throbber
VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2005
`Mangrove v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2015-01046
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Elifitlr Edition
`
`John Downes
`Editor, Beating 1119 Dow
`Former Vice President, AVCO Financial Services, Inc.
`Office for Economic Development, City of New York
`
`.
`Jordan Elliot Goodman
`Financial Analyst, NBC News at Sunrise
`Author, Everyone 's Money Book
`|
`Creator, The Money Answers Program
`Former Wall Street Correspondent,
`MONEY Magazine, Time Warner Incorporated
`Former Business News Commentator,
`Mutual Broadcasting System
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`PUT GUARANTEE LETTER
`
`482
`
`PUT GUARANTEE LETTER letter from a bank certifying that the per-
`son wiiting a put option on an underlying security or index instrument
`has sufficient funds on deposit at the bank to cover the exercise price of
`the put if needed. On a short put, the obligation is to pay the aggregate
`exercise price. There are two forms, as required under New York Stock
`Exchange Rule 431: the market index option deposit letter for index
`options, and the equity/Treasmy option deposit letter for security options.
`PUT OPTION
`Bonds: bondholder’s right to redeem a bond before maturity. See also
`PUT BOND.
`
`Options: contract that grants the right to sell at a specified price a spe.
`cific number of shares by a certain date. The put option buyer gains this
`right in return for payment of an OPTION PREMIUM. The put option seller
`grants this right in return for receiving this premium. For instance, a
`buyer of an XYZ May 70 put has the right to sell 100 shares of XYZ at
`$70 to the put seller at any time until the contract expires in May. A put
`option buyer hopes the stock will drop in price, while the put Option
`seller (called a writer) hopes the stock will remain stable, rise, or drop
`by an amount less than his or her profit on the premium.
`PUT T0 SELLER phrase used when a PUT OPTION is exercised. The
`OPTION WRITER is obligated to buy the underlying shares at the agreed
`upon price. If an XYZ June 40 put were “put to seller,” for instance,
`the writer would have to buy 100 shares of XYZ at $40 a share from
`the put holder even though the current market price of XYZ may be
`far less than $40 a share.
`
`PYRAMIDING
`In general: form of business expansion that makes extensive use of
`financial LEVERAGE to build complex corporate structures.
`Fraud: scheme that builds on nonexistent values, often in geometric
`progression, such as a chain letter, now outlawed by mail fraud legis-
`lation. A famous example was the Ponzi scheme, perpetrated by
`Charles Ponzi in the late 1920s. Investors were paid “earnings” out of
`money received from new investors until the scheme collapsed.
`Investments: using unrealized profits from one securities or commodi-
`ties POSITION as COLLATERAL to buy further positions with funds borrowed
`from a broker. This use of leverage creates increased profits in a BULL
`MARKET, and causes MARGIN CALLS and large losses in a BEAR MARKET.
`,
`Marketing: legal marketing strategy whereby additional distributor
`ships are sold side—by—side with consumer products in order to multiply
`market reach and maximize profits to the sales organization.
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket