throbber
Broughan III, Thomas A.
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Zeilberger, Daniel [danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Monday, April 11, 2016 1:08 PM
`Border, Scott; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III,
`Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Scott, we have added our position to your draft email to the Board below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Your Honors-
`
`
`Petitioner’s Positon
`The joined Petitioners request a call with the Board to request authorization for additional
`discovery for the cross-examination of a declarant (Dr. Short) whose testimony Patent Owner
`has cited and relies upon in this proceeding.
`
`
`Patent Owner submitted with its Patent Owner response a declaration from a Dr. Short, a
`named inventor on the patent at issue in this proceeding. The declaration was originally
`prepared for an inter partes reexamination proceeding. Patent Owner relies on Dr. Short’s
`declaration for its assertions that secondary considerations exist that support a finding of non-
`obviousness. See Resp. at 29-36.
`
`The joined Petitioners requested that Patent Owner either provide Dr. Short for cross-
`examination or withdraw the declaration. Patent Owner has not agreed to provide Dr. Short for
`cross-examination and has represented that such cross-examination is unnecessary given that
`Dr. Short was questioned in related litigation on topics discussed in the declaration. Patent
`Owner provided the district court trial transcript containing Dr. Short’s direct and cross-
`examination. The joined Petitioners have reviewed the transcript of the trial testimony, and
`believe that Dr. Short was not tested on each of the topics discussed in the declaration that
`Patent Owner now relies on in this proceeding.
`
`Thus, the joined petitioners request authorization for additional discovery for the cross-
`examination of Dr. Short.
`
`Patent Owner’s Position
`Petitioners are not entitled to cross-examine Dr. Short. Dr. Short’s declaration-at-issue here was
`submitted in an inter partes reexamination proceeding nearly four years ago. Moreover, Dr.
`Short has already been questioned in related litigation on the topics discussed in the
`declaration. So, there already has been a fair opportunity to cross-examine Dr. Short. Patent
`Owner even provided the transcript from the district court to Petitioners in an attempt to
`resolve this issue. Patent owner disagrees with Petitioners’ analysis of the transcript and
`believes there is a one-to-one correspondence between the topics covered in the declaration
`and the topics covered in the transcript. So, to the extent the Board considers Petitioners’
`request for additional discovery, Patent Owner requests briefing on the issue.
`
`Should the Board desire to have a conference call, the parties are available at the following
`times this week:
`
`
`Tuesday: 9:30 am-11 am
`Wednesday: 9:30 am-11 am
`1
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 1
`
`

`
`
`
`Your Honors-
`
`
`The joined Petitioners request a call with the Board to request authorization for additional
`discovery for the cross-examination of a declarant (Dr. Short) whose testimony Patent Owner
`has cited and relies upon in this proceeding.
`
`
`Patent Owner submitted with its Patent Owner response a declaration from a Dr. Short, a
`named inventor on the patent at issue in this proceeding. The declaration was originally
`prepared for an inter partes reexamination proceeding. Patent Owner relies on Dr. Short’s
`declaration for its assertions that secondary considerations exist that support a finding of non-
`obviousness. See Resp. at 29-36.
`
`The joined Petitioners requested that Patent Owner either provide Dr. Short for cross-
`examination or withdraw the declaration. Patent Owner has not agreed to provide Dr. Short for
`cross-examination and has represented that such cross-examination is unnecessary given that
`Dr. Short was questioned in related litigation on topics discussed in the declaration. Patent
`Owner provided the district court trial transcript containing Dr. Short’s direct and cross-
`examination. The joined Petitioners have reviewed the transcript of the trial testimony, and
`believe that Dr. Short was not tested on each of the topics discussed in the declaration that
`Patent Owner now relies on in this proceeding.
`
`Thus, the joined petitioners request authorization for additional discovery for the cross-
`examination of Dr. Short.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 12:37 PM
`To: Zeilberger, Daniel; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Dillon,
`Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Dan-
`
`
`Thank you for providing the trial transcripts that include Dr. Short’s cross-examination. Apple does not agree that these
`transcripts are a proper substitute for the cross-examination of Dr. Short in this proceeding. For example, the cross-
`examination does not test Dr. Short’s opinions related to long-felt need, failure of others, skepticism, or nexus.
`
`
`Consequently, we believe a call with the Board is necessary. Apple has consulted with the other joined petitioners, and
`together the petitioners propose the following email to the Board, which we intend to send in the next hour:
`
`
`Should the Board desire to have a conference call, the parties are available at the following
`times this week:
`
`
`Tuesday: 9:30 am-11 am
`Wednesday: 9:30 am-11 am
` Thursday: 9 am to 11 am
`
`
`2
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 2
`
`

`
`SCOTT BORDER
`Associate
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`+1.202.736.8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:45 AM
`To: Border, Scott; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.;
`Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Scott,
`
`Attached is one of the transcripts from Dr. Short’s examination that deals with the topics in the declaration. We
`hope this resolves the issue. Please let us know if it does not. If you intend to still email the Board, please
`provide us with the email you intend to send so that we can make sure our position is adequately reflected.
`
`Regards,
`Dan
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 5:40 PM
`To: Zeilberger, Daniel; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.;
`Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Dan-
`
`Petitioners are willing to wait until 10 AM EST on Monday for service of the Dr. Short deposition transcripts.
`Given the extremely compressed schedule, Petitioners believe that the parties will be at an impasse if service is
`not effected before then, as any further delay will to continue to prejudice Petitioners. Petitioners are willing to
`quickly review the transcripts and will consider withdrawing the request for a deposition of Dr. Short if all of the
`points raised in the declaration filed in this proceeding were appropriately tested during the previous
`depositions. If service is not effected by 10 AM EST, Petitioners will send the request for a teleconference soon
`thereafter and specifically indicate that the parties are at an impasse.
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:38 PM
`To: Border, Scott; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III,
`Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`3
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 3
`
`

`
`
`Scott,
`
`Given that we are checking into the deposition transcript issue and still meeting and conferring on this
`issue, we believe it is premature to send this email to the Board. But we have provided our position and
`availability below if Petitioners would still like to send an email to the Board. Please note that we
`moved one of your proposed sentences into the Petitioner’s position section of the email.
`
`
`Your Honors –
`
`Petitioner’s position: Patent Owner has submitted with its Patent Owner response a declaration
`from a Dr. Short, a named inventor on the patent at issue in this proceeding. Patent Owner
`relies on Dr. Short’s declaration for its assertions that secondary considerations exist that
`support a finding of non-obviousness. See Resp. at 29-36. The joined petitioners have
`requested that Patent Owner provide Dr. Short for cross-examination or withdraw the
`declaration. The joined petitioners request a call with the Board to request authorization for
`additional discovery for the cross-examination of Dr. Short.
`
`Patent Owner’s position: Petitioners are not entitled to cross-examine Dr. Short. Dr. Short’s
`declaration-at-issue here was submitted in an inter partes reexamination proceeding nearly four
`years ago. Moreover, Dr. Short has already been questioned in related litigation on the topics
`discussed in the declaration. So, there already has been a fair opportunity to cross-examine Dr.
`Short. Petitioners’ request for a conference call is also premature as the parties are still meeting
`and conferring on this issue. Patent Owner is looking into Petitioners’ latest request for
`production of the transcripts from the related litigation.
`
`
`Should the Board desire to have a conference call, the parties are available at the following
`times next week:
`
`
`Tuesday: 10 am-11 am
`Wednesday: 10 am-11 am
`
`
`Regards,
`
`Jeff Kushan
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 2:31 PM
`To: Border, Scott; Zeilberger, Daniel; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III,
`Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Dan-
`
`Draft email is below – we would like to send to the Board NLT than 3:00 EST.
`
`Your Honors –
`
`
`4
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 4
`
`

`
`Patent Owner has submitted with its Patent Owner response a declaration from a Dr. Short, a
`named inventor on the patent at issue in this proceeding. Patent Owner relies on Dr. Short’s
`declaration for its assertions that secondary considerations exist that support a finding of non-
`obviousness. See Resp. at 29-36. The joined petitioners have requested that Patent Owner
`provide Dr. Short for cross-examination or withdraw the declaration.
`
`Patent Owner position: [Patent Owner has indicated that it will not provide Dr. Short for cross-
`examination]
`
`The joined petitioners request a call with the Board to request authorization for additional
`discovery for the cross-examination of Dr. Short. The parties are available at the following times
`next week:
`
`
`Monday 10 am –2 pm,
`Tuesday 10 am-12 pm
`Wednesday 10 am-12 pm
`Thursday 10 am-1pm, 2 pm – 4:30 pm
`
`
`Regards,
`
`Jeff Kushan
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner Apple
`
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Border, Scott
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 2:05 PM
`To: 'Zeilberger, Daniel'; James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III,
`Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Dan-
`
`You’ve indicated that cross-examination is not necessary in this proceeding because Dr. Short
`has already been deposed by Apple in another proceeding. If that is your justification as to why
`you do not need to make Dr. Short available, then you should serve the relevant deposition
`transcripts on each of the Petitioners.
`
`We will send a draft email to the Board shortly.
`
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`
`5
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 5
`
`

`
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 1:41 PM
`To: James Bailey; Wesley C. Meinerding; Border, Scott
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.;
`Broughan III, Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham; IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`We continue to disagree that a deposition of Dr. Short is warranted. We do not
`understand Apple’s proposal regarding the transcripts. Can you please clarify? If
`Petitioners would like to have a call with the Board, please send us a draft of the email
`Petitioners intend to send so that we can add our position to it. We are trying to
`determine the availability for a call on our end and can add that to the email once you
`send it to us.
`
`Regards,
`Dan
`
`From: James Bailey [mailto:jtb@jtbaileylaw.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:24 AM
`To: Wesley C. Meinerding; Border, Scott
`Cc: Zeilberger, Daniel; Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing;
`Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; Kasdan, Abraham;
`IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: Re: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Counsel for Mangrove agrees with the positions expressed by Apple and Black Swamp on
`these issues and is available Monday 10 am –2 pm, Tuesday 10 am-4:30 pm; Wednesday 10
`am-1pm, 2 pm – 4:30 pm, and Thursday 10 am-1pm, 2 pm – 4:30 pm
`
`From: "Wesley C. Meinerding" <wmeinerding@martinferraro.com>
`Date: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:49 AM
`To: "Border, Scott" <sborder@sidley.com>
`Cc: "Zeilberger, Daniel" <danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com>, "Palys, Joseph E."
`<josephpalys@paulhastings.com>, "Modi, Naveen" <naveenmodi@paulhastings.com>,
`Thomas Martin <tmartin@martinferraro.com>, docketing
`<docketing@martinferraro.com>, "Kushan, Jeffrey P." <jkushan@sidley.com>,
`"Broughan III, Thomas A." <tbroughan@sidley.com>, "Dillon, Samuel"
`<samuel.dillon@sidley.com>, James Bailey <jtb@jtbaileylaw.com>, "Kasdan, Abraham"
`<AKasdan@wiggin.com>, "IP@wiggin.com" <IP@wiggin.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`Counsel for Black Swamp LLC is available for a teleconference with the Board at all times
`mentioned below.
`
`
`Best regards,
`
`Wes
`
`
`Wes Meinerding
`Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`
`6
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 6
`
`

`
`1557 Lake O'Pines Street NE
`Hartville, Ohio 44632
`330.877.8679 Direct
`330.877.2030 FAX
`wmeinerding@martinferraro.com
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 10:43 AM
`To: Wesley C. Meinerding; Zeilberger, Daniel
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Kushan, Jeffrey P.;
`Broughan III, Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; James Bailey; Kasdan, Abraham;
`IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Apple agrees with the observations made by Petitioner Black Swamp. We believe those
`are the only two viable paths forward to address concerns raised by Apple and now by
`Black Swamp.
`
`In addition, Apple notes that you have identified cross-examination testimony from Dr.
`Short in another proceeding which is not part of the present record. Given your position
`on that testimony, we assume VirnetX would serve Petitioners with full transcripts
`containing the relevant testimony and support (or would not oppose) the filing of Dr.
`Short’s deposition transcript as an exhibit in this proceeding, if necessary. Please
`confirm that our understanding is correct, and whether VirnetX believes that that
`testimony contains any confidential information that would necessitate entry of a
`protective in this proceeding.
`
`If VirnetX is prepared to neither make Dr. Short available for deposition nor withdraw
`his declaration and strike portions of the patent owner response that rely on that
`testimony, then we believe a call with the Board is required. Apple also believes this
`issue needs to be resolved immediately given the already compressed schedule for
`Petitioners, and will seek a call with the Board this afternoon if Patent Owner does not
`change its position.
`
`
`Thus, by 3:00 EST today, please let us know (i) whether VirnetX will make Dr. Short
`available for deposition or if it agrees to withdraw the declaration and associated
`portions of the patent owner response, and (ii) what dates you are available for a call
`with the Board on Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday or Thursday of next week. In
`addition, counsel for Black Swamp and Mangrove, please advise as to your availability
`on those dates.
`
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Wesley C. Meinerding [mailto:wmeinerding@martinferraro.com]
`Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:49 AM
`To: Zeilberger, Daniel
`Cc: Palys, Joseph E.; Modi, Naveen; Thomas Martin; docketing; Border, Scott; Kushan,
`Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Dillon, Samuel; James Bailey; Kasdan, Abraham;
`
`7
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 7
`
`

`
`IP@wiggin.com
`Subject: FW: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`It is clear that Patent Owner has substantively relied on upon Dr. Short’s declaration to
`support the Patent Owner’s Response in IPR2015-01047. Furthermore, it is noted that
`Petitioner Black Swamp LLC has not had any opportunity to depose Dr. Short.
`Therefore, Petitioner Black Swamp LLC sees two alternatives going forward: (1) Patent
`Owner makes Dr. Short available for a deposition by the joined Petitioners, or (2) Patent
`Owner withdraws Dr. Short’s declaration from IPR2015-01047.
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Black Swamp IP is available to discuss this issue with the Board.
`
`
`Best regards,
`
`
`Wes
`
`
`Wes Meinerding
`Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`1557 Lake O'Pines Street NE
`Hartville, Ohio 44632
`330.877.8679 Direct
`330.877.2030 FAX
`wmeinerding@martinferraro.com
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:00 PM
`To: Border, Scott; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Scott,
`
`
`We disagree that a new deposition is warranted. You have already had a fair
`opportunity to challenge Dr. Short’s declaration multiple times. In fact, Apple cross-
`examined and deposed Dr. Short in litigation after the declaration was submitted. Apple
`even questioned him on the topics discussed in the declaration.
`
`
`Regards,
`Dan
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 6:15 PM
`To: Zeilberger, Daniel; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Dan-
`
`
`Patent Owner directly and substantively relies on Dr. Short’s declaration for its
`assertions that secondary considerations exist that support a finding of non-
`
`8
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 8
`
`

`
`obviousness, so Petitioners should be offered a fair opportunity to challenge the
`testimony in the declaration. See, e.g., Mexichem Amanco Holdings S.A. de C.V v.
`Honeywell Int’l, Inc., Case, IPR2013-00576, Paper 36 (PTAB Sept. 5, 2014).
`
`
`Thanks,
`Scott
`
`
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:26 PM
`To: Border, Scott; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Scott,
`
`
`We have been considering your request regarding Dr. Short’s deposition. As you know,
`Ex. 2050 was submitted in inter partes reexamination control nos. 95/001,714,
`95/001,697. As such, please let us know on what basis Petitioners believe a deposition
`of Dr. Short is warranted or required.
`
`
`As to the deposition of Dr. Monrose, we can now confirm the 8 am start time on April
`28.
`
`
`Regards,
`Dan
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel
`Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:12 PM
`To: 'Border, Scott'; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Scott,
`
`
`We are awaiting confirmation from Dr. Monrose, but we don’t expect an 8 am start time
`to be a problem. As with the deposition of Dr. Guerin, we are willing to go a reasonable
`time beyond seven hours, if necessary.
`
`
`We are still considering your request as to Dr. Short, and will get back to you by
`tomorrow.
`
`
`Regards,
`
`9
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 9
`
`

`
`Dan
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 5:30 PM
`To: Zeilberger, Daniel; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Dan-
`
`
`April 28 in Washington, D.C. will work for Petitioners for the deposition of Dr. Monrose
`in IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047. To ensure that we can fit the deposition into a
`single day, we propose that we begin, as we did with Dr. Guerin, at 8:00 A.M. and
`continue to a reasonable time beyond seven hours for cross-examination, if necessary.
`
`
`Also, as a reminder, please provide dates that Dr. Short can be available for a deposition
`in IPR2015-1047.
`
`
`Thanks,
`Scott
`
`
`
`
`SCOTT M. BORDER
`Associate
`
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`+1 202 736 8818
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`
`
`From: Zeilberger, Daniel [mailto:danielzeilberger@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:43 AM
`To: Border, Scott; Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`
`
`Scott,
`
`
`Further to our telephone call last week regarding your email below, please confirm
`whether April 28 or April 29 will work for the Petitioners. As discussed, Patent Owner
`and Petitioner Apple will then reschedule Dr. Monrose’s deposition in the IPR2015-
`01009 and IPR2015-01010 matters for mid-May.
`
`
`Regards,
`Dan
`
`
`From: Border, Scott [mailto:sborder@sidley.com]
`Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:39 AM
`To: Palys, Joseph E.
`Cc: Thomas Martin; James Bailey; Kushan, Jeffrey P.; Broughan III, Thomas A.; Kasdan,
`Abraham; IP@wiggin.com; docketing; Modi, Naveen; Zeilberger, Daniel; Dillon, Samuel
`Subject: IPR2015-01046 and IPR2015-01047
`10
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 10
`
`

`
`
`Joe-
`
`
`Please let the Petitioners know if Dr. Monrose can be available for either April 25 or
`April 26 in Washington D.C. for a single day of deposition in the IPR2015-01046 and
`IPR2015-01047 proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`******************************************************************
`**********************************
`This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or
`confidential.
`If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
`and notify us
`immediately.
`
`******************************************************************
`**********************************
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`11
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 11
`
`

`
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`12
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC
`IPR2015-01047 - Ex. 1045, 12

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket