` Entered: May 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and QUANTUM CORPORATION,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-01544
`Patent 7,051,147 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before HYUN J. JUNG, NEIL T. POWELL, KRISTINA M. KALAN, and
`J. JOHN LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`CROSSROADS EXHIBIT
`Oracle Corp. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc.
`IPR2015-0(cid:1005)(cid:1004)(cid:1010)(cid:1008)
`
`2134
`
`
`
`IPR 2014-01544
`Patent 7,051,147 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On a conference call with the parties held on April 24, 2015, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parties jointly requested and agreed to a revised schedule as outlined below.
`
`The due dates specified below in this Revised Scheduling Order supersede
`
`the due dates specified in the Appendix to the previous Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 10). All other aspects of the previous Scheduling Order remain in
`
`effect.
`
`
`
`ADR STATEMENT DUE ........................................................ May 21, 2015
`
`DUE DATE 1 ............................................................................ May 26, 2015
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 .......................................................................... August 3, 2015
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 .................................................................... September 1, 2015
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 .................................................................. September 22, 2015
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................ October 6, 2015
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR 2014-01544
`Patent 7,051,147 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 6 ...................................................................... October 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ...................................................................... October 30, 2015
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. McCombs
`Andrew S. Ehmke
`Scott T. Jarratt
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`andy.ehmke.ipr@haynesboone.com
`scott.jarratt.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Clement S. Roberts
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`croberts@durietangri.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Russell Wong
`James Hall
`WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, LLP
`crossroadsipr@counselip.com
`
`Steven R. Sprinkle
`John L. Adair
`SPRINKLE IP LAW GROUP
`crossroadsipr@sprinklelaw.com
`
`
`
`3