throbber
LETTERS
`
`Vol 463 | 7 January 2010 | doi:10.1038/nature08638
`
`Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse
`large B-cell lymphoma
`R. Eric Davis1*, Vu N. Ngo1*, Georg Lenz1*, Pavel Tolar3, Ryan M. Young1, Paul B. Romesser1,4, Holger Kohlhammer1,
`Laurence Lamy1, Hong Zhao1, Yandan Yang1, Weihong Xu1, Arthur L. Shaffer1, George Wright5, Wenming Xiao6,
`John Powell6, Jian-kang Jiang7, Craig J. Thomas7, Andreas Rosenwald8, German Ott9,
`Hans Konrad Muller-Hermelink8, Randy D. Gascoyne10, Joseph M. Connors10, Nathalie A. Johnson10,
`Lisa M. Rimsza11,12, Elias Campo13, Elaine S. Jaffe2, Wyndham H. Wilson1, Jan Delabie14, Erlend B. Smeland15,
`Richard I. Fisher12,16, Rita M. Braziel12,17, Raymond R. Tubbs12,18, J. R. Cook12,18, Dennis D. Weisenburger19,
`Wing C. Chan19, Susan K. Pierce3 & Louis M. Staudt1
`
`A role for B-cell-receptor (BCR) signalling in lymphomagenesis
`has been inferred by studying immunoglobulin genes in human
`lymphomas1,2 and by engineering mouse models3, but genetic and
`functional evidence for its oncogenic role in human lymphomas is
`needed. Here we describe a form of ‘chronic active’ BCR signalling
`that is required for cell survival in the activated B-cell-like (ABC)
`subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The signalling
`adaptor CARD11 is required for constitutive NF-kB pathway
`activity and survival in ABC DLBCL4. Roughly 10% of ABC
`DLBCLs have mutant CARD11 isoforms that activate NF-kB5,
`but the mechanism that engages wild-type CARD11 in other
`ABC DLBCLs was unknown. An RNA interference genetic screen
`revealed that a BCR signalling component, Bruton’s tyrosine
`kinase, is essential for the survival of ABC DLBCLs with wild-type
`CARD11. In addition, knockdown of proximal BCR subunits
`(IgM, Ig-k, CD79A and CD79B) killed ABC DLBCLs with wild-
`type CARD11 but not other lymphomas. The BCRs in these ABC
`DLBCLs formed prominent clusters in the plasma membrane with
`low diffusion, similarly to BCRs in antigen-stimulated normal
`B cells. Somatic mutations affecting the immunoreceptor tyrosine-
`based activation motif (ITAM) signalling modules6 of CD79B and
`CD79A were detected frequently in ABC DLBCL biopsy samples but
`rarely in other DLBCLs and never in Burkitt’s lymphoma or mucosa-
`associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. In 18% of ABC DLBCLs, one
`functionally critical residue of CD79B, the first ITAM tyrosine, was
`mutated. These mutations increased surface BCR expression and
`attenuated Lyn kinase, a feedback inhibitor of BCR signalling.
`These findings establish chronic active BCR signalling as a new
`pathogenetic mechanism in ABC DLBCL, suggesting several thera-
`peutic strategies.
`DLBCL is a heterogeneous diagnostic category consisting of mole-
`cularly distinct subtypes that differ in gene expression, oncogenic
`
`aberrations and clinical outcome7,8. The ABC DLBCL subtype relies
`on constitutive NF-kB signalling to block apoptosis, but the germinal-
`centre B-cell-like (GCB) subtype does not9. Recurrent CARD11 muta-
`tions in ABC DLBCL provided genetic evidence that NF-kB signalling
`is central to its pathogenesis5. However, most ABC DLBCLs have wild-
`type CARD11 yet nonetheless rely on CARD11 to activate NF-kB
`signalling4,9.
`In normal B cells, CARD11 is engaged during antigenic stimu-
`lation of BCR signalling. Antigen specificity of the BCR is provided
`by surface immunoglobulin, but signalling is mediated by two assoc-
`iated proteins, CD79A (Ig-a) and CD79B (Ig-b)10. The CD79A–CD79B
`heterodimer is a scaffold for the assembly and membrane expression of
`the BCR and also initiates downstream signalling to the NF-kB,
`phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase
`(ERK) mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and NF-AT pathways.
`Engagement of the BCR by antigen induces Src-family kinases to phos-
`phorylate tyrosines in the ITAM motifs of CD79A and CD79B. The
`tyrosine kinase Syk is activated by binding to the phosphorylated
`ITAMs, triggering a signalling cascade that involves the tyrosine kinase
`Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), phospholipase Cc and protein kinase
`Cb (PKC-b). PKC-b phosphorylates CARD11, causing it to recruit
`BCL10 and MALT1 into a multiprotein ‘CBM’ complex that activates
`IkB kinase (IKK), thereby initiating NF-kB signalling.
`A potential role for BCR signalling in ABC DLBCLs with wild-type
`CARD11 was revealed by an RNA interference screen. Two short
`hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting the BCR pathway component
`BTK were highly toxic for an ABC DLBCL line with wild-type
`CARD11 (OCI-Ly10) but not for one with mutant CARD11 (OCI-
`Ly3), nor for GCB DLBCL and multiple myeloma lines (Fig. 1a and
`Supplementary Fig. 1). In subsequent survival assays, a BTK shRNA
`was toxic for four ABC DLBCL lines with wild-type CARD11 but not
`for OCI-Ly3 or six GCB DLBCL lines (Fig. 1b). BTK kinase activity
`
`1Metabolism Branch, 2Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 3Laboratory of
`Immunogenetics, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute – National
`Institutes of Health Research Scholars Program, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 5Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute,
`National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 6Bioinformatics and Molecular Analysis Section, Division of Computational Bioscience, Center for Information
`Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. 7NIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of
`Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. 8Department of Pathology, University of Wu¨rzburg, 97080 Wu¨rzburg, Germany. 9Department of Clinical
`Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, and Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany. 10British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver,
`British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4E6. 11Department of Pathology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA. 12Southwest Oncology Group, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann
`Arbor, Michigan 48106, USA. 13Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. 14Pathology Clinic, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway.
`15Institute for Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet University Hospital and Center for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty Division of the Norwegian Radium Hospital, University of Oslo, N-0310
`Oslo, Norway. 16James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. 17Oregon Health and Science University, Portland,
`Oregon 97239, USA. 18Cleveland Clinic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. 19Departments of Pathology and Microbiology, University of
`Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.
`*These authors contributed equally to this work.
`
`88
`
`©2010
`
`Coalition for Affordable Drugs IV LLC - Exhibit 1023
`Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
`
`

`
`NATURE | Vol 463 | 7 January 2010
`
`LETTERS
`
`0
`2
`4
`6
`8 10 12 14
`Days of BTK shRNA induction
`
`BTK
`shRNA
`
`BTK
`rescue
`construct
`
`Allele-specific
`kinase inhibitor
`(PP1 analogue)
`
`–+ ––+
`
`Wild type
`Wild type
`ASKA mutant
`ASKA mutant
`Kinase dead
`
`++ +++
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Live cells (% of day 2)
`
`c
`
`12
`10
`8
`6
`4
`2
`Days of BTK shRNA induction
`
`Cell
`DLBCL
`line
`subtype
`OCI-Ly3
`ABC
`HBL-1
`ABC
`TMD8
`ABC
`U2932
`ABC
`OCI-Ly10 ABC
`BJAB
`GCB
`OCI-Ly19
`GCB
`GCB
`SUDHL-6
`SUDHL-10
`GCB
`GCB
`SUDHL-4
`GCB
`OCI-Ly7
`
`CARD11
`status
`Mutant
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`Live cells (% of day 2)
`
`b
`
`BTK shRNA 1
`
`BTK shRNA 2
`
`ABC DLBCL
`
`GCB DLBCL
`
`Multiple
`myeloma
`
`CARD11
`Mutant
`
`OCI-Ly3
`
`OCI-Ly10
`
`OCI-Ly7
`
`OCI-Ly19
`
`KMS12
`
`H929
`
`WT
`
`WT
`
`WT
`
`WT
`
`WT
`
`012345
`
`–1
`
`(log2(shRNA uninduced/induced))
`
`shRNA bar-code depletion
`
`a
`
`Figure 1 | BTK is a critical kinase for survival of ABC DLBCL cells. a, RNA
`interference screen in lymphoma and multiple myeloma cell lines. An
`shRNA library targeting 442 kinases was screened in the indicated cell lines
`as described4. Shown is the selective toxicity of two BTK shRNAs after three
`weeks in culture. Results are shown as means 6 s.d. for four independent
`transductions. WT, wild type. b, Selective toxicity of a BTK shRNA for ABC
`DLBCLs with wild-type CARD11. DLBCL cell lines were infected with a
`retrovirus that expresses BTK shRNA 1 together with green fluorescent
`
`protein (GFP). Shown is the fraction of GFP-positive cells relative to the
`GFP-positive fraction on day 2. c, BTK kinase activity is required for survival
`of ABC DLBCL cells. OCI-Ly10 cells were transduced with cDNAs encoding
`wild-type or mutant BTK (kinase-dead allele or analogue-sensitive kinase
`allele (ASKA)29). Wild-type but not kinase-dead BTK rescued cells with
`endogenous BTK knockdown. The ASKA isoform-specific kinase inhibitor
`1-NM-PP1 (2 mM) killed cells bearing the BTK ASKA allele.
`
`was required for the rescue of ABC DLBCL lines from the toxicity of
`BTK knockdown (Fig. 1c).
`The role of BTK in BCR signalling prompted us to investigate the
`reliance of ABC DLBCLs on other BCR pathway components. A
`
`CD79A shRNA killed all four ABC DLBCL lines with wild-type
`CARD11 but not the line with mutant CARD11 or the GCB
`DLBCL lines (Fig. 2a). In contrast, a CARD11 shRNA killed all
`ABC DLBCL lines, and a control shRNA was non-toxic. In the line
`
`a
`
`shCD79A
`
`shSyk
`
`b
`
`shIgM
`
`10
`
`12
`
`2
`
`4
`
`8
`
`10
`
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`8
`10
`Control shRNA
`
`12
`
`2
`
`4
`6
`8
`10
`Days after transduction
`d
`
`12
`
`TMD8
`
`6
`shIg-κ
`
`DLBCL
`Cell
`subtype
`line
`ABC
`OCI-Ly3
`ABC
`HBL-1
`ABC
`TMD8
`U2932
`ABC
`OCI-Ly10 ABC
`GCB
`BJAB
`OCI-Ly19
`GCB
`SUDHL-6
`GCB
`SUDHL-10
`GCB
`HT
`GCB
`SUDHL-4
`GCB
`OCI-Ly7
`GCB
`
`CARD11
`status
`Mutant
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`WT
`
`2
`
`4
`6
`8
`Days after transduction
`
`10
`
`ABC DLBCL
`HBL-1
`
`OCI-Ly10
`
`GCB DLBCL
`BJAB
`
`ABC DLBCL
`GBC DLBCL
`Burkitt's lymphoma
`Mantle-cell lymphoma
`
`3 2 1 0
`
`f
`
`BCR clusters per cell
`
`ABC
`ABC
`ABC
`GCB
`
`10–2
`
`100
`10–1
`0
`BCR diffusion (mm2 s–1)
`
`0.05
`
`0.10
`
`0.15
`
`IgM
`
`Membrane
`
`OCI-Ly10
`TMD8
`HBL-1
`BJAB
`
`1.0
`0.9
`0.8
`0.7
`0.6
`0.5
`0.4
`0.3
`0.2
`0.1
`0
`10–4 10–3
`
`Cumulative probability
`
`e
`
`p-Akt
`
`Akt
`
`p-ERK
`
`ERK
`
`p-IκB-α
`IκB-α
`
`Actin
`
`CD79A
`
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`8
`shCARD11
`
`2
`
`4
`6
`8
`10
`Days after transduction
`
`12
`
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`Live cells (% of day 2)
`
`c
`
`ABC DLBCL
`cell line
`shCD79A
`induction
`
`TMD8
`+–
`
`HBL1
`–
`+
`
`OCI-Ly10
`–
`+
`
`Figure 2 | Chronic active BCR signalling in ABC DLBCL lines. a, Survival of
`DLBCL cell lines after shRNA-mediated knockdown of BCR signalling
`components CD79A, Syk and CARD11. b, Knockdown of immunoglobulin
`heavy or light chain is toxic for ABC DLBCLs with chronic active BCR
`signalling. c, Phosphoproteins in multiple signalling pathways depend on
`chronic active BCR signalling. The indicated ABC DLBCL cell lines were
`transduced with an shRNA targeting CD79A and phosphorylated, or total
`proteins were assessed by western blotting before and after shRNA induction
`
`for 48 h. d, Clustering of IgM in the plasma membrane was observed only in
`ABC DLBCL lines with chronic active BCR signalling, using TIRF
`microscopy. Plasma membrane density was revealed by membrane dye R18.
`e, Decreased diffusion of surface IgM in ABC DLBCL lines with chronic
`active BCR signalling compared with the GCB DLBCL line, as quantified by
`TIRF microscopy. f, Immobile BCR clusters are characteristic of lines
`representing ABC DLBCL but not other lymphoma types.
`
`©2010
`
`Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
`
`89
`
`

`
`LETTERS
`
`NATURE | Vol 463 | 7 January 2010
`
`HBL-1, the knockdown of surface CD79A expression by different
`shRNAs caused a proportional decrease in surface IgM, implying that
`the toxicity of CD79A knockdown was due to a loss of surface BCR
`(Supplementary Fig. 2a). CD79B shRNAs were also toxic to ABC
`DLBCLs, and the degree of CD79B knockdown was proportional
`to the decrease in surface BCR and to toxicity (Supplementary Fig.
`2b, c). To investigate the role of the immunoglobulin receptor, we
`developed shRNAs targeting IgM and Ig-k (Supplementary Fig. 3).
`These shRNAs were also selectively toxic to ABC DLBCLs with wild-
`type CARD11, establishing a direct role for immunoglobulin in this
`signalling (Fig. 2b).
`The NF-kB pathway is activated by BCR signalling in ABC DLBCLs
`because knockdown of BTK, CD79A, CD79B and CARD11 decreased
`the expression of NF-kB target genes and inhibited IKK (Supplemen-
`tary Fig. 4). BCR signalling also activates the phosphatidylinositol-3-
`OH kinase and ERK MAP kinase pathways in these cells, because
`CD79A knockdown inhibited phosphorylation of Akt and ERK in
`addition to IkB-a (Fig. 2c).
`A subsequent focused shRNA screen suggested that other BCR
`signalling components contribute to chronic active BCR signalling,
`including Syk, BLNK, phospholipase Cc2 and PKC-b (Supplemen-
`tary Fig. 5). A Syk shRNA killed two ABC DLBCL lines with wild-type
`CARD11 (HBL-1 and TMD8) but not two others (OCI-Ly10 and
`U2932), and also had no effect on OCI-Ly3 or GCB DLBCL lines
`(Fig. 2a), despite comparable knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 6a).
`Not only was OCI-Ly10 insensitive to Syk knockdown but it also died
`with ectopic expression of wild-type but not kinase-dead Syk
`(Supplementary Fig. 6b). A previous study with a Syk inhibitor,
`R406, concluded that most DLBCLs rely on tonic BCR signalling11.
`However, R406 killed Syk-independent GCB and ABC DLBCL lines
`(including OCI-Ly10), suggesting that its toxicity in these lines may
`be due to inhibition of other kinases and not BCR signalling
`(Supplementary Fig. 6c).
`We next used total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) micro-
`scopy to reveal BCRs on the surface of lymphoma lines. In normal
`mouse B cells, TIRF microscopy revealed that antigen exposure
`causes BCRs to form clusters with decreased diffusion, leading to
`BCR signalling12. All five ABC DLBCL lines had prominent BCR
`clusters that were not present in 16 other lines derived from GCB
`DLBCL, Burkitt’s lymphoma or mantle-cell lymphoma (Fig. 2d, f).
`BCR clusters were also observed in biopsies from three patients with
`ABC DLBCL (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Moreover, the BCRs in ABC
`DLBCLs diffused less rapidly than those in other lymphoma lines
`(Fig. 2e, f). We observed a correlation between BCR clusters and
`phosphotyrosine accumulation in ABC DLBCL lines, suggesting that
`these structures may be actively signalling (Supplementary Fig. 7b).
`Taken together, these findings establish a continuing requirement for
`proximal BCR signalling in ABC DLBCLs with wild-type CARD11.
`Because these lines also depend on CARD11, like antigen-activated
`normal B cells, we refer to this phenomenon as ‘chronic active’ BCR
`signalling. We wish to distinguish chronic active BCR signalling from
`‘tonic’ BCR signalling. Tonic BCR signalling promotes cell survival in
`all mature mouse B cells13,14, but mice deficient in CBM components
`have relatively normal numbers of mature follicular B cells15. It there-
`fore seems likely that CARD11 is not essential for tonic BCR signalling
`but is required for chronic active BCR signalling. Moreover, chronic
`active BCR signalling is characterized by BCR clustering, which is not
`observed in resting mouse B cells that depend on tonic BCR signalling12.
`To provide genetic evidence of BCR signalling in the pathogenesis
`of ABC DLBCL, we resequenced genes in the BCR pathway in DLBCL
`cell lines and biopsies. We identified missense mutations affecting the
`first tyrosine of the CD79B ITAM motif in two cell lines, HBL-1
`(Y196F) and TMD8 (Y196H) (Fig. 3a). Both lines were heterozygous
`for this mutation, but more than 90% of the CD79B messenger RNA
`in HBL-1 was derived from the mutant allele (data not shown). These
`mutations prompted us to resequence the CD79B ITAM region in
`225 DLBCL biopsies. In 18% (29 out of 161) of ABC DLBCLs, the
`
`90
`
`first ITAM tyrosine was replaced by a variety of amino acids as a
`result of point mutations; in one case, this residue was removed by a
`three-base-pair deletion (Fig. 3a, b). Less common were missense
`mutations in other ITAM residues and deletions that disrupted all
`or part of the motif. Of 64 GCB DLBCLs, only one had a mutation
`affecting the first ITAM tyrosine and one other had a different ITAM
`mutation (L199Q). Overall, the frequency of CD79B ITAM muta-
`tions was significantly higher in ABC DLBCL (21.1%) than in GCB
`DLBCL (3.1%) (P 5 8.9 3 1024). CD79B ITAM mutations were not
`present in 20 Burkitt’s lymphoma and 16 gastric mucosa-associated
`lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma biopsies. In six cases of ABC
`DLBCL, analysis of non-malignant
`tissue established that
`the
`CD79B mutations were somatically acquired by the malignant cells
`(Supplementary Fig. 8).
`The CD79A ITAM region of the ABC DLBCL line OCI-Ly10 has a
`splice-donor-site mutation16 causing an 18-amino-acid deletion that
`removes most of the ITAM, including the second tyrosine. Though
`OCI-Ly10 was heterozygous for this mutation, more than 90% of the
`CD79A mRNA was mutated (data not shown). One ABC DLBCL
`biopsy had a similar splice-site mutation and another had mutations
`that deleted the entire CD79A ITAM (Fig. 3a). CD79A mutations
`were rare among ABC DLBCLs, occurring in 2.9% (2 out of 68) of
`biopsies.
`In mouse B cells, mutations in the CD79A or CD79B ITAM
`tyrosine residues elevate surface BCR expression by inhibiting recep-
`tor internalization17. Indeed, GCB DLBCL cells reconstituted with
`CD79A or CD79B mutants derived from ABC DLBCLs had more
`surface IgM expression than cells with wild-type isoforms, but this
`was not true of CD79 ITAM mutations that were not observed in
`samples from patients (Fig. 3c). Similarly, ABC DLBCL cells recon-
`stituted with mutant CD79B had higher surface BCR expression than
`those reconstituted with wild-type CD79B (Fig. 3d). Interruption of
`chronic active BCR signalling with the kinase inhibitor dasatinib (see
`later) increased surface BCR expression in ABC DLBCL cells with
`wild-type but not mutant CD79B (Fig. 3d). Hence, one function of
`the CD79 mutations is to maintain surface BCR expression in the face
`of chronic active BCR signalling.
`We speculated that the CD79B mutations might be genetically
`selected in ABC DLBCLs for their ability to circumvent negative
`regulatory circuits that attenuate BCR signalling. Whereas several
`Src-family tyrosine kinases can initiate BCR signalling, Lyn is unique
`in mediating negative feedback on BCR signalling18. Indeed, Lyn-
`deficient mice succumb to an autoimmune disease that has been traced
`to BCR hyperactivity19. Lyn is required for BCR internalization20,21,
`suggesting that CD79 mutations might elevate surface BCR expression
`by inhibiting Lyn. To test this, we knocked down endogenous CD79B
`expression in HBL-1 and TMD8 cells, both of which harbour a CD79B
`mutation, and complemented them with exogenous wild-type or
`mutant CD79B complementary DNAs. Immunoprecipitation of Lyn
`followed by an in vitro kinase assay showed greater Lyn kinase activity
`in cells reconstituted with wild-type CD79B (Fig. 3e). These data sug-
`gest a model in which CD79B mutations are selected in ABC DLBCLs
`to attenuate negative autoregulation by Lyn during chronic active BCR
`signalling.
`The CD79 mutants are not loss-of-function mutants because they
`prevented death of ABC DLBCL cells caused by knockdown of endo-
`genous CD79 isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 9). However, the CD79
`mutants were not functionally superior to their wild-type counter-
`parts in this assay (Supplementary Fig. 9) and did not spontaneously
`activate NF-kB when introduced into GCB DLBCL cells, unlike
`CARD11 mutants5 (data not shown). We therefore propose that
`the CD79 ITAM mutations may be selected early in the genesis of
`the malignant clone, perhaps to allow it to respond abnormally well
`to a self or foreign antigen (Supplementary Fig. 10). In this regard it is
`notable that mutations that impair CD79A or CD79B ITAM function
`in mouse B cells lead to exaggerated antigenic responses17,22,23. Future
`research should investigate the potential role of antigenic stimulation
`
`©2010
`
`Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
`
`

`
`NATURE | Vol 463 | 7 January 2010
`
`LETTERS
`
`CD79B Y196 ITAM mutation
`CD79B ITAM deletion
`CD79B other ITAM mutation
`
`34/161
`
`2/64
`
`ABC
`DLBCL
`
`GCB
`DLBCL
`
`0/20
`0/16
`Burkitt's MALT
`
`a
`
`Y196H
`(10×)
`
`Y196D
`(4×)
`
`Y196C
`(5×)
`Y196S
`(2×)
`
`Y196N
`(6×)
`Y196F
`(3×)
`ΔY196
`(1×)
`
`b
`
`210
`193
`CD79B
`
`DHTYEGLDIDQTATYEDIDHTYEGLDIDQTATYEDI
`ITAM
`E197G
`L199Q
`(1×)
`(1×)
`H194Q; Δ195–197
`(1×)
`Δ205–229
`(1×)
`
`Δ196–229
`(1×)
`
`Δ193–229
`(1×)
`
`202
`185
`CD79A
`
`ENLYEGLNLDDCSMYEDIENLYEGLNLDDCSMYEDI
`ITAM
`
`Δ191–226
`(1×)
`
`Δ179–226
`(1×)
`
`Δ191–208
`(1×)
`
`10
`0
`Lymphoma
`Subtype
`
`100
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`CD79B mutation frequency (%)
`
`DMSO
`
`Dasatinib
`
`Dasatinib
`
`DMSO
`
`CD79B
`isoform
`Mutant
`Wild type
`
`2.0
`
`1.6
`
`1.2
`
`0.8
`
`0.4
`
`0
`
`Relative surface IgM (MFI)d
`
`Synthetic
`CD79B mutants
`
`CD79B Y207F
`(ITAM 2nd TYR
`mutation)
`CD79B WT
`
`CD79B Y207A
`(ITAM 2nd TYR
`mutation)
`CD79B WT
`
` 3
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 0
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
`Synthetic
`CD79A mutants
`
`CD79A YY190/201FF
`(ITAM TYR mutations)
`CD79A WT
`
`CD79A Y212F
`(BLNK binding
`mutation)
`CD79A WT
`
`ABC DLBCL
`CD79B mutants
`
`CD79B Y196H
`(ABC DLBCL 482)
`CD79B WT
`
`CD79B Y196C
`(ABC DLBCL 428)
`CD79B WT
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 0
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
`CD79B Y196F
`(ABC DLBCL 538/
`HBL-1)
`CD79B WT
`
`CD79B E197G
`(ABC DLBCL 687)
`CD79B WT
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 0
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 0
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
`ABC DLBCL
`CD79A mutants
`
`CD79A Δ179–226
`(ABC DLBCL 676)
`CD79A WT
`
`CD79A Δ191–208
`(OCI-Ly10)
`CD79A WT
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
` 0
`
` 3
`
` 2
`
` 1
`
`c
`
`log10(Surface IgM)
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 0
` 0
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
`CD79B reconstitution
`WT Y196F WT Y196F WT Y196F WT Y196F
`
`Expt 2
`Expt 1
`HBL-1
`
`Expt 2
`Expt 1
`TMD8
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`CD79B cells)
`
`Lyn kinase activity (% WT
`
` 0
` 0
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 0
` 0
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
`CD79B reconstitution
`WT
`Y196F
`–
`+
`
`+
`
`–
`
`e
`
`IP
`Lyn
`
`ATP
`WB
`p-Tyr
`(4G10)
`
`WB
`Lyn
`
` 0
` 0
` 0
` 3
` 2
` 1
` 0
`Retroviral/CD79A RNA (log10(CD8))
`
`CD79B
`reconstitution
`WT Y196F
`
`In vitro
`kinase
`
`Flag–CD79B
`
`Actin
`
`Figure 3 | CD79A and CD79B ITAM mutations in ABC DLBCL. a, CD79B
`and CD79A ITAM mutations in DLBCL biopsies and lines (case number in
`parenthesis). b, CD79B ITAM mutation frequencies in lymphoma biopsies.
`c, Mutant CD79A and CD79B isoforms increase surface IgM. The GCB
`DLBCL line BJAB was reconstituted with either wild-type or mutant
`CD79A/B proteins. Surface IgM is depicted relative to CD79 RNA levels,
`estimated with bicistronic expression of CD8. ‘Synthetic’ mutants were not
`observed in patient samples. d, CD79B mutations prevent downmodulation
`of surface BCR by BCR signalling. The ABC DLBCL line HBL-1 was
`reconstituted with wild-type or Y196H mutant CD79B and treated for 24 h
`
`with dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) or dasatinib, a BCR signalling inhibitor.
`Surface IgM (mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) is depicted relative to the
`levels in cells with wild-type CD79B treated with DMSO. Results are shown
`as means 6 s.e.m. for two experiments. e, CD79B mutations inhibit Lyn
`kinase activity in ABC DLBCLs. The indicated ABC DLBCL lines were
`reconstituted with wild-type or Y196F mutant CD79B. Lyn kinase activity in
`immunoprecipitates (IP) was estimated by densitometric analysis of western
`blots (WB) as phospho-Lyn (using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10)
`relative to total Lyn.
`
`b
`
`ABC DLBCL
`cell line
`
`HBL-1
`
`TMD8
`
`OCI-Ly10
`
`0 1 2 4
`
`0 0.5 1 2 4
`
`0 0.5 1 2 4
`
`Dasatinib
`Rx (h)
`p-IκB-α
`IκB-α
`p-Akt
`p-ERK
`Akt
`ERK
`p-Lyn
`Lyn
`
`p-Tyrosine
`
`β-Actin
`
`0
`
`3.12
`
`25
`12.5
`6.25
`PCI-32765 (nM)
`
`50
`
`100
`
`Chronic active
`BCR signalling
`
`–+++ ––
`
`DLBCL
`subtype
`ABC
`ABC
`ABC
`ABC
`GCB
`GCB
`
`OCI-Ly10
`HBL1
`TMD8
`OCI-Ly3
`BJAB
`OCI-Ly19
`
`120
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`12.5
`
`50
`25
`200
`100
`Dasatinib (nM)
`
`400
`
`800
`
`0
`
`1.56 3.12 6.25 12.5 25
`IKK-β inhibitor (µM)
`
`a
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Live cells (% of control)
`
`Figure 4 | Therapeutic strategies to target chronic active BCR signalling.
`a, Viability of DLBCL lines assessed by assay with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-
`yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) after four days of treatment
`with various doses of dasatinib, the BTK inhibitor PCI-32765 (compound 13
`
`in ref. 25) or an IKK-b inhibitor27. b, Effect of dasatinib on phosphoprotein
`levels in ABC DLBCL cells. Three ABC DLBCL lines were treated with 50 nM
`dasatinib for the indicated durations and analysed by western blotting. Rx,
`treatment.
`
`©2010
`
`Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
`
`91
`
`

`
`LETTERS
`
`NATURE | Vol 463 | 7 January 2010
`
`in chronic active BCR signalling and in the spontaneous BCR
`clustering that characterizes ABC DLBCLs. BCR clustering does
`not depend on the CD79B mutations (Supplementary Fig. 11), sug-
`gesting that other mechanisms contribute to this aspect of chronic
`active BCR signalling.
`We considered therapeutic strategies to exploit chronic active BCR
`signalling in ABC DLBCL. Dasatinib, a kinase inhibitor approved for
`the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia, inhibits Src-family
`kinases and BTK24. Dasatinib killed ABC DLBCL lines that rely on
`chronic active BCR signalling but not the BCR-independent line
`OCI-Ly3 or GCB DLBCL lines (Fig. 4a). A selective BTK inhibitor,
`PCI-32765 (ref. 25), was also selectively toxic to cell lines with
`chronic active BCR signalling (Fig. 4a). By contrast, all ABC
`DLBCL lines were sensitive to an IKK-b inhibitor. In BCR-dependent
`lines, dasatinib decreased the phosphorylation of IkB-a, Akt, ERK
`and Lyn, as well as total protein tyrosine phosphorylation and IKK
`activity (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 12). Dasatinib toxicity may
`therefore be due to NF-kB inhibition, which causes apoptosis, and
`Akt/mTOR inhibition, which causes ‘metabolic catastrophe’26.
`Indeed, rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, synergized with an IKK-b
`inhibitor in killing ABC DLBCL lines with chronic active BCR signal-
`ling (Supplementary Fig. 13). Our studies suggest that the position of
`molecular lesions in the BCR and NF-kB signalling pathways could be
`used to guide the therapy of ABC DLBCL. ABC DLBCLs with wild-
`type CARD11 and chronic active BCR signalling might respond to a
`BTK inhibitor, such as PCI-32765, and possibly to inhibitors of
`Src-family kinases, PKC-b or Syk,
`in some cases. By contrast,
`CARD11-mutant tumours would need to be treated with agents
`that target downstream components of the NF-kB pathway such as
`IKK27. A precise delineation of which ABC DLBCL cases depend on
`chronic active BCR signalling awaits the development of predictive
`biomarkers and the results of clinical trials involving BCR signalling
`inhibitors.
`
`METHODS SUMMARY
`Cell lines possessing the ecotropic retroviral receptor and the tetracycline repressor
`were generated and used in RNA interference library screening, shRNA toxicity
`assays and cDNA complementation studies as described4. DLBCL cell lines were
`assigned to the ABC or GCB subtypes by gene expression profiling4 (Sup-
`plementary Fig. 14). shRNA screening results are given in Supplementary Tables
`1 and 3, and shRNA sequences are listed in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. Specific
`shRNA-mediated mRNA and protein knockdown was documented (Fig. 2c and
`Supplementary Figs 6a and 15). IKK reporter lines were engineered to express an
`IkB-a–Photinus luciferase fusion and Renilla luciferase27. TIRF imaging of the BCR
`was based on techniques described previously12.
`Tumour biopsies were obtained before treatment from patients with de novo
`DLBCL28, gastric MALT lymphoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma. All samples were
`studied in accordance with a protocol approved by the National Cancer Institute
`Institutional Review Board.
`
`Full Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of
`the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
`
`Received 18 April; accepted 4 November 2009.
`
`9. Davis, R. E., Brown, K. D., Siebenlist, U. & Staudt, L. M. Constitutive nuclear factor
`kB activity is required for survival of activated B cell-like diffuse large B cell
`lymphoma cells. J. Exp. Med. 194, 1861–1874 (2001).
`10. Dal Porto, J. M. et al. B cell antigen receptor signaling 101. Mol. Immunol. 41,
`599–613 (2004).
`11. Chen, L. et al. SYK-dependent tonic B-cell receptor signaling is a rational
`treatment target in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 111, 2230–2237 (2008).
`12. Tolar, P., Hanna, J., Krueger, P. D. & Pierce, S. K. The constant region of the
`membrane immunoglobulin mediates B cell-receptor clustering and signaling in
`response to membrane antigens. Immunity 30, 44–55 (2009).
`13. Lam, K. P., Kuhn, R. & Rajewsky, K. In vivo ablation of surface immunoglobulin on
`mature B cells by inducible gene targeting results in rapid cell death. Cell 90,
`1073–1083 (1997).
`14. Kraus, M., Alimzhanov, M. B., Rajewsky, N. & Rajewsky, K. Survival of resting
`mature B lymphocytes depends on BCR signaling via the Iga/b heterodimer. Cell
`117, 787–800 (2004).
`15. Thome, M. CARMA1, BCL-10 and MALT1 in lymphocyte development and
`activation. Nature Rev. Immunol. 4, 348–359 (2004).
`16. Gordon, M. S., Kanegai, C. M., Doerr, J. R. & Wall, R. Somatic hypermutation of the
`B cell receptor genes B29 (Igb, CD79b) and mb1 (Iga, CD79a). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.
`USA 100, 4126–4131 (2003).
`17. Gazumyan, A., Reichlin, A. & Nussenzweig, M. C. Igb tyrosine residues contribute
`to the control of B cell receptor signaling by regulating receptor internalization.
`J. Exp. Med. 203, 1785–1794 (2006).
`18. Gauld, S. B. & Cambier, J. C. Src-family kinases in B-cell development and
`signaling. Oncogene 23, 8001–8006 (2004).
`19. Chan, V. W., Meng, F., Soriano, P., DeFranco, A. L. & Lowell, C. A. Characterization
`of the B lymphocyte populations in Lyn-deficient mice and the role of Lyn in signal
`initiation and down-regulation. Immunity 7, 69–81 (1997).
`20. Niiro, H. et al. The B lymphocyte adaptor molecule of 32 kilodaltons (Bam32)
`regulates B cell antigen receptor internalization. J. Immunol. 173, 5601–5609
`(2004).
`21. Ma, H. et al. Visualization of Syk-antigen receptor interactions using green
`fluorescent protein: differential roles for Syk and Lyn in the regulation of receptor
`capping and internalization. J. Immunol. 166, 1507–1516 (2001).
`22. Kraus, M., Saijo, K., Torres, R. M. & Rajewsky, K. Ig-a cytoplasmic truncation
`renders immature B cells more sensitive to antigen contact. Immunity 11, 537–545
`(1999).
`23. Torres, R. M. & Hafen, K. A negative regulatory role for Ig-a during B cell
`development. Immunity 11, 527–536 (1999).
`24. Hantschel, O. et al. The Btk tyrosine kinase is a major target of the Bcr-Abl
`inhibitor dasatinib. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13283–13288 (2007).
`25. Pan, Z. et al. Discovery of selective irreversible inhibitors for Bruton’s tyrosine
`kinase. ChemMedChem 2, 58–61 (2007).
`26. Jin, S., DiPaola, R. S., Mathew, R. & White, E. Metabolic catastrophe as a means to
`cancer cell death. J. Cell Sci. 120, 379–383 (2007).
`27. Lam, L. T. et al. Small molecule inhibitors of IkB-kinase are selectively toxic for
`subgroups of diffuse large B cell lymphoma defined by gene expression profiling.
`Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 28–40 (2005).
`28. Lenz, G. et al. Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med.
`359, 2313–2323 (2008).
`29. Blethrow, J., Zhang, C., Shokat, K. M. & Weiss, E. L. Design and use of analog-
`sensitive protein kinases. Curr. Protocols Mol. Biol. Unit 18.11, doi:10.1002/
`0471142727.mb1811s66 (2004).
`
`Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at
`www.nature.com/nature.
`
`Acknowledgements We thank L. Honigberg for PCI-32765, L. Dang for IKK-b
`inhibitors, S. Ansher for dasatinib, and S. Tohda for the TMD8 cell line. This
`research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National
`Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute, the Center for Cancer Research,
`the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the National Human
`Genome Research Institute. P.B.R. was a Howard Hughes Medical
`Institute-National Institutes of Health Research Scholar.
`
`Author Contributions R.E.D., V.N.N., G.L., P.T., R.M.Y., P.B.R., H.K., L.L. and A.L.S.
`designed and performed experiments. H.Z., Y.Y. and W.X. performed experiments.
`G.W., W.X. and J.P. analysed data. J.J. and C.J.T. synthesized reagents. A.R., G.O.,
`H.K.M.-H., R.D.G., J.M.C., N.A.J., L.M.R., E.C., E.S.J., W.H.W., J.D., E.B.S., R.I.F.,
`R.M.B., R.R.T., J.R.C., D.D.W. and W.C.C. supplied samples from patients and
`reviewed pathological and clinical data. S.K.P. supervised research. L.M.S. designed
`and supervised research and wrote the manuscript.
`
`Author Information Gene expression profiling data have been deposited in the
`Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE18

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket