throbber
Paper No. 50
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`THE MANGROVE PARTNERS MASTER FUND, LTD., APPLE INC., and
`BLACK SWAMP, LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.,
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2015-010471
`Patent No. 7,490,151
`____________________
`
`PETITIONERS’ OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`1 Apple Inc. and Black Swamp, LLC, who filed petitions in IPR2016-00063 and
`IPR2016-00167, respectively, have been joined as Petitioners in the instant
`proceeding.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to Evidence
`
`Petitioners file and serve the following timely objections to evidence that
`
`Patent Owner served on March 21, 2016. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1).
`
`Exhibits 2040, 2041, and 2056 are objected to for lacking relevance. See
`
`Fed. R. Evid. (FRE) 401-403. For example, the portions of these exhibits cited by
`
`Patent Owner are irrelevant to whether Kiuchi discloses a claimed “[DNS] request”
`
`under any proposed construction. Exhibit 2041 is additionally irrelevant for
`
`containing testimony involving a different claim interpretation and different claim
`
`interpretation standard than the one at issue in this proceeding. See FRE 401-403.
`
`Exhibit 2042-2049, 2054, and 2055 are objected to for lacking relevance.
`
`See FRE 401-403. For example, these exhibits do not support Patent Owner’s
`
`characterizations and are irrelevant to Patent Owner’s arguments that rely on them.
`
`Exhibit 2050 is objected to for lacking relevance, foundation, personal
`
`knowledge, exceeding the scope of lay testimony, and for containing inadmissible
`
`hearsay. See FRE 801-807. For example, Exhibit 2050 contains attachments that
`
`Dr. Short does not authenticate, are not otherwise authenticated, and are not self-
`
`authenticating. See FRE 901-903. Exhibit 2050 also contains testimony that
`
`exceeds the proper scope of lay witness testimony because, for example, Dr. Short
`
`testifies as to scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge. See FRE
`
`701(c). Exhibit 2050 also contains testimony on matters of which there is
`
`insufficient evidence to support that Dr. Short has personal knowledge. See FRE
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to Evidence
`
`602. As another example, Exhibit 2050 presents expert opinion but Patent Owner
`
`has not shown Dr. Short to be an expert. See FRE 702. Dr. Short’s declaration
`
`also does not present the bases for his opinions. See FRE 702(b); see also 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.65(a).
`
`Exhibits 2050-2053 are objected to for lacking relevance. See FRE 401-
`
`403. For example, Patent Owner relies on these exhibits as evidence of secondary
`
`considerations of non-obviousness but failed to establish nexus to any allegedly
`
`novel element of the claims.
`
`Exhibit 2058 is objected to for lacking relevance. See FRE 401-403. In
`
`addition, this exhibit is objected to as including numerous e-mails that are neither
`
`cited to, nor relied upon in Patent Owner's response.
`
`Dated: March 28, 2016
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`/Thomas H. Martin/
`Thomas H. Martin
`Reg. No. 34,383
`MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Black Swamp
`
`/Abraham Kasdan/
`Abraham Kasdan
`Reg. No. 32, 997
`WIGGIN & DANA LLP
`
`James T. Bailey
`Reg. No. 44,518
`THE LAW OFFICE OF JAMES. T. BAILEY
`Attorneys for Petitioner Mangrove
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01047
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to Evidence
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 28th day of March, 2016, a copy of the foregoing
`
`has been served in its entirety by e-mail on the following counsel of record for
`
`patent owner:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`Dated: March 28, 2016
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Apple
`
`/Thomas H. Martin/
`Thomas H. Martin
`Reg. No. 34,383
`MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner Black Swamp
`
`/Abraham Kasdan/
`Abraham Kasdan
`Reg. No. 32, 997
`WIGGIN & DANA LLP
`
`James T. Bailey
`Reg. No. 44,518
`THE LAW OFFICE OF JAMES. T. BAILEY
`Attorneys for Petitioner Mangrove

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket