throbber
4. What is your Company's direct contribution to community development projects - Amount in INR and the details of
`the projects undertaken?
`During the year ended March 31, 2015, an amount of $183.6 million was spent on various community development
`projects namely economic advancement through Education and training, Agricultural development, Animal husbandry,
`Women empowerment, Sports activities, Community health management, Infrastructure development, Flood and fire relief
`activities, Natural resource management, Promotion of rural industries and Learn and earn activities.
`
`5. Have you taken steps to ensure that this community development initiative is successfully adopted by the community?
`Please explain in 50 words, or so.
`Public Private and Community Partnership model is followed in the CSR activities by actively involving the community in the
`decision making process. Before initiating any CSR activity, needs of the community are identified. The Company implements
`its CSR activities through community groups such as Lupin Gram Vikas Panchayat, farmer clubs, women self—help groups and
`village development communities.
`
`Principle 9
`
`1. What percentage of customer complaints/consumer cases are pending as on the end of financial year?
`As on March 31, 2015, about 1% of customer complaints received during the year, were pending, which have since been
`resolved.
`
`2. Does the Company display product information on the product label, over and above what is mandated as per local
`laws? Yes/No/N.A./Remarks (additional information).
`
`The Company follows all legal statutes with respect to product labeling and displaying of product information.
`
`3.
`
`irresponsible
`Is there any case filed by any stakeholder against the Company regarding unfair trade practices,
`advertising and/or anti-competitive behaviour during the last five years and pending as on end of financial year. If so,
`provide details thereof, in about 50 words or so.
`Nil.
`
`4. Did your Company carry out any consumer survey/consumer satisfaction trends?
`Consumer surveys are regularly carried out by the Company at doctor level.
`
`For and on behalf of the Board of Directors
`
`Dr. Desh Bandhu Gupta
`Chairman
`
`Mumbai, May 13,2015
`
`106 | Lupin Limited
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 107 of 212)
`
`

`
`CONSOLIDATED
`
`ACCOUNTS
`
`Annual Report 2015 | 107
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 108 of 212)
`
`

`
`INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
`
`TO THE MEMBERS OF LUPIN LIMITED
`
`Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
`We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial
`statements of LUPIN LIMITED ("the Holding Company") and its
`subsidiaries (the Holding Company and its subsidiaries constitute
`”the Group"), and its jointly controlled entity, comprising of
`the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2015,
`the
`Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss, the Consolidated
`
`Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary
`of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory
`information ("the consolidated financial statements”).
`
`Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial
`Statements
`
`The Holding Company's Board of Directors is responsible for
`the preparation of these consolidated financial statements in
`terms of the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 ("the
`Act") that give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial
`position, consolidated financial performance and consolidated
`cash flows of the Group including its jointly controlled entity in
`accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted
`"n
`India,
`including the Accounting
`Standards
`specified
`under Section
`133 of
`the Act,
`read with Rule 7 of
`the
`
`Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. The respective Board of
`Directors of the companies included in the Group and its jointly
`controlled entity are responsible for maintenance of adequate
`accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act
`or safeguarding the assets of the Group and for preventing
`and detecting frauds and other irregularities;
`the selection
`and application of appropriate accounting policies; making
`'udgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
`and the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate
`'nternal financial controls, that were operating effectively for
`ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting
`ecords, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
`inancial statements that give a true and fair view and are free
`rom material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
`which have been used for the preparation of the consolidated
`inancial statements by the Directors of the Holding Company,
`as aforesaid.
`
`Auditors’ Responsibility
`Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
`financial statements based on our audit.
`
`While conducting the audit, we have taken into account the
`provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards
`and matters which are required to be included in the audit
`report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made
`thereunder.
`
`108 | Lupin Limited
`
`We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on
`
`Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those
`Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements
`and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
`about whether the consolidated financial statements are free
`from material misstatement.
`
`involves performing procedures to obtain audit
`An audit
`evidence about
`the amounts and the disclosures
`in
`the
`
`consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected
`depend on the auditor's judgment,
`including the assessment
`of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated
`
`In making
`financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
`those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial
`
`cont ol relevant to the Holding Company's preparation of the
`consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view
`in o der to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
`the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
`opin'on on whether the Holding Company has an adequate
`internal financial controls system over financial reporting in
`place and the operating effectiveness of such controls. An audit
`also 'ncludes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting
`polices used and the reasonableness ofthe accounting estimates
`made by the Holding Company's Board of Directors, as well as
`evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial
`statements.
`
`We believe that the audit evidence obtained by us and the audit
`evidence obtained by the other auditors in terms of their reports
`referred to in the Other Matters paragraph below,
`is sufficient
`and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the
`consolidated financial statements.
`
`Opinion
`In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
`to the explanations given to us,
`the aforesaid consolidated
`financial statements give the information required by the Act
`in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in
`conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted
`in India, of the consolidated state of affairs of the Group and
`its jointly controlled entity as at March 31, 2015, and their
`consolidated profit and their consolidated cash flows for the
`year ended on that date.
`
`Other Matter
`
`We did not audit the financial statements/financial information
`
`of 20 subsidiaries and 1 jointly controlled entity, whose financial
`statements / financial
`information reflect total assets (net) of
`? 22,330.5 million as at March 31, 2015, total revenues of
`
`? 24,0801 million and net cash inflows amounting to ? 327.7
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 109 of 212)
`
`

`
`million fo the year ended on that date, as considered in the
`consolida ed financial statements. These financial statements
`/ financia information have been audited by other auditors,
`whose reports have been furnished to us by the Management
`and our opinion, on the consolidated financial statements, in
`so far as "t relates to the amounts and disclosures included in
`respect o these subsidiaries and jointly controlled entity, and
`our repor
`in terms of sub—sections (3) and (1 1) of Section 143
`of the Act, insofar as it relates to the aforesaid subsidiaries and
`
`is based solely on the reports of the
`
`jointly controlled entity,
`Orher aUOlrrOr5-
`Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements and our
`report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements below,
`is
`not modified in respect of the above matter with respect to our
`reliance on the work done and the reports of the other auditors.
`
`Report on other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
`1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order,
`2015 ("the Order") issued by the Central Government in
`terms of sub—section (11) of Section 143 of the Act, based
`on the comments in the auditors’ reports of the Holding
`Company and the subsidiary company incorporated in
`India, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
`specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order, to the extent
`applicable.
`
`2. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report, to the
`exteht epprreebre, that:
`(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and
`explanations which to the best of our knowledge and
`belief were necessary forthe purposes of our audi of
`the aforesaid consolidated financial statements.
`
`(b)
`
`In our opinion, proper books of account as requi ed
`by law relating to the preparation of the aforesaid
`consolidated financial statements have been kept by
`the company so far as it appears from our examinaton
`of those books and the reports of the other auditors.
`
`the Consolida ed
`(c) The Consolidated Balance Sheet,
`Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Consolida ed
`
`Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are
`in agreement with the relevant books of account
`maintained for the purpose of preparation of
`he
`consolidated financial statements.
`
`(d)
`
`the aforesaid consolidated financial
`In our opinion,
`statements comply with the Accounting Standards
`specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule
`7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
`
`(e) On the basis of the written representations received
`fromthe directors ofthe Holding Company as on March
`31, 2015 taken on record by the Board of Directors of
`the Holding Company and the report of the statutory
`auditors of its subsidiary company incorporated in
`India, none of the directors of the Group companies
`incorporated in India is disqualified as on March 31,
`2015 from being appointed as a director in terms of
`Section 164(2) of the Act.
`
`he) Wrth respect to the other rhetters to he rheruded rh
`the Auditor's Report
`in accordance with Rule 11 of
`the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014,
`in
`our opinion and to the best of our information and
`according to the explanations given to us:
`r.
`The eohsorrdeted trheherer steterhehts drserose the
`
`ii.
`
`impact of pending litigations on the consolidated
`rrheheral hosrrroh or rhe Group ahel
`rrs
`lorhrly
`eohrrolleel ehrrry ' Rerer Nore 32(3)’ (b)! (C)! ahel
`re) re rhe eohsolrelereel rrhaherel Srarerhehrsi
`3rovision has been made in the consolidated
`inancial
`statements,
`as
`required under
`the
`applicable
`law or accounting standards,
`for
`haterial foreseeable losses,
`if any, on long—term
`contracts including derivative contracts — Refer
`
`Ores 40 (ll ahel 4l re rhe eohsolrelereel rrhaherel
`statements, in respect ofsuch items as it relates to
`he Group and lrs lolhtly Controlled ehmyr
`rrr- There has beeh he delay rh rrahsrerrrhg erhouhrsl
`equrreel
`re
`be
`rrahsrerreell
`re
`rhe
`lhvesror
`Zelueerloh ahel Proreerroh ruhel by rhe rlolelrhg
`Company. There were
`no
`amounts which
`were required to be transferred to the Investor
`Education and Protection Fund by its subsidiary
`company incorporated in India.
`
`For D9l°ltte Hasklhs 8‘ Sells l-l-P
`Chartered Accouhrahrs
`(Flrm'5 Reglsrlarloh N0 ll7366VV/VV'lOO0l8)
`
`Place : Mumbai
`Dated : May 13, 2015
`
`K.A. Katki
`Partner
`(Membership No.: 038568)
`
`Annual Report 2015 | 109
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 110 of 212)
`
`

`
`AN NEXU RE TO
`
`THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
`
`(Referred to in paragraph 1 under ‘Report on Other Legal and Regulatory
`Requirements’ section of our report of even date)
`
`Our reporting on the Order includes 1 subsidiary company incorporated
`in India, to which the Order is applicable, which has been audited by
`other auditor and our report in respect of this entity is based solely on
`the report of the other auditor, to the extent considered applicable
`for reporting under the Order in the case of the consolidated financial
`statements.
`
`(i)
`
`respect of the fixed assets of the Holding Company and
`In
`subsidiary company incorporated in India:
`
`records
`(a) The respective entities have maintained proper
`showing full particulars,
`including quantitative details and
`situation of fixed assets.
`
`(b) The Holding Company has a program of verification of
`fixed assets to cover all the items in a phased manner over
`a period of three years which,
`in our opinion, is reasonable
`having regard to the size of the respective entities and the
`nature of their assets. Pursuant to the program, certain fixed
`assets were physically verified by the Management of the
`entity during the year. According to the information and
`explanations given to us, no material discrepancies were
`noticed on such verification.
`
`The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by
`the Management of the subsidiary company incorporated in
`India. According to the information and explanations given
`to the other auditor, no discrepancies were noticed on such
`verification.
`
`(ii)
`
`In respect of the inventories of the Holding Company:
`
`(a) As explained to us, the inventories were physically verified
`during the year by the Management of
`the entity at
`reasonable intervals.
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and
`explanations given to us,
`the procedures of physical
`verification of inventories followed by the Management of
`the entity were reasonable and adequate in relation to the
`size of the entity and the nature of their business.
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and
`explanations given
`to us,
`the Holding Company has
`maintained proper records of its inventories and no material
`discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
`
`Having regard to the nature of the business /activities of the
`subsidiary company incorporated in India, clause (ii) of para
`3 of the order is not applicable to the subsidiary company, as
`reported by the other auditor.
`
`(iii) The Holding Company and subsidiary company incorporated
`in
`India have not granted any loans, secured or unsecured,
`to companies,
`firms or other parties covered in the Register
`maintained under Section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013 by the
`respective entities.
`
`(iv)
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
`
`110 | Lupin Limited
`
`given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the
`items purchased are of special nature and suitable alternative
`sources are not
`readily available for obtaining comparable
`quotations, there is an adequate internal control system in the
`Holding Company commensurate with the size of the respective
`entities and the nature of their business with regard to purchases
`of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and services,
`and in respect of the subsidiary company incorporated in India, in
`respect of purchase of asset. The subsidiary company incorporated
`in India does not have any inventory, sale of goods and services.
`During the course of our and the other auditors’ audit, no major
`weakness in such internal control system has been observed.
`
`According to the information and explanations given to us, the
`Holding Company and subsidiary company incorporated in
`India have not accepted any deposit during the year in terms of
`provisions of Sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions
`of the Companies Act, 2013. There were no unclaimed deposits
`as at the year end. The other auditor has not commented in
`respect of unclaimed deposit in respect of the subsidiary company
`incorporated in India.
`
`in
`According to the information and explanations given to us,
`our opinion, the Holding Company has, prima facie, made and
`maintained the prescribed cost records pursuant to the Companies
`(Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014, as amended, prescribed by
`the Central Government under subsection (1) of Section 148 of
`the Companies Act, 2013. We have, however, not made a detailed
`examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether
`
`they are accurate or complete.
`
`Having regard to the nature ofthe nature ofthe business/activities
`of the subsidiary company incorporated in India, clause (vi) of para
`3 of the order is not applicable to the subsidiary company, as
`reported by the other auditor.
`
`in
`According to the information and explanations given to us,
`respect of statutory dues of the Holding Company and subsidiary
`company incorporated in India:
`
`in
`respective entities have generally been regular
`(a) The
`depositing undisputed statutory dues,
`including Provident
`Fund, Employees’ State Insurance,
`lncome—tax, Sales Tax,
`Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value
`Added Tax, Cess and other material statutory dues applicable
`to the respective entities with the appropriate authorities.
`
`(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable by the respective
`entities in
`respect of Provident Fund, Employees’ State
`Insurance,
`lncome—tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
`Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax, Cess and other
`material statutory dues in arrears as at March 31, 2015 for a
`period of more than six months from the date they became
`payable.
`
`(c) Details of dues of lncome—tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax and
`Excise Duty which have not been deposited as on March 31,
`2015 on account of disputes by the Holding Company are
`given below:
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 111 of 212)
`
`

`
`Name of Statute
`Nature of Dues
`Forum where Dispute is Pending
`Period to which the
`Amount Involved
`
`Amount Relates
`R In million)
`
`Income-tax
`Act’ 1961
`
`Income tax
`
`Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) —
`LTU
`
`l
`
`C
`
`en ra
`t
`.
`Excise Act, 1944
`
`Excise duty
`
`Service tax credit
`matters
`
`Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate
`Tribunal (CESTAT)
`.
`.
`.
`Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)
`Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate
`.
`Tribunal (CESTAT)
`Sales Tax Tribunal
`
`Central and
`
`Vallous States’ Sales
`Tax Acts
`
`Sales tax
`
`Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals)
`
`Assistant Commissioner of Sales
`Tax (Investigations)
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Additional Commissioner
`Deputy Commissioner
`
`2006-2008
`
`l996_l 997'
`l998'ZOOO'
`Zool-Z0l0
`1997-1998
`ZOOZ_ZOO7
`
`2005-2008
`
`2006-2009
`
`2004-2005,
`2006-2007,
`ZOO8'ZOl4
`
`200620“
`2002-2003,
`201 LZO13
`2000-2001
`
`55.5
`
`486
`
`1.1
`
`202.3
`
`21.0
`
`25.0
`
`Z07
`
`4.8
`0.3
`
`There are no dues ofWealth Tax, Customs Duty, Value Added
`Tax and Cess which have not been deposited as on March 31,
`2015 on account of disputes by the Holding Company.
`In respect of the subsidiary company incorporated in India,
`there are no dues of Income- ax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
`Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Value Added Tax and
`Cess which have not been deposited as on March 31, 2015
`on account of disputes, as repor ed by the other auditor.
`
`(d) The Company has been regular in transferring amounts to
`the Investor Education and Pro ection Fund in accordance
`
`with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956
`(1 of 1956) and Rules made thereunderwithin time. There are
`no amounts that are due to be ransferred by the subsidiary
`company incorporated in India to the Investor Education and
`Protection Fund in accordance with the relevant provisions
`of the Companies Act, 1956 (
`of 1956) and Rules made
`thereunder as reported by the 0 her auditor.
`
`(viii) The Group does not have consolidated accumulated losses at the
`end of the financial year and the Group has not incurred cash
`losses on a consolidated basis during the financial year covered by
`our audit and in the immediately preceding financial year.
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
`given to us,
`the Holding Company has not defaulted in the
`repayment of dues to banks. The Holding Company has not
`obtained loans from financial institutions or by way of debentures.
`The subsidiary company incorporated in India has not borrowed
`from any financial Institution or banks issued any debenture as
`reported by the other auditor.
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
`given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by
`the Holding Company for loans taken by others outside of the
`
`Group and its jointly controlled entity from financial insititutions
`are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interests of the Group and
`its jointly controlled entity. According to the information and
`explanations given to us, the Holding Company has not given
`guarantees for loans taken by others outside of the Group and its
`jointly controlled entity from banks. According to the information
`and explanations given to us, the subsidiary company incorporated
`in India has not given guarantees for loans taken by others from
`banks and financial institutions.
`
`In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
`given to us,
`the term loans have been applied by the Holding
`Company during the year for the purposes for which they were
`obtained, other than temporary deployment pending application.
`The subsidiary company incorporated in India has not taken any
`loans as reported by the other auditor.
`
`To the best of our knowledge and according to the information
`and explanations given to us and the other auditor, no fraud by
`the Holding Company and its subsidiary company incorporated
`in India and no material fraud on the Holding Company and
`subsidiary company incorporated in India has been noticed or
`reported during the year.
`
`For Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP
`Chartered Accountants
`
`(Firm’s Registration No. 117366W/\N-100018)
`
`Place :Mumbai
`
`K.A. Katki
`Partner
`
`Dated : May 13,
`
`2015
`
`(Membership No.: 038568)
`
`Annual Report 2015 | 111
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 112 of 212)
`
`

`
`CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT MARCH 31, 2015
`
`Note
`
`As at 31.03.2015
`? in million
`
`As at31.03.2014
`? in million
`
`EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
`Shareholders’ Funds
`Share Capital
`Reserves and Surplus
`
`Minority Interest
`
`Non—Current Liabilities
`Long—Term Borrowings
`Deferred Tax Liabilities (net)
`Other Long—Term Liabilities
`Long—Term Provisions
`
`Current Liabilities
`Short—Term Borrowings
`Trade Payables
`Other Current Liabilities
`Short—Term Provisions
`
`ASSETS
`Non—Current Assets
`Fixed Assets
`Tangible Assets
`Intangible Assets — Acquired
`Capital Work—in—Progress
`Intangible Assets Under Development
`
`Goodwill on Consolidation
`Non—Current Investments
`Deferred Tax Assets (net)
`Long—Term Loans and Advances
`Other Non—Current Assets
`
`Current Assets
`Current Investments
`Inventories
`Trade Receivables
`Cash and Cash Equivalents
`Short—Term Loans and Advances
`Other Current Assets
`
`2
`3
`
`45
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8
`9
`10
`11
`
`TOTAL
`
`12
`
`43 (f)
`13
`14
`15
`16
`
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`TOTAL
`
`899.0
`87,841.6
`88,740.6
`241.0
`
`1,018.3
`2,024.1
`440.8
`1,620.3
`5,103.5
`
`3,691.5
`19,560.6
`8,297.6
`5,742.6
`37,292.3
`131,377.4
`
`26,271.4
`929.4
`5,196.9
`562.8
`32,960.5
`16,481.1
`25.1
`842.0
`2,742.0
`3.2
`53,053.9
`
`16,558.9
`25,035.6
`26,565.7
`4,813.5
`3,420.6
`1,929.2
`78,3235
`131,377.4
`
`896.8
`68,418.9
`69,315.7
`669.4
`
`1,509.6
`2,486.6
`458.6
`1,324.9
`5,779.7
`
`4,023.8
`15,941.3
`2,876.4
`3,454.0
`26,295.5
`102,060.3
`
`26,038.3
`939.0
`2,842.6
`198.6
`30,018.5
`6,578.7
`20.6
`708.1
`3,729.9
`—
`41,055.8
`
`1,764.1
`21,294.5
`24,641.0
`7,975.0
`3,016.9
`2,313.0
`61,0045
`102,060.3
`
`See accompanying notes forming part of the consolidated financial statements
`
`In terms of our report attached
`For Deloitte Haskins 84 Sells LLP
`Chartered Accountants
`
`K.A. Katki
`Partner
`
`For Lupin Limited
`
`Dr. Desh Bandhu Gupta
`Chairman
`DIN: 00209378
`
`Dr. Kamal K. Sharma
`Vice Chairman
`DIN: 00209430
`
`Vinita Gupta
`Chief Executive Officer
`DIN: 00058631
`
`Nilesh Gupta
`Managing Director
`DIN: 01734642
`Richard Zahn
`Director
`DIN: 02937226
`
`Dileep C. Choksi
`Director
`DIN: OOO16322
`Ramesh Swaminathan
`Chief Financial Officer
`
`M. D. Gupta
`Executive Director
`DIN: 00209461
`R. A. Shah
`Director
`DIN: 00009851
`
`R. V. Satam
`Company Secretary
`ACS — 11973
`
`Dr. Vijay Kelkar
`Director
`DIN: 00011991
`Dr. K. U. Mada
`Director
`DIN: 00011395
`
`: Mumbai
`Place
`Dated : May 13,2015
`
`112 | Lupin Limited
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 113 of 212)
`
`

`
`CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
`For the Current
`For the Previous
`Year ended
`Year ended
`31.03.2015
`31.03.2014
`
`Note
`
`? in million
`
`? in million
`
`INCOME:
`
`Revenue from Operations (Gross)
`Less 1 Excise Duty
`Revenue from Operations (Net)
`Other Income
`Total Revenue
`EXPENSES:
`
`Cost of Raw and Packing Materials Consumed
`Purchases of Stock—in—Trade
`
`Changes in Inventories
`of Finished Goods, Work—in—Process and Stock—in—Trade
`
`Employee Benefits Expense
`Finance Costs
`
`Depreciation and Amortisation Expense
`Other Expenses
`Total Expenses
`Profit before Tax
`
`Tax Expense/ (Benefit):
`— CurrentTax Expense
`— Tax Benefit for Prior Years
`
`Add 1 Share of Joint Venture — jointly controlled entity
`Net Current Tax Expense
`— Deferred Tax (net)
`
`Add 1 Share of Joint Venture — jointly controlled entity
`Profit after Tax before Minority Interest
`Less 1 Share of profit attributable to Minority Interest
`Profit for the year attributable to Shareholders of the Company
`Earnings per equity share (in ?)
`Basic
`Diluted
`
`Face Value of Equity Share (in ?)
`See accompanying notes forming part of the consolidated financial statements
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`28
`
`12
`29
`
`35
`
`128,635.2
`935.1
`127,700.1
`2,397.5
`130,097.6
`
`25,194.2
`17,833.1
`
`(1,456.9)
`
`17,473.4
`98.1
`
`4,347.0
`32,460.4
`95,949.3
`34,148.3
`
`10,061.7
`(26.4)
`
`6.3
`10,041.6
`(337.1)
`
`(0.5)
`24,444.3
`411.9
`24,032.4
`
`53.54
`53.20
`
`2.00
`
`113,670.5
`804.8
`112,865.7
`1,164.8
`114,030.5
`
`24,213.6
`15,964.3
`
`(2,004.1)
`
`14,646.5
`266.5
`
`2,609.7
`30,017.5
`85,714.0
`28,316.5
`
`9,551.7
`(15.7)
`
`—
`9,536.0
`85.5
`
`—
`18,695.0
`331.3
`18,363.7
`
`40.99
`40.79
`
`2.00
`
`In terms of our report attached
`For Deloitte Haskins 84 Sells LLP
`Chartered Accountants
`
`K.A. Katki
`Partner
`
`For Lupin Limited
`
`Dr. Desh Bandhu Gupta
`Chairman
`DIN: 00209378
`
`Dr. Kamal K. Sharma
`Vice Chairman
`DIN: 00209430
`
`Vinita Gupta
`Chief Executive Officer
`DIN: 00058631
`
`Nilesh Gupta
`Managing Director
`DIN: 01734642
`Richard Zahn
`Director
`DIN: 02937226
`
`Dileep C. Choksi
`Director
`DIN1OOO16322
`Ramesh Swaminathan
`Chief Financial Officer
`
`M. D. Gupta
`Executive Director
`DIN: 00209461
`R. A. Shah
`Director
`DIN: 00009851
`
`R. V. Satam
`Company Secretary
`ACS — 11973
`
`Dr. Vijay Kelkar
`Director
`DIN: 00011991
`Dr. K. U. Mada
`Director
`DIN: 00011395
`
`1 Mumbai
`Place
`Dated 1 May 13,2015
`
`Annual Report 2015 | 113
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 114 of 212)
`
`

`
`CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
`For the Current
`Year ended
`31.03.2015
`
`? in million
`
`For the Previous
`Year ended
`31.03.2014
`
`? in million
`
`A. Cash Flow from Operating Activities
`Profit before Tax
`
`Adjustments for:
`Depreciation and Amortisation Expense
`_oss on sale /write—off of Fixed Assets (net)
`Zinance Costs
`
`et Gain on Sale of Current Investments
`
`nterest on Deposits with Banks
`Dividend on Current Investments
`
`Dividend on Long—Term Investment
`Drovision for Doubtful Trade Receivables /Advances / Deposits
`Excess of carrying cost over fair value of Current Investments
`Drovision for Doubtful Trade Receivables / Deposits written back
`Credit Balances Written Back
`
`Expenses on Employees Stock Options / Stock Appreciation Rights
`mpairment of Assets
`Jnrealised Exchange (gain) / loss on revaluation (net)
`et unrealised exchange difference during the year
`Operating Profit before Working Capital Changes
`Changes in working capital:
`Adjustments for (increase) / decrease in operating assets:
`Inventories
`Trade Receivables
`Short—Term Loans and Advances
`
`Long—”erm Loans and Advances
`Other Current Assets
`
`Adjustments for increase / (decrease) in operating liabilities:
`Trade Dayables
`Other Current Liabilities
`
`Other _ong—Term Liabilities
`Short—”erm Provisions
`
`Long—Term Provisions
`Cash Generated from Operations
`Net Incosne tax paid
`Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities
`B. Cash Flow from Investing Activities
`Capital expenditure on fixed assets, including capital advances
`Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
`
`Purchase of Non—Current Investments
`Net Gain on sale of Current Investments
`
`Consideration for acquisition of subsidiary companies
`Bank balances not considered as Cash and Cash Equivalents (net)
`Interest on Deposits with Banks
`Dividend on Current Investments
`
`Dividend on Long—term Investments
`Net Cash used in Investing Activities
`
`114 | Lupin Limited
`
`34,148.3
`
`28,316.5
`
`4,347.0
`43.1
`98.1
`
`(4.0)
`
`(74.7)
`(650.8)
`
`(0.2)
`1.8
`2.5
`(119.4)
`—
`
`676.8
`—
`(182.9)
`(570.0)
`37,715.6
`
`(3,366.4)
`(1,236.2)
`(193.4)
`
`248.0
`468.0
`
`3,224.5
`(215.9)
`
`(21.7)
`(126.6)
`
`270.6
`36,766.5
`(9,436.0)
`27,330.5
`
`(8,711.8)
`36.0
`
`(4.5)
`4.0
`
`(6,294.1)
`3,699.6
`74.7
`650.8
`
`0.2
`(10,545.1)
`
`2,609.7
`1 19.4
`266.5
`
`(5.5)
`
`(138.6)
`(26.0)
`
`(0.2)
`273.7
`—
`(7.3)
`(176.8)
`
`211.0
`429.0
`595.5
`(45.4)
`32,421.5
`
`(1,563.3)
`(3,360.3)
`415.8
`
`(858.5)
`111.3
`
`256.5
`311.7
`
`(71.7)
`(82.9)
`
`178.3
`27,758.4
`(7,719.1)
`20,039.3
`
`(5,286.4)
`34.0
`
`—
`5.5
`
`(886.8)
`(2,616.5)
`138.6
`26.0
`
`0.2
`(8,585.4)
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 115 of 212)
`
`

`
`C. Cash Flow from Financing Activities
`
`Repayment of Long—Term Borrowings (net)
`
`Repayment of Short—Term Borrowings — Loans from banks (net)
`
`Proceeds from issue of equity shares (ESOPs)
`Securities Premium Received (ESOPs)
`
`Finance Costs
`
`Dividend paid
`
`Corporate Tax on Dividend
`Net Cash used in Financing Activities
`
`Net increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
`
`Cash and Cash Equivalents as at the beginning of the year
`
`Cash and Cash Equivalents taken over on acquisition of subsidiary companies
`Cash and Cash Equivalents as at the end of the year
`
`Reconciliation of Cash and Cash Equivalents with the Balance Sheet
`
`Cash and Cash Equivalents as per Balance Sheet (Refer note 20)
`
`Unrealised loss/(gain) on foreign currency Cash and Cash Equivalents
`
`Less: Bank balances not considered as Cash and Cash Equivalents as defined
`in AS—3 — Cash Flow Statements (Refer note 20)
`
`Add: Current investments considered as part of Cash and Cash Equivalents
`(Refer note 17)
`
`For the Current
`Year ended
`31.03.2015
`
`? in million
`
`For the Previous
`Year ended
`31.03.2014
`
`? in million
`
`(690.2)
`
`(9.3)
`
`2.2
`410.8
`
`(109.2)
`
`(1,344.5)
`
`(228.7)
`(1,968.9)
`
`14,816.5
`
`6,066.2
`
`201.6
`21 ,084.3
`
`4,813.5
`
`14.1
`
`304.7
`
`(1 ,984.6)
`
`(3,313.6)
`
`1.7
`237.7
`
`(278.2)
`
`(3,214.9)
`
`(19.2)
`(8,571 .1)
`
`2,882.8
`
`3,109.3
`
`74.1
`6,066.2
`
`7,975.0
`
`180.1
`
`3,853.0
`
`16,561.4
`
`1,764.1
`
`Cash and Cash Equivalents as restated as at the year end
`
`21 ,084.3
`
`6,066.2
`
`Notes :
`
`1.
`
`The above Cash Flow Statement has been prepared under the ‘Indirect Method’ as set out in the Accounting Standard 3 (AS—3),
`"Cash Flow Statements".
`
`2. Consideration for acquisition of subsidiary companies and Other Current Liabilities exclude investments of ? 5,977.6 million
`(previous year ? nil) [Refer note 43 (d) (iv)]
`
`3. Cash comprises cash on hand, Current Accounts and deposits with banks. Cash equivalents are short—term balances (with an
`original maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition), highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into
`known amounts of cash and which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value.
`
`In terms of our report attached
`For Deloitte Haskins 84 Sells LLP
`Chartered Accou ntants
`
`K.A. Katki
`Partner
`
`: Mumbai
`Place
`Dated : May 13,2015
`
`For Lupin Limited
`
`Dr. Desh Bandhu Gupta
`Chairman
`DIN: 00209378
`
`Nilesh Gupta
`Managing Director
`DIN: 01734642
`Richard Zahn
`Director
`DIN: 02937226
`
`Dileep C. Choksi
`Director
`DIN: 00016322
`Ramesh Swaminathan
`Chief Financial Officer
`
`Dr. Kamal K. Sharma
`Vice Chairman
`DIN: 00209430
`
`M. D. Gupta
`Executive Director
`DIN: OOZO9461
`R. A. Shah
`Director
`DIN: 00009851
`
`R. V. Satam
`Company Secretary
`ACS — 11973
`
`Vinita Gupta
`Chief Executive Officer
`DIN: 00058631
`
`Dr. Vijay Kelkar
`Director
`DIN: 00011991
`Dr. K. U. Mada
`Director
`DIN: 00011395
`
`Annual Report 2015 | 115
`
`Janssen Ex. 2002
`
`Lupin Ltd. v. Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
`|PR2015-01030
`
`(Page 116 of 212)
`
`

`
`NOTES FORMING PART OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STAT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket