throbber
Paper No. 74
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`THE MANGROVE PARTNERS MASTER FUND, LTD., APPLE INC., and
`BLACK SWAMP IP, LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2015-010471
`Patent No. 7,490,151
`____________________
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`1 Apple Inc. and Black Swamp IP, LLC, who filed petitions in IPR2016-00063 and
`IPR2016-00167, respectively, have been joined as Petitioners in the instant
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Updated Exhibit List
`
`1003
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`1007
`1008
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`1001
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151 to Munger
`1002
`Takahiro Kiuchi and Shigekoto Kaihara, “C-HTTP - The
`Development of a Secure, Closed HTTP-based Network on the
`Internet,” published by IEEE in the Proceedings of SNDSS 1996
`Declaration of Dr. Roch Guerin
`E. Rescorla and A. Schiffman, “The Secure Hypertext Transfer
`Protocol,” Internet Draft (Feb. 1996)
`Mockapetris, P., RFC 1034, “Domain Names–Concepts and
`Facilities,” Nov. 1997
`Excerpts from the Prosecution History of the ’151 Patent
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Paper 7, in IPR2014-00610
`Excerpts from Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1971)
`VirnetX’s Reply Claim Construction Brief in VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco
`Systems, Inc. et al., 6:10-cv-417 (Dec. 19, 2011) (E.D. Tex.)
`Bradner, S., RFC 2026, “The Internet Standards Process – Revision
`3,” Oct. 1996
`Decision to Institute Inter Partes Review, Paper 9, in IPR2014- 00610
`(Oct. 15, 2014)
`Chatel, M., RFC 1919, “Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies,”
`March 1996
`Fielding et al., RFC 2068, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1,”
`Jan. 1997
`Berners-Lee et al., RFC 1945, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
`HTTP/1.0,” May 1996
`[RESERVED]
`[RESERVED]
`[RESERVED]
`[RESERVED]
`[RESERVED]
`[RESERVED]
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`1016
`1017
`1018
`1019
`1020
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Updated Exhibit List
`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`
`
`1025
`
`1026
`1027
`
`1028
`1029
`
`1030
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`1021
`[RESERVED]
`1022
`[RESERVED]
`1023
`[RESERVED]
`1024
`E. Rescorla and A. Schiffman, RFC 2660, “The Secure Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol,” Aug. 1999
`Petitioner’s Proposed Revisions of Patent Owner’s Requests for
`Production
`Petitioner’s Proposed Revisions of Patent Owner’s Interrogatories
`Declaration of Scott M. Border in Support of Petitioner Apple’s
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`[RESERVED]
`Declaration of Sandy Ginoza on behalf of the RFC Publisher for the
`Internet Engineering Task Force, dated January 23, 2013, submitted in
`Investigation No. 337-TA-858
`Mockapetris, P., RFC 1034, “Domain Names – Concepts and
`Facilities,” bearing Bates Nos. 337-TA-858-IETF00022 through
`00073
`Transcript of Feb. 8, 2013 deposition of Sandy Ginoza, ITC Inv. No.
`337-TA-858
`The Reality of Virtual Private Networks, InfoWorld, Aug. 16, 1999
`(Advertising Supplement)
`Gibbs, M., IP Security: Keeping Your Business Private, Network
`World (March 15, 1999)
`Bradner, S., RFC 2418, “IETF Working Group Guidelines and
`Procedures” (September 1998)
`Proposed Protective Order
`Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`Malkin, G., RFC 1983, “Internet Users’ Glossary,” Aug. 1996
`Plaintiff VirnetX Inc.’s Opening Brief in Support of its Constructions
`of Claims Pursuant to P.R. 4-5, VirnetX Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case
`No. 6:07-cv-00080-LED, ECF No. 194 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 30, 2008)
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`1036
`1037
`1038
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Updated Exhibit List
`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`
`
`Exhibit # Reference Name
`1039
`Guerin, R., RFC 2676, “QoS Routing Mechanisms and OSPF
`Extensions,” Aug. 1999
`Guerin, R., Internet Draft, “QoS Routing Mechanisms and OSPF
`Extensions,” Nov. 5, 1996, draft-guerin-qos-routing-ospf-00.txt
`Huitema, C., RFC 1602, The Internet Standards Process – Revision 2,
`Mar. 1994
`Chapin, L., RFC 1310, The Internet Standards Process, Mar. 1992
`Microsoft Computer Dictionary (4th Ed. 1999)
`Transcript of Trial, November 1, 2012 Afternoon Session, VirnetX
`Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 6:07-cv-00417-RWS, ECF No. 612 (E.D.
`Tex. Nov. 9, 2012)
`E-mail exchange regarding request for Dr. Short’s deposition between
`Counsel for Petitioners and Counsel for Patent Owner from March 25,
`2016 to April 11, 2016
`Petitioners’ Demonstratives
`
`1046
`[NEW]
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Abraham Kasdan/
`Abraham Kasdan
`Reg. No. 32, 997
`Wiggin & Dana LLP
`
`James T. Bailey
`Reg. No. 44,518
`The Law Office of James. T. Bailey
`Attorneys for Petitioner Mangrove
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 29, 2016
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`/Thomas H. Martin/
`Thomas H. Martin
`Reg. No. 34,383
`Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Black Swamp
`
`
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`1044
`
`1045
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), this is to certify that on this 29th day of
`
`June, 2016, I caused to be served a true and correct copy by electronic means of the
`
`foregoing on the following counsel:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 29, 2016
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`/Thomas H. Martin/
`Thomas H. Martin
`Reg. No. 34,383
`Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Black Swamp
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Abraham Kasdan/
`Abraham Kasdan
`Reg. No. 32, 997
`Wiggin & Dana LLP
`
`James T. Bailey
`Reg. No. 44,518
`The Law Office of James. T. Bailey
`Attorneys for Petitioner Mangrove

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket