throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 24
`Entered: January 5, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and
`MICRON MEMORY JAPAN, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2015-01087
`Patent 6,057,221 C1
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, BRIAN J. McNAMARA, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Request for Adverse Judgment
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-01087
`Patent 6,057,221 C1
`
`On November 5, 2015, we instituted an inter partes review of claims
`
`3, 4, 6–8, 13–15, 17, 18, and 21–30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,057,221 C1 (“the
`
`’221 patent”), which are all of the claims that emerged from reexamination
`
`pursuant to Reexamination Request No. 90/011,607. Paper 12. On
`
`December 21, 2015, pursuant to our authorization (Paper 22), Patent Owner
`
`filed a request to cancel the challenged claims and have adverse judgment
`
`entered against it under 37 C.F.R. 42.73(b)(2). Paper 23.1
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 42.73(b), a party may request judgment against
`
`itself at any time during a proceeding. Also, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(2),
`
`actions construed as a request for entry of adverse judgment include
`
`cancellation of a claim such that the party has no remaining claim in the
`
`trial.
`
`Patent Owner has requested adverse judgment and the cancellation of
`
`all claims involved in this inter partes review, such that after the
`
`cancellation it will have no remaining claim in the trial.
`
`We hereby grant Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request to cancel claims 3, 4, 6–8,
`
`13–15, 17, 18, and 21–30 and request for entry of adverse judgment are
`
`granted;
`
`
`1 Patent Owner makes its request to cancel the challenged claims “in light
`of” alleged “statistics weighing against it once a decision instituting
`proceedings has been issued.” Paper 23. Each case presents its own unique
`facts and our decision to grant Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse
`Judgment is in no way influenced by Patent Owner’s unsupported assertion.
`This judgment is entered solely on the basis of Patent Owner’s request,
`without regard to any factor Patent Owner alleges as its motivation.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-01087
`Patent 6,057,221 C1
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against Patent
`
`Owner with respect to claims 3, 4, 6–8, 13–15, 17, 18, and 21–30 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,057,221 C1; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that claims 3, 4, 6–8, 13–15, 17, 18, and 21–
`
`30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,057,221 C1 shall be canceled.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`4
`
`Case IPR2015-01087
`Patent 6,057,221 C1
`
`
`
`For PETITIONERS:
`
`Michael Turner
`mturner@kenyon.com
`
`Rose Cordero Prey
`rcordero@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Steven Pollinger
`spollinger@mckoolsmith.com
`
`Ramzi Khazen
`rkhazen@mckoolsmith.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket