throbber
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
`Washington, D.C. 2D231
`
`FIRST NAMED APPLICANT
`
`ATIORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`- I
`
`EXAMINER
`
`I
`.5\0C<._\ON J L .
`I
`I PAPER NUMBER
`\3
`
`ART UNIT
`
`INTERVIEW SUMMARY
`
`DATE MAILED:
`
`All participants .(applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personr:tel);
`
`(2)
`
`(1) Y\1'. 5--\lwa.n.. ¥.&\ ~
`. ~
`'t\r. ~o.Sw!.,c;..
`Date of Interview ~ ·~ 2-tf} \99 ~
`Type: 0 Telephonic ~ersonal (copy is given to 0 applicant 0 applicant's representative).
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: 0 Yes 0 No
`
`If yes, brief description: __________________ .:___
`
`Agree~ was reached. 0 was not reached.
`Claim(s) diSCf.!SSed: __ N..-L---''---'-----------------------------------------
`Identification of prior art discussed: ___________________________________ _
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments: d·~
`\£'\· C9nAlM.VC\ ·•.···~· .. ··a.\\ 6v9~"
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a qopy of the amendments, if available, which the examiner agreed would render the claims allowable
`must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments which would render the claims allowable is available, a summary thereof must be
`attached.)
`1. 0 It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview.
`Unless the paragraph above has been checked to indicate to the contrary. A FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION
`IS NOT WAIVED AND MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. (See MPEP Section 713.04). If a response to the last Office
`action has are ready been filed, APPLICANT IS GIVEN ONE MONTH FROM THIS INTERVIEW DATE TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE
`SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW.
`2. 0 Since the Examiner's interview summary above (including any attachments) reflects a complete response to each of the objections,
`rejections and requirements that may be present in the last Office action, and since the claims are now allowable, this completed form
`re ·eved from providing a separate record of
`is considered to fulfill the response requirements of the last Office action. Applicant is
`the intervi.ew unless box 1 above is also checked.
`
`Examiner Note: You must sign this form unless it is an attachment to another form.
`
`FORMPTOL·413(REV.1-96)
`
`~ __Qj__
`1:7ft(cid:173)
`-----1--~ d _ _____) ·~
`
`NCI Exhibit 2021
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`Interview Summary
`
`Application No.
`07/883,398
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Voshihiro Fujikawa et al.
`
`Examiner
`Laura L. Stockton
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`( 1 I Laura L. Stockton
`
`(2) Mr. Steven B. Kelber
`
`(3) ________________________________ __
`
`(4) __________________________________ __
`
`Date of Interview ____ __;S::..;e::.cp'-2=8,'--'-19=:..9=-8=------
`
`Type:
`
`lXI Telephonic D Personal (copy is given to D applicant D applicant's representative).
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: D Yes
`
`lXI No.
`
`If yes, brief description:
`
`Agreement
`
`lXI was reached. D was not reached.
`
`Claim(s) discussed: -=3-=6--------------------------------------
`
`Identification of prior art discussed:
`
`Description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was reached, or any other comments:
`The Examiner called Applicants' representative for permission to change the "c-Pr" group to a cyclopropyl group.
`
`(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments, if available, which the examiner agreed would render
`the claims allowable must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendents which would render the claims allowable
`is available, a summary thereof must be attached.)
`lXI
`
`It is not necessary for applicant to provide a separate record of the substance of the interview.
`
`1.
`
`Unless the paragraph above has been checked to indicate to the contrary, A FORMAL WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE
`LAST OFFICE ACTION IS NOT WAIVED AND MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. (See MPEP
`Section 713.04). If a response to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS GIVEN ONE MONTH
`FROM THIS INTERVIEW DATE TO FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW.
`2. D Since the Examiner's interview summary above (including any attachments) reflects a complete response to
`each of the objections, rejections and requirements that may be present in the last Office action, and since the
`claims are now allowable, this completed form is considered to fulfill the response requirements of the last
`Office action. Applicant is not relieved from providing a separate record of the interview unless box 1 above
`is also checked.
`
`Examiner Note: You must sign and stamp this form unless it is an attachment to a signed Office action.
`
`U. S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PT0-413 (Rev. 1 0-95)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`LAURA L. STOCKTON
`PATENT EXAMINER
`ART UNIT 1613
`
`Paper No.
`
`14
`
`NCI Exhibit 2021
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket