IPR2015-01046, -01047
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`1
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`
`Exhibit 1060, page 1
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`1
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`
`Exhibit 1060, page 1
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`• Kiuchi’s User Agent as “Client [Computer]” Mapping
`- 151 Patent
`• “determining” by DNS proxy module
`• “between [A] and [B]” and obviousness based on Rescorla
`- 135 Patent
`• “direct” communications
`• Kiuchi’s Client-Side Proxy as “Client [Computer]” Mapping
`- Common Issue
`• Construction and Application of “client”/ “client computer”
`- 151 Patent
`• Obviousness based on RFC 1034 and/or Rescorla
`• Sending/Forwarding DNS request
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 2
`
`
`
`Claims
`
`3
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 3
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claim 1
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`4
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 4
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Claim 1
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`5
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 5
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Claim 7
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`6
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 6
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Claim 13
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`7
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 7
`
`
`
`135 Patent Mappings
`
`8
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 8
`
`
`
`135 Patent – User Agent to Origin Server Mapping
`
`135 Remand Br. at 12
`
`9
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 9
`
`
`
`135 Patent – Proxy to Proxy Mapping
`
`135 Remand Br. at 12
`
`10
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 10
`
`
`
`Direct
`
`11
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 11
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Direct Addressability
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036 (‘135)
`
`“I believe that figure 2 describes a link
`between the originating TARP terminal
`and the destination TARP terminal as
`being direct, in that the… TARP
`{{
`terminal 110 [sic] can directly address
`TARP terminal 110.”
`
`Ex. 1036 (‘135) at 79:22-80:7
`135 Remand Br. at 21
`
`{{
`
`12
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 12
`
`
`
`VirnetX’s Litigation Position: “Direct” Means “Direct Addressability”
`Ex. 1044 –Transcript of Trial, Afternoon Session (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2012)
`
`Trial Transcript
`Ex. 1044 (‘135)
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1044 (‘135) at 50:25-51:5
`135 Remand Br. at 10; 135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 16
`
`13
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 13
`
`
`
`HTTP Communications Are Direct
`
`135 Remand Br. at 22
`
`14
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 14
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: Direct HTTP Communications
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Ex. 1003, ¶33; 135 Petrs’ Reply at 14-15; 135 Remand Br. at 22
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 37
`
`15
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 15
`
`
`
`Kiuchi v. 135: “Direct” Allows Encryption and Wrapping
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 135 Petrs’ Reply at 14-15
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent at 13:33-39; 135 Petrs’ Reply at 14-15
`
`16
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 16
`
`
`
`HTTP Message Is Encrypted and Wrapped in C-HTTP
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`Encrypted HTTP/1.0 Get Request
`
`Kiuchi at 74-75; 135 Remand Br. at 15
`
`{{
`
`Encrypted HTTP/1.0 Response
`
`Kiuchi at 75; 135 Remand Br. at 16
`
`17
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 17
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`VirnetX: “C-HTTP Name Server Does Not
`Return the IP Address of the URL”
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`135 PO Remand Br. at 18
`
`135 Patent at 38:36-42; 135 Petrs’ Reply at 6; 135 Remand Br. at 9.
`
`18
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 18
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`With respect to the second argument, Apple argues that
`FaceTime servers do not provide “direct” communication
`because the communications are addressed to a NAT, rather
`than to the receiving device…
`
`Apple argues that this testimony cannot support a finding of
`infringement because it is inconsistent with the court's claim
`{{
`construction that required “direct addressability.” But the
`district court considered this argument and disagreed, noting
`that its claim construction expressly provided that “routers,
`firewalls, and similar servers ... Do not impede ‘direct’
`communication,” and VirnetX presented evidence that NATs
`operate like routers or firewalls.
`
`VirnetX, 767 F.3d at 1319-20
`135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 12
`
`19
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 19
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Mangrove, 778 F. Appx. 897 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
`
`VirnetX v. Mangrove
`(Fed. Cir. 2019)
`
`The statements VirnetX made during reexamination
`constitute disclaimer. VirnetX described a system in which a
`client computer communicates with an intermediate server
`via a singular, point-to-point connection. That intermediate
`server then relays the data to a target computer on the same
`private network on which the server resides. VirnetX stated
`that because the computers “do not communicate directly
`{{
`with each other” and “[t]he client cannot open a connection
`with the target itself,” the computers are not on the same
`VPN. This clearly and unmistakably states that a “VPN
`between the client computer and the target computer”
`requires direct communication between the client and target
`computers.
`
`VirnetX, 778 F. Appx. at 910
`135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 12
`
`20
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 20
`
`
`
`VirnetX’s Disclaimer
`
`Office Action
`Ex. 2036 (‘135)
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 2036 (‘135) at 7; 135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 10
`
`21
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 21
`
`
`
`VirnetX’s Description of Aventail
`
`Office Action
`Ex. 2036 (‘135)
`
`Ex. 2036 (‘135) at 4; 135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 10
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 2036 (‘135) at 5-6; 135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 10
`
`22
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 22
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Kiuchi’s “URL is the Address” of the “Resource on the Origin Server”
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036 (‘135)
`
`{{
`
`***
`
`Ex. 1036 (‘135) at 240:21-241:14
`135 Petrs’ Reply at 16
`
`23
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 23
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: Image and Sound Data Are Not Altered
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Ex. 1003 (‘135), 33;
`135 Petrs’ Reply at 16; 135 Remand Br. at 16
`
`Kiuchi at 67; 135 Petrs’ Reply at 16; 135 Remand Br. at 16
`
`24
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 24
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Kiuchi Can Send “Image or Sound” Files
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036 (‘135)
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 (‘135) at 229:22-230:12; 135 Petrs’ Remand Br. at 16.
`
`25
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 25
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`With respect to the second argument, Apple argues that FaceTime
`servers do not provide “direct” communication because the
`communications are addressed to a NAT, rather than to the receiving
`device. The district court concluded that there was substantial
`evidence to support the jury's finding that the NAT routers used by
`FaceTime do not impede direct communication, and we agree. As
`{{
`the district court noted, VirnetX’s expert testified that the NAT
`routers still allow for “end-to-end communication between the two
`devices,” because they merely translate addresses from the public
`address space to the private address space, but do not terminate the
`connection. Even Apple's expert admitted that the connection does
`not stop at the NAT routers.
`
`VirnetX, 767 F.3d at 1319-20
`135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 13-14
`
`26
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 26
`
`
`
`Client
`
`27
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 27
`
`
`
`Client Computer / Client
`
`’135: Client Computer
`{{
`
`Petitioners’ Construction
`A computer from which a
`data request to a server is
`generated
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction
`{{
`User’s Computer
`
`135 Petition at 15-16; 135 Resp. at 15
`
`’151: Client
`{{
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Petitioners’ Construction
`Construction
`A device, computer, system,
`User’s Computer
`{{
`or program from which a data
`request to a server is
`generated
`
`151 Petition at 15; 151 Resp. at 8
`
`28
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 28
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin’s Testimony on “Client”
`
`Guerin Declaration
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1003 (151) at ¶16
`151 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 10
`
`29
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 29
`
`
`
`VirnetX: Not Relying on “Special Definition” of “Client”
`
`Patent Owner’s 151
`Sur-Reply Brief
`
`{{
`
`PO’s 151 Sur-Reply Brief at 2
`
`30
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 30
`
`
`
`“Client” and “User’s Computer” Are Used Differently
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent at Fig. 26, 38:13-17;
`135 Petrs’ Reply at 9
`
`31
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 31
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose on “Conventional Client”
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036 (‘135)
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 (‘135) at 74:15-75:6
`135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 1
`
`32
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 32
`
`
`
`The Specification Has Multiple “Clients”
`
`Ex. 1001
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1001 at 1:45-56; Pet. at 16; 135 Petrs Remand Reply at 6.
`
`33
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 33
`
`
`
`VirnetX’s U.S. 9,386,000
`
`USP 9,386,000
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 3
`
`34
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 34
`
`
`
`RFC 1945: Client and Proxy
`
`RFC 1945
`Ex. 1014
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1014 at 5-6; 135 Pet. at 26-27 (citing Ex. 1003 ¶19); 135 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 9-10
`
`35
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 35
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Petitioners’ Construction of Client Computer
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 at 101:1-10
`135 Petrs Remand Reply at 9
`
`36
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 36
`
`
`
`“Client” Is Not Always Tied to a User
`
`Ex. 1001
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1001 at 16:16-55; 135 Pet. at 16
`
`37
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 37
`
`
`
`Federal Circuit on “Client”
`
`VirnetX v. Mangrove
`778 F. App'x 897
`
`{{
`
`778 F. App'x 897, 908; 135 Remand Br. 4
`
`38
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 38
`
`
`
`VirnetX Relies on Embodiments and Examples
`
`Ex. 1001
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1001 at 38:23-42
`135 PO Remand Br. at 4.
`
`39
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 39
`
`
`
`Kiuchi’s Client-Side Proxy is a “Client [Computer]”
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 135 Remand Br. 28-29
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. 26-27; 135 Reply 7-11; 135 Remand Br. 13-15
`
`40
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 40
`
`
`
`151 Patent Mappings
`
`41
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 41
`
`
`
`151 Patent – User Agent to Server-Side Proxy / Origin Server
`
`151 Remand Br. 11
`
`42
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 42
`
`
`
`151 Patent – Proxy to Proxy / Origin Server Mapping
`
`151 Remand Br. 17
`
`43
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 43
`
`
`
`DNS Proxy Module
`
`44
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 44
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petition
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 25
`See also BlackSwamp 151 Pet. at 13-14
`
`45
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 45
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`46
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 46
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`“determining whether… access to a secure web site [was requested]”
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 135 Pet. at 27-28
`
`47
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 47
`
`
`
`151 Patent Describes Several DNS Proxy Configurations
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Patent at Fig. 26, 38:22-24, 30-34;
`151 Petrs’ Reply at 8-9
`
`48
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 48
`
`
`
`Plain and Ordinary Meaning of “Determining”
`
`ePlus v. Lawson
`(Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`“…Lawson's argument invites us to hold that "determining" is
`limited to the act of looking up an item in the inventory by the
`party that has `control' over the inventory
`information. See Appellant's Br. 24-25. Under that terminology, a
`customer who causes a vendor to report whether a particular
`item is available does not "determine" whether that item is
`available. Of course, if Lawson desired such a narrow definition,
`it could (and should) have sought a construction to that effect. In
`{{
`the absence of such a construction, however, the jury was free
`to rely on the plain and ordinary meaning of the term
`"determining" and conclude that a user who prompts a
`vendor to report whether a particular item is available
`"determines" whether that item is available — much in the
`same way, for example, that one may call and speak to a
`sales representative at a local store to determine whether a
`certain item is in stock.”
`ePlus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc., 700 F.3d 509, 520. (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`151 Petrs’ Reply 16-17
`
`49
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 49
`
`
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`Remand Br.
`Paper 104
`
`Kiuchi
`“determining”
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 28-29
`See also BlackSwamp 151 Pet. at 15-16
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Remand Br. at 21
`
`50
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 50
`
`
`
`Between
`
`51
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 51
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petr’s Remand Reply
`
`{{
`
`151 Petr’s Remand Reply at 10
`
`52
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 52
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`{{
`
`VirnetX, 767 F.3d at 1321
`151 Petrs’ Remand Reply at 10
`
`53
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 53
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`VirnetX CC Br.
`Ex. 1009
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 64; 151 Pet. at 28
`
`Ex. 1009 at 10; 151 Petrs Remand Reply at 10
`
`54
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 54
`
`
`
`DNS Request
`
`55
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 55
`
`
`
`Domain Name Service (DNS) Request
`
`’135: DNS Request
`{{
`
`Petitioners’ Construction
`A request for a resource
`corresponding to a network
`address
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction
`{{
`A request for a resource
`corresponding to a domain
`name
`
`135 Resp. at 13
`
`’151: DNS Request
`{{
`
`Petitioners’ Construction
`A request for a resource
`corresponding to a network
`address
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction
`A request for a resource
`{{
`corresponding to a domain
`name
`
`151 Resp. at 14
`
`56
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 56
`
`
`
`Rescorla
`
`57
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 57
`
`
`
`Kiuchi Works with Other Security Protocols
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 69; 151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 39
`
`58
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 58
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: Rescorla Teaches End-to-End Encryption
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶34; 151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 38-40
`
`59
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 59
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi
`
`Kiuchi at 69-70
`151 Pet. at 39
`
`{{
`
`Petition at 26; Kiuchi at 64
`
`60
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 60
`
`
`
`Public Availability of Rescorla
`
`151 Petition
`Paper 2
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. at 5.
`
`151 Pet. at 39.
`
`61
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 61
`
`
`
`RFC 1034
`
`62
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 62
`
`
`
`RFC 1034: Two Types of DNS Servers
`
`RFC 1034
`Ex. 1005
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1005 at 4; 151 Petrs’ Remand Reply. at 26
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1005 at 22; 151 Petrs’ Remand Reply. at 26
`
`63
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 63
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1060, page 64
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
