throbber
EP 1 567 529 & EP 2 314 591
`EXPERIMENTAL REPORT
`
`Example 25: stability and dissolution experiments hydrate vs amorphous
`
`In this experiment, the thermal characteristics (by DSC - differential scanning calorimetry) and
`
`powder dissolution are determined for (3R,3aS,6aR)-hexahydrofuro [2,3-b] furan-3-yl (1S,2R)-3-[[(4-
`
`aminophenyl) sulfonyl] (isobutyl) amino]-l-benzyl-2-hydroxypropylcarbamate ("Compound") in the
`
`hydrate crystalline form and in the amorphous form, with reference to storage under defined
`
`conditions.
`
`Sample Preparation
`
`Compounds to be tested are stored in a closed container at 25°C, in which a relative humidity (RH) of
`
`93% is installed by means of a saturated (NH4)H2P04 solution. The same set up is used also at 40°C
`
`(RH>93%). Compounds are stored in the specified conditions for i day, i week, 2 weeks and 1
`
`month. Subsequently the samples are analyzed using DSC and powder dissolution.
`
`DSC
`
`DSC experiments are carried out using a DSC-7 (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using N2 as purge gas.
`
`Liquid N2 is used as a coolant. Samples (approximately 5 mg) are analyzed using aluminum hermetic
`
`pans (TA Instruments, Brussels, Belgium). Temperature calibration is performed using indium and tin
`
`standards, enthalpic calibration is carried out using indium standards. Validation of temperature and
`
`enthalpic response is performed using tin and indium standards. All samples are scanned at lO°C/min
`
`from 15°C to 140°C.
`
`The results are indicated in Table 27. In view of the different solid state nature of Compounds in the
`
`samples tested, the temperature characteristics necessarily are also different: the temperature
`
`values indicated are the onset of a melting peak (for the crystalline hydrate form) and the Tg (for the
`
`amorphous form). Rather than being based on a comparison of the absolute temperature values,
`
`conclusions are drawn from comparing the temperature changes depending on the sample history.
`
`Dissolution
`
`Dissolution (Hanson Dissolution test station SR8 PLUS) is performed according to the rotating paddle
`
`method (USP 24) at 37°C and 50 rpm in 1000 ml of O.01N HCI to which was added 0.1% sodium
`
`laurylsulfate. The dissolution test was performed on 50.0 mg of Compound (in either form), which
`
`was placed between filter paper at the bottom of the vessel. Two ml of the samples are taken a tO.6,
`
`12, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes and immediately filtered over a O.45pm PVDF membrane filter
`
`(Acrodica, USA) into a vial. The samples are analyzed using HPLC. The peak of Compound in the
`
`chromatogram is integrated and the concentration of Compound in the samples is calculated using a
`
`calibration curve, made of standards of known concentrations.
`
`The results are depicted in Figures 27 to 30. Each of these figures is a graph representing the
`
`percentage of Compound dissolved (Y-axis) over time (X-axis).
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 1 of 6)
`
`

`
`Example 26: dissolution experiments ethanolate vs amorphous
`
`In this experiment, the dissolution is tested of(3R,3aS,6aR)-hexahydrofuro [2,3-b] furan-3-yl (1S,2R)-
`
`3-[[(4-aminophenyl) sulfonyl] (isobutyl) amino]-l-benzyl-2-hydroxypropylcarbamate ("Compound")
`
`in the ethanolate crystalline form and in the amorphous form.
`
`The results are depicted in Figures 31 to 33. In each figure, a graph indicates the percentage of
`
`Compound dissolved (Y-axis) over time (X-axis).
`
`Figure 31 relates to samples at zero storage time. Samples 1-6 all represent the amorphous form.
`
`The mean dissolution percentage of the amorphous form is 75.16% at 120 minutes, whilst for the
`
`ethanolate crystalline form this is 99.98%. After 90 minutes, the dissolution level of the ethanolate
`
`crystalline form is more or less stable and complete (100%), while the dissolution level of the
`
`amorphous form is still increasing after 120 minutes.
`
`Figure 32 relates to samples that were subjected to 1 month of storage at 25°C. Samples 1-6 all
`
`represent the amorphous form.
`
`The mean dissolution percentage of the amorphous form after one month of storage is 81.07%
`
`(which is 107.87% compared to the value found at zero storage time). For the ethanolate crystalline
`
`form, the dissolution percentage is 97.28% (which is 97.29% as compared to the value found at zero
`
`storage time). All these observations are extracted at time point 120 minutes.
`
`As at zero storage time, the dissolution level of the ethanolate crystalline form is more or less stable
`
`and complete after 90 minutes dissolution (97%), while the dissolution level of the amorphous form
`
`is still increasing after 120 minutes.
`
`Figure 33 relates to samples that were subjected to 3 months of storage at 25°C. Samples 1-4 all
`
`represent the amorphous form.
`
`The mean dissolution percentage of the amorphous form after three month of storage is 87.92%
`
`(which is 116.99% compared to the value found at zero storage time). For the ethanolate crystalline
`
`form, the dissolution percentage is 102.67% (which is 102.69% as compared to the value found at
`
`zero storage time). All these observations are extracted at time point 120 minutes.
`
`As at zero storage time, the dissolution level of the ethanolate crystalline form is more or less stable
`
`and complete after 90 minutes dissolution (103%), while the dissolution level of the amorphous form
`
`is still increasing after 120 minutes.
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 2 of 6)
`
`

`
`Table 271
`
`Thermal characteristics of (3R,3aS,6aR)-hexahydrofuro [2,3-b] furan-3-yl (lS,2R)-3-[[(4-aminophenyl)
`
`sulfonyl] (isobutyl) amino]-l-benzyl-2-hydroxypropylcarbamate (crystalline hydrate and amorphous)
`
`Sample history T hydrate (°C)
`Untreated
`70.38 (0.23)
`after storage 25°C/93% RH:
`1 day
`69.80 (0.92)
`after storage at 25°C/93% RH:
`1 week
`71.10 (1.09)
`after storage at 25°C/93% RH:
`2 weeks
`70.64 (0.16)
`after storage at 25°C/93% RH:
`1 month
`69.49 (0.21)
`- O.g9
`Zl °C a~ter 1 month oJ: storage at 25°C/93% RH
`after storage 40°C/93% RH:
`1 day
`after storage at 40°C/93% RH:
`1 week
`after storage at 40°C/93% RH:
`2 weeks
`after storage at 40°C/93% RH:
`1 month
`Z~ °C a~ter 1 month oJ: storage at 40C/93% RH
`
`70.37 (1.52)
`68.48 (0.07)
`70.15 (0.82)
`67.77 (0.89)
`- 2.61
`
`T amorphous (°C)
`63.87 (3.01)
`63.37 (6.71)
`45.19 (1.19)
`44.45 (0.41)
`n.d.
`>_ -19.42
`49.16 (4.18)
`32.01 (single value)
`
`31.83 (3.67)
`32.38 (0.17)
`-31.49
`
`1 Each of the reported values is the mean of two measurements. In parentheses the difference between the two
`
`measurements is indicated (with one exception where a single value was available).
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 3 of 6)
`
`

`
`Figure 27: dissolution of Compound crystalline hydrate after storage at 25°C/93% RH
`
`day
`week
`Weeks
`
`month
`
`+ 1 day
`
`+ I week
`
`~2 weeks
`
`~ 1 month
`
`T|me (rain)
`
`t2o
`
`i40
`
`Figure 28: dissolution of amorphous Compound after storage at 25°C/93% RH
`
`8O
`
`~> 60
`
`© 40
`
`20
`
`0 20 40
`
`60 80
`
`100 120 140
`
`Time (rain)
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 4 of 6)
`
`

`
`Figure 29: dissolution of Compound crystalline hydrate after storage at 40°C/93% RH
`
`lOO
`
`month
`
`+ 1 day
`
`+ 1 week
`
`~ 2 weeks
`
`! mon~
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`120
`
`140
`
`Time
`
`Figure 30: dissolution of amorphous Compound after storage at 40°C/93% RH
`
`8O
`
`~ 6O
`
`~, 40
`
`2O
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`120
`
`t40
`
`Time (rain)
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 5 of 6)
`
`

`
`Figure 31: dissolution profiles of Compound (amorphous form and ethanolate crystalline form)
`
`Figure 32: dissolution profiles after 1 month of storage at 25°C)
`
`Figure 33: dissolution profiles after 3 months of storage at 25°C)
`
`Lupin Ex. 1021 (Page 6 of 6)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket