throbber
Inter Partes Review | Practice | Finnegan
`
`Finnegan Facts | Diversity | Pro Bono | Press Room | Contact Us | Register | Languages
`
`Advanced Search
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Home > Services > Practice > Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`Overview
`Professionals
`Representative
` Engagements
`Articles
`IP Updates
`News
`Events
`Contacts
`
`Patent Office Trials
` Areas:
`Inter Partes Review
`Post-grant Review
`Covered Business
` Method Patents
`Interferences
`Derivations
`Appeals of PTAB Trial
` Decisions
`
`Patent Office Trials - Inter Partes Review
`
`The America Invents Act (AIA) did away with inter partes reexamination and created an
` inter partes review (IPR) procedure. While post-grant review provides a petitioner a
` forum to challenge a patent on any basis of patentability, IPRs are limited to
` challenges on the grounds of novelty and non-obviousness based on only patents and
` printed publications. A challenged patent in an IPR is not presumed valid, unlike in
` district court litigation. IPRs are trial-like proceedings conducted in front of a panel of
` administrative patent judges—the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Parties may
` collect evidence by deposing experts and inventors, and the parties support their
` cases with oral arguments before the PTAB.
`
`Finnegan attorneys are involved in more than 150 IPRs. Our professionals represent
` clients in a wide range of technologies and industries, from pharmaceutical dosage
` forms to oil processing to the mechanical arts. More than 230 are registered to
` practice before the USPTO, and they have a wealth of experience in all aspects of
` patent office practice. This experience, combined with Finnegan’s extensive litigation
` practice before U.S. district courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission,
` makes the firm particularly well suited for this new PTAB procedure.
`
`Privacy | Disclaimer | Site Map | ©2015 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`
`http://www.finnegan.com/InterPartesReviewPractice/[7/9/2015 10:28:03 AM]
`
`Caterpillar v. ESCO IPR2015-01032
`ESCO Exhibit 2044 Page 1
`
`

`
`Inter Partes Review | Practice | Finnegan
`
`http://www.finnegan.com/InterPartesReviewPractice/[7/9/2015 10:28:03 AM]
`
`Caterpillar v. ESCO IPR2015-01032
`ESCO Exhibit 2044 Page 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket