throbber
J. Med. Chem. 1990,33, 21-31
`21
`( f )-cis - [ 3- (5,7-Diamino-3H- 1,2,3-triazolo[ 4,5- d Ipyrimi-
`(B+); IR (KBr) 3600-3000 (NH2, OH), 1750,1600 cm-' (C=C,
`din-3-yl)cyclopentyl]carbinol (1 lb). Compound 9b (268 mg,
`253 nm in 0.1 N HCl; NMR (dimethyl-d8 sulf-
`C=N); UV A,,
`oxide) 6 11.05-10.95 (s, 1 H, 7-OH, DzO exchangeable), 7.10-6.90
`1 mmol) was processed as described for 9a to yield 220 mg of 1 lb
`(br, 2 H, NHz, DzO exchangeable), 4.95-4.80 (m, 1 H, H-l'),
`(88%), which was recrystallized from ethanol-water (1:2) to afford
`4.70-4.50 (br, 1 H, CHzOH, DzO exchangeable), 3.50-3.40 (d, 2
`pink-white crystals: mp 223-225 "C; MS (30 eV, 250 "C) m/e
`249 (M'), 218 (M+ - 31), 151 (B'); IR (KBr) 3600-3100 (NHz,
`H, CHzOH), 2.32-1.55 (m, 7 H, H-4', CHzCHz, CHH'). Anal.
`OH), 1700,1600 cm-' (C=C, C=N); UV A,
`253,283 nm in 0.1
`(CloH1~N602*1.25H20) C, H, N.
`(*)-cis -[ 4 4 5,7-Diamino-3H- 1 ,2,3-triazolo[ 4,5-d]pyrimi-
`N HCl; NMR (dimethyl-d, sulfoxide) 6 7.85-7.25 (br, 2 H, NHz,
`din-3-yl)-2-cyclopentenyl]carbinol(l la). Compound 9a (267
`D20 exchangeable), 6.50-6.30 (s, 2 H, NHz, D20 exchangeable),
`4.95-4.85 (m, 1 H, H-l'), 4.65-4.60 (t, 1 H, CHzOH, DzO ex-
`mg, 1 mmol) was processed as described for compound 6a with
`changeable), 3.50-3.40 (d, 2 H, CH20H), 2.35-1.60 (m, 7 H, H-4',
`a reaction time of 20 h at 60 "C. The residual mixture was
`absorbed onto silica gel (2 g); it was packed into a column (2.0
`CHzCHz, CHH'). Anal. (CloHl,N70) C, H, N.
`X 10 cm) and eluted by CHC13-MeOH (151) to yield lla as white
`Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Public
`crystals, 204 mg (83%). The crude product was recrystallized
`Health Service Grant CA23263 from the National Cancer
`from ethanol-water (2:l) to yield lla: mp 240-242 "C dec; MS
`(30 eV, 240 "C) mle 247 (M+), 229 (M+ - 18), 217 (M+ - 30), 151
`Institute. We gratefully acknowledge the valuable assis-
`(B+); IR (KBr) 3600-3100 (NHz, OH), 1700, 1650, 1600 cm-'
`tance of J a y Brownell.
`(C=O, C=C, C=N); UV A,,
`253,283 nm in 0.1 N HCl; NMR
`(dimethyl-d6 sulfoxide) 6 7.80-7.20 (br, 2 H, NHz, D20 ex-
`Registry No. la, 61865-50-7; lb, 65898-98-8; 2a, 122624-72-0;
`changeable), 6.50-6.30 (s,2 H, NH2, D20 exchangeable), 6.15-6.10
`2b, 78795-20-7; 3a, 122624-73-1; 3b, 122624-74-2; 4a, 122624-75-3;
`and 5.95-5.90 (dd, 2 H, CH=CH vinyl, J = 5.0 Hz), 5.65-5.55
`4b, 122624-76-4; 5a, 122624-77-5; 5b, 12262478-6; 6a, 118237-87-9;
`6b, 118237-86-8; 7a, 118353-05-2; 7b, 11291500-1; 8a, 118237-88-0;
`(m, 1 H, H-l'), 4.75-4.65 (t, 1 H, CHzOH, D20 exchangeable),
`8b, 120330-36-1; 9a, 122624-79-7; 9b, 12262480-0; loa, 12262481-1;
`3.55-3.40 (m, 2 H, CH20H), 2.95-2.85 (m, 1 H, H-49, 2.65-2.55
`lob, 122624-82-2; 1 la, 122624-83-3; 1 lb, 122624-71-9; 2-amino-
`(m, 1 H, CH"), 1.90-1.80 (m, 1 H, CHH?. Anal. (CloH13N7-
`O-HzO) C, H, N.
`4,6-dichloropyrimidine, 56-05-3; p-chloroaniline, 106-47-8.
`
`Inhibitors of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. 1.
`trans -6-(2-Pyrrol- l-ylethyl)-4-hydroxypyran-2-ones, a Novel Series of HMG-CoA
`Reductase Inhibitors. 1. Effects of Structural Modifications at the 2- and
`5-Positions of the Pyrrole Nucleus
`
`B. D. Roth,* D. F. Ortwine,* M. L. Hoefle, C. D. Stratton, D. R. Sliskovic, M. W. Wilson, and R. S. Newton
`Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Warner-Lambert Company, 2800 Plymouth Road,
`Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105. Received January 25, 1989
`A novel series of trans-6-(2-pyrrol-l-ylethyl)-4-hydroxypyran-2-ones and their dihydroxy acid derivatives were prepared
`and evaluated for their ability to inhibit the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase in vitro. A systematic study of substitution
`at the 2- and 5-positions of the pyrrole ring revealed that optimum potency was realized with the 2-(4-fluoro-
`phenyl)-&isopropyl derivative 8x (Table In), which possessed 30% of the in vitro activity of the potent fungal metabolite
`compactin (I). A molecular modeling analysis led to the description of a pharmacophore model characterized by
`(A) length limits of 5.9 and 3.3 8, for the 2- and 5-substituenta, respectively, as well as an overall width limit of 10.6
`8, across the pyrrole ring from the 2- to the 5-substituent and (B) an orientation of the ethyl(ene) bridge to the
`4-hydroxypyran-2-one ring nearly perpendicular to the planes of the parent pyrrole, hexahydronaphthalene, and
`phenyl rings of the structures examined (Figure 3,O = 80-110"). Attempts to more closely mimic compactin's polar
`isobutyric ester side chain with the synthesis of 2-phenylpyrroles containing polar phenyl substituents resulted in
`analogues (Table 111, 8m-p) with equal or slightly reduced potencies when compared to the 2-[(unsubstituted or
`4-fluoro)phenyl]pyrroles, supporting the hypothesis that inhibitory potency is relatively insensitive to side-chain
`polarity or charge distribution in this area.
`The discovery that the fungal metabolites compactin (I)'
`and mevinolin (11)2 are not only potent inhibitors of the
`enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR), the rate-limiting
`enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis, b u t are also effective
`hypocholesterolemic agents in man3 has led t o a plethora
`
`of publications describing synthetic and biological studies
`of close structural analogue^.^
`
`(1) (a) Endo, A.; Kuroda, M.; Tsujita, Y. J. Antibiot. 1976, 1346-8.
`(b) Endo, A,; Kuroda, Y.; Tanzawa, K. FEBS Lett. 1976, 72(2),
`323-6. (c) Brown, A. G.: Smale. T. C.: King. T. J.: Hassen-
`kamp, R.; Thompson, R.' H. J. Chem. Soc.,?'erkin' Trans. 1
`1976, 1165-9.
`(a) Endo, A. J. Antibiot. 1979, 32, 852. (b) Alberts, A.; Chen,
`J.; Kuron, G.; Hunt, V.; Huff, J.; Hoffman, C.; Rothrock, J.;
`Lopez, M.; Joshua, H.; Harris, E.; Pachett, A.; Monaghan, R.;
`Currie, S.; Stapley, E.; Albers-Schonberg, G.; Hensens, 0.;
`Hirshfield, J.; Hoogsteen, K.; Liesch, J.; Springer, J. R o c .
`Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77(7), 3957-61.
`(a) Therapeutic response to Lovastatin (Mevinolin) in Non-
`Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1986,256,
`2829. (b) Vega, L.; Grundy, S. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1987,
`257(1), 33-38 and references contained therein.
`
`I: R = H (compactin)
`CHJ
`I11
`11: R = CH3 (mevinolin)
`T h e disclosure of a series of very potent 6-(o-bi-
`phenyly1)-substituted 4-hydroxypyran-2-ones (111) by
`Willard et al.5 led us to hypothesize that the key structural
`
`(4) For a review, see: Rosen, T.; Heathcock, C. Tetrahedron 1986,
`42 (18), 4909-51.
`
`0022-2623/90/1833-0021$02.50/0
`0 1989 American Chemical Society
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 1 of 11
`
`

`
`22 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1
`
`Both et al.
`
`Scheme Io
`Method A
`RICOCH=CHz + RzCHO a R1COCHZCH2CORz
`
`Scheme 11"
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`-
`
`Rlw 2 R
`
`3
`
`a(method A) L
`i - k (mhod C)
`
`CN
`I
`X
`I
`
`5
`
`CHO
`I
`X
`I
`J
`6
`f
`
`e
`
`
`
`z
`
`
`
`1
`\
`
`Method B
`
`b c
`3
`R ~ C O C H ~ C O Z C H ~
`a (a) 3-Benzyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazolium chloride,
`Et3N, 70 OC. (b) NaH, RICOCHzBr. (c) NaOH, CH30H.
`
`d, c (method 6 )
`
`feature possessed by all of these agents was a large lipo-
`philic group held in a particular spatial relationship with
`respect to the 4-hydroxypyran-2-one moiety. Indeed, ex-
`amination of CPK models of these inhibitors suggested
`that the ortho phenyl ring might occupy the same space
`as the isobutyric ester moiety of compactin and mevinolin.
`This hypothesis is supported by the 100-fold loss in po-
`tency found on hydrolysis of the isobutyric ester group?
`as well as the suggestion by Nakamura and Abeles that
`this portion of mevinolin fits into a lipophilic pocket in
`the active site of HMGR normally occupied by coenzyme
`A.'
`If this were true, then any connecting group that
`served to hold the lactone and the lipophilic moiety in the
`correct spatial relationship might be sufficient for potent
`inhibition. To investigate this, we selected the pyrrole ring
`as the anchor for various connecting groups, since there
`appeared to be sufficient synthetic methodology to allow
`for the simultaneous introduction of a variety of 2- and
`5-substituents. By varying the steric and electronic
`properties of these substituents, modifying the connecting
`group, and employing a molecular modeling analysis, we
`hoped to discern, at least in part, the optimal spatial re-
`lationship between the lipophilic group and the 4-
`hydroxypyran-2-one moiety and use this information in
`the design of potent HMGR inhibitors.
`We herein present our initial investigations into this
`series of inhibitors that define the structure-activity re-
`lationships at the 2- and 5-positions of the pyrrole nucleus
`and in the connecting group to the lactone ring. Also
`reported is the molecular modeling study and associated
`pharmacophore model, which describe conformational
`requirements of the side chain and steric requirements at
`the 2- and 5-positions of the pyrrole ring.
`Chemistry
`Our general synthetic strategy entailed the preparation
`of a suitable 1,4-diketone (3, Table I), either by the thia-
`zolium salt chemistry developed by Stetter (Scheme I,
`method A)8 or by alkylation of a @-keto ester with an a-halo
`ketone followed by hydrolysis and decarboxylation (me-
`thod B). The Stetter reaction proved to be the more
`versatile and generally higher yielding of the two. Paal-
`Knorr cyclization with 3-aminopropionitrile or an w-amino
`acetal provided the pyrroles in good yield (Scheme 11).
`The one exception was 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-5,5-dimethyl-
`
`(a) Willard. A.: Novello. F.: Hoffman. W.: Craeoe. E. USP
`4459422. (b) Stokker, G.; Hoffman, W.; Aibert; A:; Cragoe,
`E.; Deana, A.; Gilfillan, J.; Huff, J.; Novello, F.; Prugh, J.;
`Smith, R.; Willard, A. J. Med. Chem. 1985,28, 347-358. (c)
`Stokker, G. E.; Alberts, A. W.; Anderson, P. S.; Cragoe, E. J.;
`Deana, A. A.; Gilfillan, J. L.; Hirshfield, J.; Holtz, W. J.;
`Hoffman, W. F.; Huff, J. W.; Lee, T. J.; Novello, F. C.; Prugh,
`J. D.; Rooney, C. S.; Smith, R. L.; Willard, A. K. J. Med. Chem.
`1986,29, 17C-181.
`Endo, A. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 401-5.
`Nakamura, C.; Abeles, R. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 1364-76.
`(a) Stetter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976,15,639. (b)
`Stetter, H.; Kuhlmann, H. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 2890. (c)
`Stetter, H.; Schreckenberg, M. Chem. Ber. 1974,107,2453. (d)
`Stetter, H.; Kuhlmann, H. Synthesis 1975, 379.
`
`HO-0
`
`HO,,,-O
`
`9
`8
`7
`"(a) H,N-X-CN, HOAc, reflux. (b) DIBAL-H, toluene, -78 "C.
`(c) aqueous HCl. (d) HzN-X-CH(OEt)2, toluene, cat. p-TSA, re-
`flux. (e) -CH2CO-CHCH3CH3, THF, -78 OC. (0 n-Bu3B, NaBH,,
`-78 "C.
`(9) HzOZ, OH-.
`(h) Toluene, reflux.
`(i) HzN-X-OH,
`HOAc. 6 ) CH3S02C1, pyr. (k) KCN, DMF-H20, 100 "C.
`
`Scheme I11
`
`HO-0
`
`8U
`
`Scheme IV
`
`HO-0
`
`8v
`
`8k n, P
`81, rn, o
`hexane-1,4-dione (3q), which was extremely resistant to
`cyclization. After considerable experimentation, it was
`found that treatment with ethanolamine in acetic acid
`resulted in an exothermic reaction from which the pyrrole
`was isolated in 84% yield. Mesylation and displacement
`with potassium cyanide in DMF/H20 afforded the re-
`quisite nitrile. Reduction of the nitriles 5 with DIBAL-H
`produced the desired aldehydes 6 in good yields (Table 11).
`Condensation of 6 with the dianion of methyl or ethyl
`acetoacetate under the conditions of Weilerg afforded the
`corresponding alcohols 7. Sih et a1.I0 reported the re-
`duction of a related 6-hydroxy-@-keto ester in their syn-
`thesis of compactin in which little stereoselectivity (2:l
`erythro:threo) was found employing either sodium or zinc
`borohydride. We, and others,5b have found excellent se-
`lectivity (>10:1 erythro:threo) employing the procedure
`of Narasaka and Pai," in which 7 was complexed with a
`trialkylborane prior to treatment with borohydride at low
`temperature. The resultant boronate was hydrolyzed with
`
`(9) Huckin. S. N.: Weiler. L. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1974. 96.
`1082-1087.
`(10) Wang. N. Y.: Hsu. C. T.: Sih. C. J. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1981.
`' 103, z538-6539. '
`(11) (a) Narasaka, K.; Pai, H. C. Chem. Lett. 1980, 1415-1418. (b)
`Ibid. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2233-2238.
`
`I
`
`,
`
`
`
`I
`
`,
`
`
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`
`Inhibitors of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. 1
`- 4 1
`
`J o u r n a l of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1 23
`
`n
`
`Table 11. 2,fi-Disubstituted Pyrrol-1-yl Carbox- or Benzaldehydes
`
` %
`
`O n
`
`-8
`
`-8
`
`- 7
`
`-6
`
`-5
`
`I
`-1
`
`Figure 1. Correlation between CSI a n d COR ICm's.
`
`LOG COR IC50
`
`Table I. Substituted 1,4-Diketones
`RICOCH2CH2COR2
`3
`
`R,
`
`no.
`3aEb Ph
`3b
`4-FCeH4
`3~
`4-PhCeH4
`3dac 4-ClCeH4
`4-CH30C6H4
`3eh
`3f
`3-F3CCeH4
`3g
`3-CH3OCeH4
`3h
`2-CH3OCeH4
`3i
`2-naphthyl
`3j
`1-naphthyl
`3k
`
`A &-
`A
`
`3'
`3m"
`3~
`30
`3p
`3q
`3r
`38
`3t
`3~
`
`cyclohexyl
`PhzCH
`4-FCeHL
`4-FCiH;
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCBH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`
`% yield"
`(Drocedure)
`
`R,
`
`bp
`(mmHd. "C
`100 (0.1)
`46-8
`109-112
`116-8 (1.0)
`b
`b
`143-5 (0.2)
`133-5 (1.0)
`87-8
`105 (0.1)
`114-6 (1.0)
`
`b
`
`110 (4)
`b
`b
`133-5 (1.0)
`108-9 (0.2)
`132-3 (0.2)
`b
`132-5 (1.0)
`150-5 (0.1)
`b
`
`X
`THO
`
`Rl&* \ I
`
`6
`
`R1
`
`I-FCeH,
`
`4-FCeH4
`
`4-FCeH4
`
`R2
`
`% yieldnrb
`(method)
`
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeHd
`Ph
`4-PhCeH4
`4-CH3OCeH4
`4-C1C&
`3-F&H4
`3-CH3OCeH4
`2-CH3OCeH4
`2-naphthyl
`1-naphthyl
`
`cyclohexyl LB
`4
`
`PhzCH
`4-FCsH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCeH4
`4-FCaHA
`
`no.
`
`X
`
`6d
`-CH2CHzCHz-
`6e -CH(CH3)CHz-
`6f
`-CHZCHz-
`6g
`-CHZCHz-
`6h
`-CHpCHz-
`6i
`-CHzCHz-
`6j
`-CHzCH2-
`6k
`-CH2CH2-
`61
`-CHPCHp-
`6m
`-CHzCHz-
`6n
`-CHzCH2-
`60
`-CHzCHz-
`-CH&HZ-
`6p
`6q
`-CHzCHp-
`
`6r
`
`-CHzCHz-
`
`6s
`-CHzCHz-
`6t
`-CHzCHz-
`6~
`-CHZCHz-
`6~
`-CHzCHz-
`6~
`-CHzCHz-
`-CHZCHz-
`6 s
`6y
`-CHZCHz-
`62
`-CHzCHz-
`6aa
`-CHzCH2-
`6bb
`-CHzCH2-
`~ C C -CHzCHz-
`6dd
`-CH,CH,-
`6ee
`-CH;CHi-
`6ff
`-CH,CHI-
`6gg
`-CH,CH;-
`6hh -CHzCH2-
`6ii
`-CH2CHz-
`
`32
`b
`CHiCH;);
`2,4-F&H3
`3aa
`138-141 (0.2)
`CH(CH&
`2-CH30C6H4
`68 (B)
`3bb
`160-2 (2)
`2,6-(CH3O)zCeH3 CH(CH3)Z
`All spectral data were consistent with assigned structures.
`Purified by silica gel chromatography.
`
`aqueous peroxide and base.'* The dihydroxy acids were
`then lactonized by refluxing in toluene with azeotropic
`removal of water. Generally, the lactones were crystalline,
`such that the small amounts of the cis ladone stereoisomer
`9 present were easily removed by recrystallization, pro-
`viding >95% of the racemic trans stereoisomer (8). The
`conversion of 8u to 8v was accomplished by hydrogenation
`over Pd-C at 1 atm (Scheme 111). Finally, the phenol
`analogues 8k, 8h, and 8p were prepared from the corre-
`
`~~~~~
`
`Isolated yields after chromatography on silica gel. bAll compounds
`possessed 'H NMR spectra in accord with assigned structure (aldehydic
`proton, singlet, 6 8.95-9.65). eMp 70-3 "C. dMp 104-6 "C. Anal. C,
`H, N. 'Mp 105-7 "C. Anal. C, H, N.
`sponding methyl ethers Si, Sm, and 80 by BBr,-mediated
`demethylation (Scheme IV).13
`Biological Results
`The target lactones (8, Table 111) were saponified and
`tested for their ability to inhibit HMGR employing two
`protocols. Method 114 (cholesterol synthesis inhibition
`screen, or CSI) measured the rate of conversion of [14C]-
`
`(12) A detailed examination of this reaction has appeared: Ka-
`thawala, F.; Prager, B.; Prasad, K.; Repic, 0.; Shapiro, M.;
`Stabler, R.; Widler, L. Helu. Chirn. Acta 1986, 69, 803-5.
`
`(13) McOmie, J.; Watts, M.; West, D. Tetrahedron 1968,24, 2289.
`(14) Dugan, R.; Slakey, L.; Briedis, A.; Porter, J. Arch. Biochim.
`Biophys. 1972, 152, 21-7.
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`
`24 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1
`
`Roth et ai
`
`I
`
`60 00 100 120 140 100 180 200 220 240 200 280 300 320 340 300
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`COMPO
`
`- I
`----. 0cc
`
`-
`
`ANGLE
`
`-
`
`I11
`t ~ h a 0e (R
`t*-+ ann
`?+?Ex 0 x
`
`isomeP1
`
`Obb
`-*-
`0e IS isomer1
`0t lend01
`+*-c 0"
`
`tt-• 0f
`cf+ 0t lex01
`i i 4 i t a z
`Figure 2. cAMsE9-n energies calculated for comparahle orientations of the lactone side chain. Dashed lines represent less potent analogues
`(8j, 82,8bb, 8cc, and 8nn; CSI ICm > 5 rM).
`acetate to cholesterol employing a crude liver homogenate
`derived from rats fed a chow diet containing 5% chole-
`styramine. Method II', (CoA reductase inhibition screen,
`or COR) was a more specific screen employing a partially
`purified microsomal enzyme preparation to measure the
`direct conversion of o,b[W]HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid.
`The biological activities are reported as IC, values and
`as a ratio to compactin, which was employed as the internal
`standard in each testing protocol. Compactin consistently
`displayed an IC,, between 0.02 and 0.03 pM. The IC,
`values from the two assays were moderately correlated (eq
`1,'6 Figure 1).
`log (IC50, COR) = 0.81 (+0.09) log (ICM, CSI) - 1.32
`(1)
`
`aside from a length limitation of the 2-substituent (see the
`molecular modeling section below), no obvious structure-
`activity relationships could be discerned. Optimum po-
`tency resided in the 4-fluorophenyl analogue, 8f. With
`2-subtitution held constant as the optimal 4-fluorophenyl,
`potency increased with increasing length of the 5-sub-
`stituent from methyl (80 through cyclopentyl(8aa) to a
`maximum with isopropyl (8x) (length = 2.5 A; see mod-
`eling section below). Potency decreased thereafter to a low
`of >lo0 pM with 5-cyclohexyl substitution (8cc).
`With 5-substitution held constant as the optimal iso-
`propyl, additional variation of the 2-phenyl substituents,
`now keeping within the length limit of 5.9 A suggested by
`the modeling analysis (h-mrn), failed to improve the
`potency over the 2-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-isopropyl derivative,
`8s. Indeed, an additional "front-to-back" width limitation
`(Figure 3) may be apparent with 8ii and 8mm, which
`project significantly greater bulk in these directions than
`the other analogs. Finally, of interest is the 2-(4-flUOrO-
`phenyl)-5-trifluoromethyl analogue add, whose high po-
`tency may be due in part to stabilization of the pyrrole ring
`by the electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group, an
`aspect to be addressed in future communications.
`These results, combined with results from the molecular
`modeling study, confirmed our belief that 8x possessed the
`optimum substitution pattern, since structural modifica-
`tions at the 2- and 5-positions, as well as variation of the
`bridge to the lactone ring, led to decreased potency. A
`similar conclusion can be inferred from the examination
`of other 5-membered ring heterocycles reported in the
`patent 1iterature.l'
`(16) Compounds Be and 800 were assigned IC, values of 100 PM
`so they could be included in the correlation.
`(17) Kathawala, F. G. WIPO Patent WO 84/02131, 1984.
`
`n = 36, 9 = 0.70, F = 81, s = 0.39
`Structure-Activity Relationships
`As very little was known about heterocycle-containing
`inhibitors at the outset of this study, our strategy was to
`systematically examine each portion of the structure,
`keeping the 4-hydroxypyran-2-one ring intact. Initially,
`the optimum chain length between the lactone and the
`pyrrole ring was determined. A two-carbon bridge (80 was
`superior to either a three-carbon (8d) or aryl spacer (8a-c)
`(Table In). This is consistent with the fmdmgs of Stokker
`et ai."
`Holding the bridge constant as ethyl, the structure-ac-
`tivity relationships of the 2 and 5 pyrrole substituents were
`explored. With &methyl substitution (8f-w), high potency
`was conferred by bulky cycloalkyl 2-substitutents (8s-v).
`Among Z-(substituted-phenyI)-&methyl derivatives (8f-r),
`
`(15) Kita. T.; Brown. M.; Goldstein, J. J. Clin. Invest. 1980, 66,
`1094-1100.
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`
`Inhibitors of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. 1
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, NO. 1 25
`
`Table 111. truns-6-(2-Pyrrol-l-ylalkyl or -aryl)-4-hydroxypyran-2-ones
`
`X
`
`Ri
`
`Rz
`
`d-
`
`4-FCeH4
`
`no.
`8a
`
`8b
`
`8C
`
`8d
`Be
`8f
`8g
`8h
`8i
`8j
`8k
`81
`8m
`8n
`80
`8P
`8q
`8r
`8s
`8t
`
`8U
`
`8 V
`
`8
`
`mp, OC
`155-7
`
`%
`formula'
`yield
`32 C22H2oFNOS
`
`relative
`ICm,b,r pM, log ICw, potency,d ICw>' pM, log ICw,
`CSI
`CSI
`CSI
`COR
`COR
`-
`-
`20
`-4.7
`0.10
`
`54-7
`
`29 C22H~$N03
`
`24
`
`-4.6
`
`0.01
`
`63
`
`-4.2
`
`142-5
`
`21 C22HaN03
`
`>lo0
`
`-4.0
`
`<0.01
`
`>lo0
`
`oil
`167-9
`oil
`89-91
`104-7
`95-96
`118-1 2 1
`161-2
`oil
`106-9
`144-5
`112-3
`140-2
`foam
`137-8
`129-130
`125-6
`
`41
`30
`32
`29
`35
`50
`28
`-
`65
`21
`-
`38
`-
`30
`21
`25
`20
`
`C19H25N03
`
`53
`5.0
`0.51
`1.4
`23
`12
`10
`2.6
`1.5
`2.5
`1.9
`2.1
`2.5
`16
`1.8
`0.69
`1.4
`
`-4.3
`-5.3
`-6.3
`-5.9
`-4.6
`-4.9
`-5.0
`-5.6
`-5.8
`-5.6
`-5.7
`-5.7
`-5.6
`-4.8
`-5.8
`-6.2
`-5.8
`
`0.02
`0.50
`0.90
`0.40
`0.10
`0.10
`0.20
`1.0
`0.30
`0.80
`1.40
`0.90
`1.10
`0.10
`0.70
`0.50
`1.10
`
`-
`40
`2.8
`13
`23
`28
`3.2
`6.3
`5.4
`11
`12
`25
`30
`3.6
`4.0
`2.2
`5.8
`
`-4.0
`
`-
`-4.4
`-5.6
`-4.9
`-4.6
`-4.6
`-5.5
`-5.2
`-5.3
`-5.0
`-5.0
`-4.6
`-4.5
`-5.4
`-5.4
`-5.6
`-5.2
`
`135-8
`
`13 C20H27N03'
`
`1.3
`
`-5.9
`
`1.60
`
`3.2
`
`-5.5
`
`135-9
`
`68 CzoHaNOs
`
`2.3
`
`-5.6
`
`1.10
`
`2.3
`
`-5.6
`
`8W
`8 X
`8Y
`82
`8aa
`8bb
`8cc
`8dd
`8ee
`8ff
`8gg
`8hh
`8ii
`8jj
`8kk
`811
`8mm -CH2CH2-
`
`129-132
`105-6
`117-8
`107-8
`CH(C;H&
`cyclopropyl foam
`cyclobutyl
`88-9
`cyclohexyl 64-6
`CF,
`oil
`87-9
`CH(CHJ2
`CH(CH&
`oil
`2,4-F&Hs
`CH(CH&
`75-7
`2-MeOC6H4
`CH(CH3):,
`oil
`2,6-(Me0)2C6H3 CH(CHd2
`foam
`2,5-Me2CBH3 CH(CH3)2 oil
`2-iPrOC&
`CH(CH3)2 oil
`2-ClC&
`CH(CH3)2
`foam
`CH(CH3)2 oil
`
`%LH,
`
`13
`33 C25H27N03
`0.40
`34 CZoH24FN03
`24 C,rH,cFNOq
`1.6
`20
`36 C,;HzFNO,
`2.2
`22 CzoHzzFN03
`17
`5 C21H24FN03
`30 C23H28FN03 >lo0
`58 CrsHr7FANOq
`0.25
`40 CiHGFNO3-
`1.3
`9 C2oH2rFNO:
`3.2
`8 CmH23FzN03
`1.6
`2.2
`l6 C21H27N04
`36 Cz2HzsNO5
`19
`25 CZ2HzsN0J,
`12
`12 CsH31N04'
`3.2
`25 CmHZ4ClNO3
`3.2
`34 CZ5HzsNOt
`9.6
`
`-4.9
`-6.4
`-5.8
`-4.7
`-5.7
`-4.8
`-4.0
`-6.6
`-5.9
`-5.5
`-5.8
`-5.6
`-4.7
`-4.9
`-5.5
`-5.5
`-5.0
`
`0.10
`30.2
`1.70
`0.10
`1.30
`0.20
`<0.01
`8.0
`1.8
`0.9
`1.5
`1.0
`0.2
`0.2
`0.9
`0.5
`0.2
`
`8.9
`0.23
`1.8
`32
`2.6
`-
`>lo0
`0.63
`2.6
`1.8
`2.6
`5.6
`87
`16
`-
`9.1
`25
`
`-5.4
`-6.6
`-5.7
`-4.5
`-5.6
`-
`-4.0
`-6.2
`-5.6
`-5.8
`-5.2
`5.2
`-4.1
`-4.8
`-
`-5.0
`-4.6
`
`CH(C2H5)2
`
`CH(C2H5)2 oil
`
`-
`-
`<0.01
`-4.0
`>IO0
`-CH2CH2-
`8nn
`I
`-7.6
`0.025
`-7.6
`0.026
`compactin
`100
`"Analytical results are within f0.4% of theoretical values unless otherwise noted. bCholesterol synthesis inhibition screen; a measure of the rate
`of conversion of [Wlacetate to cholesterol employing a crude liver homogenate. 'ICw values were determined with four dose levels of each inhibitor
`in the assay systems described in ref 14 (CSI) and 15 (COR). dCalculated as follows: (ICw of test compound)/(ICw of compactin determined
`simultaneously) X 100. 'CoA reductase inhibition screen; a measure of the direct conversion of D,L-['~C]HMG-COA to mevalonic acid employing a
`partially purified microsomal enzyme preparation. 'C: calcd, 75.62; found, 75.12. 'C: calcd, 72.92; found, 72.50. hC: calcd, 69.54; found, 71.37; H:
`calcd, 7.01; found, 7.54. IC: calcd, 74.33; found, 74.78. IC: calcd, 71.66; found, 72.09. *C: calcd, 73.69; found, 72.09.
`
`20 C21H35N03
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`
`y
`
`26 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1
`
`
`
`
`pyrrole Out Ethyl(ene) o f 0' t h e the bridge
`plane
`f a = 90-i:oo)
`
`0
`----__4_L ?
`
`OH
`
`/
`
`\
`
`Y
`
`Roth et al.
`
`S > z e c o n s t r a i n t s
`
`dl - less than 5 9 8.
`d2 - l e s s thali 3 3 ;i
`d j - l e s s than 10 6 A
`Figure 3. Summary of conclusions from the molecular modeling
`study.
`
`Molecular Modeling
`In order to identify the required spatial relationship
`between the lipophilic group (represented by the substi-
`tuted pyrrole, phenyl, and hexahydronaphthalene ring
`systems) and the 4-hydroxypyran-2-one moiety, quantify
`steric tolerances across the pyrrole ring, and evaluate the
`relationship between potency and the polarity (charge
`distribution) of the side chains, selected analogues from
`Table 111, compactin (I), and the potent biphenyl inhibitor
`111 were modeled by using the CAMSEQ-11 program pack-
`age18J9 (Table IV; see the Experimental Section). Con-
`formational preferences of the ethyl (or ethylene) bridge
`to the lactone ring, size of the R1 and R2 substituents
`(Table IV), and charge distribution were compared to
`potency in the CSI screen (at the outset of this study,
`affinities in the COR screen were unavailable for the
`majority of the analogues studied) in order to develop a
`pharmacophore model for HMGR inhibition.
`Lactone Side Chain Conformations. For reference
`purposes, calculated energies for the 0", 90°, MOO, and
`lowest energy conformations of 0 are summarized in Table
`IV. Figure 2 depicts the calculated energies for individual
`conformations. From Figure 2, all of the modeled com-
`pounds, including compactin (I), the biphenyl analogue 111,
`and the less potent analogues 8z,8bb, 8cc, and 8nn, can
`adopt an eneretically favorable conformation where the
`ethyl(ene) bridge is nearly perpendicular to the parent
`pyrrole, benzene, or hexahydronaphthalene ring systems.
`Indeed, for the potent derivatives 8t and 111, the calcula-
`tions show that the out of plane (0 = 80-110") orientation
`is the only one allowed. In addition, the reduced potency
`of the tert-butyl(8y) over the isopropyl (8x1 analogue may
`be explained by the fact that the out of plane conformation
`(0 = 110") of 8y is calculated to be energetically disfavored
`over the in-plane (0 = 0-70") orientations.
`Thus, it is concluded that a conformation of the
`ethyl(ene) bridge to the 4-hydroxypyran-2-one ring out of
`the plane (90-120") of the parent ring systems is consistent
`with increased potency as a HMGR inhibitor. Interest-
`ingly, this corresponds to the calculated minimum energy
`and not the X-ray conformationlb of compactin. The X-ray
`conformation represents a secondary minimum at 0 =
`
`(18) (a) Potenzone, R., Jr.; Cavicchi, E.; Weintraub, H. J. R.; Hop-
`finger, A. J. Comput. Chem. 1977,1, 187. (b) Potenzone, R.,
`Jr.; Hopfinger, A. J. A Demonstration of the CAMSEQ-II
`Software System In DHEW Publ. (FDA) (U.S.), Issue FDA
`78-1046, Structural Correlations of Carcinogenesis and Muta-
`genesis, 1978, pp 102-103.
`(19) In-house conversion of the program to run on an IBM 3033
`under MVS/TSO (J. W. Vinson, unpublished work).
`
`i
`a t
`Figure 4. Charge distribution of compactin and selected ana-
`logues. Hatched and open spheres represent positive and negative
`charges, respectively. Sphere size is proportional to the magnitude
`of the atomic charge.
`
`24.6", 1.2 kcal/mol higher in energy, probably due to
`packing interactions.
`Steric Tolerances. In determining steric tolerances,
`the substituents were somewhat arbitrarily assigned.
`Larger substituents such as substituted phenyl, nor-
`bornenyl, and the isobutyric ester on compactin were
`placed at R1 (Table IV); small alkyl groups were assigned
`to R,. Changing the assignment would affect the conclu-
`sions regarding these tolerances. Low-energy, extended
`conformations of the substituents were used in the distance
`calculations; other orientations of flexible groups such as
`CH(C,H,), could produce different distances.
`The maximum lengths of R1 and Rz and the overall
`width of the molecule across the parent ring system from
`R1 to R2 are given in Table IV. The calculations show a
`clear dependence of CSI potency on all three distances
`summarized in Figure 3. High potency (ICw < 1.6 pM)
`is observed only for those analogues whose (a) maximum
`length of R1 (Figure 3, d,) is <5.9 8, (Table IV: compare
`8f and Sj), (b) maximum length of R2 (Figure 3, d,) is <3.3
`8, (compare 8x and 82 or 8114, and (c) overall width
`(Figure 3, d3) is C10.6 A (compare 8y and 8bb). Other
`analogues not included in Table IV reinforce the length
`constraints at R,: the 2-naphthyl analogue 8q (d, = 6.40
`A) is less potent than the l-naphthyl (d, = 4.20 A), and
`the para-substituted derivatives 8h and 8i possess reduced
`potency.
`Charge Distribution. Initially, it was hypothesized
`that the spatial orientation of polar regions with relatively
`large partial charges within the molecule might be con-
`nected to CSI potency. Compactin contains two distinct
`regions of relatively large partial charges corresponding
`to the 4-hydroxypyran-2-one ring and the isobutyric ester
`side chain (Figure 4). The potent inhibitors 8f and 8x
`also present relatively large partial charges, albeit weaker
`in strength, in roughly the same region as this side chain.
`However, attempts to increase potency by more closely
`mimicking the polar regions associated with the isobutyric
`ester of compactin with the more polar 2- and 3-(methoxy
`and hydroxy)phenyl analogues 8m-p resulted in equipo-
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`
`Inhibitors of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. 1
`Table IV. Results of Modeling Studies on Compactin and Substituted Pyrroles
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 1 27
`
`5.0
`
`-37.10'
`
`-41.43e
`
`100'
`
`60°, -42.92'
`
`10.12
`
`5.0
`0.51
`
`-46.93'
`-40.92
`
`-27.09'a
`-39.27
`
`OD, -46.931'
`lW
`-10.03 Oo, -40.92
`
`10
`1.4
`
`67.11
`
`-44.98
`
`-16.40 90°, -44.98
`
`10.12
`7.66
`
`9.33
`7.22
`
`1.4
`
`19.63
`
`-43.65
`
`-15.01 70°, -44.65
`
`7.87
`
`0.40
`
`-46.64
`
`-45.06
`
`46.29 OD, -46.64
`
`1.6
`
`-47.77
`
`-24.10'
`
`100
`
`OD, -47.77
`
`10.12
`
`10.20
`
`20
`
`-52.35
`
`-50.97
`
`100
`
`Oo, -52.35
`
`10.99
`
`5.58 2.48 [
`
`@H,]
`
`,
`'
`*:&Ha
`>so bond from a-Me
`to lactone side chain
`from Oo to 60° by 20°
`5.58 2.48 as above
`5.58 1.50 methyl group (&) from
`0' to 60° by 10'
`5.89 1.50 as above
`3.64 1.50 bond from R1 to pyrrole
`from OD to 360° by 20°
`
`4.27 1.50 as above
`
`5.58 2.48 [ 4;]
`5.58 2.48 [
`5.58 3.74 [ +&&]
`
`H&H,]
`
`*&H3
`
`all bonds from Oo to
`60' by 20'
`
`"YY
`
`100
`0.026
`
`-47.28
`100
`10.17' -56.04'
`
`-46.46
`
`-44.82
`
`6.01 60°, -46.64
`
`17
`
`100
`
`-51.76
`
`-50.31
`
`100
`
`100
`100'
`
`OD, -51.76
`looo, -54.31
`120°, -61.74'
`
`H*?H,
`terminal methyls set
`to a staggered
`conformation
`5.58 3.35 bond from & to pyrrole
`from Oo to 360° by 20°
`5.58 4.33 bond from & to pyrrole
`from Oo to 360° by 20°
`3.74 3.74 see compound 82 above
`5.66 1.50
`
`10.62
`
`11.92
`
`9.41
`8.81
`
`H
`
`O
`
`W
`
` 0.01
`
`100
`
`-48.89
`
`100
`
`130°, -52.92
`
`8.74
`
`F$
`
`H3
`
`0
`
`CH,
`
`terminal alkyl groups
`set to a staggered
`conformation
`
`5.52 1.50 bond from & (Me) to
`phenyl from Oo to 60°
`by 20°; bond from R1
`(4-F,3-MeC6H3) to
`phenyl from Oo
`(biphenyl coplanar) to
`90' by 1 5 O
`
`8X
`
`4-FC6H4
`
`8y
`
`4-FCaH4
`
`82
`
`4-FCeHd
`
`I
`
`I11
`
`"CSI screen (see Table 111). *Counterclockwise rotation of 0 from 0 to 180° by loo, unless otherwise noted, starting from the in-plane conformation shown
`(atoms A, B, C, D in a cis orientation). Steric and electrostatic (using charges calculated via the CNDO/2 method) terms were used. Energies are in kilocalo-
`ries/mole. CAt each conformation of the lactone side chain, rotations were performed on the marked bonds from 0" to 180° by 20°, unless otherwise indicated.
`was scanned from OD to 250° by loD. f S stereoisomer. 8 8 = 110'
`Substituted phenyl rings at R1 were held perpendicular to the pyrrole. d R stereoisomer.
`conformer, -46.09 kcal/mol. hEndo isomer. 'Ex0 isomer. ' 8 = 70" conformer, -46.93 kcal/mol. kchair form; equatorial attachment to pyrrole. '-9 was scanned
`from 0' to 350" by loo.
`sensitive to the polarity of the group at R1.
`tent, not more potent, analogues. In addition, compounds
`containing bicyclo moieties at R1 (8t-v) demonstrated that
`Conclusions
`a polar substituent in this area (or an aryl ring, for that
`A series of 6-(2-pyrrol-l-ylethyl)-4-hydroxypyran-2-ones
`matter) was not required for CSI potency at the 1 FM level.
`(8) has been identified as inhibiting the enzyme HMG-CoA
`Thus, it is concluded that CSI potency is relatively in-
`
`NCI Exhibit 2030
`Page 7 of 11
`
`

`
`28 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990, Vol. 33, No. I
`reductase (HMGR). By measuring t h e inhibition of
`HMGR in vitro, the 2- and 5-substituents on the pyrrole
`ring have been optimized, thus obtaining a compound (8x1
`that possesses 30% of t h e in vitro potency of the potent
`fungal metabolite compactin.
`From a molecular modeling study, i t was determined
`that so long as the 2- and 5-substituents did not interfere
`with the ability of the ethyl bridge to t h e lactone ring t o
`attain an out-of-plane conformation (0 = 90-110°), and the
`substituents were within the distance contraints given in
`Figure 3, one could expect t o achieve potency at the 1 pm
`level in the CSI screen. Attempts to enhance potency by
`mimicking partial charges in the polar isobutyric ester side
`chain in compactin failed. It is concluded that there are
`no strong electronic requirements for binding in this area.
`In addition, the reduced potency of 8w, 8ii, and 8mm
`relative to other substituted phenyl derivatives suggests
`a steric intolerance off of one of the ortho phenyl positions
`of the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket