views of general passivation coverage. 55°.
`
`29
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`IMD 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`METAL 2
`
`Mag. 17,000x
`
`CAP
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`11
`22
`33
`
`ALUMINUM 3
`
`BARRIER
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`Figure 11. SEM section views of metal 3 line profiles.
`
`30
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 3700x
`
`VIAS
`(M3-M2)
`
`Figure 12. Topological SEM views illustrating metal 3 patterning. 0°.
`
`Mag. 6000x
`
`31
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 5500x
`
`CAP
`
`ALUMINUM 3
`
`BARRIER
`
`Mag. 15,000x
`
`Figure 13. SEM views of general metal 3 integrity. 55°.
`
`32
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`METAL 3
`
`IMD 2
`
`VOID
`
`METAL 2
`
`95% THINNING
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`
`ALUMINUM 3
`
`CAP
`BARRIER
`
`VOID
`
`METAL 2
`
`IMD 2
`
`Mag. 32,000x
`
`Figure 14. SEM section views of M3-to-M2 vias.
`
`33
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 2
`
`IMD 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`METAL 1
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`CAP
`
`METAL 2
`
`11
`22
`33
`
`ALUMINUM 2
`
`BARRIER
`
`Mag. 52,000x
`
`Figure 15. SEM section views of metal 2 line profiles.
`
`34
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`VIAS
`(FROM M3)
`
`VIAS
`(PLUGS
`TO M1)
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 2
`
`Figure 16. Topological SEM views illustrating metal 2 patterning. Mag. 6000x, 0°.
`
`35
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 8000x
`
`BARRIER
`
`CAP
`
`ALUMINUM 2
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`Figure 17. Perspective SEM views of general metal 2 integrity. 50°.
`
`36
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`M2 PLUGS
`
`METAL 1
`
`Mag. 15,400x
`
`METAL 1
`
`M2 PLUGS
`
`Mag. 35,000x
`
`Figure 18. SEM views of metal 2 tungsten plugs. 55°.
`
`37
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`IMD 2
`
`METAL 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`METAL 1
`
`M2 PLUG
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`METAL 2
`
`M2
`PLUG
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`PRE-METAL
`DIELECTRIC
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`METAL 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`M2 PLUG
`
`METAL 1
`
`Figure 19. SEM section views of M2-to-M1 vias.
`
`Mag. 25,000x
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`Mag. 40,000x
`
`38
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 1
`
`PRE-METAL
`DIELECTRIC
`
`Figure 20. SEM section view of metal 1 line profiles. Mag. 52,000x.
`
`METAL 1
`
`VIAS (M2-M1)
`
`Figure 21. Topological SEM views illustrating metal 1 patterning. Mag. 7000x, 0°.
`
`39
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Row Decode,
`Mag. 5000x
`
`Column Decode,
`Mag. 8000x
`
`VIAS (M2-M1)
`
`METAL 1
`
`Column Decode,
`Mag. 8000x
`
`Figure 22. Topological SEM views illustrating metal 1 patterning in the decode areas. 0°.
`
`40
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`M2 PLUGS
`
`METAL 1
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`POLY 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`POLY 2
`
`Mag. 12,000x
`
`M2 PLUGS
`
`Figure 23. Perspective SEM views illustrating general metal 1 integrity. 60°.
`
`41
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 20,000x
`
`M2 PLUGS
`
`METAL 1
`
`POLY 2
`GATE
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`EVIDENCE OF
`DAMASCENE
`METAL 1
`
`POLY 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`Figure 24. Detail SEM views of general metal 1 integrity. 60°.
`
`42
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`PRE-METAL
`DIELECTRIC
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`DENSIFIED
`OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`Mag. 30,000x
`
`Mag. 35,000x
`
`START OF
`MEMORY
`CELL
`
`Mag. 35,000x
`
`Figure 25. SEM section views of metal 1-to-poly 2 contacts.
`
`43
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 2
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`N+
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`N+
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`Mag. 40,000x
`
`POLY 2
`
`N+ S/D
`
`Mag. 40,000x
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`Figure 26. SEM section views of metal 1-to-N+ diffusion contacts.
`
`44
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 4000x
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`POLY 2 GATES
`
`DIFFUSION
`
`CONTACT
`(PLUG FROM M1)
`
`Mag. 8000x
`
`Figure 27. Topological SEM views illustrating poly 2 patterning. 0°.
`
`45
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 3200x
`
`POLY 2
`
`Figure 28. Topological SEM views illustrating poly 2 patterning in the decode areas. 0°.
`
`Mag. 4000x
`
`46
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 7000x
`
`POLY 2 GATE
`
`DIFFUSION
`
`Mag. 17,000x
`
`Figure 29. Perspective SEM views of poly 2. 55°.
`
`47
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 2
`
`POLY 2
`GATE
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1
`PLUG
`
`N+ S/D
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`N+ S/D
`
`POLY 2
`
`GATE OXIDE
`
`Mag. 52,000x
`
`Figure 30. SEM section views of N-channel transistors.
`
`48
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`DENSIFIED OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`P+ S/D
`
`GATE OXIDE
`
`P-channel
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`W SILICIDE
`
`POLY
`
`glass etch
`
`Figure 31. SEM section views of typical transistors. Mag. 52,000x.
`
`49
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`POLY 2 GATE
`
`Mag. 52,000x
`
`GATE OXIDE
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`P-WELL
`
`Mag. 1600x
`
`Mag. 1600x
`
`P-WELL
`
`N-EPI
`
`TRENCH
`CAPACITORS
`
`P SUBSTRATE
`
`Figure 32. Section views of a trench/gate oxide interface and well structure.
`
`50
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`
`
`(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)
`
`
`
`(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)(cid:0)
`
`
`P SUBSTRATE
`
`N-EPI
`
`Figure 33. Color cross section drawing illustrating device structure.
`
`Red = Diffusion,and Gray = Substrate
`
`Orange = Nitride,Blue = Metal,Yellow = Oxide,Green = Poly,
`
`P-WELL
`
`N+ S/D
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`P+ S/D
`
`PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC
`
`METAL 1
`
`METAL 2
`
`IMD 1
`
`IMD 2
`
`PASSIVATION 1
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`POLY 2
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`DENSIFIED OXIDE
`
`METAL 3
`
`M2 PLUG
`
`51
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 320x
`
`Mag. 2500x
`
`BLOWN
`
`INTACT
`
`CUTOUT
`
`BLOWN
`
`INTACT
`
`Mag. 6000x
`
`CUTOUT
`
`Figure 34. Topological views of poly 2 fuses. 0°.
`
`52
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`CUTOUT
`
`BLOWN
`
`INTACT
`
`Mag. 2500x
`
`BLOWN
`
`CUTOUT
`
`Mag. 5000x
`
`Figure 35. Perspective SEM views of poly 2 fuses. 55°.
`
`53
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Figure 36. SEM section views of intact and blown poly 2 fuses. Mag. 7000x.
`
`blown
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`CUTOUT
`
`BLOWN SITE
`
`POLY2 FUSE
`
`METAL1
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`intact
`
`POLY2 FUSE
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`METAL3
`
`DIELECTRIC
`PRE-METAL
`
`METAL1
`
`CUTOUT
`
`METAL2
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`54
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`CUTOUT
`
`BLOWN SITE
`
`POLY 2
`
`PASSIVATION 2
`
`UNDERCUT
`(FILLED-IN WITH
`EPOXY)
`
`Mag. 15,000x
`
`POLY 2
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`BLOWN SITE
`
`METAL 1
`
`M1 PLUG
`
`Mag. 35,000x
`
`OXIDE
`
`POLY 2
`
`TRENCH OXIDE
`
`Figure 36a. SEM section details of a blown fuse.
`
`55
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`“PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES
`
`metal 3
`
`metal 2
`
`BIT LINES
`
`metal 1
`
`Figure 37. Topological SEM views of the cell array. Mag. 8000x, 0°.
`
`56
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINES
`
`poly 2 and 3
`
`TRENCH CAPACITORS
`
`delayered to substrate
`
`Figure 37a. Topological SEM views of the cell array. Mag. 8000x, 0°.
`
`57
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`“PIGGYBACK” WORD LINES
`
`metal 3
`
`metal 2
`
`metal 1
`
`BIT LINES
`
`Figure 38. Perspective SEM views of the cell array. Mag. 7000x, 55°.
`
`58
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINES
`
`poly 2 and 3
`
`delayered to substrate
`
`Figure 38a. Perspective SEM views of the cell array. Mag. 7000x, 55°.
`
`59
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`metal 1
`
`BIT LINES
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINES
`
`POLY 3 LINKS
`
`poly 2 and 3
`
`BIT LINE
`CONNECTIONS
`
`POLY IN
`TRENCHES
`
`delayered to substrate
`
`Figure 39. Detail views of DRAM cells. Mag. 20,000x, 55°.
`
`60
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`TRENCH CAPACITORS
`
`Mag. 10,000x
`
`TRENCH CAPACITOR
`
`Mag. 11,000x
`
`Figure 40. Perspective views illustrating trench capacitors (substrate etched). 55°.
`
`61
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`BIT LINE
`
`metal 1
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINE
`
`BIT
`
`Q
`
`POLY 3
`LINK
`
`Figure 41. Detailed topological SEM views of DRAM cells. Mag. 30,000x, 0°.
`
`poly 2 and 3
`
`62
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`BIT
`
`Q
`
`C
`
`POLY 3 LINK
`CONNECTION
`
`TRENCH
`CAPACITORS
`
`FIELD OXIDE
`(SHALLOW TRENCH)
`
`delayered to substrate
`
`TRENCH CAPACITORS
`
`trench capacitors
`
`WORD
`
`BIT
`
`Q1
`
`C1
`
`MEMORY
`ENABLE
`
`Figure 41a. Detail topological SEM views of DRAM cells with the cell schematic.
`Mag. 30,000x, 0°.
`
`63
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 3
`
`METAL 1 BIT LINES
`
`METAL 2
`
`Mag. 6500x
`
`TRENCH
`CAPACITORS
`
`METAL 1 BIT LINES
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINE
`
`TRENCH
`CAPACITOR
`
`BIT LINES
`
`POLY 2 WORD LINE
`
`Mag. 13,000x
`
`Mag. 26,000x
`
`OXIDE COLLAR
`
`POLY 1 FILLED
`TRENCH
`
`Figure 42. SEM section views of DRAM cells (parallel to word lines).
`
`64
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC5165165AFT-50
`
`Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation
`
`METAL 1 BIT LINES
`
`POLY 3
`
`Mag. 9000x
`
`TRENCH
`CAPACITORS
`
`POLY 3 LINKS
`
`METAL 1
`
`POLY 1 FILLED
`TRENCH
`
`POLY 3
`LINK
`
`SELECT GATE
`DRAIN DIFFUSION
`
`Mag. 20,000x
`
`Mag. 35,000x
`
`POLY 1
`
`OXIDE COLLAR
`
`Figure 43. SEM section views of DRAM cells illustrating poly 3 link connection.
`
`65
`
`

`
`Toshiba TC51651

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket