`
`Finnegan Facts | Diversity | Pro Bono | Press Room | Contact Us | Register | Languages
`
`Advanced Search
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Home > Services > Practice > Covered Business Method Patents
`
`
`
`Patent Office Trials - Covered Business Method Patents
`
`Since filing the first-ever petition for Covered Business Method Review (CBM) in
` November 2012, Finnegan attorneys have helped multiple clients navigate these
` unique PTAB procedures. Finnegan regularly fields teams of attorneys with the mix of
` experience needed to successfully contest CBM proceedings, including familiarity with
` the threshold requirements for instituting a CBM, expertise in the non-patentable
` subject matter challenges often brought in these proceedings, knowledge of the
` technology at issue, and experience briefing and arguing cases before the PTAB. In
` addition, Finnegan attorneys stand ready to assist their clients with parallel litigation
` beyond the Patent Office, including motions to stay, the automatic interlocutory appeal
` of stay decisions to the Federal Circuit, and the eventual appeal of the PTAB decision
` itself. This integrated, team approach has allowed Finnegan to provide effective,
` efficient representation of its clients in more than 25 of the 225 CBMs filed to date.
`
`Overview
`Professionals
`Representative
` Engagements
`Articles
`News
`Events
`Contacts
`
`Patent Office Trials
` Areas:
`Inter Partes Review
`Post-grant Review
`Covered Business
` Method Patents
`Interferences
`Derivations
`Appeals of PTAB Trial
` Decisions
`
`Privacy | Disclaimer | Site Map | ©2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`
`http://www.finnegan.com/coveredbusinessmethodpatentspractice/[7/9/2015 10:29:19 AM]
`
`Caterpillar v. ESCO IPR2015-01032
`ESCO Exhibit 2045 Page 1
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patents | Practice | Finnegan
`
`http://www.finnegan.com/coveredbusinessmethodpatentspractice/[7/9/2015 10:29:19 AM]
`
`Caterpillar v. ESCO IPR2015-01032
`ESCO Exhibit 2045 Page 2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
