throbber
Wang, Philip (LA)
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Nguyen, Bao <bnguyen@kirkland.com>
`Tuesday, March 15, 2016 6:40 PM
`Wang, Philip (LA)
`DeCoro, Christopher; Trainor, D. Sean; #Samsung-NVIDIA-IPR-Service; Holloway, Julie
`(SF); Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Re: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript
`
`Philip, 

`Without waiving any objections to its use, we confirm that the revised redacted transcript does not contain Samsung 
`confidential information.  

`Thanks, 
`Bao 

`Bao Nguyen  
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
`555 California St, SF 

`On Mar 15, 2016, at 11:34 AM, "Philip.Wang@lw.com" <Philip.Wang@lw.com> wrote: 
`
`Bao, 
`
`  
`We have not received a response to our e‐mails of March 2nd, March 3rd, and March 9th. Could we 
`please get a response today? 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Philip 
`
`  
`Philip X. Wang 
`

`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue | Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`T: +1.213.891.7612 | M: +1.310.909.9386  
`  
`
`  
`From: Wang, Philip (LA)
`Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:18 PM
`To: 'Nguyen, Bao'; Holloway, Julie (SF)
`Cc: 'DeCoro, Christopher'; 'Trainor, D. Sean'; Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: RE: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`
`  
`Bao, 
`  
`It’s been more than a week since we agreed to your proposed redactions. Please confirm Samsung’s 
`agreement that the attached transcript does not contain any confidential information. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`1
`
`Ex. 1019-0001
`
`

`
`  
`
`Philip 
`
`  
`From: Wang, Philip (LA)
`Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:07 PM
`To: 'Nguyen, Bao'; Holloway, Julie (SF)
`Cc: 'DeCoro, Christopher'; 'Trainor, D. Sean'; Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: RE: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`
`  
`Bao, 
`
`  
`We haven’t heard from you on this. Please confirm that the attached transcript does not contain any 
`confidential information since both parties have already agreed on the redactions. The agreed‐upon 
`redactions are 386:1–7, 389:9–15, 508:13–509:3, 660:1–664:14 from your March 1 e‐mail and 509:4–
`555:15, 570:13–575:1, 587:18–588:15 from my February 17 e‐mail. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Philip 
`
`  
`Philip X. Wang 
`

`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue | Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`T: +1.213.891.7612 | M: +1.310.909.9386  
`  
`
`  
`From: Wang, Philip (LA)
`Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:40 AM
`To: 'Nguyen, Bao'; Holloway, Julie (SF)
`Cc: DeCoro, Christopher; Trainor, D. Sean; Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: RE: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`
`  
`Bao, 
`
`  
`Thanks for your e‐mail. Without agreeing that the material is confidential and in an excess of caution, 
`we agree to your additional proposed redactions at 386:1‐7, 389:9–15, 508:13–509:3, and 660:1–664:14 
`
`  
`Attached is another redacted version of Mr. McAlexander’s transcript with these redactions as well as 
`the redactions identified in my February 17 e‐mail (509:4–555:15, 570:13–575:1, and 587:18–588:15).  
`
`  
`Please confirm by March 2 that Samsung agrees that this redacted transcript does not contain any 
`confidential information.  
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Philip 
`
`  
`Philip X. Wang 
`

`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue | Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`T: +1.213.891.7612 | M: +1.310.909.9386  
`  
`
`2
`
`Ex. 1019-0002
`
`

`
`  
`
`From: Nguyen, Bao [mailto:bnguyen@kirkland.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:47 PM
`To: Holloway, Julie (SF); Wang, Philip (LA)
`Cc: DeCoro, Christopher; Trainor, D. Sean; Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: RE: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`  
`Julie, 
`
`  
`NVIDIA’s proposed redactions are generally fine, except for the  following: 
`  
`‐ 386:1‐7 and 389:9‐15 may need to be redacted.  The underlying deposition questions refer generally to 
`Samsung’s information that may be all confidential and possibly covered by protective orders.  To the 
`extent you disagree, please identify non‐confidential information on point.  
`  
`‐ 508:13‐509:3 may need to be redacted. This part of the transcript discusses at a high level certain 
`evidence cited in McAlexander’s infringement expert report, including source code, schematics and 
`other documents. Would appear to be a violation of the 941 Protective Order because it would disclose 
`NVIDIA CBI information.  To the extent you disagree, please identify non‐confidential information on 
`point.  
`  
`‐ 660:1 to 664:14 may need to be redacted.  This part of the transcript discusses Mr. McAlexander’s 
`prior work and includes information that may be confidential to third parties, such as at 660:2‐4, 661:12, 
`661:17‐19, 664:7‐14.  If you do not agree, we would need Mr. McAlexander to review this part of the 
`transcript to be sure.   
`  
`‐ 635:7‐8 should be unredacted. This probably was done by mistake (the redaction is not identified in 
`Philip’s email). 
`
`  
`Regards, 
`Bao 
`
`  
`From: Julie.Holloway@lw.com [mailto:Julie.Holloway@lw.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 11:19 AM
`To: Nguyen, Bao; Philip.Wang@lw.com
`Cc: DeCoro, Christopher; Trainor, D. Sean; Brett.Sandford@lw.com
`Subject: RE: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`
`  
`Bao, 
`
`  
`Could we please get a response today?  It’s been nearly two weeks.  Thank you. 

`Best, 
`  
`Julie 
`
`  
`From: Nguyen, Bao [mailto:bnguyen@kirkland.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 6:21 AM
`To: Wang, Philip (LA)
`Cc: DeCoro, Christopher; Trainor, D. Sean; Holloway, Julie (SF); Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: Re: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`  
`
`3
`
`Ex. 1019-0003
`
`

`
`Philip, I am traveling and have not had a chance to review your proposed redactions. I should be able to 
`do so in a couple of days. Thanks, Bao 

`Bao Nguyen  
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
`555 California St, SF 

`On Feb 23, 2016, at 12:50 AM, "Philip.Wang@lw.com" <Philip.Wang@lw.com> wrote: 
`
`Bao, 
`
`  
`We haven’t heard from you and assume that Samsung agrees the redacted transcript 
`does not contain any confidential information. If this is incorrect, please let us know 
`immediately and identify the parts of the transcript you contend are confidential. 
`
`  
`Philip 
`
`  
`Philip X. Wang 
`

`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue | Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`T: +1.213.891.7612 | M: +1.310.909.9386  
`  
`
`  
`From: Wang, Philip (LA)
`Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:29 PM
`To: 'Nguyen, Bao'; 'christopher.decoro@kirkland.com'; 'd.sean.trainor@kirkland.com'
`Cc: Holloway, Julie (SF); Sandford, Brett (SV)
`Subject: IPR 2015-01068 ('734 Patent) - Redacted McAlexander Transcript 
`
`  
`Bao, 
`
`  
`Attached is a redacted version of Mr. McAlexander’s July 1, 2015 ITC deposition 
`transcript with the following portions redacted: 509:4–555:15, 570:13–575:1, and 
`587:18–588:15. The redacted transcript is limited to information that is publicly known 
`(i.e., information about the ’734 patent and the prior art), and does not contain any 
`confidential information. 
`
`  
`Please confirm by Friday, Feb. 19 that Samsung agrees the redacted transcript does not 
`contain any confidential information. If you believe that any part of the redacted 
`transcript is confidential, please explain why. We are available on Thursday and Friday 
`to meet and confer. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Philip 
`
`  
`Philip X. Wang 
`

`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue | Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
`T: +1.213.891.7612 | M: +1.310.909.9386  
`
`4
`
`
`
`Ex. 1019-0004
`
`

`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work
`product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by
`others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP  
`
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information,
`and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
`Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
`have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email to postmaster@kirkland.com,
`and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`  
`
`
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole
`use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
`permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
`delete all copies.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP  
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information,
`and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
`Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
`have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email to postmaster@kirkland.com,
`and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`  
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole
`use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
`permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and
`delete all copies.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only
`for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of
`this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
`immediately by return email or by email to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Ex. 1019-0005

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket