throbber
Case 6:10-cv-00417-RWS Document 612 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 232 PageID #: 21622
`
` 1
`
` 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` 2 TYLER DIVISION
`
` 3
` VIRNETX, INC. )
` 4 DOCKET NO. 6:10cv417
` -vs- )
` 5 Tyler, Texas
` ) 12:34 p.m.
` 6 APPLE, INC. November 1, 2012
`
` 7
`
` 8 TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
` AFTERNOON SESSION
` 9 BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
` UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
` 10
`
` 11
`
` 12 A P P E A R A N C E S
`
` 13
`
` 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS:
`
` 15
` MR. DOUGLAS CAWLEY
` 16 MR. BRADLEY W. CALDWELL
` MR. JASON D. CASSADY
` 17 MR. JOHN AUSTIN CURRY
` McKOOL SMITH
` 18 300 Crescent Court, Ste. 1500
` Dallas, TX 75201
` 19
`
` 20
`
` 21 COURT REPORTERS: MS. JUDITH WERLINGER
` MS. SHEA SLOAN
` 22 shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov
`
` 23
`
` 24 Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
` produced by a Computer.
` 25
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., and Apple Inc.
`IPR2015-01046, Ex. 1044, p. 1
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-RWS Document 612 Filed 11/09/12 Page 2 of 232 PageID #: 21623
`
` 2
`
` 1 FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
`
` 2 MR. ROBERT M. PARKER
` MR. ROBERT CHRISTOPHER BUNT
` 3 PARKER BUNT & AINSWORTH
` 100 East Ferguson, Ste. 1114
` 4 Tyler, TX 75702
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
` FOR THE DEFENDANT:
` 9
` MR. DANNY L. WILLIAMS
` 10 MR. TERRY D. MORGAN
` MR. RUBEN S. BAINS
` 11 MR. CHRIS CRAVEY
` MR. MATT RODGERS
` 12 MR. DREW KIM
` MR. SCOTT WOLOSON
` 13 WILLIAMS, MORGAN & AMERSON, P.C.
` 10333 Richmond, Ste. 1100
` 14 Houston, TX 77042
`
` 15
` MR. ERIC ALBRITTON
` 16 MR. STEPHEN E. EDWARDS
` MS. DEBRA COLEMAN
` 17 MR. MATTHEW C. HARRIS
` ALBRITTON LAW FIRM
` 18 P.O. Box 2649
` Longview, TX 75606
` 19
`
` 20 MR. JOHN M. DESMARAIS
` MR. MICHAEL P. STADNICK
` 21 DESMARAIS, LLP - NEW YORK
` 230 Park Avenue
` 22 New York, NY 10169
`
` 23
`
` 24
`
` 25
`
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., and Apple Inc.
`IPR2015-01046, Ex. 1044, p. 2
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-RWS Document 612 Filed 11/09/12 Page 3 of 232 PageID #: 21624
`
` 3
`
` 1 P R O C E E D I N G S
` 2 (Jury out.)
` 3 COURT SECURITY OFFICER: All rise.
` 4 (Pause in proceedings.)
` 5 THE COURT: You may be seated until the
` 6 jury is ready.
` 7 (Pause in proceedings.)
` 8 COURT SECURITY OFFICER: All rise for the
` 9 jury.
` 10 (Jury in.)
` 11 THE COURT: Please be seated.
` 12 All right, Mr. Williams. You may
` 13 proceed.
` 14 MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you, Your Honor.
` 15 May it please the Court.
` 16 MARK JONES, Ph.D., PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS, PREVIOUSLY SWORN
` 17 CROSS-EXAMINATION
` 18 BY MR. WILLIAMS:
` 19 Q. Good afternoon, Dr. Jones.
` 20 A. Good afternoon, sir.
` 21 Q. My name is Danny Williams. We met earlier,
` 22 right?
` 23 A. Yes, sir.
` 24 Q. At your deposition that was taken earlier this
` 25 year?
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., and Apple Inc.
`IPR2015-01046, Ex. 1044, p. 3
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-RWS Document 612 Filed 11/09/12 Page 50 of 232 PageID #: 21671
`
` 50
`
` 1 the IP address is 1.15 coming in, right?
` 2 A. That's right.
` 3 Q. And going out, it's got a different IP
` 4 address, right?
` 5 A. That's right.
` 6 Q. So if you looked at the port address there, it
` 7 would be different, wouldn't it, because it's a
` 8 combination of a different IP address and port? Isn't
` 9 that correct?
` 10 A. That's correct. It's been translated to the
` 11 different address space.
` 12 Q. So you can't use the port -- the transport
` 13 address of the MacBook Air by the iPhone, can you? You
` 14 cannot directly address that transport address by the
` 15 iPhone. Isn't that correct?
` 16 A. I can. It has multiple addresses, and one of
` 17 them is that transport address. Another would be its
` 18 internal network IP address.
` 19 Q. And you will agree with me, right, that the
` 20 secure communication link requires direct communication?
` 21 Correct?
` 22 A. Yes.
` 23 MR. WILLIAMS: And that's Slide 50, if we
` 24 take a look at that real quick.
` 25 Q. (By Mr. Williams) This is Judge Davis'
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., and Apple Inc.
`IPR2015-01046, Ex. 1001, p. 50
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-RWS Document 612 Filed 11/09/12 Page 51 of 232 PageID #: 21672
`
` 51
`
` 1 construction. A secure communication link must be a
` 2 direct communication link.
` 3 And I believe that you've told us that direct
` 4 communication refers to direct addressability, correct?
` 5 A. That's correct.
` 6 MR. WILLIAMS: Let's see Slide 51 just to
` 7 confirm that we're not missing something.
` 8 Q. (By Mr. Williams) This was in your report,
` 9 right?
` 10 A. Yes.
` 11 Q. Okay. The word directly refers to direct
` 12 addressability. So if addressing changes, that would
` 13 not be direct addressability, right?
` 14 A. Well, I don't agree at all.
` 15 Q. Okay.
` 16 A. You'd have to look at the particulars of the
` 17 situation.
` 18 Q. Now, a secure communication link is not
` 19 necessarily a VPN; isn't that right?
` 20 A. That's correct.
` 21 Q. Okay. Well, we don't seem to be able to agree
` 22 on much. Let's go to something where we might be able
` 23 to agree.
` 24 I believe that you said this morning that
` 25 relays -- when relay servers are used in the
`
`Petitioners The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., and Apple Inc.
`IPR2015-01046, Ex. 1001, p. 51

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket