`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., TOSHIBA
`CORPORATION, AND VIZIO, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`V.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,009,469
`
`Case IPR No.: To Be Amgned
`
`DECLARATION OF RAJEEV GUPTA
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`LG Electronics Exhibit 1034
`
`
`
`I, Raj eev Gupta, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a patent attorney at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`
`Dunner, LLP.
`
`I am counsel for LG Electronics, Inc. in this proceeding.
`
`2.
`
`The present Petition was prepared by LG Electronics, Inc., together
`
`with LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.
`
`(collectively “LGE”), Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Information
`
`Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America, Inc. (collectively “Toshiba”), and VIZIO, Inc.
`
`(“VIZIO”).
`
`3.
`
`Hulu, LLC (“Hulu”) did not control or fund LGE’s participation in the
`
`present Petition. Hulu is not indemnifying LGE with respect to this proceeding nor
`
`is LGE acting at Hulu’s request.
`
`4.
`
`LGE did not provide Hulu with any drafts of the Petition or its
`
`supporting declarations.
`
`5.
`
`I understand that counsel for Toshiba and VIZIO are making similar
`
`declarations regarding the non—involvement of Hulu.
`
`6.
`
`Accordingly, since only LGE, Toshiba, and VIZIO participated in the
`
`preparation of the Petition and supporting declarations in this proceeding and
`
`neither LGE, Toshiba, nor VIZIO provided any drafts to Hulu, took any direction
`
`from Hulu, or were fimded by Hulu, Hulu took no part in the preparation of the
`
`Petition or the supporting declarations. Thus, Hulu did not control or fund the
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Petition or the supporting declaration in any way, and Hulu is not a real party-in-
`
`interest in this proceeding.
`
`7.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true
`
`and correct.
`
`Date: April 6, 2015
`
`By: £3u-/
`
`Rajeev Gupta
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`3