`
`1 of 1
`
`1/24/2014 8:16 AM
`
`Patent Risk
`
`Services
`
`Membership
`
`Why Join
`
`For the CFO
`
`Company
`
`News & Events
`
`Blog
`
`RPX Site Search
`
`Text Size | A | A
`Why Join
`
`Become a Member
`
`We are not an NPE
`
`We are a unique solution to NPE risk
`
`We deliver measurable risk reduction
`
`We can quantify your patent risk in financial terms
`
`We provide compelling ROI
`
`We price our service cost-effectively
`
`We provide valuable market intelligence
`
`We prevent patent litigation
`
`We can help after a litigation has begun
`
`RPX is uniquely able to help members of our client network quickly and
`cost-effectively extricate themselves from NPE lawsuits. Our central, trusted
`position in the market enables us to negotiate with plaintiffs, acquire a license
`to the litigated patent and selectively clear our clients from the suit. Through
`September 30, 2013, we had achieved more than 414 dismissals for our clients
`in 62 litigations.
`
`Our intervention is beneficial for both the plaintiff and the defendants. For NPE
`plaintiffs, we have the capital resources to offer a more compelling price than
`any single company will usually be willing to offer. We are also able to
`negotiate more dispassionately and effectively than a defendant in suit. For our
`clients, we act as a trusted representative to find a workable resolution and are
`able to achieve a far more cost-effective price for dismissal than any operating
`company can achieve unilaterally.
`
`We have a growing network of 160 satisfied clients
`
`We have solutions for large and small companies
`
`We are making the patent market more rational
`
`© 2008-2014 RPX Corporation. All rights reserved. | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Sitemap
`
`An ICVM Group Site
`
`http://www.rpxcorp.com/why-join-rpx
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2008
`RPX v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR 2014-00171
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2048
`Mangrove v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2015-01047
`
`Page 1 of 1
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
